This is their intro to the article: "No need for your tinfoil hat here - It is a sensitive issue that is not taken seriously in America. Does Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity exist? A town without wifi or cellphones is attracting the electrosensitive" and here's the article link: http://www.treehugger.com/health/town-without-wifi-or-cellphones-attracting-electrosensitive.html I posted on the comments for this site 15 hours ago as a rebuttal to all the comments negating ES as a valid condition. I included some of my personal experience and also multiple links from scientists, including the Bioinitiave.org link. Treehugger never posted my comment. IMO this article is slanted and attempts to marginalize those with ES symptoms and the whole spectrum of EMF issues. Though am somewhat surprised my comment not posted, am not entirely, as Treehugger is pro-Agenda 21 and CFL's, smartgrid, etc. Please feel free to add your own comments to the article. I believe we all must pursue getting our voices heard. "First they ignore you, then they mock you, then they fight you, then you win." M. Gandhi |
Oh, and here are some titles of the related articles on Treehugger:
Safety Shorts Protect Your Privates From The Perils of EMF Radiation Wi-Fi in Schools: Should We Apply the Precautionary Principle? Are Your Mattress And Bedframe Killing You With EMF? Should Cell Phone Towers Be Put on Residential Buildings? Renee --- In [hidden email], "iamhamsa" <iamhamsa@...> wrote: > > > This is their intro to the article: > "No need for your tinfoil hat here - > It is a sensitive issue that is not taken seriously in America. Does Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity exist? A town without wifi or cellphones is attracting the electrosensitive" > and here's the article link: > http://www.treehugger.com/health/town-without-wifi-or-cellphones-attracting-electrosensitive.html > I posted on the comments for this site 15 hours ago as a rebuttal to all the comments negating ES as a valid condition. I included some of my personal experience and also multiple links from scientists, including the Bioinitiave.org link. Treehugger never posted my comment. IMO this article is slanted and attempts to marginalize those with ES symptoms and the whole spectrum of EMF issues. > Though am somewhat surprised my comment not posted, am not entirely, as Treehugger is pro-Agenda 21 and CFL's, smartgrid, etc. > Please feel free to add your own comments to the article. I believe we all must pursue getting our voices heard. > "First they ignore you, then they mock you, then they fight you, then you win." M. Gandhi > |
In reply to this post by Eleccor
I agree with you. I also posted there 2 times --one with links to other places in the US, Canada, France and one in Italy that are refuges for those avoiding EMF. And the other post with links to over 2,000 studies from a report by the US Navy showing over 122 different biological effects, as well as a couple of studies showing different mechanisms that cause harm, and 2 studies that show that chemicals increase the damaging effects of RF Microwave Radiation, plus a link to a bunch of articles called Late Lessons from Early Warnings. They did not post either email .
blessings Shan --- In [hidden email], "iamhamsa" <iamhamsa@...> wrote: > > > This is their intro to the article: > "No need for your tinfoil hat here - > It is a sensitive issue that is not taken seriously in America. Does Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity exist? A town without wifi or cellphones is attracting the electrosensitive" > and here's the article link: > http://www.treehugger.com/health/town-without-wifi-or-cellphones-attracting-electrosensitive.html > I posted on the comments for this site 15 hours ago as a rebuttal to all the comments negating ES as a valid condition. I included some of my personal experience and also multiple links from scientists, including the Bioinitiave.org link. Treehugger never posted my comment. IMO this article is slanted and attempts to marginalize those with ES symptoms and the whole spectrum of EMF issues. > Though am somewhat surprised my comment not posted, am not entirely, as Treehugger is pro-Agenda 21 and CFL's, smartgrid, etc. > Please feel free to add your own comments to the article. I believe we all must pursue getting our voices heard. > "First they ignore you, then they mock you, then they fight you, then you win." M. Gandhi > |
Administrator
|
On April 18, bestsurprise2 <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I agree with you. I also posted there 2 times. They did not post either email . Ahh, so the comments are rigged -- I won't feel so bad then about the overwhelming anti-ES comments I see after some of these articles. Interestingly, in all of the years I have maintained this "eSens" group, I cannot recall ANYONE ever joining this group to tell us all that ES does not exist and that we are all nuts. I'd probably not allow those posts anyway, but I find it interesting that nobody has even tried. Marc |
In reply to this post by Eleccor
yes, it's sad, but some of the organizations that
sound like the most 'green' are actually pushing the corporate agenda. :( it's sad. it's hard to know which ones we can trust. patricia Begin forwarded message: > This is their intro to the article: > "No need for your tinfoil hat here - > It is a sensitive issue that is not taken seriously in America. Does Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity exist? A town without wifi or cellphones is attracting the electrosensitive" > and here's the article link: > http://www.treehugger.com/health/town-without-wifi-or-cellphones-attracting-electrosensitive.html > I posted on the comments for this site 15 hours ago as a rebuttal to all the comments negating ES as a valid condition. I included some of my personal experience and also multiple links from scientists, including the Bioinitiave.org link. Treehugger never posted my comment. IMO this article is slanted and attempts to marginalize those with ES symptoms and the whole spectrum of EMF issues. > Though am somewhat surprised my comment not posted, am not entirely, as Treehugger is pro-Agenda 21 and CFL's, smartgrid, etc. > Please feel free to add your own comments to the article. I believe we all must pursue getting our voices heard. > "First they ignore you, then they mock you, then they fight you, then you win." M. Gandhi [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
On April 18, Patricia Robinett <[hidden email]> wrote:
> yes, it's sad, but some of the organizations that > sound like the most 'green' are actually pushing > the corporate agenda. And unfortunately, from an energy consumption standpoint, being "green" seems to also equate with harmful RF. I know that we've had people here who cannot tolerate their energy-efficient lighting, refrigerators, etc., while they tolerate the old-fashioned equivalents just fine. Marc |
In reply to this post by Eleccor
Well, I haven't read the article, but is it possible that "tree hugger" is a euphemism for ecological destruction, like "war is peace" or "free society." Or, I'm not familiar with them, but I did hear that the "occupied movement" had been co-opted as well as the "tea party" movement. Movements have been infiltrated in this country as long as there has been a country. Ever hear of "black-ops." Many issues that people have been made to believe have come through disinformation including the "real agendas" of statesmen, clergy and corporations. Read Orwell's 1984 language is the perfect medium for brainwashing. Peace.
________________________________ From: iamhamsa <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 3:39 PM Subject: [eSens] "Tinfoil hat not required" This is their intro to the article: "No need for your tinfoil hat here - It is a sensitive issue that is not taken seriously in America. Does Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity exist? A town without wifi or cellphones is attracting the electrosensitive" and here's the article link: http://www.treehugger.com/health/town-without-wifi-or-cellphones-attracting-electrosensitive.html I posted on the comments for this site 15 hours ago as a rebuttal to all the comments negating ES as a valid condition. I included some of my personal experience and also multiple links from scientists, including the Bioinitiave.org link. Treehugger never posted my comment. IMO this article is slanted and attempts to marginalize those with ES symptoms and the whole spectrum of EMF issues. Though am somewhat surprised my comment not posted, am not entirely, as Treehugger is pro-Agenda 21 and CFL's, smartgrid, etc. Please feel free to add your own comments to the article. I believe we all must pursue getting our voices heard. "First they ignore you, then they mock you, then they fight you, then you win." M. Gandhi [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |