Thanks to all who responded. I read all of your emails to
my friend. He was bummed. Now he is obsessing about EMFs. Turns out it isn't Peripheral Neuropathy. The fifth doctor or so he saw said it wasn't. To me, that makes it much more likely that it's EMF related. Stephen: What are longitudinal waves? What do you think the best emf book is that I could read to understand these basics, and not have to ask for explanations. Yes, Paul, TV is the Black Abyss! hahaha. So in a way, we are blessed to have a built-in deterrent to watching much TV. Got to get these blessings wherever we can! emraware: Sorry, don't know your name. The rating on the Trifield was 3mg or less. That's what is supposedly considered "tolerable", at least by mainstream, thick-skinned folks! Yeah, I don't even bother to use the microwave setting on the Trifield. I was renting a massage office that was probably a football field's length away from a very big cell phone tower. My Trifield microwave showed very low, but I had an environmental consultant come with his specialized microwave meter ($300++) with triangulated wires on top which was much more sensitive, and showed very high readings. We fixed it though, with transparent window foil (from Germany). Brought the readings right down to a safe level. Lily [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Lily,
I copy/paste Dietrich Grün's messages from this group which will give youa good idea what longitudinal/scalar/Teslar waves are about. You can shield from the harmful longitudinal waves from emf with water it seems, so if you build an aquarium around your bed, that may not be such a bad idea?! Longitudinal waves can be positive and/or negative for you. They are present in: geopathic stress, homeopathy, stones, energized water, energy therapy, music, qlink, bioprotect card, quantum, electro-acupuncture,... On longitudinal waves, there will definitely be some interesting books... Ihave some interesting books on specific subjects but not one book that discusses longitudinal waves in general. Stephen. Hallo Nicolaj, from my experiments with those electromagnetic waves that easily penetrate a Fardayan cage and the biological effect of these waves, that I can measure in electroacupuncture, there are two aspects to it. The biological effect I can measure, decreases with distance from the source of radiation in a regular way; this means there is an aspect of intensitiy or energy involveld like with any other electromegnetic waves we can measure. This biological effect of longitudinal waves can be positive or negative, which has to do with the second aspect, namely the information the longitudinal wave carries. You can measure the intensity of a radio wave quite exactly, but not the information carried by this wave; for this you need someone - a biological entitiy - listening to the program. And again the reaction will depend on the individual taste of this person, wether he likes this kind of music or not. So, if some day we can measure longitudinal waves, it will be helpful if we are going to use these waves to light our houses or driving engines. Bur since our biological organism as well as animals and plants easily are influencedby just these waves even in extreme low intensities, we have to be careful not to do harm. So far we do not care about these waves and create a lot of harm as electrosensitive people know. So, even if we could measure longitudinal waves, we would have to do some biological testing. New medicines are also tested first on living cells, may be plants, animals and finally humans. The chemical data alone are not sufficient. Doing biological testing, the individuals you test may react more or less different and each individual again may react different with time depending wether it is stressed, or fresh and healthy or an aged individual. So you can manage to have contradicting results with the same experiment and discreditany existing result. Part of the discussion about the negative side effects of mobile phones, I suppose, functions this way. Dietrich Gruen Hello, your usual meter never will change its readings after installing one of these electrosmog devices. But measuring through electroacupuncture you will see a big difference, and people using these devices will loose their symptoms, at least many of them. What does this say? First, the radiation you measure, cannot be the cause of the complaints, because this radiation is still there, but there are no symptoms. Second, there must be some other radiation contained in the radiation you measure, that is not recorded by your meter, but that is the one that is biological effective. I have studied this radiation extensively, because in elektroacupunkture I could measure it. This radiation has the properties described by Nicola Tesla for the waves he discoverd, the Tesla waves. Knowing the laws these Tesla waves follow, you will be able to develop tools that prevent you from their harmful effects. All the electrosmog devices I had the chance to test with electroacupuncture did change these Tesla waves, so the harmful effect disappears. The waves themselves are not eliminated, as one might think, just the information they carry is neutralized. And if you want, you may even give to these Tesla waves a biological positive information.This is already done by dozens of electrically driven healing tools. Playing with all kinds of meters, that are available on the market, you never will get to the root of the problem, which are the Tesla waves. I am not the only one, who knows this. Years ago already Prof. u. Warnke from the university of Saarbrücken Germany stated, that we follow essentially the wrong way by studying only the transversal hertzian waves and forgetting the longitudinal ones, which are the Tesla waves. But so far almost no one seems to take notice of this and do research along these lines. dietrich gruen Hallo, You are right, to go in resonance with the scalar waves, different things have a different capacity. So these devices must have a stronger resonance than a normal human body. But if the body of a person has an extra strong resonance, these devices will not work; this is the case in ES. I could measure this via electroacupuncture. A few other experiments have reassured this law of resonance again and again. It contradicts to the behaviour we learned in physics about radio waves, which are transversal waves or Hertzian waves. The longitudinal or Tesla waves behave different. They also pass the shielding of a Faraday cage, they are absorbed by 2,5 cm of water, they pass along wires - that is how we get the electrosmog our neighbours produce into our house. They are altered by crystals to the degree that they are no more harmful. It is worth while studying them, because this way you may find the solution to the electrosmog problem. dietrich --- In [hidden email], Latifah T <zzzapit@...> wrote: > > Thanks to all who responded. I read all of your emails to > my friend. He was bummed. Now he is obsessing about EMFs. > > Turns out it isn't Peripheral Neuropathy. The fifth doctor or > so he saw said it wasn't. To me, that makes it much more likely > that it's EMF related. > > Stephen: What are longitudinal waves? What do you think the > best emf book is that I could read to understand these basics, > and not have to ask for explanations. > > Yes, Paul, TV is the Black Abyss! hahaha. So in a way, we are > blessed to have a built-in deterrent to watching much TV. > Got to get these blessings wherever we can! > > emraware: Sorry, don't know your name. The rating on the > Trifield was 3mg or less. That's what is supposedly considered > "tolerable", at least by mainstream, thick-skinned folks! > Yeah, I don't even bother to use the microwave setting on the > Trifield. I was renting a massage office that was probably a > football field's length away from a very big cell phone tower. > My Trifield microwave showed very low, but I had an > environmental consultant come with his specialized microwave > meter ($300++) with triangulated wires on top which was much > more sensitive, and showed very high readings. We fixed it though, > with transparent window foil (from Germany). Brought the readings > right down to a safe level. > > Lily > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
In reply to this post by Lily
Latifah T wrote:
> I don't even bother to use the microwave setting on the > Trifield. I was renting a massage office that was probably a > football field's length away from a very big cell phone tower. > My Trifield microwave showed very low, This is a good example of how one meter can show nothing, while another shows useful warnings. Consider the specs for the Trifield, set on RF/Microwave, does not Start detecting until 6.0 V/m But that level is at the Top of the Acoustimeter range. Stewart |
In reply to this post by Lily
Hi Lily,
Hmm, it's very interesting you found a big cell phone tower. I'm so glad you were able to remediate it with special window film. That's probably much worse than the power line magnetic fields. The following video suggests that wireless radiation is worse than power line magnetic fields: http://www.magdahavas.com/2010/03/22/live-blood-cells-and-electrosmog/ In my research, I found that German students found a similar phenomenon of clumping during cell phone use, and Bo Sernelius predicted cell clumping based on math/physics modelling on van der Waals forces, which are normally very weak, but increase dramatically in the presence of microwaves. Regarding power line magnetic fields, though, I would still aim for < 1mG for sleeping quarters, if possible. The average level in houses in the UK, based on the PowerWatch Handbook is 0.5 mG. SBM 2008 (Standard of Building Biology Testing Methods) guidelines for sleeping quarters recommends <1 mG. No ConcernSlight ConcernSevere concernExtreme concern <0.2 mG 0.2 mG to 1 mG 1 mG to 5 mG > 5 mG The EPA once was considering 2mG as a recommendation. However, some scientists like Robert Becker are more conservative and suggest it should be <1 mG. (substandard sperm at 1.6 mG, De-Kun Li, see microwavenews.com, and Chick embryonic development effects at 1 mG) Recently, I learned more about a 3rd type of radiation which is dirty electricity, intermediate frequencies on power lines. A study found that even when the magnetic field was low, the dirty electricity could still be high, and cause health effects. See: http://www.electricalpollution.com/documents/MilhamMorganAmJIndMed2008.p\ df Fortunately, the levels in my house are usually <200 on the Graham-Stetzer meter, which is even considered high. However, in the above document, some school had extremely high ratings > 1000. > emraware: Sorry, don't know your name. The rating on the > Trifield was 3mg or less. That's what is supposedly considered > "tolerable", at least by mainstream, thick-skinned folks! > Yeah, I don't even bother to use the microwave setting on the > Trifield. I was renting a massage office that was probably a > football field's length away from a very big cell phone tower. > My Trifield microwave showed very low, but I had an > environmental consultant come with his specialized microwave > meter ($300++) with triangulated wires on top which was much > more sensitive, and showed very high readings. We fixed it though, > with transparent window foil (from Germany). Brought the readings > right down to a safe level. > > Lily > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |