Someone mentioned http://safespaceprotection.com/products.htm so I took
a look. They say "Placing a Safe Space patch near the source of power on any electric appliance, entertainment technologies or office equipment will stop interfering radiation immediately...." If you have bought one of these have you tested it to see if it actually stops radiation? This is a strange claim. They also say their product can "Transform the toxic radio frequency emissions from your wireless devices." If it actually transformed frequencies, your cell phone would no longer work. They claim that their "products can help by raising the vibration of the environment. These noxious chemicals may still be recognized as being present, their negative effects are made null and void." No supporting research is offered to support this or any of their other claims. They say their products "are designed to balance and harmonize our environments by creating a peaceful and harmonious flow of the energies or the life force throughout the space it affects." I definitely prefer to protect my health with products that make an actual measurable difference in frequencies and fields, that can be measured with a meter. I wonder how many people are spending money on products that supposedly, somehow work magic but in fact only give you a false feeling of safety. My #1 choice remains the GrahamStetzer filters, which make a measurable difference and have some fine supporting research. Regards, Shivani [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
> They also say their product can "Transform the toxic radio frequency
> emissions from your wireless devices." If it actually transformed > frequencies, your cell phone would no longer work. I believe that their point is that the toxic emmissions which come from your wireless devices are NOT something you measure with your meter, so you CAN change them without impacting the performance of the device. > No supporting research > is offered to support this or any of their other claims. They do however list various methods of diagnosis which have been used to test the effectiveness of these devices on people. The list does represent various modalities which have a substantial following throughout the world. > I definitely prefer to protect my health with products > that make an actual measurable difference in > frequencies and fields, that can be measured with a meter. That's fine, but I think that those products will only get you so far. For example, they're not going to help you much at an airport, in the grocery store, etc. If you want to live a "normal life", you're going to have to find some other solution than plugging something into an outlet. > I wonder how many people are spending money on products that > supposedly, somehow work magic but in fact > only give you a false feeling of safety. False sense of safety? I've earned hundreds of thousands of dollars working at a job that I otherwise could not work at without these sorts of devices, so I'd say that they do far more than offer as false feeling of safety. Sometimes they can make the difference between being disabled and being a productive member of society... By the way, I ordered another SafeSpace product -- one of the personal protection "Protectoplex" cards. Unlike the Safe Space II, this appears to at least be tolerable. It also seems to be beneficial. I was also impressed with the instruction sheet, which cautioned initial usage to 1-2 hours a day, and ramping up to tolerance. A lot of products don't acknowledge in their instructions that you might need to ramp up your usage. Based on my initial positive reaction to this card, I've also now ordered their "Environmental Protection Card", which is their portable EMF protection solution. I will of course report anything worth reporting... :-) Marc |
Administrator
|
...and of course, on the subject of magical effects,
I refer you to Arthur C. Clarke, who said: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" Heck, I'm sure that if we go back far enough in time, even those Graham Stetzer filters would be dismissed as having "magical effects". :-) Marc |
In reply to this post by SArjuna
Hear hear. Magic, after all, is simply anything that we have yet to
understand. Once upon a time electricity was regarded with great suspicion for the same reason - before they had measuring equipment!! Sarah -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Marc Martin Sent: Saturday, 13 August 2005 10:00 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [eSens] products claiming magical effects ...and of course, on the subject of magical effects, I refer you to Arthur C. Clarke, who said: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" Heck, I'm sure that if we go back far enough in time, even those Graham Stetzer filters would be dismissed as having "magical effects". :-) Marc Yahoo! Groups Links |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Yes, Marc, this is a good one!
That is what I wanted to point out in my numerous replies to Shivani: Stetzer (as most of our devices), if effective (what I don't doubt!), have no valid explanation. One of the reasons is that we simply don't know neither the cause nor the mechanism of impact! In such situation most of the attempts to scientifically justify the work of the devices are leading to loss of credibility... (That doesn't apply to statistical proofs of effectiveness, that involve no much explanation!) Drasko ----- > ...and of course, on the subject of magical effects, > I refer you to Arthur C. Clarke, who said: > > "Any sufficiently advanced technology is > indistinguishable from magic" > > Heck, I'm sure that if we go back far enough > in time, even those Graham Stetzer filters > would be dismissed as having "magical effects". :-) > > Marc > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > |
Hello,
I maintain another opinion. A lot of this stuff is inhabitated by information. In some *magical* way, this information is sent to us. The information can be positive as well as negative. Some products do have an impact with their information. (Longitudinal waves contain also information!) Besides the chakras, our body does have a number of *vortexes*. And the information is transformed or otherwise guided along these vortexes. We cannot measure that in a normal way, but I think that it works along those lines. Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton Antivirus ----- Original Message ----- From: "Drasko Cvijovic" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 12:21 Subject: Re: [eSens] products claiming magical effects > Yes, Marc, this is a good one! > > That is what I wanted to point out in my numerous replies to Shivani: > Stetzer (as most of our devices), if effective (what I don't doubt!), have > no valid explanation. One of the reasons is that we simply don't know > neither the cause nor the mechanism of impact! In such situation most of the > attempts to scientifically justify the work of the devices are leading to > loss of credibility... (That doesn't apply to statistical proofs of > effectiveness, that involve no much explanation!) > > Drasko > > > ----- > > ...and of course, on the subject of magical effects, > > I refer you to Arthur C. Clarke, who said: > > > > "Any sufficiently advanced technology is > > indistinguishable from magic" > > > > Heck, I'm sure that if we go back far enough > > in time, even those Graham Stetzer filters > > would be dismissed as having "magical effects". :-) > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |