Hello,
this is only part of information, given by Andrew Goldsworthy, in the bioelectromagnetics group of Yahoo.. The other preceding part is: ************ Hi All, It has been known for over 30 years that weak electromagnetic fields remove calcium ions from the cell surfaces of brain tissue. We also know that the loss of bound calcium weakens cell membranes and would be expected to increase their tendency to form transient pores under natural mechanical stresses (they are only 10nm thick!). We might expect a similar loss if the tissue were to be exposed to a lower than normal level of calcium in the surrounding medium. This is exactly what happens to victims of hypocalcemia, where the blood contains a subnormal level of ionised calcium. Symptoms of hypocalcemia include skin disorders, paresthesias (pins and needles, numbness, sensations of burning etc.) fatigue, muscle cramps, cardiac arrhythmia, gastro-intestinal problems and many others. A more comprehensive list can be found at http://tinyurl.com/2dwwps , which corresponds to the website: - http://www.endotext.org/parathyroid/parathyroid7/parathyroid7.htm. The symptoms of hypocalcemia are remarkably similar to those of electrosensitivity and may have a similar origin. In either case, neurones, whose membranes have been weakened by calcium loss would be expected to generate spurious action potentials since the resulting unprogrammed entry of free calcium would trigger neurotransmitter release. This could then result in the range or neurological symptoms experienced by victims of both electrosensitivity and hypocalcemia. Is it possible that at least some forms of electrosensitivity could be due to the victims having low levels of ionised calcium in their blood that border on hypocalcemia? Electromagnetic exposure would then remove even more calcium from their cell membranes to push them over the edge and give hypocalcemia symptoms. If this is correct, conventional treatment for hypocalcemia (which is usually caused by a hormone imbalance) may relieve some if not all of these symptoms. I have uploaded a file that explains some of the background to this and also to other related issues. Click on "files" on the left hand side of the screen and navigate to "Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields 2007. pdf". If you think anyone else may be interested, please feel free tp copy it and pass it on. Best wishes Andrew ************ So, accordingly, the symptoms of electrosensibility and hypocalcemia can be seen as similar. It is probably advisable to contact you physician for a treatment of hypocalcemia if you are ES. I asked Han Stiekema M.D. about it, and he responded, that the normal calcium carbonate is not good, because the body does not absorb it enough. The best is calcium chloride 10 %, two spoons a day, but the pharmacies do not like to fabricate that. Than there is the available calcium citrate. (But the treatment is complex and concerns also eating habits.) In my opinion, Andrew Goldsworthy is one of the key persons, who may come with a solution for ES. He has published enormously. I published some of his postings in *het bitje* english issues October and December 2006. http://www.hetbitje.nl/bitjeE2610f.pdf http://www.hetbitje.nl/bitjeE2612g.pdf There one may read that they unraveled 90 % of the working mechanism of ES. Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton Antivirus ----- Original Message ----- From: "Redaktion Buergerwelle e.V. (BI Omega-CI Omega)" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 09:12 Subject: [eSens] The Biological Effects of Weak Electromagnetic Fields > The Biological Effects of Weak Electromagnetic Fields > http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3552381/ > > |
In reply to this post by Redaktion Buergerwelle e.V. (BI Omega-CI Omega)
This is an intriguing paper, and the theory about Ca++ is
logical. Besides: - my red blood cell test from 'Doctors Data' showed very low Ca++. - I've experienced higher incidences of "pins and needles". - experienced terrible muscle pain after consuming valarian root. - feeling somewhat better these days. Been taking antacids containing Calcium Carbonate. Other things that make me feel better: -hard, steady exercise -sauna every day -Chlorella -milk thistle -CoQ10 -Lecithin -B-12 injections -use a low emission computer/LED backlight monitor, and general avoidance of EMF. One more thing. The theory proposed in this paper disproves those who insist that low frequency EMF is not harmfull. Eli |
hi
where did you get the led backlight monitor On 11 Apr 2007, at 21:15, jaime_schunkewitz wrote: > This is an intriguing paper, and the theory about Ca++ is > logical. > > Besides: > > - my red blood cell test from 'Doctors Data' showed very low Ca++. > > - I've experienced higher incidences of "pins and needles". > > - experienced terrible muscle pain after consuming valarian root. > > - feeling somewhat better these days. Been taking antacids containing > Calcium Carbonate. > > Other things that make me feel better: > -hard, steady exercise > -sauna every day > -Chlorella > -milk thistle > -CoQ10 > -Lecithin > -B-12 injections > -use a low emission computer/LED backlight monitor, and general > avoidance of EMF. > > One more thing. The theory proposed in this paper disproves > those who insist that low frequency EMF is not harmfull. > > Eli > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
> where did you get the led backlight monitor
heh, heh... I think he made it himself! LED backlight monitors are pretty rare, but should become more popular in the next few years. The cheapest one I know about is the Samsung XL20, which retails for US$2000. Probably next year you'll be able to find something for $1000, and the year after that $500. Marc |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by jaime_schunkewitz
> Other things that make me feel better:
> -Chlorella If chlorella makes you feel better, I'm interested in knowing what brand you are taking and what your dosage is. Chlorella often makes people feel worse! Marc |
--- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@...> wrote:
> > > Other things that make me feel better: > > -Chlorella > > If chlorella makes you feel better, I'm interested > in knowing what brand you are taking and what your > dosage is. > > Chlorella often makes people feel worse! > > Marc > Right now I'm taking SUN Chlorella "A". Can't recall the brand prior to using this package. What I do is pop 12 or so 200 mg tablets of Chlorella and two capsules of milk thistle 15 minutes before going into the Finnish sauna. Then slowly swill down a crap load of Poland Spring water. Then sweat my butt off for 30 to 40 minutes. The trick is to heat the sauna up before going in, then shut down the heater. I tried thysilyn but it didn't agree with me. Eli |
In reply to this post by pete robinson
--- In [hidden email], pete robinson <robbo@...> wrote:
> > hi > where did you get the led backlight monitor > On 11 Apr 2007, at 21:15, jaime_schunkewitz wrote: Built it myself. It's a Samsung LCD monitor with an LED backlight, and a remote power supply. Standard LCD monitors literally burn me up. Here are a few picks: http://www.ahappyhabitat.com/LEDMON.JPG http://www.ahappyhabitat.com/100_0482.JPG |
In reply to this post by Redaktion Buergerwelle e.V. (BI Omega-CI Omega)
In a message dated 4/12/2007 3:29:24 AM GMT Standard Time, [hidden email] writes: > where did you get the led backlight monitor > On 11 Apr 2007, at 21:15, jaime_schunkewitz wrote: Built it myself. It's a Samsung LCD monitor with an LED backlight, and a remote power supply. Standard LCD monitors literally burn me up. Here are a few picks: _http://www.ahappyhahttp://wwwhttp://www_ (http://www.ahappyhabitat.com/LEDMON.JPG) _http://www.ahappyhahttp://wwwhttp://wwhtt_ (http://www.ahappyhabitat.com/100_0482.JPG) PAULUK REPLIES - Have you ever established exactly what/why the lcd screen burns you up is it the cold cathode lights hence replacing them with LEDS. Also how simple is that/how many leds did you use etc ? thanks Paul [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Redaktion Buergerwelle e.V. (BI Omega-CI Omega)
In a message dated 4/12/2007 5:36:53 PM GMT Standard Time, [hidden email] writes: It takes a good amount of skill, care and trial and error. The most time consuming part was designing the power supply for the LEDs, and filtering the crappy LCD power supply. Using a soldering iron, working near the electronics was hell for this ES sufferer. But it was worth it! Eli I am no electronics expert but I can apply a little noodle to things, could I easily extract the power supply board from the monitor casing and attch it to sheilded cables and then site this a couple of meters from the monitor. Funnilly enough I get a problem from digital free view settop boxes fo the TV, crappy components I suppose giving off rf etc.. ? Thanks Paul UK [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by PUK
> PAULUK REPLIES - Have you ever established exactly what/why the lcd screen > burns you up is it the cold cathode lights hence replacing them with LEDS. > Also how simple is that/how many leds did you use etc ? > > thanks > > Paul > > Replacing the fluorescent tubes with LEDs only marginally relieved my ES symptoms (chest pains/ tinnitus/tremors). It's essential to remove the power supply board from the LCD case and get it far away. Shielding components is also vital. So don't count on commercial LED/LCDs to provide much relief. The project required a good amount of skill, care and trial and error. The most time consuming part was designing the power supply for the LEDs, and filtering the crappy LCD power supply. Using a soldering iron, working near the electronics was hell for this ES sufferer. But it was well worth it! Eli www.ahappyhabitat.com |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Redaktion Buergerwelle e.V. (BI Omega-CI Omega)
> So don't count on commercial LED/LCDs to provide much relief.
