land line cordless phones that don't constantly emit rf

I was wondering if anyone knows of any cordless phones that don't constantly
emit rf between the base stations and handsets when not in use?

--
Paul Coffman


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Have a look at "Orchid" brand phones; don't know if they're available outside of the UK, but they're DECT phones that were specially designed not to emit RF from the base station when not in use. They also have a "low radiation" mode that keeps the signal power down...I think it adjusts it based onthe proximity of the phone to the base station.

There's another company that recently came out with "green", lower radiation cordless phones, one of the more mainstream companies, but I've forgottenwhich one.

Often, older ones, like those that operate at 900 Mhz instead of the GHz range, don't emit when not in use. But you have to check! I've seen some that still do emit.

If you must use a cordless, go with something like I've described above; though, the best is to not use cordless if possible - it still goes into yourhead when in use!

R.

--- In [hidden email], Paul Coffman <pkcoff@...> wrote:

Paul, i have never meter checked it, but i have a cordless 2.4 ghtz panasonic which doesn't bother me and the only time it did was when i had the homeopathic treatment i just mentioned in my reply to Joni.  of course i cannot make the claim it wouldn't bother you--you might be more sensitive than me.  i do not think it emits 24/7 tho.
 
d

--- On Thu, 6/18/09, Paul Coffman <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Paul Coffman <[hidden email]>
Subject: [eSens] land line cordless phones that don't constantly emit rf
To: [hidden email]
Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009, 2:23 PM








I was wondering if anyone knows of any cordless phones that don't constantly
emit rf between the base stations and handsets when not in use?

--
Paul Coffman

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

















     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In a message dated 19/06/2009 21:32:06 GMT Daylight Time,
[hidden email] writes:

Paul, i have never meter checked it, but i have a cordless 2.4 ghtz
panasonic which doesn't bother me and the only time it did was when i had the
homeopathic treatment i just mentioned in my reply to Joni. of course i
cannot make the claim it wouldn't bother you--you might be more sensitive than
me. i do not think it emits 24/7 tho.

d



Paul uk replies -
As far as I am concerned the DECT Phone is something to be avoided, the rf
signal at close quarters is constantly chipping away at you and even if you
dont feel it it may be topping up your ES symptoms. All these devices in
my oppinion are Anti-Nature, they should be shunned as they lead to a
disruption in the harmony of our natural surroundings and deprive us of the
inner peice that our bodies and indeed minds require to thrive, as far as Iam
concerned thay are borderline Evil, both for now and their future potential.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Evie -

What is the exact model?

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Evie <[hidden email]> wrote:



--
Paul Coffman


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

hi, Paul,
 
it is a Panasonic KX-TG2205  2.4 GHz "Gigarange Digital" phone.  what is interesting here is, almost all electrical digital products bother me.  this phone never did bother me when it was not being used.  and the only time it bothered me during use was during the homeopathy treatments. it might be that i got used to it prior to becoming severely es, i am in denile ( :) ), or it is made in a way which is a little different from othercordless phones.....  i always used it on speakerphone function, and that may have made a difference.   good luck. 
 
diane

--- On Sat, 6/20/09, Paul Coffman <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Paul Coffman <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] land line cordless phones that don't constantly emit rf
To: [hidden email]
Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 12:47 PM








Evie -

What is the exact model?

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Evie <evie15422@yahoo. com> wrote:

--
Paul Coffman

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

















     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]