i bought a cheapo GaussMaster to begin to get an idea of the mag fields
near my place. It measures from 0-1 miligauss. 1 milligauss is equivalent to 0.1microtesla. (yes?) 1 micro tesla is what i know the Swiss say is the max allowed for people to live in there. The meter doesn't register at all in my general home environment, so the mag fields in my house are at the very most 0.2milligauss. (away from electric objects, obviously) i'm not niave enough to think that even what the swiss say is anywhere near a safe level from humans to live in let alone an ES. So i'm trying to find out what a reading of 0.2milligauss means to someone with ES.??? |
I'm suffering from what I can only guess is a reaction to magnetic
fields. I bought 2 meters from LessEMF but they picked up nothing of note. After further enquiries I got some infromation from a gent in Sweeden who told me that the meters available today are not much use. "(We used to have a good EMF-meter for sale in Sweden that reacted more like hypersensitive individual do, but unfortunately it is no longer in production. It measured the rate of change (the dB/dt of the magnetic field = uT/s in one scale and the displacement current induced by the dE/dt of theelectric field in nA...)" Also magnetic fields today come in very high frequencies which meters do not detect. This is something that was started by (appliance) companies about 15 years ago. "Your Tri-Field meter is of limited use as it contains no frequency information; for most people the 35kHz fields of a fluorescent light is much worse that a 50Hz incandescent lamp ( a meter like the one I described above would show 35000/50=700 times stronger deflection for a 35kHz field than for a 50Hz field of the same strength) ..." My first post - hope it works! |
--- In [hidden email], "decourcycolin" <decourcycolin@...> wrote:
> > I'm suffering from what I can only guess is a reaction to magnetic > fields. I bought 2 meters from LessEMF but they picked up nothing of > note. > After further enquiries I got some infromation from a gent in Sweeden > who told me that the meters available today are not much use. > > "(We used to have a good EMF-meter > for sale in Sweden that reacted more like hypersensitive individual > do, but > unfortunately it is no longer in production. It measured the rate of > change > (the dB/dt of the magnetic field = uT/s in one scale and the > displacement > current induced by the dE/dt of theelectric field in nA...)" > > Also magnetic fields today come in very high frequencies which meters > do not detect. This is something that was started by (appliance) > companies about 15 years ago. > > "Your Tri-Field meter is of limited use as it contains no frequency > information; for most people the 35kHz fields of a fluorescent light > is much > worse that a 50Hz incandescent lamp ( a meter like the one I > described above > would show 35000/50=700 times stronger deflection for a 35kHz field > than for > a 50Hz field of the same strength) ..." > > My first post - hope it works! > The TriField is frequency weighted, calibrated at 60 hz. So higher frequencies do show stronger readings. Eli |
In reply to this post by asurisuk
--- In [hidden email], "canaryyuk" <asurisuk@...> wrote:
> > i bought a cheapo GaussMaster to begin to get an idea of the mag fields > near my place. It measures from 0-1 miligauss. > 1 milligauss is equivalent to 0.1microtesla. (yes?) > 1 micro tesla is what i know the Swiss say is the max allowed for > people to live in there. > > The meter doesn't register at all in my general home environment, so > the mag fields in my house are at the very most 0.2milligauss. (away > from electric objects, obviously) > > i'm not niave enough to think that even what the swiss say is anywhere > near a safe level from humans to live in let alone an ES. So i'm > trying to find out what a reading of 0.2milligauss means to someone > with ES.??? > An ambient field of 0.2 mili gauss is on the borderline of being tolerable for several hours of exposure. I can feel 3-5 mg within seconds/minutes. Unfortunately there are fields not picked up by such meters that the ES can sense. Eli |
In reply to this post by jaime_schunkewitz
--- In [hidden email], "jaime_schunkewitz"
<jaime_schunkewitz@...> wrote: > > > The TriField is frequency weighted, calibrated at 60 hz. > So higher frequencies do show stronger readings. > Eli > Not the very high ones. Modern equipment uses frequency converters to change frequency from 50 or 60 cycles/second to thousands, millions and beyond c/s. |
--- In [hidden email], "decourcycolin" <decourcycolin@...> wrote:
> > --- In [hidden email], "jaime_schunkewitz" > <jaime_schunkewitz@> wrote: > > > > > > The TriField is frequency weighted, calibrated at 60 hz. > > So higher frequencies do show stronger readings. > > Eli > > > > Not the very high ones. Modern equipment uses frequency converters to > change frequency from 50 or 60 cycles/second to thousands, millions > beyond c/s. > Correct, the magnetic and electric modes of the Trifield meter measure up to 100k hz, and the RF mode of the TriField meter is rather impotent. That's why it's important to have a quality RF meter to complement the general purpose TriField meter. Eli |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |