Re: BioProtect card, Quantum Pro and Stetzer

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
56 messages Options
123
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re:EMF/Chemicals

charles-4
Hello Marc,

we know, that frequencies like to travel upon other frequencies, it is quite
possible that the spectroscopic frequencies associated with several
processes inside the tube, may ride along.

I have measured 30 kHz signals riding on radar beams, as well as on UMTS or
3G radiation beams.

With the bioresonance there are many frequencies known, also for Bach
flowers and metals.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus




----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc Martin" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 23:49
Subject: RE: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals


>> I have seen reports that fluorescent bulbs contain traces of mercury
>> vapour
>> and therefore emit the spectroscopic frequencies associated with mercury.
>> However, this is a very different thing to physically emitting the vapour
>> itself.
>
> This leads to the question -- can someone have a bad reaction to the
> "spectroscopic frequencies associated with mercury" ? And could a
> person's
> bad reaction to flourescent lights be due to these frequencies alone?
>
> Marc
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re:EMF/Chemicals

charles-4
In reply to this post by eleccentric
I have looked it up.
In bioresonance, the corresponding frequency for mercury is 17.827 MHz.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Kemp" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 01:21
Subject: RE: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals


>I think I have seen it suggested that mercury's spectroscopic frequencies
> could be ones which have a particularly bad effect on the body, even
> possibly by mimicking the effect of mercury actually inside the body, or
> stimulating some small residual amount. That's very much a paraphrase and
> I
> am not convinced one way or the other about these theories!
>
> The main observational evidence I have to work with is that Sue and others
> definitely react to fluorescent lights differently to standard tungsten
> incandescents. Of course it might be the electronic gizmos in the lamp
> itself (and Sue finds it much worse if the lamp is not far above her
> head).
> On the other hand, there is still the big unsolved mystery of why she
> suffered a bad reaction to a white high pressure sodium street light (50
> yards away) but not a yellow low pressure sodium one. That seems a bit
> too
> far away to be down to electronic circuitry in the lamp?
>
> Ian
>
> _____
>
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
> Marc
> Martin
> Sent: 17 October 2006 22:50
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: RE: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals
>
>
>
>> I have seen reports that fluorescent bulbs contain traces of mercury
> vapour
>> and therefore emit the spectroscopic frequencies associated with mercury.
>> However, this is a very different thing to physically emitting the vapour
>> itself.
>
> This leads to the question -- can someone have a bad reaction to the
> "spectroscopic frequencies associated with mercury" ? And could a
> person's
> bad reaction to flourescent lights be due to these frequencies alone?
>
> Marc
>

PUK
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re:EMF/Chemicals

PUK
In reply to this post by eleccentric
Thats a bad one is it not, similar to Tetra system radio and close to the
beta brain wave ?

Paul


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Re:EMF/Chemicals

Phyllicia Hutchinson
In reply to this post by Vinny Pinto
Hi Vinny,
 
Sorry to be off topic for a moment, but do you know of any Rife machinesthat are being produced today that actually use the Rife dual frequenciesof 17MHz
plus a lower audio frequency at the same time? I am really interested to find one
if one exists.
 
Phyllicia

Vinny Pinto <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi Marc:
 
Interestingly, this question has arisen at times in the world of Rife
plasma devices, since many Rife Ray Beam plasma devices use a
partially evacuated gas tube filled with rare gases at a low
pressure, and some of these tubes include a bit of mercury in order
to achieve "tighter" ignition. Worse, many users of Rife plasma
devices are people who are chronically ill, persons who have chronic
Lyme disease, cancer or MCS. So far, it seems that even chronically
ill people like the effects of the tubes. Of course, Rife plasma
devices DO produce cleansing and detox symptoms, and users expect them.
 
with care,
--Vinny
 
At 05:49 PM 10/17/2006, you wrote:

> > I have seen reports that fluorescent bulbs contain traces of mercury vapour
> > and therefore emit the spectroscopic frequencies associated with mercury.
> > However, this is a very different thing to physically emitting the vapour
> > itself.
>
>This leads to the question -- can someone have a bad reaction to the
>"spectroscopic frequencies associated with mercury" ? And could a
>person's
>bad reaction to flourescent lights be due to these frequencies alone?
>
>Marc
>
 
Vinny Pinto
[hidden email]
 
phone 301-694-1249
 
To see my informational websites and e-mail list groups, please go to:
http://www.vinnypinto.us
 
 
     
 

 
---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great ratesstarting at 1ยข/min.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Rife Carrier Frequencies

Vinny Pinto
Hi Phyllicia:

No, I do not. Most of the modern Rife plasma devices use RF carrier
signals (modulated by "audio" frequencies in the 1 Hz to 80 KHz
range) in the 28 MHz region, usually at the FCC-approved
commercial/industrial device frequency in the 28 MHz range, and a few
operate in the 14 MHz range, at the FCC-approved
commercial/industrial device frequency in that range. You could
always do a good search of the sites selling Rife plasma devices, and
also ask on the half-dozen or so Rife list gorups (and also search
the archives of those list groups as well) to see if someone is
marketing devices with a 17 MHz carrier frequency commercially. And,
of course, any good RF engineer-type person could easly design and
build such a device for you from scratch, but it would be more costly
than the typical Rife palsma devices running in the 28 MHz range,
because the latter use easily-available RF exciter/modules (basically
modified transmitter sections of CB band transceivers.)

with care,
--Vinny

At 10:12 AM 10/18/2006, you wrote:

>Hi Vinny,
>
> Sorry to be off topic for a moment, but do you know of any
> Rife machines that are being produced today that actually use the
> Rife dual frequencies of 17MHz
> plus a lower audio frequency at the same time? I am really
> interested to find one
> if one exists.
>
> Phyllicia
>
>Vinny Pinto <[hidden email]>
>wrote: Hi Marc:
>
> Interestingly, this question has arisen at times in the world of Rife
> plasma devices, since many Rife Ray Beam plasma devices use a
> partially evacuated gas tube filled with rare gases at a low
> pressure, and some of these tubes include a bit of mercury in order
> to achieve "tighter" ignition. Worse, many users of Rife plasma
> devices are people who are chronically ill, persons who have chronic
> Lyme disease, cancer or MCS. So far, it seems that even chronically
> ill people like the effects of the tubes. Of course, Rife plasma
> devices DO produce cleansing and detox symptoms, and users expect them.
>
> with care,
> --Vinny
>
> At 05:49 PM 10/17/2006, you wrote:
> > > I have seen reports that fluorescent bulbs contain traces of
> mercury vapour
> > > and therefore emit the spectroscopic frequencies associated
> with mercury.
> > > However, this is a very different thing to physically
> emitting the vapour
> > > itself.
> >
> >This leads to the question -- can someone have a bad reaction to the
> >"spectroscopic frequencies associated with mercury" ? And could a
> >person's
> >bad reaction to flourescent lights be due to these frequencies alone?
> >
> >Marc
> >


Vinny Pinto
[hidden email]

phone 301-694-1249

To see my informational websites and e-mail list groups, please go to:
http://www.vinnypinto.us

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re:EMF/Chemicals

denom
In reply to this post by charles-4
Where did you look this up at? I'd love to have that information. What isthe frequency for gold?
----- Original Message -----
From: charles
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 2:54 AM
Subject: Re: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals


I have looked it up.
In bioresonance, the corresponding frequency for mercury is 17.827 MHz.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Kemp" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 01:21
Subject: RE: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals

>I think I have seen it suggested that mercury's spectroscopic frequencies
> could be ones which have a particularly bad effect on the body, even
> possibly by mimicking the effect of mercury actually inside the body, or
> stimulating some small residual amount. That's very much a paraphrase and
> I
> am not convinced one way or the other about these theories!
>
> The main observational evidence I have to work with is that Sue and others
> definitely react to fluorescent lights differently to standard tungsten
> incandescents. Of course it might be the electronic gizmos in the lamp
> itself (and Sue finds it much worse if the lamp is not far above her
> head).
> On the other hand, there is still the big unsolved mystery of why she
> suffered a bad reaction to a white high pressure sodium street light (50
> yards away) but not a yellow low pressure sodium one. That seems a bit
> too
> far away to be down to electronic circuitry in the lamp?
>
> Ian
>
> _____
>
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
> Marc
> Martin
> Sent: 17 October 2006 22:50
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: RE: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals
>
>
>
>> I have seen reports that fluorescent bulbs contain traces of mercury
> vapour
>> and therefore emit the spectroscopic frequencies associated with mercury.
>> However, this is a very different thing to physically emitting the vapour
>> itself.
>
> This leads to the question -- can someone have a bad reaction to the
> "spectroscopic frequencies associated with mercury" ? And could a
> person's
> bad reaction to flourescent lights be due to these frequencies alone?
>
> Marc
>



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re:EMF/Chemicals

charles-4
The bioresonace frequency for gold is 1.729 MHz.

Now what will you do with that information?

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus


----- Original Message -----
From: "denom" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 05:56
Subject: Re: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals


> Where did you look this up at? I'd love to have that information. What
> is the frequency for gold?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: charles
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 2:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals
>
>
> I have looked it up.
> In bioresonance, the corresponding frequency for mercury is 17.827 MHz.
>
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> www.milieuziektes.nl
> www.milieuziektes.be
> www.hetbitje.nl
> checked by Norton Antivirus
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

gold frequency

Andrew McAfee
In using a rife machine and punching in that frequency, will it
disintegrate the gold that is in the body or will it make it radiate
out further?
Andrew
On Oct 19, 2006, at 4:57 AM, charles wrote:

> The bioresonace frequency for gold is 1.729 MHz.
>
> Now what will you do with that information?
>
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> www.milieuziektes.nl
> www.milieuziektes.be
> www.hetbitje.nl
> checked by Norton Antivirus
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "denom" <[hidden email]>
> To: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 05:56
> Subject: Re: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals
>
>
>> Where did you look this up at? I'd love to have that information.
>> What
>> is the frequency for gold?
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: charles
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 2:54 AM
>> Subject: Re: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals
>>
>>
>> I have looked it up.
>> In bioresonance, the corresponding frequency for mercury is 17.827
>> MHz.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Charles Claessens
>> member Verband Baubiologie
>> www.milieuziektes.nl
>> www.milieuziektes.be
>> www.hetbitje.nl
>> checked by Norton Antivirus
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re:EMF/Chemicals

denom
In reply to this post by charles-4
Can't do much with that information. megahertz are way to high frequenciesfor me. I could tell you what I think but you'd think me mad. I'm into numbers, ufo's etc. 72 and 19 are indeed numbers that have to do with gold  
----- Original Message -----
From: charles
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 3:57 AM
Subject: Re: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals


The bioresonace frequency for gold is 1.729 MHz.

Now what will you do with that information?

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus

----- Original Message -----
From: "denom" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 05:56
Subject: Re: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals

> Where did you look this up at? I'd love to have that information. What
> is the frequency for gold?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: charles
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 2:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals
>
>
> I have looked it up.
> In bioresonance, the corresponding frequency for mercury is 17.827 MHz.
>
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> www.milieuziektes.nl
> www.milieuziektes.be
> www.hetbitje.nl
> checked by Norton Antivirus
>



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: gold frequency

denom
In reply to this post by Andrew McAfee
I was looking for the efffect that gold has on mercury. Mercury binds to certain enzymes. Gold breaks the link and binds to the mercury and chelatesit. I am thinking I would get a good effect just by running the frequencyof gold. But it is much too high. I may try 1729, 17290 though.
----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew McAfee
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 7:38 AM
Subject: [eSens] gold frequency


In using a rife machine and punching in that frequency, will it
disintegrate the gold that is in the body or will it make it radiate
out further?
Andrew
On Oct 19, 2006, at 4:57 AM, charles wrote:

> The bioresonace frequency for gold is 1.729 MHz.
>
> Now what will you do with that information?
>
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> www.milieuziektes.nl
> www.milieuziektes.be
> www.hetbitje.nl
> checked by Norton Antivirus
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "denom" <[hidden email]>
> To: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 05:56
> Subject: Re: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals
>
>
>> Where did you look this up at? I'd love to have that information.
>> What
>> is the frequency for gold?
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: charles
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 2:54 AM
>> Subject: Re: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals
>>
>>
>> I have looked it up.
>> In bioresonance, the corresponding frequency for mercury is 17.827
>> MHz.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Charles Claessens
>> member Verband Baubiologie
>> www.milieuziektes.nl
>> www.milieuziektes.be
>> www.hetbitje.nl
>> checked by Norton Antivirus
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Rife Carrier Frequencies

Vinny Pinto
In reply to this post by Vinny Pinto
Hi Phyllicia and folks:

Just a quick and minor errata for my earlier post, below. I have
realized that in that post I used the general term "28 MHz" to
indicate the general range of an FCC industrial/scientific/medical
(ISM) reserved frequency in that frequency region, and, looking back,
I feel that my use of that general descriptive term of "28 MHz" was a
bit loose. The actual reserved ISM frequency, along with much of the
midrange and upper portion of the CB radio band, actually falls in
the range of 27 MHz to 28 MHz. The ISM frequency in that region is
27.120 Mhz, which actually coincides with CB channel 14; this is why
so many Rife plasma devices use as the RF exciter the (modified)
transmitter section of inexpensive CB radio transceivers and why they
are usually set to CB channel 14 (at least they are so set if the
deisgner/operator is at all concerned about stray RF escaping from
the device and the plasma tube and about its interference potential
to other radio services.)

There useta also be an FCC approved ISM frequency in the 14 MHz range
as well, at about 14.14 MHz (or was it around 14.4 MHz?), if I recall
correctly, but nowadays the only remaining ISM frequency in that
region lies at 13.56 MHz. The darned space aliens (greys from Zeta
Reticuli, the ones who feed on glandular secretions of humans, you
know... >:-} =-O :-) ) made them get rid of the 14 MHz ISM frequency
because it was too close to the frequencies used by their hapless
half-human, half-reptoid slaves to communicate with the mother ships. :-)

with care,
--Vinny

At 4ZXVCMH9GHY75TTYUQ8GH2Q4AR406, I had written:

>Hi Phyllicia:
>
>No, I do not. Most of the modern Rife plasma devices use RF carrier
>signals (modulated by "audio" frequencies in the 1 Hz to 80 KHz
>range) in the 28 MHz region, usually at the FCC-approved
>commercial/industrial device frequency in the 28 MHz range, and a few
>operate in the 14 MHz range, at the FCC-approved
>commercial/industrial device frequency in that range. You could
>always do a good search of the sites selling Rife plasma devices, and
>also ask on the half-dozen or so Rife list gorups (and also search
>the archives of those list groups as well) to see if someone is
>marketing devices with a 17 MHz carrier frequency commercially. And,
>of course, any good RF engineer-type person could easly design and
>build such a device for you from scratch, but it would be more costly
>than the typical Rife palsma devices running in the 28 MHz range,
>because the latter use easily-available RF exciter/modules (basically
>modified transmitter sections of CB band transceivers.)
>
>with care,
>--Vinny
>
>At 10:12 AM 10/18/2006, you wrote:
> >Hi Vinny,
> >
> > Sorry to be off topic for a moment, but do you know of any
> > Rife machines that are being produced today that actually use the
> > Rife dual frequencies of 17MHz
> > plus a lower audio frequency at the same time? I am really
> > interested to find one
> > if one exists.
> >
> > Phyllicia
> >
> >Vinny Pinto <[hidden email]>
> >wrote: Hi Marc:
> >
> > Interestingly, this question has arisen at times in the world of Rife
> > plasma devices, since many Rife Ray Beam plasma devices use a
> > partially evacuated gas tube filled with rare gases at a low
> > pressure, and some of these tubes include a bit of mercury in order
> > to achieve "tighter" ignition. Worse, many users of Rife plasma
> > devices are people who are chronically ill, persons who have chronic
> > Lyme disease, cancer or MCS. So far, it seems that even chronically
> > ill people like the effects of the tubes. Of course, Rife plasma
> > devices DO produce cleansing and detox symptoms, and users expect them.
> >
> > with care,
> > --Vinny
> >
> > At 05:49 PM 10/17/2006, you wrote:
> > > > I have seen reports that fluorescent bulbs contain traces of
> > mercury vapour
> > > > and therefore emit the spectroscopic frequencies associated
> > with mercury.
> > > > However, this is a very different thing to physically
> > emitting the vapour
> > > > itself.
> > >
> > >This leads to the question -- can someone have a bad reaction to the
> > >"spectroscopic frequencies associated with mercury" ? And could a
> > >person's
> > >bad reaction to flourescent lights be due to these frequencies alone?
> > >
> > >Marc
> > >
>
>


Vinny Pinto
[hidden email]

phone 301-694-1249

To see my informational websites and e-mail list groups, please go to:
http://www.vinnypinto.us

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Rife Carrier Frequencies

Andrew McAfee
Don't forget that microwave ovens where on now cell phone frequencies.

On Oct 20, 2006, at 2:49 PM, Vinny Pinto wrote:

> The darned space aliens (greys from Zeta
> Reticuli, the ones who feed on glandular secretions of humans, you
> know... >:-} =-O :-) ) made them get rid of the 14 MHz ISM frequency
> because it was too close to the frequencies used by their hapless
> half-human, half-reptoid slaves to communicate with the mother ships.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: gold frequency

cindybishop100
In reply to this post by denom

Does anyone know the frequency for steel?



On Oct 19, 2006, at 6:38 PM, denom wrote:

> I was looking for the efffect that gold has on mercury. Mercury binds
> to certain enzymes. Gold breaks the link and binds to the mercury and
> chelates it. I am thinking I would get a good effect just by running
> the frequency of gold. But it is much too high. I may try 1729, 17290
> though.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Andrew McAfee
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 7:38 AM
> Subject: [eSens] gold frequency
>
> In using a rife machine and punching in that frequency, will it
> disintegrate the gold that is in the body or will it make it radiate
> out further?
> Andrew
> On Oct 19, 2006, at 4:57 AM, charles wrote:
>
> > The bioresonace frequency for gold is 1.729 MHz.
> >
> > Now what will you do with that information?
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Charles Claessens
> > member Verband Baubiologie
> > www.milieuziektes.nl
> > www.milieuziektes.be
> > www.hetbitje.nl
> > checked by Norton Antivirus
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "denom" <[hidden email]>
> > To: <[hidden email]>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 05:56
> > Subject: Re: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals
> >
> >
> >> Where did you look this up at? I'd love to have that information.
> >> What
> >> is the frequency for gold?
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: charles
> >> To: [hidden email]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 2:54 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [eSens] Re:EMF/Chemicals
> >>
> >>
> >> I have looked it up.
> >> In bioresonance, the corresponding frequency for mercury is 17.827
> >> MHz.
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >> Charles Claessens
> >> member Verband Baubiologie
> >> www.milieuziektes.nl
> >> www.milieuziektes.be
> >> www.hetbitje.nl
> >> checked by Norton Antivirus
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>  
>  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: gold frequency

kefirisgood
In reply to this post by denom
--- In [hidden email], "denom" <denom@...> wrote:
>
> Mercury binds to certain enzymes. Gold breaks the link and binds to
the mercury and chelates it.

Hello!
Where did you get this information?
Do you have any links (web or books)?

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: gold frequency

denom
I read it on the web. I think I googled gold and autism. It was a story of a person who was autistic and cured himself with gold salts. I think it was just a hypothesis. Not a proven fact that the gold breaks a bond between mercury and an enzyme.
----- Original Message -----
From: kefirisgood
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 6:02 AM
Subject: [eSens] Re: gold frequency


--- In [hidden email], "denom" <denom@...> wrote:
>
> Mercury binds to certain enzymes. Gold breaks the link and binds to
the mercury and chelates it.

Hello!
Where did you get this information?
Do you have any links (web or books)?



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Candida

Jane Springs
In reply to this post by Phyllicia Hutchinson

Some additional thoughts on Candida:

- I was informed that you can tell if you have Candida by whether you have a layer of white
coating on your tongue.

- Probiotics are recommended for Candida sufferers.

Jane



--- In [hidden email], Phyllicia Hutchinson <phylliciah@...> wrote:

>
> Charles,
>  
> I want to know more about your bioresonance machine.
> Phyllicia
>
> charles <charles@...> wrote: Hello Christine,
>  
>
>  
> But this spitting test in water works very instantly.
>  
> Of course I found the Candida by myself.
>  
> Three sessions on my bioresonance machine, and it is gone.
> No strings going down in the water jar.
>  
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> www.milieuziektes.nl
> www.milieuziektes.be
> www.hetbitje.nl
> checked by Norton Antivirus
>  
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "eleccentric" <eleccentric@...>
> To: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 16:05
> Subject: [eSens] Re: Candida
>  
> > Charles, Interesting Info! Thanks! I had suggested for years to Dr's
> > that could I possibly have internal candida (d/t episodic severe
> > abdominal pain) and they all responded that this wasn't possible.  
> > Well! Upon recognizing my ES last May, 2005, I went to Environmental
> > Health Clinic, Dallas, TX (Dr. William Rae) end of June 2005 and was
> > told that this, in fact, was present! I will check out the
> > additional info you have provided. Thanks again for contributing to
> > awareness! I wish traditional MD's could afford the time to become
> > enlightened (to ES, ill-effects of 50/60Hz, ELF, VLF, micro and radio
> > waves and to the value of nutritional supplements, herbal remedies,
> > etc...) As I grow more aware of issues of consideration to ES, I, at
> > times, feel overwhelmed, primarily due to my limited knowledge of EMF
> > spectrum, technicalities of EMF generation/transmission/fq vs. power
> > intensity, body chemistry/biology, alternative medicines/approaches,
> > etc.. Thanks, again! Christine
> >
> >
> > --- In [hidden email], "charles" <charles@> wrote:
> >> Many symptoms of electrosensibility may come from Candida
> > (albicans).
> >> That is a different chapter and something one should be aware of
> > quite well.
> >>
> >> (It is all written on my HP starting at:
> >> http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Pagina100.html
> >> and following pages.
> >> But most people do not take the trouble in reading that.
> >> They wait till somebody brings it with a spoon.)
> >>
> >> There is a simple test to determine if you have Candida:
> >> See: http://www.1stcandidacure.com/candidatest.html
> >>
> >> First thing in the morning, before you put ANYTHING in your mouth,
> > fill a
> >> clear glass with room temperature bottled water.Try not to use tap
> > water to
> >> eliminate the possibility of mineral and chemical contamination.
> >>
> >> Work up a bit of saliva, then spit it into the glass of water.
> > Check the
> >> water every 15 minutes or so for up to one hour.
> >>
> >> If you have candidiasis, you will see strings (like legs) traveling
> > down
> >> into the water from the saliva floating on the top, or "cloudy"
> > saliva will
> >> sink to the bottom of the glass, or cloudy specks will seem to be
> > suspended
> >> in the water.
> >>
> >> And if you have Candida, take proper actions.
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >> Charles Claessens
> >> member Verband Baubiologie
> >> www.milieuziektes.nl
> >> www.milieuziektes.be
> >> www.hetbitje.nl
> >> checked by Norton Antivirus
> >>
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>  
>  
>      
>  
>
>  
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

123