Re: Re: DECT phones (was titled higher cancer rates...)

>
> Are dect phones ANY cordless phone they sell nowadays?
> Amy
>
>
> A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough
> to take everything you have.
> Thomas Jefferson
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 9/4/2009 2:45:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> reader41@... writes:
>
>
>
>
> Mercola wrote along the same lines as this only yesterday - he showed brain
> scan imaging of what cell phone use does to the brain of a child under 10
> years old - compared to the impact on an adult - the radiation penetrates
> the brain of a child much deeper than that for an adult. If you saw those
> images you would not let your child near a cell phone. But the more shocking
> thing was [as we here already know] the greater damage is done by dect
> phones. I didn't become ES until after I had installed a dect phone in myhome
> - within 4 months I was ES - I don't have it any more.
>
> --- On Thu, 3/9/09, Donnie <_mickiemc@frontier nemicki_
> (mailto:mickiemc@ ...) > wrote:
>
> From: Donnie <_mickiemc@frontier nemicki_ (mailto:mickiemc@ ...) >
> Subject: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users
> To: _eSens@..._ (mailto:eSens@ yahoogroups. com)
> Date: Thursday, 3 September, 2009, 9:41 PM
>
> Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users.
>
> The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some scientists
> and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the cell
> phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia Bulletin,
> PA.
>
> _http://thebulletin. http://thebuhttp ://thebhttp: //thebuhttp: //thebullethttp:
> //thehtt_
> (http://thebulletin. us/articles/ 2009/08/31/ top_stories/ doc4a9aa14099aa7 897239842. txt)
>
> Or use this link, if the above url wraps.
>
> _http://tinyurl. http://tin_ (http://tinyurl. com/nxoo7d)
>
> Donnie
>
> ------------ --------- --------- ------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
>
> As I have understood,
> in Europe DECT phones work at 1880-1900 MHz.
>
> In the USA DECT phones work in the 5.8 GHz band.
>
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> www.milieuziektes.nl
> www.milieuziektes.be
> www.hetbitje.nl
> checked by Norton
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "rob77max" <[hidden email] <rob77max%40yahoo.com>>
> To: <[hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>>
> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 8:34 AM
> Subject: [eSens]Re: DECT phones (was titled higher cancer rates...)
>
> > DECT phones are usually clearly labeled DECT 6.0. Any phone labeled 5.8,
> > 5.8 GHz, 2.4 GHz, or 900 MHz is not DECT. A DECT phone broadcasts its 1.9
>
> > GHz signal 24/7, whereas the other phones mentioned only broadcast when a
>
> > call is in progress. Hope this helps, java.
> >
> > Rob
> >
> > --- In [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>, javamdnss@...
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Are dect phones ANY cordless phone they sell nowadays?
> >> Amy
> >>
> >>
> >> A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong
> >> enough
> >> to take everything you have.
> >> Thomas Jefferson
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> In a message dated 9/4/2009 2:45:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> >> reader41@... writes:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Mercola wrote along the same lines as this only yesterday - he showed
> >> brain
> >> scan imaging of what cell phone use does to the brain of a child under
> >> 10
> >> years old - compared to the impact on an adult - the radiation
> penetrates
> >> the brain of a child much deeper than that for an adult. If you saw
> >> those
> >> images you would not let your child near a cell phone. But the more
> >> shocking
> >> thing was [as we here already know] the greater damage is done by dect
> >> phones. I didn't become ES until after I had installed a dect phone in
> >> my home
> >> - within 4 months I was ES - I don't have it any more.
> >>
> >> --- On Thu, 3/9/09, Donnie <_mickiemc@frontiernemicki_
> >> (mailto:mickiemc@...) > wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Donnie <_mickiemc@frontiernemicki_ (mailto:mickiemc@...) >
> >> Subject: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users
> >> To: _eSens@..._ (mailto:[hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>
> )
> >> Date: Thursday, 3 September, 2009, 9:41 PM
> >>
> >> Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users.
> >>
> >> The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some
> >> scientists
> >> and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the
> >> cell
> >> phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia
> >> Bulletin,
> >> PA.
> >>
> >> _
> http://thebulletin.http://thebuhttp://thebhttp://thebuhttp://thebullethttp:<http://thebulletin.http//thebuhttp://thebhttp://thebuhttp://thebullethttp:>
> >> //thehtt_
> >> (
> http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/08/31/top_stories/doc4a9aa14099aa7897239842.txt
> )
> >>
> >> Or use this link, if the above url wraps.
> >>
> >> _http://tinyurl.http://tin_ <http://tinyurl.http//tin_> (
> http://tinyurl.com/nxoo7d)
> >>
> >> Donnie
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>