troubleshooting radio frequencies

> This past week I have been troubleshooting radio frquencies and I am
> hoping there is some science/order to it and someone here might be
> able to help enlighten me. I have reduced the electric and magnetic
> fields, but the Rf is a very difficult to understand.
>
> I pulled a cable that connected two smoke detectors that was causing
> high Rf on circuit two. It lowered circuit two, but then raised the Rf
> on circuit one (my bedroom). Circuit two went from 70 (microwatts per
> centimeter squared) down to 15. Circuit one from.9 up to 5.5.
> Circuit 5 and 6 also were reduced from 8 down to 1. (Thats nice for my
> computer use)
>
> My EMF person tells me these are very low levels and suggests that
> they are being absorbed form the neighborhood ambient fields which are.3
> The incoming power water gas phone cable are all below.1
>
> Most of the power to our house is off however my MIL lives in an
> attached studio and she has a cordless phone but its far from circuit
> one and two. The circuit on which the cordless is plugged in reads low
> too.She has one dimmer also and the same smoke detector (ionizing) we
> had, hers now on battery, ours removed.
>
> It seems that the RF is circuit specific. We have metal heating
> ductwork in attic and below house.
>
> I want to reduce the levels in my bedroom. Any suggestions as to how I
> might proceed?
> Also any suggestions for a smoke detector? seems that the ones in the
> store are all ionizing. Photo electric ok?
>
> Thanks, Sandi
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

> This past week I have been troubleshooting radio frquencies and I am
> hoping there is some science/order to it and someone here might be
> able to help enlighten me. I have reduced the electric and magnetic
> fields, but the Rf is a very difficult to understand.
>
> I pulled a cable that connected two smoke detectors that was causing
> high Rf on circuit two. It lowered circuit two, but then raised the Rf
> on circuit one (my bedroom). Circuit two went from 70 (microwatts per
> centimeter squared) down to 15. Circuit one from.9 up to 5.5.
> Circuit 5 and 6 also were reduced from 8 down to 1. (Thats nice for my
> computer use)
>
> My EMF person tells me these are very low levels and suggests that
> they are being absorbed form the neighborhood ambient fields which are.3
> The incoming power water gas phone cable are all below.1
>
> Most of the power to our house is off however my MIL lives in an
> attached studio and she has a cordless phone but its far from circuit
> one and two. The circuit on which the cordless is plugged in reads low
> too.She has one dimmer also and the same smoke detector (ionizing) we
> had, hers now on battery, ours removed.
>
> It seems that the RF is circuit specific. We have metal heating
> ductwork in attic and below house.
>
> I want to reduce the levels in my bedroom. Any suggestions as to how I
> might proceed?
> Also any suggestions for a smoke detector? seems that the ones in the
> store are all ionizing. Photo electric ok?
>
> Thanks, Sandi
>
>

>
> Hi Sandi,
>
> I'm curious, how are you measuring the RF?
> Doesn't sound like a GS meter plugged in the wall (circuit).
>
> I guess it must be measured at a close distance to the wiring?
>
> Are circuit one and two on the same phase? I would guess yes.
>
> I guess the smoke detector is one of the new ones that have a 3-wire
> cable to sound the alert throughout the house if one gets set off?
> I also had to disconnect them, and go to a battery model.
>
> Unfortunately, even it is noisier than the Old one in my previous

>
> Its funny that you should highlight the warm air ducts. I came to an
> arrangement with a local Housing developer whereby if I worked for him it
> would
> have to be in a house that was empty (knocking down in future)rather than
> his
> "highly" electrosmogged office. But typically with ES for every compromise
>
> there is a sting in the tale lurking behind the scenes. In the case of the
>
> house I soon realisefd that it was not the place for me. After a couple of
> hours
> working there alone with most of the elec off. I was climbing up the walls
>
> !! It turns out that there are several telephone masts in the vicinity,
> 6-7
> within 800mtrs. one of those places where there are many dotted around the
>
> place within a relatively short distance from one another but you would
> need a
> plane view to see it !! Anyway this house has metal underfloor warm air
> vents
> and a measure with my trifeild revealed high emf. at ground floor level.
> In
> fact the whole vicinity drives me up the wall so I only visit the place
> for
> short periods max 30mins before scalp gets tight, tingling starts and
> heart
> rythm gets odd, get very uptight for no apparent reason ??!! Tinitus goes
> mad
> later and I feel fogged /mentally fatigued all day long !!
>
> This stuff is like cryptonite to me, I am at my core very strong and fit,
> but I am finding my heart is floundering of late, and the glands under my
> arms
> are sore, plus to look like real hypocondriac I have developed a mega
> intermittant pain in my left little toe, I am beginning to think that that
> it is
> related to stress reaction as I think that it sets off sometimes just
> before I
> register a hit of adrenaline when angry or shocked ??I had an ECG which
> came
> up normal, typical really we are fit but this stuff hits the fit in
> insidious
> somewhat untracable ways in the short term.
>
> Bassically the RF is a largely hidden problem for ES persons and I have
> intentions of getting up to speed on this one and equipping myself with a
> suitable meter. Many fledgling ESSERS only get to grips with emf/elec
> feilds but I
> have long since suspected that RF is probably one of the worst offenders
> for
> ES getting us from greater distances therfore far more
> troublesome/insidiuos
> than bog standard near feild EMFS, I feel that many modern applainces such
> as
> LCD vdus and televisons, digital set-top boxes etc give off chaotic RF
> which
> by the law of averges will hit the spot for most ESSERS in a matte of
> moments of exposure.
>
> We are like apprentices messing with the Scourcerors magic on this one,
> who
> knows what we are doing !
>
> Paul UK
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>