Hi all,
I've been learning about how essential an exposure to full spectrum light is every day and have been looking for ideas to get that in my home this winter, as I live pretty far north and get very cold outside! the one I have come across is the Verilux Happy light---but it has a 26 watt fluorescant bulb and I am very Esens......has anyone tried similiar size bulbs? ny other products you may have heard of for this purpose? Thanks! Debbie |
Debbie, Fluorescent bulbs outgass Mercury! NOt a good idea. There are full spectrum bulbsthat are incandescent. Much much safer.And if a fluorescent bulb gets broken, Haz Matt clean up! Lizzie To: [hidden email] From: [hidden email] Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 20:37:09 -0400 Subject: [eSens] Verilux Happy Light fluorescant bulb Hi all, I've been learning about how essential an exposure to full spectrum light is every day and have been looking for ideas to get that in my home this winter, as I live pretty far north and get very cold outside! the one I have come across is the Verilux Happy light---but it has a 26 watt fluorescant bulb and I am very Esens......has anyone tried similiar size bulbs? ny other products you may have heard of for this purpose? Thanks! Debbie [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by debbie4god39
Hi Debbie,
Fluorescent bulbs should be avoided because of dirty electicity and mercury: http://www.magdahavas.com/category/electrosmog-exposure/lighting/ Use full-spectum LED bulbs instead. They are more expensive, but way better. Rolf On Oct 5, 2012, at 5:37 PM, [hidden email] wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been learning about how essential an exposure to full spectrum > light is every day and have been looking for ideas to get that in my > home this winter, as I live pretty far north and get very cold outside! > the one I have come across is the Verilux Happy light---but it has a > 26 watt fluorescant bulb and I am very Esens......has anyone tried > similiar size bulbs? > > ny other products you may have heard of for this purpose? Thanks! > > Debbie > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [hidden email] [hidden email] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [hidden email] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
In reply to this post by debbie4god39
hi, debbie. i'm new here but i couldn't resist
answering your question. i have been using verilux lamps for decades... longer, perhaps, as i also used to buy my own fluorescent bulbs when i worked at fortune 500 companies, because the regular bulbs drove me nuts... as do the 'new compact fluorescent bulbs'... i couldn't tolerate those things. they hurt my eyes, made it more difficult for me to see, and i had to remove them all from my home... as well as offices where i have worked. but the verilux lamps have never hurt my eyes and have only made it easier for me to see. i can work all day and night under them and feel steady, energetic, peaceful, well. now, as for the happy light - it is quite intense. it is ok when it is across a room, not aimed at your eyes, but it is very strong light and is not my idea of therapeutic. i prefer the verilux floor lamps or the desk lamps. they have always served me well. i have one on either side of me as i sit at my computer. i have used a wide variety of different bulbs over the years. these are my favorite lamps. curious, i pulled out my little EMF meter and measured the output from the lamps. less than 1mg at all points, including bulb. there may be a qualitative difference between verilux and other fluorescent bulbs i know their effect on me is vastly superior and i know they cost vastly more money... and i trust them to deliver high quality, smooth light. the cheap long or spiral bulbs seem to flicker and hum and really, truly do make me feel like i want to run out of the room. i have probably had these two lamps for 10 years and only even considered changing the bulb a few months ago... they had not malfunctioned in any way. it just seemed like it was time to do that. hmm... since you asked about the happylite, i just turned mine on and tested it with my EMF meter... not good. no wonder i don't turn it on more than once or twice a year. :) perhaps it is the ballast, but it went WAY high on my meter - which only goes to 5mg, but it maxed it out - and i am DONE with happylite. thanks for drawing my attention to it. solved a mystery about why i don't like using it. now i went to the fluorescent overhead fixture in the kitchen, here in the house where i am staying. ouch! that is NASTY! it WAY exceeds my little 5mg meter. very very nasty. thanks for the education. :) patricia On Oct 5, 2012, at 5:37 PM, [hidden email] wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been learning about how essential an exposure to full spectrum > light is every day and have been looking for ideas to get that in my > home this winter, as I live pretty far north and get very cold outside! > the one I have come across is the Verilux Happy light---but it has a > 26 watt fluorescant bulb and I am very Esens......has anyone tried > similiar size bulbs? > > ny other products you may have heard of for this purpose? Thanks! > > Debbie > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by rolf
On October 5, Rolf Muertter <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Use full-spectum LED bulbs instead. They are more expensive, but way better. Does anyone have experience here with full-spectrum LED lights? And if so, which ones, and how do you like them? Every once and awhile I check on the status of full spectrum LED lighting. It used to not exist at all, and then later it existed but was too expensive to be taken seriously. Now I see that Chromalux is selling full spectrum LED bulbs, which gets my attention since I've been using Chromalux incandescent bulbs for years: http://www.healthlighting.com/Online_Store.php?thiscat=37&=SID Still too expensive to replace all of the light bulbs in my house, but perhaps okay to buy just one bulb to test it out... :-) Marc |
Hi Marc,
Every new LED bulb I have tried, which is about half-a dozen, have been intolerable, to varying degrees. It seems all the new techniques to get brighter lights need transformers to alter the AC voltage, and few transformers are clean. But no, I have not tried That brand and model. I may yet be surprised someday. The only LEDs that I find acceptable are ones that run on 12V DC power. That way there is no transformer, and in a DC house or travel trailer, the 12V battery charger can be placed several dozen feet away. That would be the ideal setup. Stewart Marc Martin wrote: >> Use full-spectum LED bulbs instead. They are more expensive, but way better. >> > > Does anyone have experience here with full-spectrum LED lights? > And if so, which ones, and how do you like them? > |
Stewart, thanks for your experience! Are you talking about regular
lamp light bulb size or something bigger like what I posted.....I just realized I could just fill my lamps, overhead with the full spectrum....) -----Original Message----- From: S Andreason <[hidden email]> To: eSens <[hidden email]> Sent: Sat, Oct 6, 2012 1:31 pm Subject: Re: [eSens] Full Spectrum LED lights Hi Marc, Every new LED bulb I have tried, which is about half-a dozen, have been intolerable, to varying degrees. It seems all the new techniques to get brighter lights need transformers to alter the AC voltage, and few transformers are clean. But no, I have not tried That brand and model. I may yet be surprised someday. The only LEDs that I find acceptable are ones that run on 12V DC power. That way there is no transformer, and in a DC house or travel trailer, the 12V battery charger can be placed several dozen feet away. That would be the ideal setup. Stewart Marc Martin wrote: >> Use full-spectum LED bulbs instead. They are more expensive, but way better. >> > > Does anyone have experience here with full-spectrum LED lights? > And if so, which ones, and how do you like them? > |
In reply to this post by S Andreason
i too cannot tolerate LED lightbulbs.
i took them all out of this place when i moved in. incandescents replaced them. On Oct 6, 2012, at 10:30 AM, S Andreason wrote: > Hi Marc, > > Every new LED bulb I have tried, which is about half-a dozen, have been > intolerable, to varying degrees. > It seems all the new techniques to get brighter lights need transformers > to alter the AC voltage, and few transformers are clean. > > But no, I have not tried That brand and model. I may yet be surprised > someday. > > The only LEDs that I find acceptable are ones that run on 12V DC power. > That way there is no transformer, and in a DC house or travel trailer, > the 12V battery charger can be placed several dozen feet away. That > would be the ideal setup. > > Stewart > > > Marc Martin wrote: >>> Use full-spectum LED bulbs instead. They are more expensive, but way better. >>> >> >> Does anyone have experience here with full-spectrum LED lights? >> And if so, which ones, and how do you like them? >> > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > |
Stewart, do you mean that the regular size light bulbs you put in lamps
that are LED all need transformers and you react to those kind? thanks, just want to clarify, i have to go to the store soon and have to decide... -----Original Message----- From: Auntie Patricia <[hidden email]> To: eSens <[hidden email]> Sent: Sat, Oct 6, 2012 4:43 pm Subject: Re: [eSens] Full Spectrum LED lights i too cannot tolerate LED lightbulbs. i took them all out of this place when i moved in. incandescents replaced them. On Oct 6, 2012, at 10:30 AM, S Andreason wrote: > Hi Marc, > > Every new LED bulb I have tried, which is about half-a dozen, have been > intolerable, to varying degrees. > It seems all the new techniques to get brighter lights need transformers > to alter the AC voltage, and few transformers are clean. > > But no, I have not tried That brand and model. I may yet be surprised > someday. > > The only LEDs that I find acceptable are ones that run on 12V DC power. > That way there is no transformer, and in a DC house or travel trailer, > the 12V battery charger can be placed several dozen feet away. That > would be the ideal setup. > > Stewart > > > Marc Martin wrote: >>> Use full-spectum LED bulbs instead. They are more expensive, but way better. >>> >> >> Does anyone have experience here with full-spectrum LED lights? >> And if so, which ones, and how do you like them? >> > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > |
Hi Debbie,
Sorry I was not faster. They all need _something_ to convert the 120V alternating current to 5V or 12V Direct current. The 1st generation led from 2006 is quiet, but brightness is more like a night light. I think because the current draw in milliamps is so little, these bulbs could get away with simple circuits without a "transformer." http://seahorseCorral.org/images/emf/20090107_led_bulb_meters_1931-800.jpg Yes I react to transformers due to RF emissions, or what I perceive as a high pitched whine. Usually the same as dirty electricity, where the AC sine wave gets chopped up into square waves, creating spikes on the wires. In this case, I only see a spike on the GS meter when turned on, then nothing, for the newer lights below. The few newer lights I have tested: http://seahorseCorral.org/images/emf/light-E27-60LED2-2W-800Lm-wide.jpg http://seahorseCorral.org/images/emf/light-E27-60LED2-3W-globe.jpg http://seahorseCorral.org/images/emf/light-E27-108LED3-7W-cylinder.jpg http://seahorseCorral.org/images/emf/light-E27-44SMD-8W-2420Lm-cylinder.jpg None of these I can tolerate. The SMD or 4th generation LED is okay if I am not in the same room. The LED2nd generation measured 4 milliGauss up close, and the cylinders were less, 0.7 mG. None show up on the Zap Checker, and there is a slight buzz on the Acoustimeter. Very short range. I am lumping them all together because they just don't show up on my meters. I can't really explain why I can't tolerate their silent whine. I do know they are a Lot better than the curley-florescent-energy-saving-nightmare-bulbs.!! So to be fair, it is a step in the right direction, away from the florescent kinds being promoted as green. But to be completely quiet, only incandescent bulbs are symptom free. Stewart [hidden email] wrote: > Stewart, do you mean that the regular size light bulbs you put in lamps > that are LED all need transformers and you react to those kind? > thanks, just want to clarify, i have to go to the store soon and have > to decide... > |
Test them with the AM radio. Yes some of the early ones had simple full
wave rectifiers and enough led's in series so the voltage didn't need to change. But LED's are not very bright and don't age that well in that situation... With the rectifiers you still get strong harmonics but that's a lot better than PWM or SMPS. Actual DC with a linear power supply would be best. On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 8:14 PM, S Andreason <[hidden email]> wrote: > ** > > > Hi Debbie, > Sorry I was not faster. > > They all need _something_ to convert the 120V alternating current to 5V > or 12V Direct current. > > The 1st generation led from 2006 is quiet, but brightness is more like a > night light. I think because the current draw in milliamps is so little, > these bulbs could get away with simple circuits without a "transformer." > http://seahorseCorral.org/images/emf/20090107_led_bulb_meters_1931-800.jpg > > Yes I react to transformers due to RF emissions, or what I perceive as a > high pitched whine. Usually the same as dirty electricity, where the AC > sine wave gets chopped up into square waves, creating spikes on the wires. > In this case, I only see a spike on the GS meter when turned on, then > nothing, for the newer lights below. > > The few newer lights I have tested: > http://seahorseCorral.org/images/emf/light-E27-60LED2-2W-800Lm-wide.jpg > http://seahorseCorral.org/images/emf/light-E27-60LED2-3W-globe.jpg > http://seahorseCorral.org/images/emf/light-E27-108LED3-7W-cylinder.jpg > http://seahorseCorral.org/images/emf/light-E27-44SMD-8W-2420Lm-cylinder.jpg > > None of these I can tolerate. The SMD or 4th generation LED is okay if I > am not in the same room. > The LED2nd generation measured 4 milliGauss up close, and the cylinders > were less, 0.7 mG. > None show up on the Zap Checker, and there is a slight buzz on the > Acoustimeter. Very short range. I am lumping them all together because > they just don't show up on my meters. I can't really explain why I can't > tolerate their silent whine. > > I do know they are a Lot better than the > curley-florescent-energy-saving-nightmare-bulbs.!! So to be fair, it is > a step in the right direction, away from the florescent kinds being > promoted as green. But to be completely quiet, only incandescent bulbs > are symptom free. > > Stewart > > > [hidden email] wrote: > > Stewart, do you mean that the regular size light bulbs you put in lamps > > that are LED all need transformers and you react to those kind? > > thanks, just want to clarify, i have to go to the store soon and have > > to decide... > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [hidden email] [hidden email] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [hidden email] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |