WHO Says No to Stricter EMF Exposure Limts

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

WHO Says No to Stricter EMF Exposure Limts

Benson, Sarah (Sen L. Allison)
Here is an email from Microwave News re the latest on the PP at WHO.

Sarah

********************

Dear Colleague

Mike Repacholi's EMF project at the World Health Organization in Geneva
has released his long-awaited formulation on how to apply the
precautionary principle to uncertain health risks like power-frequency
EMFs and RF radiation.

In the document, Repacholi argues that new tougher exposure limits
should not be set to reduce the risk of leukemia among EMF-exposed
children. Instead he continues to advocate relying on current safety
standards, which are more than a hundredfold higher than the threshold
for an increased childhood leukemia risk found in a large number of
epidemiological studies.

I encourage you to read the complete story which is now posted on our
Web site. Simply go to http://www.microwavenews.com.


Best,
Louis Slesin, PhD

Editor
Microwave News, A Report on Non-Ionizing Radiation
155 East 77th Street
New York, NY 10021, U.S.A.
Phone: +1 (212) 517-2800; Fax: +1 (212) 734-0316
E-mail: [hidden email]
Internet: http://www.microwavenews.com


P.S. Access to the information posted on our Web site is freely
available to all. As you may imagine, it is hard to continue to provide
this service without some financial assistance. We need your support!
Please help keep one of the very few independent voices on the health
impacts of electromagnetic radiation in business. Whether large or
small, all contributions would be most welcome.


P. P.S. We hate spam, too. So, if you don't want to continue receiving
these updates, just send a message to [hidden email] and we will
remove you from our mailing list immediately

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: WHO Says No to Stricter EMF Exposure Limts

Lachlan Mudge
Wasn't Repacholi originally from Adelaide Uni? Damn him, wherever he's from...

-----Original Message-----
From: Benson, Sarah (Sen L. Allison) [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, 3 November 2004 3:44 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [eSens] WHO Says No to Stricter EMF Exposure Limts


Here is an email from Microwave News re the latest on the PP at WHO.

Sarah

********************

Dear Colleague

Mike Repacholi's EMF project at the World Health Organization in Geneva
has released his long-awaited formulation on how to apply the
precautionary principle to uncertain health risks like power-frequency
EMFs and RF radiation.

In the document, Repacholi argues that new tougher exposure limits
should not be set to reduce the risk of leukemia among EMF-exposed
children. Instead he continues to advocate relying on current safety
standards, which are more than a hundredfold higher than the threshold
for an increased childhood leukemia risk found in a large number of
epidemiological studies.

I encourage you to read the complete story which is now posted on our
Web site. Simply go to http://www.microwavenews.com.


Best,
Louis Slesin, PhD

Editor
Microwave News, A Report on Non-Ionizing Radiation
155 East 77th Street
New York, NY 10021, U.S.A.
Phone: +1 (212) 517-2800; Fax: +1 (212) 734-0316
E-mail: [hidden email]
Internet: http://www.microwavenews.com


P.S. Access to the information posted on our Web site is freely
available to all. As you may imagine, it is hard to continue to provide
this service without some financial assistance. We need your support!
Please help keep one of the very few independent voices on the health
impacts of electromagnetic radiation in business. Whether large or
small, all contributions would be most welcome.


P. P.S. We hate spam, too. So, if you don't want to continue receiving
these updates, just send a message to [hidden email] and we will
remove you from our mailing list immediately




Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: WHO Says No to Stricter EMF Exposure Limts

Benson, Sarah (Sen L. Allison)
In reply to this post by Benson, Sarah (Sen L. Allison)
Yeah, he was actaully! There's heaps of amazing stories floating around
about him....he really is rather bad, methinks.

I also read that article by Rowan Campbell yesterday, its really good,
lots of stuff I already knew - but also some I didn't. I'm planning on
cantacting him a bit later.


-----Original Message-----
From: Lachlan Mudge [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, 3 November 2004 4:19 PM
To: '[hidden email]'
Subject: RE: [eSens] WHO Says No to Stricter EMF Exposure Limts



Wasn't Repacholi originally from Adelaide Uni? Damn him, wherever he's
from...

-----Original Message-----
From: Benson, Sarah (Sen L. Allison) [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, 3 November 2004 3:44 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [eSens] WHO Says No to Stricter EMF Exposure Limts


Here is an email from Microwave News re the latest on the PP at WHO.

Sarah

********************

Dear Colleague

Mike Repacholi's EMF project at the World Health Organization in Geneva
has released his long-awaited formulation on how to apply the
precautionary principle to uncertain health risks like power-frequency
EMFs and RF radiation.

In the document, Repacholi argues that new tougher exposure limits
should not be set to reduce the risk of leukemia among EMF-exposed
children. Instead he continues to advocate relying on current safety
standards, which are more than a hundredfold higher than the threshold
for an increased childhood leukemia risk found in a large number of
epidemiological studies.

I encourage you to read the complete story which is now posted on our
Web site. Simply go to http://www.microwavenews.com.


Best,
Louis Slesin, PhD

Editor
Microwave News, A Report on Non-Ionizing Radiation
155 East 77th Street
New York, NY 10021, U.S.A.
Phone: +1 (212) 517-2800; Fax: +1 (212) 734-0316
E-mail: [hidden email]
Internet: http://www.microwavenews.com


P.S. Access to the information posted on our Web site is freely
available to all. As you may imagine, it is hard to continue to provide
this service without some financial assistance. We need your support!
Please help keep one of the very few independent voices on the health
impacts of electromagnetic radiation in business. Whether large or
small, all contributions would be most welcome.


P. P.S. We hate spam, too. So, if you don't want to continue receiving
these updates, just send a message to [hidden email] and we will
remove you from our mailing list immediately



 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: WHO Says No to Stricter EMF Exposure Limts

xmanflash2001
Hmm - here is a letter to him in a similar vein..

http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/gper241003.htm

Cheers
Pete

--- "Benson, Sarah (Sen L. Allison)"
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Yeah, he was actaully! There's heaps of amazing
> stories floating around
> about him....he really is rather bad, methinks.
>
> I also read that article by Rowan Campbell
> yesterday, its really good,
> lots of stuff I already knew - but also some I
> didn't. I'm planning on
> cantacting him a bit later.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lachlan Mudge
> [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 3 November 2004 4:19 PM
> To: '[hidden email]'
> Subject: RE: [eSens] WHO Says No to Stricter EMF
> Exposure Limts
>
>
>
> Wasn't Repacholi originally from Adelaide Uni? Damn
> him, wherever he's
> from...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson, Sarah (Sen L. Allison)
> [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 3 November 2004 3:44 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [eSens] WHO Says No to Stricter EMF
> Exposure Limts
>
>
> Here is an email from Microwave News re the latest
> on the PP at WHO.
>
> Sarah
>
> ********************
>
> Dear Colleague
>
> Mike Repacholi's EMF project at the World Health
> Organization in Geneva
> has released his long-awaited formulation on how to
> apply the
> precautionary principle to uncertain health risks
> like power-frequency
> EMFs and RF radiation.
>
> In the document, Repacholi argues that new tougher
> exposure limits
> should not be set to reduce the risk of leukemia
> among EMF-exposed
> children. Instead he continues to advocate relying
> on current safety
> standards, which are more than a hundredfold higher
> than the threshold
> for an increased childhood leukemia risk found in a
> large number of
> epidemiological studies.
>
> I encourage you to read the complete story which is
> now posted on our
> Web site. Simply go to http://www.microwavenews.com.
>
>
> Best,
> Louis Slesin, PhD
>
> Editor
> Microwave News, A Report on Non-Ionizing Radiation
> 155 East 77th Street
> New York, NY 10021, U.S.A.
> Phone: +1 (212) 517-2800; Fax: +1 (212) 734-0316
> E-mail: [hidden email]
> Internet: http://www.microwavenews.com
>
>
> P.S. Access to the information posted on our Web
> site is freely
> available to all. As you may imagine, it is hard to
> continue to provide
> this service without some financial assistance. We
> need your support!
> Please help keep one of the very few independent
> voices on the health
> impacts of electromagnetic radiation in business.
> Whether large or
> small, all contributions would be most welcome.
>
>
> P. P.S. We hate spam, too. So, if you don't want to
> continue receiving
> these updates, just send a message to
> [hidden email] and we will
> remove you from our mailing list immediately
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
http://au.movies.yahoo.com