Yeah, especially since the Samsung XL20 has the AC power plugged straight into the back of the monitor, which means it has an AC-DC transformer built into the panel (ouch!). I suspect that the best solution with LCD monitors is to push them as far away from you as possible. You may need to look for a larger sized screens and lower pixel counts so that you can see them from a distance (most of my coworkers seem to have their faces within a foot of their hi-rez LCD monitor, while my low-rez CRT monitor is 3+ feet away!) Marc |
In reply to this post by Redaktion Buergerwelle e.V. (BI Omega-CI Omega)
In a message dated 4/12/2007 5:53:47 PM GMT Standard Time, [hidden email] writes: I suspect that the best solution with LCD monitors is to push them as far away from you as possible. You may need to look for a larger sized screens and lower pixel counts so that you can see them from a distance (most of my coworkers seem to have their faces within a foot of their hi-rez LCD monitor, while my low-rez CRT monitor is 3+ feet away!) Marc KNOWLEDGE IS POWER ! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by PUK
--- In [hidden email], paulpjc@... wrote:
> > > In a message dated 4/12/2007 5:36:53 PM GMT Standard Time, > jaime_schunkewitz@... writes: > > It takes a good amount of skill, care and trial and error. > The most time consuming part was designing the power supply > for the LEDs, and filtering the crappy LCD power supply. > Using a soldering iron, working near the electronics was > hell for this ES sufferer. But it was worth it! > > Eli > > > > I am no electronics expert but I can apply a little noodle to > I easily extract the power supply board from the monitor casing and attch it > to sheilded cables and then site this a couple of meters from the monitor. > Funnilly enough I get a problem from digital free view settop boxes fo the TV, > crappy components I suppose giving off rf etc.. ? > > Thanks > > Paul UK > Not a chance with the 2,000 volts supplied to the fluorescent tubes! I found that out the hard way. That's why the low voltage LEDs are part of the solution. Besides, the pure white light looks great. I get a bad reaction to cable boxes and TVs (tinnitus) even when they're switched off. Keep those buggers unplugged when not in use. Crappy components indeed. What I really need to do is replace the crappy LCD power supply all together. Look at the supposed DC supply signals on a scope. They have 250 mv spikes that'll make you ill just looking at them. Whereas my LED power supply has only 5 mv ripples. Eli |
In reply to this post by Redaktion Buergerwelle e.V. (BI Omega-CI Omega)
In a message dated 4/12/2007 6:55:26 PM GMT Standard Time, [hidden email] writes: Not a chance with the 2,000 volts supplied to the fluorescent tubes! I found that out the hard way. That's why the low voltage LEDs are part of the solution. Besides, the pure white light looks great. I get a bad reaction to cable boxes and TVs (tinnitus) even when they're switched off. Keep those buggers unplugged when not in use. Crappy components indeed. What I really need to do is replace the crappy LCD power supply all together. Look at the supposed DC supply signals on a scope. They have 250 mv spikes that'll make you ill just looking at them. Whereas my LED power supply has only 5 mv ripples. Eli pAUL UK REPLIES Wow thats alot of volts, I too get increased tinitus when using the LCD amoungst other things. I remember a post here where it was reported about TV/RADIO broadcast workers working near FM/TV transmitters, they got hearing impairments many at 4000hz, my records show that I have this at same frequency !! spooky, but not as spooky as when you put up survival blankets over windows to block out your neighbours dect and you keep on seeing imgaes trapped in the semi seethrough silver, the other day I was in the bath and swore I could see Jesus so I have taken a photo call me mad if you like but its quite facinating/amusing, best wishes Paul [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by jaime_schunkewitz
> Crappy components indeed. What I really need to do is
> replace the crappy LCD power supply all together. Look > at the supposed DC supply signals on a scope. They have > 250 mv spikes that'll make you ill just looking at them. > Whereas my LED power supply has only 5 mv ripples. Maybe we could encourage one of the more obscure computer manufacturers to build something with a quality power supply, shield noisy components, etc. I know that there are a few unique "green" computer manufacturers out there... ...for example, this one sells computers right along side EMF protection devices: http://greenmachineshop.com/ And this one make "biodegradable" computers (!): http://www.iameco.com/ Marc |
In reply to this post by Redaktion Buergerwelle e.V. (BI Omega-CI Omega)
I've printed this out to read it properly at home. I take a Calcium Citrate supplement intermittently (Solgar), and Vitamin D, Magnesium, etc.., etc.. Haven't found it to be any kind of a wondercure. But am I absorbing it? that's the question. And then there's issues, isn't there, with whether - even if you're blood levels are OK - you're body is actually utilizing it. God i wish i could afford comprehensive monthly full vit and mineral tests. I haven't the faintest idea what any of my levels are. I just take a bit of this that or the other every week or so in order to prevent potential full-on deficiency. Very scientific, i know. I shall go and bother my GP again though for this calcium test, who i have no doubt believes i am a hypochondriac. --- In [hidden email], "Redaktion Buergerwelle e.V. (BI Omega- CI Omega)" <star.mail@...> wrote: > > The Biological Effects of Weak Electromagnetic Fields > http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3552381/ > |
--- In [hidden email], "canaryyuk" <asurisuk@...> wrote:
> > > I've printed this out to read it properly at home. I take a Calcium > Citrate supplement intermittently (Solgar), and Vitamin D, > Magnesium, etc.., etc.. Haven't found it to be any kind of a > wondercure. But am I absorbing it? that's the question. And then > there's issues, isn't there, with whether - even if you're blood > levels are OK - you're body is actually utilizing it. God i wish i > could afford comprehensive monthly full vit and mineral tests. I > haven't the faintest idea what any of my levels are. I just take a > bit of this that or the other every week or so in order to prevent > potential full-on deficiency. Very scientific, i know. I shall go > and bother my GP again though for this calcium test, who i have no > doubt believes i am a hypochondriac. > > --- In [hidden email], "Redaktion Buergerwelle e.V. (BI Omega- > CI Omega)" <star.mail@> wrote: > > > > The Biological Effects of Weak Electromagnetic Fields > > http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3552381/ > > > A while ago, to the suggestion of Dr. Rea, I took a packed red blood cell elements test by 'Doctor's Data'. The results indicated very low levels of calcium, yet another test showed that calcium levels in my serum were normal. Since I couldn't afford a trip to Dallas the red blood cell test has gone undiagnosed. Several local MDs saw the results but never raised a flag since the RBC cell test is "unconventional". In retrospect Dr. Rea may have hit the nail on the head when he suggested the red blood cell test, especially in light of this theory about calcium getting booted off the cell membrane by EMF. Of course due to the lack of good MDs and general lame medical system in the U.S. I must fend for myself in the analysis. For now I'm taking Ca supplements in liquid form. The analysis that came with the 'Doctor's Data' results say: "A finding of subnormal unwashed packed blood cell Ca is consistent with cell fragility, fatty acid abnormalities in the plasma membrane of erythrocytes. Exposure to toxic chemicals may lessen cell ability to bind to Ca. Calcium deficiency or vitamin D deficiency may also feature low packed cell Ca, but low packed cell Ca is more likely to be related to cell membrane problems or cell structure." Any ES sufferers willing to take the same test to compare results? Eli |
I will take the test if you send information on it to me. I have
been cautiously reading the posts and believe I am also calcium deficient. Peg --- In [hidden email], "jaime_schunkewitz" <jaime_schunkewitz@...> wrote: > > --- In [hidden email], "canaryyuk" <asurisuk@> wrote: > > > > > > I've printed this out to read it properly at home. I take a Calcium > > Citrate supplement intermittently (Solgar), and Vitamin D, > > Magnesium, etc.., etc.. Haven't found it to be any kind of a > > wondercure. But am I absorbing it? that's the question. And then > > there's issues, isn't there, with whether - even if you're blood > > levels are OK - you're body is actually utilizing it. God i wish i > > could afford comprehensive monthly full vit and mineral tests. I > > haven't the faintest idea what any of my levels are. I just take a > > bit of this that or the other every week or so in order to prevent > > potential full-on deficiency. Very scientific, i know. I shall go > > and bother my GP again though for this calcium test, who i have no > > doubt believes i am a hypochondriac. > > > > --- In [hidden email], "Redaktion Buergerwelle e.V. (BI Omega- > > CI Omega)" <star.mail@> wrote: > > > > > > The Biological Effects of Weak Electromagnetic Fields > > > http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3552381/ > > > > > > > A while ago, to the suggestion of Dr. Rea, I took > a packed red blood cell elements test by 'Doctor's Data'. > The results indicated very low levels of calcium, yet > another test showed that calcium levels in my serum were > normal. > > Since I couldn't afford a trip to Dallas the red > blood cell test has gone undiagnosed. Several local > MDs saw the results but never raised a flag since > the RBC cell test is "unconventional". > > In retrospect Dr. Rea may have hit the nail on > the head when he suggested the red blood cell > test, especially in light of this theory about > calcium getting booted off the cell membrane > by EMF. > > Of course due to the lack of good MDs and general > lame medical system in the U.S. I must fend > for myself in the analysis. For now I'm taking > Ca supplements in liquid form. > > The analysis that came with the 'Doctor's Data' > results say: > > "A finding of subnormal unwashed packed blood cell > Ca is consistent with cell fragility, fatty acid > abnormalities in the plasma membrane of erythrocytes. > Exposure to toxic chemicals may lessen cell > ability to bind to Ca. Calcium deficiency or vitamin D > deficiency may also feature low packed cell Ca, > but low packed cell Ca is more likely to be related to > cell membrane problems or cell structure." > > Any ES sufferers willing to take the same test > to compare results? > > Eli > |
In reply to this post by asurisuk
We're convinced that gut absorption problems have a major part in many ME,
MCS and ES type problems. There can be more than one cause - leaky gut and candida are examples. For Sue, she was taking lots of high dose supplements, yet when she did tests it showed she was very low in magnesium and some other key minerals. Taking these intravenously made a big difference. It may be worth adding up how much you spend on supplements and, for one month, investing the money in doing a suitable wide-range test. Tests need not be monthly, but one set of comprehensive tests should show what things are actually low. You can easily find that you save money on supplements because a lot of levels turn out to be normal after all. There may be a vicious circle - if you're low on some key substances, it may inhibit the gut wall from repairing itself so that leaky gut continues as a problem even when eating a healthy diet. Sue seems to absorb some magnesium orally now that her general system is working better. Ian and Sue _____ From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of canaryyuk Sent: 17 April 2007 19:48 To: [hidden email] Subject: [eSens] Re: The Biological Effects of Weak Electromagnetic Fields I've printed this out to read it properly at home. I take a Calcium Citrate supplement intermittently (Solgar), and Vitamin D, Magnesium, etc.., etc.. Haven't found it to be any kind of a wondercure. But am I absorbing it? that's the question. And then there's issues, isn't there, with whether - even if you're blood levels are OK - you're body is actually utilizing it. God i wish i could afford comprehensive monthly full vit and mineral tests. I haven't the faintest idea what any of my levels are. I just take a bit of this that or the other every week or so in order to prevent potential full-on deficiency. Very scientific, i know. I shall go and bother my GP again though for this calcium test, who i have no doubt believes i am a hypochondriac. --- In eSens@yahoogroups. <mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com> com, "Redaktion Buergerwelle e.V. (BI Omega- CI Omega)" <star.mail@...> wrote: > > The Biological Effects of Weak Electromagnetic Fields > http://omega. <http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3552381/> twoday.net/stories/3552381/ > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |