Independent Assessment of Bioprotect Card

I think those readings would be correct, but it would help to have an
idea of how many meters away the tower is. There are research studies
that show biological effects at these levels and lower - so if you are
in any doubt about your health it would be good to either get shielding
materials in place or to move. As shielding tecgnology is still in its
infancy, and therefore somewhat unreliable, you might consider moving.
But it depends upon your health and your resources of course.

Sarah

0.004 uW/cm2 = 40 uW/m2
0.012 uW/cm2 = 120 uW/m2
For a living room, we say max 100 uW/m2
For a bedroom, we say max 1 uW/m2 for a normal person, but for an
electrosensible person. we say 0.1 uW/m2 is max.

I would suggest that you should shield your bedroom.
The distance of celltowers is not so important, because they may radiate
over you or sideways, or right into your face from a far distance.
So the distance is not important, but the amount of radiation you measure.

You mention the possibility of moving away.
Please let us know where-to this may be, because a lot of people will follow
you. ;o))
We are all looking for radiation-free zones.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus

CONTENTS DELETED

$8,000 equipment is very cheap for professional equipment.
The cheapest spectrumanalyser just costs that, end then you need the
expensive antennas and cables.


0.0187 uW/cm2 = 187 uW/m2
0.0250 uW/cm2 = 250 uW/m2

We say 100 uW/m2 max for a living room, and 0.1-1 uW/m2 for a bedroom.
That means for a normal person max 1 uW/m2.
For an electrosensitive person 0.1 uW/m2, which is difficult to achieve.

So, 250 uW/m2 for a bedroom is 250 times too much.
You need shielding there.
Do you know from which direction the RF is coming from ?
Is it one source, or is the radiation coming from other angles?

If it is coming from only one direction, than, that wall, or walls shoud be
shielded.
Look out for reflctions from other walls.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus

CONTENTS DELETED

It is not clear why you sleep head to the north.
There are no general rules for that.
It depends on the person involved.
Read a book about Feng Shui , by f.i. Lilian Too.

If this opposite side is an outside wall, than you must shiel that one.
If it is an inside wall, than you should shield the rooms behind this wall.
Otherwise, when you shiled your inside wall, and behind this wall is your
living room, you will get the RF from outside, plus the reflection from your
bedroom wall.

The guy that measured should tell you direction and sources, as well as the
frequency involved.
Depending on the used shielding materials, you may bring the RF down to
acceptable levels.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus

CONTENTS DELETED

no, that is not true.
There are houses with less, and there are houses with much more.

The TNO UMTS study had a starting point of 1 V/m or 2652 uW/m2.
That is a value that they find normally inside homes in the Netherlands.

So, your 250 uW/m2 is only a tenth of that, but still too much for your
bedroom.

*High trees catch much wind*.
I say, *the higher the building, the more radiation it catches.*

So finding a home, very low, between higher buildings may offer less
radiation.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus

CONTENTS DELETED

you may look at Biologa or Priggen:
this Diamant Gewebe is a good one.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus

CONTENTS DELETED

there are no page references.

www.priggen.de.vu
Zum PSE -Online shop
Abschirmung
Abschirmmaterial
Then scroll down to Diamant, HF Abschirmgewebe.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus

CONTENTS DELETED

you may also use the G-ES, HF- Abschirmgewebe

And yes, incorrect installation can make RF worse by reflexion.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus

CONTENTS DELETED

A Springlife polarizer may be an inexpensive tool to help with this. From
my own limited experience, you may need to position the polarizer a distance
away from your body, on the side of the room where the source of RF is
strongest.

You don't want to drown yourself in white light from the polarizer, but
rather just use the white light as a shield. If you drown yourself in white
light, it can have a similar negative effect as the RF does on your body,
since natural bioenergy frequencies can't move in/out of body properly with
too much white light.

Glenn

Hi
I am going to plug the bioguard here because I think it would help
significantly, also ther eis a three month money back trial so if it
doesn't help then nothing is lost.
If anyone wants to try one then contact me directly at
[hidden email] discount for Esens members! They have worked
for me and also have a very good write up in
www.radiationresearch.org website in the section recent research go
to the bottom of the page to latest norwegian study published and
click link.
Hope I can help folks suffering - the product has helped me, that is
why I promote them!
Ian Gander
>
> Thanks. Does anybody know an inexpensive option to
> sheild RF from home or at least one room? Is putting
> metal around you the only option? Are there devices
> that attract RF to a certain point and eleminite RF
> from the rest of the room, like a bed you sleep on?
>

>A Springlife polarizer may be an inexpensive tool to help with this.

I agree -- devices seem to be a cheaper, more practical, and sometimes an
even more effective alternative to shielding.

>You don't want to drown yourself in white light from the polarizer, but
>rather just use the white light as a shield.

Is this your own theory, or based on something else that I could read?
I've never read this on the Polarizer websites. I've noticed when going to
my nutritionist for muscle testing with these things, she often recommends
putting them nearby, as opposed to being on my person.

By the way, I never found an acceptable solution with the Springlife
Polarizers and that new LCD monitor I bought. The Quantum Products were
the only thing that made it tolerable. Since my cats react badly to the
Quantum Products, I've just gone back to using my old CRT.

As for why the LCD might be worse than a CRT for me, I suppose they might
be generating more EMF noise than a CRT. Or perhaps the mercury content or
the frequencies in the florescent backlight is provoking mercury
mobilization in my head. The symptoms I'm experiencing with the LCD are
the same symptoms I get when taking a lot of chlorella or coral calcium --
a feeling of swelling/pressure in my brain/head area, skin eruptions in my
scalp, difficulty to concentrate. Plus a burning sensation on my skin. I
don't get these symptoms with my CRT at 800x600 resolution plus the
Springlife Polarizers, but 1024x768 resolution does cause me some problems
(although not as bad as this LCD).

Since the cats have a problem with too many devices in the house, I'm
looking more at taking things internally. For instance, my nutritionist
recommended "Primal Defense", which I have also found to be helpful. Also
"Sea Energy" (or "Seasilver") helps. Also, I'm just starting to experiment
with something I briefly tried a few years ago then shelved called
"Aulterra":

http://www.energeticnutrition.com/hi/aulterra.html

This has quite a detox effect on me (even still), but I'm not sure if it
helps with EMF. They make an EMF protection sticker to put on cellphones,
which uses the powder as it's active ingredient, and this seemed to
eliminate the headaches my wife got using her cellphone:

http://www.energeticnutrition.com/hi/neutralizer.html

Marc

There are other options.
Shielding paint (CuPro-Cote from Less EMF Inc at
www.lessemf.com/paint.html) is very easy to apply to walls, ceilings/doors
and gives high attenuation.

Plastic film for windows, or mesh fabrics for window drapes are also
available from Less EMF Inc.

For high levels of attenuation, the trick is to minimize all leakage
points, such as the gap under a door, outlets and switch plates on walls,
vent ducts etc. Also, be sure to ground all shielding.

Emil DeToffol

A Faraday Canopy is a useful way to shield a limited area.
See http://www.lessemf.com/personal.html#200

Emil DeToffol