Hi all, I ordered that baseball cap that has the shielding fabric inside ofit. I hooked up my wireless router again and put the cap over the whole thing (the router is small) and it made *no difference* in the signal strength my computer picked up - five full bars. If it can't block the emittingsignal at all then how's it going to block that same signal when it's on my head? Then I check the website's return policy and they only give store credit not money back :(
Thoughts? Alexa |
It comes through the bottom too
On 2009-12-05, at 3:05 AM, [hidden email] wrote: > Hi all, I ordered that baseball cap that has the shielding fabric inside of it. I hooked up my wireless router again and put the cap over the whole thing (the router is small) and it made *no difference* in the signal strength my computer picked up - five full bars. If it can't block the emitting signal at all then how's it going to block that same signal when it's on myhead? Then I check the website's return policy and they only give store credit not money back :( > > Thoughts? > > Alexa > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by roxalis@rocketmail.com
5 bars is not a good way to measure. But the cap is not very
good-- the fabric is good but they sewed it with seams and no conductivity between the pieces. A large piece of veil-shield is a better way to go. Still it will just reflect the signal down from the antenna. Put it over the receiving computer (try to allow at least an inch of spacing from wherever the receiver antenna is) or put a real big piece (like at least 5' square) between the router and computer. Bill On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:05 AM, [hidden email] < [hidden email]> wrote: > > > Hi all, I ordered that baseball cap that has the shielding fabric inside of > it. I hooked up my wireless router again and put the cap over the whole > thing (the router is small) and it made *no difference* in the signal > strength my computer picked up - five full bars. If it can't block the > emitting signal at all then how's it going to block that same signal when > it's on my head? Then I check the website's return policy and they only give > store credit not money back :( > > Thoughts? > > Alexa > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Bob, don't RF waves travel in straight lines? I made sure to block completely the direction between the router and the laptop with the cap at the router end and also at the laptop side.
Bill, I'd measure with an RF meter if I had one, but surely those bars count for something, a crude measure of signal strength at least. So are you saying the Naturashield fabric is good but even stuff like seams will mess it up? What is a veil-shield? My main purpose in getting the cap was to test to see how much the wi-fi coming down from the apartment above was affecting me. If it helped a lot then I was planning to buy more in the way of shielding the ceiling. But of course now the apartment below me just got wi-fi too. Just gotta move it seems. Thanks, Alexa --- In [hidden email], Bill Bruno <wbruno@...> wrote: > > 5 bars is not a good way to measure. But the cap is not very > good-- the fabric is good but they sewed it with seams and > no conductivity between the pieces. > > A large piece of veil-shield is a better way to go. Still > it will just reflect the signal down from the antenna. > Put it over the receiving computer (try to allow at > least an inch of spacing from wherever the receiver antenna is) > or put a real big piece (like at least 5' square) between the router > and computer. > > Bill > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:05 AM, roxalis@... < > roxalis@...> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, I ordered that baseball cap that has the shielding fabric inside of > > it. I hooked up my wireless router again and put the cap over the whole > > thing (the router is small) and it made *no difference* in the signal > > strength my computer picked up - five full bars. If it can't block the > > emitting signal at all then how's it going to block that same signal when > > it's on my head? Then I check the website's return policy and they onlygive > > store credit not money back :( > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Alexa > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
They go in straight lines EXCEPT when there is something metal
that is about their size. Then they scatter. Their size is a few inches. That's why you need any shield to be a few feet at least on each side. There will still be scattering at the edges, but most of the energy doesn't scatter at sharp angles from a flat shield. See if you can get your neighbors to watch the Panorama BBC Wi-Fi show. Bill On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 8:02 PM, [hidden email] < [hidden email]> wrote: > > > Bob, don't RF waves travel in straight lines? I made sure to block > completely the direction between the router and the laptop with the cap at > the router end and also at the laptop side. > > Bill, I'd measure with an RF meter if I had one, but surely those bars > count for something, a crude measure of signal strength at least. So are you > saying the Naturashield fabric is good but even stuff like seams will mess > it up? What is a veil-shield? > > My main purpose in getting the cap was to test to see how much the wi-fi > coming down from the apartment above was affecting me. If it helped a lot > then I was planning to buy more in the way of shielding the ceiling. But of > course now the apartment below me just got wi-fi too. Just gotta move it > seems. > > Thanks, > Alexa > > > --- In [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>, Bill Bruno > <wbruno@...> wrote: > > > > 5 bars is not a good way to measure. But the cap is not very > > good-- the fabric is good but they sewed it with seams and > > no conductivity between the pieces. > > > > A large piece of veil-shield is a better way to go. Still > > it will just reflect the signal down from the antenna. > > Put it over the receiving computer (try to allow at > > least an inch of spacing from wherever the receiver antenna is) > > or put a real big piece (like at least 5' square) between the router > > and computer. > > > > Bill > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:05 AM, roxalis@... < > > roxalis@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, I ordered that baseball cap that has the shielding fabric > inside of > > > it. I hooked up my wireless router again and put the cap over the whole > > > thing (the router is small) and it made *no difference* in the signal > > > strength my computer picked up - five full bars. If it can't block the > > > emitting signal at all then how's it going to block that same signal > when > > > it's on my head? Then I check the website's return policy and they only > give > > > store credit not money back :( > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Alexa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by roxalis@rocketmail.com
I have to take issue with this thread.
Let me start right off by telling you that I am the creator and manufacturer of the shielded cap under discussion. There are two analogies that I think will help readers understand what is going on here. Pretend that you have a new beekeeper suit. You decide to test it by hanging it in front of a large and active beehive. You are disappointed to find that despite the claims of the garment manufacturer, you still receive quite a few nasty bee stings. So does the garment work or not? Well, first, you have no idea how many bees went THROUGH the garment, and how many simply went AROUND it. Furthermore, you still have no idea how well the garment works when used the way it was designed to be used. It is not the garment that is faulty, it is the test design. The suit is not designed to be placed on the hive. It is meant to be worn. Next, assume you are inside a white room with a single incandescent light bulb. The room is quite bright (5 bars). Now, hold a mirror (reflector) up to one side of the light bulb. How dark is the room now? The room has not darkened at all. All the radiation is still in the room. This is very similar to what was done in the experiment described. Remember that the microwaves from a router fill the room through reflection off walls, floors, and most surfaces. Placing a small reflector near the source does create a small shadow in the vicinity of the "shield", but even there, the light level does not go to zero, perhaps only 50% reduction. (You might notice that to go from 5 bars to 4 bars requires a reduction of 10-20 dB, depending on the equipment you are using... this corresponds to 90-99% reduction of signal strength). On the other hand, if you are in that same room and your mirror is cup or dome shaped, and you put it over your chest, how dark will it be inside the "cup"? With a reasonable seal around the perimeter, it will be quite dark inside the "cup". You can test this way with the shielded cap, but you need a meter with an external probe that can fit inside the cap. Be careful about testing shielding to make sure that your test is valid. Emil ----- Original Message ----- From: <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 10:02 PM Subject: [eSens] Re: disappointed in the cap > Bob, don't RF waves travel in straight lines? I made sure to block > completely the direction between the router and the laptop with the cap at > the router end and also at the laptop side. > > Bill, I'd measure with an RF meter if I had one, but surely those bars > count for something, a crude measure of signal strength at least. So are > you saying the Naturashield fabric is good but even stuff like seams will > mess it up? What is a veil-shield? > > My main purpose in getting the cap was to test to see how much the wi-fi > coming down from the apartment above was affecting me. If it helped a lot > then I was planning to buy more in the way of shielding the ceiling. But > of course now the apartment below me just got wi-fi too. Just gotta move > it seems. > > Thanks, > Alexa > > --- In [hidden email], Bill Bruno <wbruno@...> wrote: >> >> 5 bars is not a good way to measure. But the cap is not very >> good-- the fabric is good but they sewed it with seams and >> no conductivity between the pieces. >> >> A large piece of veil-shield is a better way to go. Still >> it will just reflect the signal down from the antenna. >> Put it over the receiving computer (try to allow at >> least an inch of spacing from wherever the receiver antenna is) >> or put a real big piece (like at least 5' square) between the router >> and computer. >> >> Bill >> >> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:05 AM, roxalis@... < >> roxalis@...> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > Hi all, I ordered that baseball cap that has the shielding fabric >> > inside of >> > it. I hooked up my wireless router again and put the cap over the whole >> > thing (the router is small) and it made *no difference* in the signal >> > strength my computer picked up - five full bars. If it can't block the >> > emitting signal at all then how's it going to block that same signal >> > when >> > it's on my head? Then I check the website's return policy and they only >> > give >> > store credit not money back :( >> > >> > Thoughts? >> > >> > Alexa >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > |
Excellent illustration Emil.
Stewart lessemf.com wrote: > Next, assume you are inside a white room with a single incandescent light > bulb. The room is quite bright (5 bars). Now, hold a mirror (reflector) up > to one side of the light bulb. How dark is the room now? The room has not > darkened at all. All the radiation is still in the room. This is very > similar to what was done in the experiment described. > > Remember that the microwaves from a router fill the room through reflection > off walls, floors, and most surfaces. |
In reply to this post by Emil at Less EMF Inc
Some 10 years ago I bought such caps with www.priggen.com as well as with
www.marburg-technic.de Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton ----- Original Message ----- From: "lessemf.com" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 3:05 PM Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: disappointed in the cap >I have to take issue with this thread. > Let me start right off by telling you that I am the creator and > manufacturer > of the shielded cap under discussion. > > There are two analogies that I think will help readers understand what is > going on here. > Pretend that you have a new beekeeper suit. You decide to test it by > hanging > it in front of a large and active beehive. You are disappointed to find > that > despite the claims of the garment manufacturer, you still receive quite a > few nasty bee stings. > > So does the garment work or not? Well, first, you have no idea how many > bees > went THROUGH the garment, and how many simply went AROUND it. Furthermore, > you still have no idea how well the garment works when used the way it was > designed to be used. It is not the garment that is faulty, it is the test > design. The suit is not designed to be placed on the hive. It is meant to > be > worn. > > Next, assume you are inside a white room with a single incandescent light > bulb. The room is quite bright (5 bars). Now, hold a mirror (reflector) up > to one side of the light bulb. How dark is the room now? The room has not > darkened at all. All the radiation is still in the room. This is very > similar to what was done in the experiment described. > > Remember that the microwaves from a router fill the room through > reflection > off walls, floors, and most surfaces. Placing a small reflector near the > source does create a small shadow in the vicinity of the "shield", but > even > there, the light level does not go to zero, perhaps only 50% reduction. > (You > might notice that to go from 5 bars to 4 bars requires a reduction of > 10-20 > dB, depending on the equipment you are using... this corresponds to 90-99% > reduction of signal strength). > > On the other hand, if you are in that same room and your mirror is cup or > dome shaped, and you put it over your chest, how dark will it be inside > the > "cup"? With a reasonable seal around the perimeter, it will be quite dark > inside the "cup". You can test this way with the shielded cap, but you > need > a meter with an external probe that can fit inside the cap. > > > Be careful about testing shielding to make sure that your test is valid. > > > > Emil > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[hidden email]> > To: <[hidden email]> > Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 10:02 PM > Subject: [eSens] Re: disappointed in the cap > > >> Bob, don't RF waves travel in straight lines? I made sure to block >> completely the direction between the router and the laptop with the cap >> at >> the router end and also at the laptop side. >> >> Bill, I'd measure with an RF meter if I had one, but surely those bars >> count for something, a crude measure of signal strength at least. So are >> you saying the Naturashield fabric is good but even stuff like seams will >> mess it up? What is a veil-shield? >> >> My main purpose in getting the cap was to test to see how much the wi-fi >> coming down from the apartment above was affecting me. If it helped a >> lot >> then I was planning to buy more in the way of shielding the ceiling. But >> of course now the apartment below me just got wi-fi too. Just gotta move >> it seems. >> >> Thanks, >> Alexa >> >> --- In [hidden email], Bill Bruno <wbruno@...> wrote: >>> >>> 5 bars is not a good way to measure. But the cap is not very >>> good-- the fabric is good but they sewed it with seams and >>> no conductivity between the pieces. >>> >>> A large piece of veil-shield is a better way to go. Still >>> it will just reflect the signal down from the antenna. >>> Put it over the receiving computer (try to allow at >>> least an inch of spacing from wherever the receiver antenna is) >>> or put a real big piece (like at least 5' square) between the router >>> and computer. >>> >>> Bill >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:05 AM, roxalis@... < >>> roxalis@...> wrote: >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > Hi all, I ordered that baseball cap that has the shielding fabric >>> > inside of >>> > it. I hooked up my wireless router again and put the cap over the >>> > whole >>> > thing (the router is small) and it made *no difference* in the signal >>> > strength my computer picked up - five full bars. If it can't block the >>> > emitting signal at all then how's it going to block that same signal >>> > when >>> > it's on my head? Then I check the website's return policy and they >>> > only >>> > give >>> > store credit not money back :( >>> > >>> > Thoughts? >>> > >>> > Alexa >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------ >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |