Springlife Polarizer

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
29 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Springlife Polarizer

carazzz

To those who have used the Springlife Polarizer, a question: Did you
experience an increase or return of your ES symptoms when you first
started using your Polarizer?

My husband started wearing his Polarizer last night. What he noticed
immediately was a sensation of "heat" and "pressure" from the device,
which he wore close to his neck. No immediate noticeable effect on
his ES symptoms, positive or negative. For the heck of it, I asked
him whether he felt intuitively that the Polarizer was a "good" thing
for him, and he said yes.

Very early this morning he was awakened by extreme pain of the kind
we associate with ES. FYI, he has not had pain at this high level
since we first started our shielding/grounding efforts. We are
wondering:

1. Is the pain resurgence related to the Polarizer?
2. Is the pain a "detox" reaction? If it is, should be attempt to
moderate this effect, maybe by keeping the device further away from
him until he builds a tolerance to it?
3. Is the pain an indication that the Polarizer is not helping
relieve ES symptoms in our case?

I should add that we have had stormy weather here recently and we are
also considering the possibility that our "grounded" sleeping area
has been compromised by altered/increased electrical charge in the
earth where we live. This speculation is supported somewhat by the
fact that my husband experienced some relief when he disconnected his
grounded wrist strap and left the grounded mattress to go lie on the
couch instead. But, again, when this much pain is involved we don't
always trust subjective experience/perception.

Your thoughts/feedback would be appreciated. Thanks.

Cara

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Springlife Polarizer

bbin37

--- In [hidden email], "Cara" <cara_evangelista@h...> wrote:
>
> To those who have used the Springlife Polarizer, a question: Did
you
> experience an increase or return of your ES symptoms when you first
> started using your Polarizer?

When I first got my OM pendant I couldn't immediately wear it. The
energy it radiates was too strong for my system to accomodate and I
could feel its emanations from about 10 ft. away. I gradually
acclimated to the energy over a couple of weeks. I still don't keep
it on me all the time as it sometimes imparts an extra amount of
energy that is too much for my system to handle, especially if I've
been overexposed or the environmental/weather conditions are harsh. I
normally use it when I know I'll be going into a EM-rife area or when
I'm using my computer.

I also can't easily wear it over my chest region or near my throat as
it causes more intense reaction, probably through heart/throat chakra
interaction. I wear it in my pants pocket or set it near me, between
myself and known EM sources if I can.

Beau

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Springlife Polarizer

Marc Martin
Administrator
In reply to this post by carazzz
> To those who have used the Springlife Polarizer, a question: Did you
> experience an increase or return of your ES symptoms when you first
> started using your Polarizer?

I had a very difficult time with the Springlife Polarizers at first.
After wearing an OM pendant for about 20 minutes, I had to get
it away from me. And then for the next few weeks, I experimented
with using it for only short amounts of time, versus keeping it
a few feet away from me, versus using the smaller "Lifeforce"
model.

After a few weeks, I could wear the OM pendant fulltime, but while
sleeping I either put it under the mattress, or on the nightstand.
Even today, over a year later, I still keep it a foot or two
away from me while sleeping.

My feeling is that it's just a simple case of overdoing it. Too
much of a good thing. The good news is that it's pretty easy
to get less exposure using the methods mentioned about. But
it may take some trial & error to determine how much is "too
much", and how much is "just right".

> 1. Is the pain resurgence related to the Polarizer?
> 2. Is the pain a "detox" reaction? If it is, should be attempt to
> moderate this effect, maybe by keeping the device further away from
> him until he builds a tolerance to it?

Yes, yes, and yes.

> 3. Is the pain an indication that the Polarizer is not helping
> relieve ES symptoms in our case?

I'd say that it's too early to tell. One can't accurately judge
the effectiveness of any therapy while one is still trying to
build a tolerance to it. However, if he is not able to build
a tolerance to it, then of course you're going to have to look
for a different solution for now, and then maybe later come
back to the polarizers when he's stronger.

> I should add that we have had stormy weather here recently and we are
> also considering the possibility that our "grounded" sleeping area
> has been compromised by altered/increased electrical charge in the
> earth where we live.

Heh, heh, usually whenever I try something new, there is something
else new going on that makes me wonder what the true cause of
any change is. Continued experimentation should clear up any
doubts.

Also, you might want to have him try discontinue using the
grounding strip temporarily, so you can see what the reaction
is to just the polarizers, compared to the polarizers+grounding
strip. Sometimes multiple therapies at the same time is worse
than just one at a time.

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Springlife Polarizer

carazzz
In reply to this post by bbin37

Beau, can you say more about what you experienced when you wore it
too close to your neck/chest, or when you wore it for too long a
duration?

I'm trying to distinguish between "good" effects and "bad" effects...

Thanks.

Cara


--- In [hidden email], "Beau" <netfarer2@y...> wrote:

> When I first got my OM pendant I couldn't immediately wear it. The
> energy it radiates was too strong for my system to accomodate and I
> could feel its emanations from about 10 ft. away. I gradually
> acclimated to the energy over a couple of weeks. I still don't keep
> it on me all the time as it sometimes imparts an extra amount of
> energy that is too much for my system to handle, especially if I've
> been overexposed or the environmental/weather conditions are
harsh. I
> normally use it when I know I'll be going into a EM-rife area or
when
> I'm using my computer.
>
> I also can't easily wear it over my chest region or near my throat
as
> it causes more intense reaction, probably through heart/throat
chakra
> interaction. I wear it in my pants pocket or set it near me,
between
> myself and known EM sources if I can.
>
> Beau

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Springlife Polarizer

Marc Martin
Administrator
> I'm trying to distinguish between "good" effects and "bad" effects...

I'm not sure it's that simple, because something "good" for
you can have "bad" effects if you overdo it.

In the case of the polarizers, they are most likely making the
toxins in your body less harmful, plus giving your body more
energy to rid yourself of these toxins. In such a case, the
toxins start entering your bloodstream with the goal of leaving
the body. However, as soon as they hit the bloodstream,
you start feeling adverse effects. The key is to do this
slowly enough so that your body can handle it, or to add
antioxidants, probiotics, proteins, essential fatty acids,
etc. so that the toxins have something to bind to and
hopefully don't settle in some other part of the body.

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Springlife Polarizer

Marc Martin
Administrator
In reply to this post by bbin37
> I normally use it when I know I'll be going into a EM-rife area or when
> I'm using my computer.

Yes, I've found this to be the case as well. Using a polarizer in
an unhealthy EMF-filled environment works quite well. However,
using that same polarizer in a "healthy" environment can lead
me to feeling bad.

When I was in Hawaii last month, I quickly became aware that
I felt better when I didn't use the polarizer at all when
I was outside in the sunshine or at the beach. However,
when sitting in an Internet cafe I felt a lot better with
it than without it.

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Springlife Polarizer

Marc Martin
Administrator
In reply to this post by carazzz
> I'm trying to distinguish between "good" effects and "bad" effects...

By the way, when used in moderation, here are the good effects
I've noticed from the Springlife polarizers:

* reduced need for sleep
* increased energy, stamina
* increased tolerance for EMF
* increased tolerance for air pollution
* reduction of allergies

However, overdoing them can cause me to feel ill, angry,
give me headaches, dehydration, and skin irritation.

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Springlife Polarizer

carazzz

Thanks Marc. This is exactly the sort of information I'm looking for--
signposts so we can tell if we're doing it right, overdoing it, or on
the wrong path altogether.

By the way, are there specific supplements you recommend for this
very early detox period? My husband seems to be able to tolerate only
a little at a time. Right now he is responding positively to the
Seasilver and Milk Thistle. (Not great reactions to Niacin,
Magnesium, Glucosamine, Zinc.) If we were to add one or two other
things, any thoughts on what they should be?

Thanks again.

Cara

--- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@u...> wrote:
> > I'm trying to distinguish between "good" effects and "bad"
effects...

>
> By the way, when used in moderation, here are the good effects
> I've noticed from the Springlife polarizers:
>
> * reduced need for sleep
> * increased energy, stamina
> * increased tolerance for EMF
> * increased tolerance for air pollution
> * reduction of allergies
>
> However, overdoing them can cause me to feel ill, angry,
> give me headaches, dehydration, and skin irritation.
>
> Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Springlife Polarizer

Glenn Coleman
In reply to this post by bbin37
I had a similar reaction to Springlife Polarizer as Beau. I investigated
further and found out that the Springlife polarizer increases the energy on
all my chakras (measured in pranic healing), which would often be considered
good, but can also lead to energy congestion. So I no longer wear it unless
I'm in an extreme EMF environment, and rather keep it between me and the
source of EMF.

Glenn

>From: "Beau" <[hidden email]>
>Reply-To: [hidden email]
>To: [hidden email]
>Subject: [eSens] Re: Springlife Polarizer
>Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:20:52 -0000
>
>
>--- In [hidden email], "Cara" <cara_evangelista@h...> wrote:
> >
> > To those who have used the Springlife Polarizer, a question: Did
>you
> > experience an increase or return of your ES symptoms when you first
> > started using your Polarizer?
>
>When I first got my OM pendant I couldn't immediately wear it. The
>energy it radiates was too strong for my system to accomodate and I
>could feel its emanations from about 10 ft. away. I gradually
>acclimated to the energy over a couple of weeks. I still don't keep
>it on me all the time as it sometimes imparts an extra amount of
>energy that is too much for my system to handle, especially if I've
>been overexposed or the environmental/weather conditions are harsh. I
>normally use it when I know I'll be going into a EM-rife area or when
>I'm using my computer.
>
>I also can't easily wear it over my chest region or near my throat as
>it causes more intense reaction, probably through heart/throat chakra
>interaction. I wear it in my pants pocket or set it near me, between
>myself and known EM sources if I can.
>
>Beau
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Springlife Polarizer

Marc Martin
Administrator
In reply to this post by carazzz
> By the way, are there specific supplements you recommend for this
> very early detox period? My husband seems to be able to tolerate only
> a little at a time. Right now he is responding positively to the
> Seasilver and Milk Thistle. (Not great reactions to Niacin,
> Magnesium, Glucosamine, Zinc.) If we were to add one or two other
> things, any thoughts on what they should be?

It seems like everyone reacts differently to supplements, so
I can't really say that there is anything that universally
works well for everyone.

I remember that when I first started out, I responded really
well to a supplement called "Cellfood", and also a one called
"Microhydrin". The latter seems to have a number of variants
these days, going by the names "Active H-", "Megahydrin",
"Megahydrate", etc.

Also, I've taken a LOT of probiotics over the years, mostly
"Primal Defense", which has also been helpful in reducing
my ES symptoms.

And if there are digestive problems, some sort of digestive
enzyme might be helpful. I don't have any strong feelings
on any brand, although I did well on Zypan by Standard
Process.

Also, I reacted particularly well to certain foods, like
avocados, bananas, dates, prunes, carrot juice, oatmeal,
etc. But in this case I think one should also check with the "eat
right for your blood type" recommendations, and if there's
a yeast/candida problem then you'll have to restrict your
intake of excessive sugars.

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Springlife Polarizer

bbin37
In reply to this post by carazzz

Wearing it near my neck or chest allows its energy to enter my system
too quickly, causing what I feel is overload and energetic congestion.
I get strong headaches, and/or tightness/pain in the chest and
throat, very similar to some of what I experience with EM fields,
though not as "sharp". Overexposure to the Springlife polarizer's
energy can definitely cause me to be more sensitive to EM fields or
chemicals. I view it as a matter of "too much of a good thing".

I'm cautious about using the word "detox" as one of the strong
implications is that toxins are being removed from the system. On our
list there is a tendency to apply the term whenever there is a
negative response to an energy or substance being tried or used for
therapeutic support. As these negative responses are many times
similar or identical to symptoms we encounter from our ES/CS
conditions, it could just as well be systemic overload due to the
addition of the new energy or substance. Even if the new symptoms go
away after a while that could readily be viewed as adaptation, not
alleviation due to toxins being removed. Adding supplements used to
help weather detoxification processes and having them help also
doesn't immediately mean that detoxification is occuring; your system
could just as easily be able to better cope with new
energies/substances because of the added nutritional support. As I've
seen "detox" used in the list, the triggering of our symptoms through
original incitants such as EM fields or chemicals might be easily
classed as "detox", too.

Without testing that can measure toxin release, I think using the term
"detox" can be misleading and may unintentionally create unwarranted
assumptions that may cause unnecessary stress or lead one to take an
unjustified course of action.

Beau

--- In [hidden email], "Cara" <cara_evangelista@h...> wrote:
>
> Beau, can you say more about what you experienced when you wore it
> too close to your neck/chest, or when you wore it for too long a
> duration?
>
> I'm trying to distinguish between "good" effects and "bad"
effects...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Cara
>
>
> --- In [hidden email], "Beau" <netfarer2@y...> wrote:
>
> > When I first got my OM pendant I couldn't immediately wear it.
The
> > energy it radiates was too strong for my system to accomodate and
I
> > could feel its emanations from about 10 ft. away. I gradually
> > acclimated to the energy over a couple of weeks. I still don't
keep
> > it on me all the time as it sometimes imparts an extra amount of
> > energy that is too much for my system to handle, especially if
I've
> > been overexposed or the environmental/weather conditions are
> harsh. I
> > normally use it when I know I'll be going into a EM-rife area or
> when
> > I'm using my computer.
> >
> > I also can't easily wear it over my chest region or near my
throat
> as
> > it causes more intense reaction, probably through heart/throat
> chakra
> > interaction. I wear it in my pants pocket or set it near me,
> between
> > myself and known EM sources if I can.
> >
> > Beau

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Springlife Polarizer

franspppp
In reply to this post by carazzz

As far as I have information, grounded matress to sleep on is not a
good idea at all. To ground youurself, maybe, I used it when I had
vibrations (movements) in my body, they disappeared, but one time the
current was strong and I got a scar from the heat (it is one of the
few objective things related to e.m.-fields and the current they
induce). If you lie down on a grounded matress you will attract extra
low frequency V/m. I myself consider it to be an extra antenna in
which currents are induced (don't know if this is true. Somehow it
seems everything is loaded by radiofrequent radiation). Nevertheless,
tell me, did it help you to sleep on a grounded matress? I don't
believe much in the theories of detoxing, chelation, diets etcetera,
maybe there is something in parameters of the radiation that
scientists are not aware of yet (maybe a longitudinal movement, maybe
quantum physics, I don't know). I think so because generally there is
a correlation between unwellness and level of radiofrequency
radiation, but it is not absolute, there must be more parameters of
body and environment. Normally, a body is able to keep homeostasis
(balance) by removing or making harmless overdoses of all kinds of
stuff. I think the real problem is the currents inducted (distorting
your nerve systems and distorting cell functions), the double DNA
breaks and possibly more, also not yet understood interferences.
Remember, the present radiofrequent radiation is far, far more than
the natural background and much of the radiation is of pulsed and
modulated types that does not even exist in nature. Of course our
bodies try to keep homeostasis and the bodies of many people succeed
reasonably, but not everybody (e.g. children are in danger, see the
news today, Sir William Stewart again, but other groups with some
defects or weakness are in danger also, like us). This is my idea so
far, wish it is more or less helpful. Frans.


--- In [hidden email], "Cara" <cara_evangelista@h...> wrote:
>
> To those who have used the Springlife Polarizer, a question: Did
you
> experience an increase or return of your ES symptoms when you first
> started using your Polarizer?
>
> My husband started wearing his Polarizer last night. What he
noticed
> immediately was a sensation of "heat" and "pressure" from the
device,
> which he wore close to his neck. No immediate noticeable effect on
> his ES symptoms, positive or negative. For the heck of it, I asked
> him whether he felt intuitively that the Polarizer was a "good"
thing

> for him, and he said yes.
>
> Very early this morning he was awakened by extreme pain of the kind
> we associate with ES. FYI, he has not had pain at this high level
> since we first started our shielding/grounding efforts. We are
> wondering:
>
> 1. Is the pain resurgence related to the Polarizer?
> 2. Is the pain a "detox" reaction? If it is, should be attempt to
> moderate this effect, maybe by keeping the device further away from
> him until he builds a tolerance to it?
> 3. Is the pain an indication that the Polarizer is not helping
> relieve ES symptoms in our case?
>
> I should add that we have had stormy weather here recently and we
are
> also considering the possibility that our "grounded" sleeping area
> has been compromised by altered/increased electrical charge in the
> earth where we live. This speculation is supported somewhat by the
> fact that my husband experienced some relief when he disconnected
his
> grounded wrist strap and left the grounded mattress to go lie on
the
> couch instead. But, again, when this much pain is involved we don't
> always trust subjective experience/perception.
>
> Your thoughts/feedback would be appreciated. Thanks.
>
> Cara

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Springlife Polarizer

stichting milieuziektes
Hello,

I also consider sleeping on a grounded matress not a good idea.

It raises the body tension, because the potential diffenerence is not in
order.

The same idea goes for canopies.
They also raise the body tension.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus


----- Original Message -----
From: "franspppp" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 22:12
Subject: [eSens] Re: Springlife Polarizer


