Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
> Paul wrote:
> I wonder if 600-1400 reading are than the filters can handle. The 1400 is > the power strips for this computer. 600 in most walls, some as low as 200. I > might need an electrician. > Shivani replies: These levels are not a problem for the filters. It just takes more filters. An electrician will not be of any help in such a situation, as electricians are not trained to understand or deal with electrical pollution. Regards, Shivani www.LifeEnergies.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Administrator
|
Hi all,
I was browsing the discussion forums on psaudio.com, the manufacturer of the Noise Harvester. It says that this device focuses primarily on reducing the noise in the 8-12 khz range, and that this indirectly reduces the higher frequency harmonics that other filters focus on. One filter is supposed to reduce the line noise by 6dB in these frequencies, two by 9dB. They noted that a competitor, the "Quiet Line" filter, starts filtering at 220khz (this is one the models I've tried before but gave me a headache very quickly). Although in this case, "filtering" just means that the noise is transferred from the hot wire to the neutral wire. They also noted that there is a 240v version of the Noise Harvester, although I haven't seen where this is sold. This product appears to have been released in May 2006, so it's a new product (and is not being marketed for your health, it's being marketed for the audiophile crowd) Marc |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Administrator
|
Hi all,
When I first tried the Stetzer filters, I made a statement that my ES was telling me that the filters were adding to problem, not helping. Now I see that there is a report (with lots of oscilliscope photos) that concludes the same thing -- that at frequencies around 10khz, there is more line noise after the filters were installed than before! http://tinyurl.com/z8u2j Marc |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
...oh, and here is a German source of the Noise Harmonizer,
so there is indeed a European version of this: http://www.hifi2die4.de/produkte/ps_a_harv.htm Marc |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Somebody will have to straighten me out here if I don't know what I'm talking about. 10 killoherts is 10000, correct. That is a frequency that is very good for the brain. People in the lyme rife group run that frequency after running their rife frequencies. I used to run that frequency for hoursbecause it was so soothing. Maybe that is why I get such a good feeling from all the filters I have. Just a thought. I'm sure somebody here will chime in if I'm incorrect.
----- Original Message ----- From: Marc Martin To: [hidden email] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 5:47 PM Subject: [eSens] negative evaluation of Stetzer filters Hi all, When I first tried the Stetzer filters, I made a statement that my ES was telling me that the filters were adding to problem, not helping. Now I see that there is a report (with lots of oscilliscope photos) that concludes the same thing -- that at frequencies around 10khz, there is more line noise after the filters were installed than before! http://tinyurl.com/z8u2j Marc [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |