Are dect phones ANY cordless phone they sell nowadays?
Amy A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have. Thomas Jefferson In a message dated 9/4/2009 2:45:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [hidden email] writes: Mercola wrote along the same lines as this only yesterday - he showed brain scan imaging of what cell phone use does to the brain of a child under 10 years old - compared to the impact on an adult - the radiation penetrates the brain of a child much deeper than that for an adult. If you saw those images you would not let your child near a cell phone. But the more shocking thing was [as we here already know] the greater damage is done by dect phones. I didn't become ES until after I had installed a dect phone in my home - within 4 months I was ES - I don't have it any more. --- On Thu, 3/9/09, Donnie <_mickiemc@frontiernemicki_ (mailto:[hidden email]) > wrote: From: Donnie <_mickiemc@frontiernemicki_ (mailto:[hidden email]) > Subject: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users To: _eSens@yahoogroups.eSe_ (mailto:[hidden email]) Date: Thursday, 3 September, 2009, 9:41 PM Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users. The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some scientists and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the cell phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia Bulletin, PA. _http://thebulletin.http://thebuhttp://thebhttp://thebuhttp://thebullethttp: //thehtt_ (http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/08/31/top_stories/doc4a9aa14099aa7897239842.txt) Or use this link, if the above url wraps. _http://tinyurl.http://tin_ (http://tinyurl.com/nxoo7d) Donnie ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
DECT phones are usually clearly labeled DECT 6.0. Any phone labeled 5.8, 5.8 GHz, 2.4 GHz, or 900 MHz is not DECT. A DECT phone broadcasts its 1.9 GHz signal 24/7, whereas the other phones mentioned only broadcast when a call is in progress. Hope this helps, java.
Rob --- In [hidden email], javamdnss@... wrote: > > Are dect phones ANY cordless phone they sell nowadays? > Amy > > > A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough > to take everything you have. > Thomas Jefferson > > > > > In a message dated 9/4/2009 2:45:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > reader41@... writes: > > > > > Mercola wrote along the same lines as this only yesterday - he showed brain > scan imaging of what cell phone use does to the brain of a child under 10 > years old - compared to the impact on an adult - the radiation penetrates > the brain of a child much deeper than that for an adult. If you saw those > images you would not let your child near a cell phone. But the more shocking > thing was [as we here already know] the greater damage is done by dect > phones. I didn't become ES until after I had installed a dect phone in my home > - within 4 months I was ES - I don't have it any more. > > --- On Thu, 3/9/09, Donnie <_mickiemc@frontiernemicki_ > (mailto:mickiemc@...) > wrote: > > From: Donnie <_mickiemc@frontiernemicki_ (mailto:mickiemc@...) > > Subject: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users > To: _eSens@..._ (mailto:[hidden email]) > Date: Thursday, 3 September, 2009, 9:41 PM > > Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users. > > The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some scientists > and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the cell > phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia Bulletin, > PA. > > _http://thebulletin.http://thebuhttp://thebhttp://thebuhttp://thebullethttp: > //thehtt_ > (http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/08/31/top_stories/doc4a9aa14099aa7897239842.txt) > > Or use this link, if the above url wraps. > > _http://tinyurl.http://tin_ (http://tinyurl.com/nxoo7d) > > Donnie > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
As I have understood,
in Europe DECT phones work at 1880-1900 MHz. In the USA DECT phones work in the 5.8 GHz band. Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton ----- Original Message ----- From: "rob77max" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 8:34 AM Subject: [eSens]Re: DECT phones (was titled higher cancer rates...) > DECT phones are usually clearly labeled DECT 6.0. Any phone labeled 5.8, > 5.8 GHz, 2.4 GHz, or 900 MHz is not DECT. A DECT phone broadcasts its 1.9 > GHz signal 24/7, whereas the other phones mentioned only broadcast when a > call is in progress. Hope this helps, java. > > Rob > > --- In [hidden email], javamdnss@... wrote: >> >> Are dect phones ANY cordless phone they sell nowadays? >> Amy >> >> >> A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong >> enough >> to take everything you have. >> Thomas Jefferson >> >> >> >> >> In a message dated 9/4/2009 2:45:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >> reader41@... writes: >> >> >> >> >> Mercola wrote along the same lines as this only yesterday - he showed >> brain >> scan imaging of what cell phone use does to the brain of a child under >> 10 >> years old - compared to the impact on an adult - the radiation penetrates >> the brain of a child much deeper than that for an adult. If you saw >> those >> images you would not let your child near a cell phone. But the more >> shocking >> thing was [as we here already know] the greater damage is done by dect >> phones. I didn't become ES until after I had installed a dect phone in >> my home >> - within 4 months I was ES - I don't have it any more. >> >> --- On Thu, 3/9/09, Donnie <_mickiemc@frontiernemicki_ >> (mailto:mickiemc@...) > wrote: >> >> From: Donnie <_mickiemc@frontiernemicki_ (mailto:mickiemc@...) > >> Subject: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users >> To: _eSens@..._ (mailto:[hidden email]) >> Date: Thursday, 3 September, 2009, 9:41 PM >> >> Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users. >> >> The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some >> scientists >> and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the >> cell >> phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia >> Bulletin, >> PA. >> >> _http://thebulletin.http://thebuhttp://thebhttp://thebuhttp://thebullethttp: >> //thehtt_ >> (http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/08/31/top_stories/doc4a9aa14099aa7897239842.txt) >> >> Or use this link, if the above url wraps. >> >> _http://tinyurl.http://tin_ (http://tinyurl.com/nxoo7d) >> >> Donnie >> >> ------------------------------------ >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > |
There is a lot of confusion but apparently US DECT phones are 1.92 GHz.
They may be labeled DECT 5.8 or DECT 6.0. It is not true that all non-DECT transmit only when there is a call. The Uniden ones I tested transmit only during a call, and many Panasonics. For sure some Sony transmit all the time. Unfortunately the only way to know is to test the phone, apparently. I think some Radio Shack phones are identical to Uniden. Bill On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:58 AM, <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > As I have understood, > in Europe DECT phones work at 1880-1900 MHz. > > In the USA DECT phones work in the 5.8 GHz band. > > Greetings, > Charles Claessens > member Verband Baubiologie > www.milieuziektes.nl > www.milieuziektes.be > www.hetbitje.nl > checked by Norton > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "rob77max" <[hidden email] <rob77max%40yahoo.com>> > To: <[hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>> > Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 8:34 AM > Subject: [eSens]Re: DECT phones (was titled higher cancer rates...) > > > DECT phones are usually clearly labeled DECT 6.0. Any phone labeled 5.8, > > 5.8 GHz, 2.4 GHz, or 900 MHz is not DECT. A DECT phone broadcasts its 1.9 > > > GHz signal 24/7, whereas the other phones mentioned only broadcast when a > > > call is in progress. Hope this helps, java. > > > > Rob > > > > --- In [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>, javamdnss@... > wrote: > >> > >> Are dect phones ANY cordless phone they sell nowadays? > >> Amy > >> > >> > >> A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong > >> enough > >> to take everything you have. > >> Thomas Jefferson > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> In a message dated 9/4/2009 2:45:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > >> reader41@... writes: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Mercola wrote along the same lines as this only yesterday - he showed > >> brain > >> scan imaging of what cell phone use does to the brain of a child under > >> 10 > >> years old - compared to the impact on an adult - the radiation > penetrates > >> the brain of a child much deeper than that for an adult. If you saw > >> those > >> images you would not let your child near a cell phone. But the more > >> shocking > >> thing was [as we here already know] the greater damage is done by dect > >> phones. I didn't become ES until after I had installed a dect phone in > >> my home > >> - within 4 months I was ES - I don't have it any more. > >> > >> --- On Thu, 3/9/09, Donnie <_mickiemc@frontiernemicki_ > >> (mailto:mickiemc@...) > wrote: > >> > >> From: Donnie <_mickiemc@frontiernemicki_ (mailto:mickiemc@...) > > >> Subject: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users > >> To: _eSens@..._ (mailto:[hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com> > ) > >> Date: Thursday, 3 September, 2009, 9:41 PM > >> > >> Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users. > >> > >> The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some > >> scientists > >> and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the > >> cell > >> phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia > >> Bulletin, > >> PA. > >> > >> _ > http://thebulletin.http://thebuhttp://thebhttp://thebuhttp://thebullethttp: > >> //thehtt_ > >> ( > http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/08/31/top_stories/doc4a9aa14099aa7897239842.txt > ) > >> > >> Or use this link, if the above url wraps. > >> > >> _http://tinyurl.http://tin_ (http://tinyurl.com/nxoo7d) > >> > >> Donnie > >> > >> ------------------------------------ > >> > >> Yahoo! Groups Links > >> > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by rob77max
Thanks Rob, I just looked at my phone & it says Dect 6.0. I had no idea. sothis thing is broadcasting all the time I guess. What phone can someone recommend? Loni
--- On Fri, 9/4/09, rob77max <[hidden email]> wrote: From: rob77max <[hidden email]> Subject: [eSens]Re: DECT phones (was titled higher cancer rates...) To: [hidden email] Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 11:34 PM DECT phones are usually clearly labeled DECT 6.0. Any phone labeled 5.8, 5.8 GHz, 2.4 GHz, or 900 MHz is not DECT. A DECT phone broadcasts its 1.9 GHzsignal 24/7, whereas the other phones mentioned only broadcast when a callis in progress. Hope this helps, java. Rob --- In eSens@yahoogroups. com, javamdnss@.. . wrote: > > Are dect phones ANY cordless phone they sell nowadays? > Amy > > > A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough > to take everything you have. > Thomas Jefferson > > > > > In a message dated 9/4/2009 2:45:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > reader41@... writes: > > > > > Mercola wrote along the same lines as this only yesterday - he showed brain > scan imaging of what cell phone use does to the brain of a child under 10 > years old - compared to the impact on an adult - the radiation penetrates > the brain of a child much deeper than that for an adult. If you saw those > images you would not let your child near a cell phone. But the more shocking > thing was [as we here already know] the greater damage is done by dect > phones. I didn't become ES until after I had installed a dect phone in myhome > - within 4 months I was ES - I don't have it any more. > > --- On Thu, 3/9/09, Donnie <_mickiemc@frontier nemicki_ > (mailto:mickiemc@ ...) > wrote: > > From: Donnie <_mickiemc@frontier nemicki_ (mailto:mickiemc@ ...) > > Subject: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users > To: _eSens@..._ (mailto:eSens@yahoogroups. com) > Date: Thursday, 3 September, 2009, 9:41 PM > > Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users. > > The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some scientists > and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the cell > phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia Bulletin, > PA. > > _http://thebulletin. http://thebuhttp ://thebhttp: //thebuhttp: //thebullethttp: > //thehtt_ > (http://thebulletin. us/articles/ 2009/08/31/ top_stories/ doc4a9aa14099aa7 897239842. txt) > > Or use this link, if the above url wraps. > > _http://tinyurl. http://tin_ (http://tinyurl. com/nxoo7d) > > Donnie > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by BiBrun
Bill, You could tell me what Uniden or Panasonic phone one could look in topurchasing that did not transmit 24/7? Loni
--- On Sat, 9/5/09, Bill Bruno <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Bill Bruno <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens]Re: DECT phones (was titled higher cancer rates...) To: [hidden email] Date: Saturday, September 5, 2009, 8:31 AM There is a lot of confusion but apparently US DECT phones are 1.92 GHz. They may be labeled DECT 5.8 or DECT 6.0. It is not true that all non-DECT transmit only when there is a call. The Uniden ones I tested transmit only during a call, and many Panasonics. For sure some Sony transmit all the time. Unfortunately the only way to know is to test the phone, apparently. I think some Radio Shack phones are identical to Uniden. Bill On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:58 AM, <charles@milieuziekt es.be> wrote: > > > As I have understood, > in Europe DECT phones work at 1880-1900 MHz. > > In the USA DECT phones work in the 5.8 GHz band. > > Greetings, > Charles Claessens > member Verband Baubiologie > www.milieuziektes. nl > www.milieuziektes. be > www.hetbitje. nl > checked by Norton > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "rob77max" <rob77max@yahoo. com <rob77max%40yahoo. com>> > To: <eSens@yahoogroups. com <eSens%40yahoogroup s.com>> > Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 8:34 AM > Subject: [eSens]Re: DECT phones (was titled higher cancer rates...) > > > DECT phones are usually clearly labeled DECT 6.0. Any phone labeled 5.8, > > 5.8 GHz, 2.4 GHz, or 900 MHz is not DECT. A DECT phone broadcasts its 1.9 > > > GHz signal 24/7, whereas the other phones mentioned only broadcast whena > > > call is in progress. Hope this helps, java. > > > > Rob > > > > --- In eSens@yahoogroups. com <eSens%40yahoogroup s.com>, javamdnss@.. . > wrote: > >> > >> Are dect phones ANY cordless phone they sell nowadays? > >> Amy > >> > >> > >> A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong > >> enough > >> to take everything you have. > >> Thomas Jefferson > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> In a message dated 9/4/2009 2:45:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > >> reader41@... writes: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Mercola wrote along the same lines as this only yesterday - he showed > >> brain > >> scan imaging of what cell phone use does to the brain of a child under > >> 10 > >> years old - compared to the impact on an adult - the radiation > penetrates > >> the brain of a child much deeper than that for an adult. If you saw > >> those > >> images you would not let your child near a cell phone. But the more > >> shocking > >> thing was [as we here already know] the greater damage is done by dect > >> phones. I didn't become ES until after I had installed a dect phone in > >> my home > >> - within 4 months I was ES - I don't have it any more. > >> > >> --- On Thu, 3/9/09, Donnie <_mickiemc@frontier nemicki_ > >> (mailto:mickiemc@ ...) > wrote: > >> > >> From: Donnie <_mickiemc@frontier nemicki_ (mailto:mickiemc@ ...) > > >> Subject: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users > >> To: _eSens@..._ (mailto:eSens@yahoogroups. com <eSens%40yahoogroup s.com> > ) > >> Date: Thursday, 3 September, 2009, 9:41 PM > >> > >> Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users. > >> > >> The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some > >> scientists > >> and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the > >> cell > >> phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia > >> Bulletin, > >> PA. > >> > >> _ > http://thebulletin. http://thebuhttp ://thebhttp: //thebuhttp: //thebullethttp: > >> //thehtt_ > >> ( > http://thebulletin. us/articles/ 2009/08/31/ top_stories/ doc4a9aa14099aa7 897239842. txt > ) > >> > >> Or use this link, if the above url wraps. > >> > >> _http://tinyurl. http://tin_ (http://tinyurl. com/nxoo7d) > >> > >> Donnie > >> > >> ------------ --------- --------- ------ > >> > >> Yahoo! Groups Links > >> > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Loni Rosser
> Thanks Rob, I just looked at my phone & it says Dect 6.0. I had no idea.
> so this thing is broadcasting all the time I guess. What phone can > someone recommend? Loni Ideally, you'd get a corded phone -- that's all we have in our house. It sounds like you have the worst possible kind of phone right now. If you or your family require a cordless phone, then perhaps someone here can recommend one that's less damaging than the one you've got. Marc |
Hello There Here is an older but very good article on the Neurological effects of RFR http://www.mapcruzin.com/radiofrequency/henry_lai2.htm |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
YES, I sure hope so Marc. I had no idea. I learn so much from this group. thanks so much for putting it together! Loni
--- On Sat, 9/5/09, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens]Re: DECT phones (was titled higher cancer rates...) To: [hidden email] Date: Saturday, September 5, 2009, 10:08 AM > Thanks Rob, I just looked at my phone & it says Dect 6.0. I had no idea. > so this thing is broadcasting all the time I guess. What phone can > someone recommend? Loni Ideally, you'd get a corded phone -- that's all we have in our house. It sounds like you have the worst possible kind of phone right now. If you or your family require a cordless phone, then perhaps someone here can recommend one that's less damaging than the one you've got. Marc [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
This dect phone that I have; what raduis would it be harmful? I'm just wondering where to put it until I can get a different phone. Is the whole house effected? Loni
--- On Sat, 9/5/09, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens]Re: DECT phones (was titled higher cancer rates...) To: [hidden email] Date: Saturday, September 5, 2009, 10:08 AM > Thanks Rob, I just looked at my phone & it says Dect 6.0. I had no idea. > so this thing is broadcasting all the time I guess. What phone can > someone recommend? Loni Ideally, you'd get a corded phone -- that's all we have in our house. It sounds like you have the worst possible kind of phone right now. If you or your family require a cordless phone, then perhaps someone here can recommend one that's less damaging than the one you've got. Marc [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
> This dect phone that I have; what raduis would it be harmful? I'm just
> wondering where to put it until I can get a different phone. Is the whole > house effected? Loni I'm no expert on cordless phones (since I don't own one), but I assume that you'd want to keep the phone base (transmitter) as far away from you as possible. In theory, I suppose the signals could affect you anywhere that the phone receiver works. Marc |
I bought a Uniden analog cordless phone, and it gives off very little low level EMFs from the phone and base when not in use. No high levels at all, on the Tri-field meter. The low reading drops off when the meter is moved several inches away.
I bought it from Amazon, and it was very inexpensive. Donnie |
In reply to this post by Loni Rosser
Normally DECT phones do have a range of 300 meters.
There are newer types that go as far as 1000 meters. And it is not the phone itsself that poses the danger, but it is the base station (where the phone in rests and will be charged) that emits its 100 Hz allo the time, 24 hours a day, whether you phone or not. There are now DECT phones which do not radiate all the time, like the types of Orchid. But, beware of the following: There are Eco DECT. They use lesser electricity, so they are more economical in current costs, but the radiation stays the same. So they are bad. Then we have DECT ECO MODE. They do have 80 % less radiation. And finally we have DECT ECO MODE PLUS, which are shielded 100 %. Those are the types we can use. Of course, they do radiate when you use the phone, but not 24 hours a day. There are also the wireless house phones, which are not DECT but analogue, and do not radiate like the DECT phones, but in Europe they are no longer available. In Europe they work between 885 and 932 MHz. Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton ----- Original Message ----- From: "Loni" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 8:05 PM Subject: Re: [eSens]Re: DECT phones (was titled higher cancer rates...) This dect phone that I have; what raduis would it be harmful? I'm just wondering where to put it until I can get a different phone. Is the whole house effected? Loni --- On Sat, 9/5/09, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens]Re: DECT phones (was titled higher cancer rates...) To: [hidden email] Date: Saturday, September 5, 2009, 10:08 AM > Thanks Rob, I just looked at my phone & it says Dect 6.0. I had no idea. > so this thing is broadcasting all the time I guess. What phone can > someone recommend? Loni Ideally, you'd get a corded phone -- that's all we have in our house. It sounds like you have the worst possible kind of phone right now. If you or your family require a cordless phone, then perhaps someone here can recommend one that's less damaging than the one you've got. Marc [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links |
In reply to this post by javamdnss
In a message dated 05/09/2009 20:07:29 GMT Daylight Time,
[hidden email] writes: Then we have DECT ECO MODE. They do have 80 % less radiation. And finally we have DECT ECO MODE PLUS, which are shielded 100 %. Those are the types we can use. Of course, they do radiate when you use the phone, but not 24 hours a Paul UK replies Hi Charles can you give a list of suppliers of these phones ? - many thanks. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by javamdnss
In a message dated 05/09/2009 20:07:29 GMT Daylight Time, [hidden email] writes: > Thanks Rob, I just looked at my phone & it says Dect 6.0. I had no idea. > so this thing is broadcasting all the time I guess. What phone can > someone recommend? Loni paul uk = try tin foil around the base with the phone in the base and experiment on your reception to the phone, you will need an electrosmog detector or similar to show results.. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by javamdnss
In a message dated 05/09/2009 19:59:00 GMT Daylight Time, [hidden email] writes: I bought a Uniden analog cordless phone, and it gives off very little low level EMFs from the phone and base when not in use. No high levels at all, on the Tri-field meter. The low reading drops off when the meter is moved several inches away. I bought it from Amazon, and it was very inexpensive. Donnie TRY USING THE ELECTROSMOG DETECTOR NEAR YOUR PHONE THE TRIFEILD WILL NOT GIVE YOU A GOOD ENOUGH READING. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
It would work throughout the whole house. I have it in a room I don't spendmuch time in but maybe it doesn't matter. Loni
--- On Sat, 9/5/09, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens]Re: DECT phones (was titled higher cancer rates...) To: [hidden email] Date: Saturday, September 5, 2009, 11:14 AM > This dect phone that I have; what raduis would it be harmful? I'm just > wondering where to put it until I can get a different phone. Is the whole > house effected? Loni I'm no expert on cordless phones (since I don't own one), but I assume that you'd want to keep the phone base (transmitter) as far away from you as possible. In theory, I suppose the signals could affect you anywhere that the phone receiver works. Marc [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Donnie
How long ago did you buy it Donnie? Loni
--- On Sat, 9/5/09, Donnie <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Donnie <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens]Re: DECT phones (was titled higher cancer rates...) To: [hidden email] Date: Saturday, September 5, 2009, 11:58 AM I bought a Uniden analog cordless phone, and it gives off very little low level EMFs from the phone and base when not in use. No high levels at all, on the Tri-field meter. The low reading drops off when the meter is moved several inches away. I bought it from Amazon, and it was very inexpensive. Donnie ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
>How long ago did you buy it Donnie? Loni
I think I bought the Uniden phone last fall. They may still be available, or some other analog phones on the site. Donnie |
In reply to this post by Loni Rosser
Loni
I have gone back to the corded analogue phone I used before - you don't have the same convenience of being able to use it anywhere you want and I still get problems ES wise which phone calls, but at least it is better than having a constant signal in your home. BW Steph --- On Sat, 5/9/09, Loni <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Loni <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens]Re: DECT phones (was titled higher cancer rates...) To: [hidden email] Date: Saturday, 5 September, 2009, 5:01 PM Thanks Rob, I just looked at my phone & it says Dect 6.0. I had no idea. sothis thing is broadcasting all the time I guess. What phone can someone recommend? Loni --- On Fri, 9/4/09, rob77max <rob77max@yahoo. com> wrote: From: rob77max <rob77max@yahoo. com> Subject: [eSens]Re: DECT phones (was titled higher cancer rates...) To: eSens@yahoogroups. com Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 11:34 PM DECT phones are usually clearly labeled DECT 6.0. Any phone labeled 5.8, 5.8 GHz, 2.4 GHz, or 900 MHz is not DECT. A DECT phone broadcasts its 1.9 GHzsignal 24/7, whereas the other phones mentioned only broadcast when a callis in progress. Hope this helps, java. Rob --- In eSens@yahoogroups. com, javamdnss@.. . wrote: > > Are dect phones ANY cordless phone they sell nowadays? > Amy > > > A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough > to take everything you have. > Thomas Jefferson > > > > > In a message dated 9/4/2009 2:45:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > reader41@... writes: > > > > > Mercola wrote along the same lines as this only yesterday - he showed brain > scan imaging of what cell phone use does to the brain of a child under 10 > years old - compared to the impact on an adult - the radiation penetrates > the brain of a child much deeper than that for an adult. If you saw those > images you would not let your child near a cell phone. But the more shocking > thing was [as we here already know] the greater damage is done by dect > phones. I didn't become ES until after I had installed a dect phone in myhome > - within 4 months I was ES - I don't have it any more. > > --- On Thu, 3/9/09, Donnie <_mickiemc@frontier nemicki_ > (mailto:mickiemc@ ...) > wrote: > > From: Donnie <_mickiemc@frontier nemicki_ (mailto:mickiemc@ ...) > > Subject: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users > To: _eSens@..._ (mailto:eSens@ yahoogroups. com) > Date: Thursday, 3 September, 2009, 9:41 PM > > Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users. > > The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some scientists > and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the cell > phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia Bulletin, > PA. > > _http://thebulletin. http://thebuhttp ://thebhttp: //thebuhttp: //thebullethttp: > //thehtt_ > (http://thebulletin. us/articles/ 2009/08/31/ top_stories/ doc4a9aa14099aa7 897239842. txt) > > Or use this link, if the above url wraps. > > _http://tinyurl. http://tin_ (http://tinyurl. com/nxoo7d) > > Donnie > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |