radiation

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
PUK
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

radiation

PUK


In a message dated 6/22/2007 12:45:18 AM GMT Daylight Time,
[hidden email] writes:

The short summary is that all radiation, whether by chemical or
photon is ionizing. Demyelinization is a huge problem from that.

THAT,-radiation-THAT,-radiation-<WBR>, is your biophysical answer. The
individuals overall exposure and constitution they started with.



Hi Snoshoe

How has all radiation been shown to be Ionizing, has this been observed and
recorded and by what means, cos obviously this is a very contravercial
statement.

Paul UK







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: radiation

Snoshoe
Hi Espaules, :)

It's only controversial if you haven't had a good look at your
sciences.

First look up the defintion of ionization.
Then recall the model you were probably taught in school of elements
with the little electrons on the rings outside of the proton.
When that goes to something else, that is ionization, sometimes
called oxidation, or redox. What they neglected to tell you is that
is material radioactivity with radiation.

Then read the paper I mentioned. Look up the references and read the
articles. We could've made a whole book of just the references, but
this already more than twice as long as most of the papers expected
for the symposium.

Just after the deadline it was submitted by, I ran across a couple
more very plain studies on the regular news websites. Try googling
microwaves cause DNA breakage, or something along those lines. One
article was specific to microwaves.

The only difference between one end of the spectrum and the other is
the frequency, the speed it does the damage at. This can be
manipulated and transformed. Probably more of that will become
available to the public in just the next couple years the way
technology is snowballing. But it is particularly through people like
us who can be the most helpful in finding what are the best means not
only of shielding, but converting to helpful methods.

Using the sound generators, or other devices that generate
frequencies are already doing this. What I think is missing, at least
I haven't found it yet, is a clear "recipe" for mixing. "If you apply
this frequency to that you get this." Sound cancellation technology
is right in there with this idea.

Hope that helps.

~ Snoshoe



--- In [hidden email], paulpjc@... wrote:
>> Hi Snoshoe
>  
> How has all radiation been shown to be Ionizing, has this been
observed and  
> recorded and by what means, cos obviously this is a very
contravercial  

> statement.
>  
> Paul UK
>  
>  
> In a message dated 6/22/2007 12:45:18 AM GMT Daylight Time,  
> snoshoe_2@... writes:
>
> The short summary is that all radiation, whether by chemical or
> photon is ionizing. Demyelinization is a huge problem from that.
>
> THAT,-radiation-is your biophysical answer. The
> individuals overall exposure and constitution they started with.
>
>
>

>

PUK
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: radiation

PUK
In reply to this post by PUK

In a message dated 6/23/2007 5:55:40 PM GMT Daylight Time,
[hidden email] writes:

Using the sound generators, or other devices that generate
frequencies are already doing this. What I think is missing, at least
I haven't found it yet, is a clear "recipe" for mixing. "If you apply
this frequency to that you get this." Sound cancellation technology
is right in there with this idea.

Hope that helps.

~ Snoshoe



Like the beach I am always happy to recive new waves that push the old
stones aside - THANKS

Paul






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]