I found this very interesting page about the charges in our bodies,
and outside influences. Longer read, but worth it I think. I've had a UVA bulb shining on and between me and the pc for quite some time now, and find it makes a huge difference in comfort level. That's beside the radiation screens and such. http://www.syntonicphototherapy.com/online/page.cfm? Directory=42&SubPage=43 ~ Snoshoe |
Administrator
|
> I've had a UVA bulb shining on and between me and the pc for quite some
> time now, and find it makes a huge difference in comfort level. That's > beside the radiation screens and such. A UVA bulb? Do you have a link, or a product/manufacturer name? Marc |
In reply to this post by Snoshoe
Thanks Snoshoe,
that is indeed very interesting. Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton Antivirus ----- Original Message ----- From: "snoshoe_2" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 22:44 Subject: [eSens] The Leak in Potential > I found this very interesting page about the charges in our bodies, > and outside influences. Longer read, but worth it I think. > > I've had a UVA bulb shining on and between me and the pc for quite some > time now, and find it makes a huge difference in comfort level. That's > beside the radiation screens and such. > > http://www.syntonicphototherapy.com/online/page.cfm? > Directory=42&SubPage=43 > > ~ Snoshoe > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
I don't know offhand what all links I'd originally read about UVA and
UVB, it's been quite a while now. The UVA I have is 100w incandescant, It says on the box label: EXO TERRA, Sun Glo Neodymium Daylight Lamp. You can find them in the reptile sections of petstores. I also have a UVB by Zoo Med, that is a 75W incandescant. I find the A more beneficial by the pc to use on a regular basis. The A for "treatment" for short periods, it will tend to keep you awake when you should be winding down towards the end of the day. I have tried in a ceiling fixture and had it on just as regular day lighting, and liked that fine too, but by pc it made me uncomfortable. (First few times I used it up close for like 5 min., it made me uncomfortable as well, but I suspect it was "doing it's thing", like the blue lighting in the article. UVB is the tanning one, but I doubt tmuch is available through this, being it is meant for the "mental and emotional wellbeing of your reptile pets", haha. That is what I recall reading for information about them, googling under their necessity for indoor pets. I did read somewhere using an fir light between the pc and oneself will transmute much of the energy frequencies to fir as well, and that, that wavelength is the best to use for changing other frequencies. I like sleeping with one over me at times, or over my lower legs anyhow. ~ Snoshoe --- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote: > > > I've had a UVA bulb shining on and between me and the pc for quite some > > time now, and find it makes a huge difference in comfort level. That's > > beside the radiation screens and such. > > A UVA bulb? Do you have a link, or a product/manufacturer name? > > Marc > |
Administrator
|
> The UVA I have is 100w incandescant, It says on the box label: EXO
> TERRA, Sun Glo Neodymium Daylight Lamp. You can find them in the > reptile sections of petstores. Thanks, I found various references to this light on the Internet, for example: http://exo-terra.com/EN/products/sun_glo_neodymium_i.html I'm wondering if these are any different than the "full spectrum" neodymium incandescent lights found in health food stores? It seems that both use neodymium, but perhaps there is something different that allows one to produce UVA and one not? Note that Chromalux makes a wide range of "full spectrum" incandescents, and they also sell a "pet light". I liked the size and wattage of the pet light better than their regular lights, so most of the lights in our house are currently pet lights!! I called up the company to make sure that these were the same technology as their normal bulbs, and the person I spoke to said that they were. Interesting... I suppose if there is ban on incandescent lights, one could alway see if pet lights are still being sold! Marc |
If incandescents are banned, what about LED lights? They are even more
energy efficient than CFLs. Dr. Havas thinks LEDs are the way of the future. Regards, Shivani www.LifeEnergies.com ************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
> If incandescents are banned, what about LED lights? They are even
> more energy efficient than CFLs. Nobody has announced any plans to ban LED lights. Nor would they, as they are more efficient than incandescents. So far, very few LED lights have been shown to be more efficient than compact florescents (in terms of lumens per watt). However, LEDs are currently in the midst of rapid improvement, and certainly they will be much more efficient in the future. > Dr. Havas thinks LEDs are the way of the future. I think so too... but for now, they are simply too expensive and too dim to rush out and replace all of the lights in your house. Marc |
In reply to this post by SArjuna
Do LEDs basically have 0 rf associated with them?
On 3/14/07, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote: > > If incandescents are banned, what about LED lights? They are even more > energy efficient than CFLs. > > Dr. Havas thinks LEDs are the way of the future. > > Regards, > Shivani > www.LifeEnergies.com > > ************************************** > AOL now > offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at > > http://www.aol.com. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > -- Paul Coffman [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Hi Paul,
Look through the archives of this group, from Feb.12 to Feb.18. The summary version is, yes, LEDs are emission free. But some of the newer designs with Brighter LEDs or "white colored LEDs" or "LED drivers" may not. The basic design of an LED does not need a transformer. But some engineers seem to think they need one! Stewart Paul Coffman wrote: > Do LEDs basically have 0 rf associated with them? > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |