reply to Paul re. filtering

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

reply to Paul re. filtering

SArjuna
> Paul wrote:
> I wonder if 600-1400 reading are than the filters can handle. The 1400 is
> the power strips for this computer. 600 in most walls, some as low as 200. I
> might need an electrician.
>
Shivani replies:
These levels are not a problem for the filters. It just takes more
filters.
An electrician will not be of any help in such a situation, as
electricians are not trained to understand or deal with electrical pollution.
Regards,
Shivani
www.LifeEnergies.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

More Noise Harvester info

Marc Martin
Administrator
Hi all,

I was browsing the discussion forums on psaudio.com, the
manufacturer of the Noise Harvester. It says that this
device focuses primarily on reducing the noise in the
8-12 khz range, and that this indirectly reduces the
higher frequency harmonics that other filters
focus on. One filter is supposed to reduce the line
noise by 6dB in these frequencies, two by 9dB. They
noted that a competitor, the "Quiet Line" filter,
starts filtering at 220khz (this is one the models
I've tried before but gave me a headache very quickly).
Although in this case, "filtering" just means that
the noise is transferred from the hot wire to the
neutral wire.

They also noted that there is a 240v version of the
Noise Harvester, although I haven't seen where this
is sold.

This product appears to have been released in May
2006, so it's a new product (and is not being
marketed for your health, it's being marketed
for the audiophile crowd)

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

negative evaluation of Stetzer filters

Marc Martin
Administrator
Hi all,

When I first tried the Stetzer filters, I made a statement
that my ES was telling me that the filters were adding to
problem, not helping. Now I see that there is a report
(with lots of oscilliscope photos) that concludes the same
thing -- that at frequencies around 10khz, there is more
line noise after the filters were installed than before!

http://tinyurl.com/z8u2j

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: More Noise Harvester info

Marc Martin
Administrator
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
...oh, and here is a German source of the Noise Harmonizer,
so there is indeed a European version of this:

http://www.hifi2die4.de/produkte/ps_a_harv.htm

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: negative evaluation of Stetzer filters

denom
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Somebody will have to straighten me out here if I don't know what I'm talking about. 10 killoherts is 10000, correct. That is a frequency that is very good for the brain. People in the lyme rife group run that frequency after running their rife frequencies. I used to run that frequency for hoursbecause it was so soothing. Maybe that is why I get such a good feeling from all the filters I have. Just a thought. I'm sure somebody here will chime in if I'm incorrect.
----- Original Message -----
From: Marc Martin
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 5:47 PM
Subject: [eSens] negative evaluation of Stetzer filters


Hi all,

When I first tried the Stetzer filters, I made a statement
that my ES was telling me that the filters were adding to
problem, not helping. Now I see that there is a report
(with lots of oscilliscope photos) that concludes the same
thing -- that at frequencies around 10khz, there is more
line noise after the filters were installed than before!

http://tinyurl.com/z8u2j

Marc



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]