>
>
> As far as I have information, grounded matress to sleep on is not a
> good idea at all. To ground youurself, maybe, I used it when I had
> vibrations (movements) in my body, they disappeared, but one time the
> current was strong and I got a scar from the heat (it is one of the
> few objective things related to e.m.-fields and the current they
> induce). If you lie down on a grounded matress you will attract extra
> low frequency V/m. I myself consider it to be an extra antenna in
> which currents are induced (don't know if this is true. Somehow it
> seems everything is loaded by radiofrequent radiation). Nevertheless,
> tell me, did it help you to sleep on a grounded matress? I don't
> believe much in the theories of detoxing, chelation, diets etcetera,
> maybe there is something in parameters of the radiation that
> scientists are not aware of yet (maybe a longitudinal movement, maybe
> quantum physics, I don't know). I think so because generally there is
> a correlation between unwellness and level of radiofrequency
> radiation, but it is not absolute, there must be more parameters of
> body and environment. Normally, a body is able to keep homeostasis
> (balance) by removing or making harmless overdoses of all kinds of
> stuff. I think the real problem is the currents inducted (distorting
> your nerve systems and distorting cell functions), the double DNA
> breaks and possibly more, also not yet understood interferences.
> Remember, the present radiofrequent radiation is far, far more than
> the natural background and much of the radiation is of pulsed and
> modulated types that does not even exist in nature. Of course our
> bodies try to keep homeostasis and the bodies of many people succeed
> reasonably, but not everybody (e.g. children are in danger, see the
> news today, Sir William Stewart again, but other groups with some
> defects or weakness are in danger also, like us). This is my idea so
> far, wish it is more or less helpful. Frans.
>
>
> --- In [hidden email], "Cara" <cara_evangelista@h...> wrote:
> >
> > To those who have used the Springlife Polarizer, a question: Did
> you
> > experience an increase or return of your ES symptoms when you first
> > started using your Polarizer?
> >
> > My husband started wearing his Polarizer last night. What he
> noticed
> > immediately was a sensation of "heat" and "pressure" from the
> device,
> > which he wore close to his neck. No immediate noticeable effect on
> > his ES symptoms, positive or negative. For the heck of it, I asked
> > him whether he felt intuitively that the Polarizer was a "good"
> thing
> > for him, and he said yes.
> >
> > Very early this morning he was awakened by extreme pain of the kind
> > we associate with ES. FYI, he has not had pain at this high level
> > since we first started our shielding/grounding efforts. We are
> > wondering:
> >
> > 1. Is the pain resurgence related to the Polarizer?
> > 2. Is the pain a "detox" reaction? If it is, should be attempt to
> > moderate this effect, maybe by keeping the device further away from
> > him until he builds a tolerance to it?
> > 3. Is the pain an indication that the Polarizer is not helping
> > relieve ES symptoms in our case?
> >
> > I should add that we have had stormy weather here recently and we
> are
> > also considering the possibility that our "grounded" sleeping area
> > has been compromised by altered/increased electrical charge in the
> > earth where we live. This speculation is supported somewhat by the
> > fact that my husband experienced some relief when he disconnected
> his
> > grounded wrist strap and left the grounded mattress to go lie on
> the
> > couch instead. But, again, when this much pain is involved we don't
> > always trust subjective experience/perception.
> >
> > Your thoughts/feedback would be appreciated. Thanks.
> >
> > Cara
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Beliefs

Marc Martin
Administrator
In reply to this post by franspppp
> I don't believe much in the theories of detoxing, chelation, diets

Be careful what you don't believe in... it may prevent you
from becoming well again!

I remember back in early 2001, when I first read about a piece
of software that could help one improve their tolerance to EMF.
I didn't believe it. So I spent the next several months on
medical disability from work, until I met someone who recommended
this company's products (Quantum Products) to me.

So I tried these products, and amazingly they worked. Even
the piece of software which I didn't believe in worked!
And I was able to return to work part-time almost immediately.

If I had only been more open-minded in the first place,
I could have saved myself months of being on medical
disability....

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Beliefs

Glenn Coleman
Very well said Marc.

I believe this is the #1 cause for people staying ill or recovering very
slowly.

For me I have always been one that believed I heal very quickly, and always
took it on as a challenge to see how fast I could heal. I just hating being
sick, so bounce out of it ASAP anytime it occurs.

I'm currently copywriting a website for Anne Marie Evers, a popular author
of books on affirmations, and she goes into great depth on this concept of .
It was most interesting to read Anne Marie's view on how our subconsious
responds directly to our thoughts, and causes our body to respond directly
to those thoughts. So positive thoughts about healing dramatically impact
healing.

Glenn

>From: "Marc Martin" <[hidden email]>
>Reply-To: [hidden email]
>To: [hidden email]
>Subject: Re: [eSens] Beliefs
>Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:09:48 -0800
>
> > I don't believe much in the theories of detoxing, chelation, diets
>
>Be careful what you don't believe in... it may prevent you
>from becoming well again!
>
>I remember back in early 2001, when I first read about a piece
>of software that could help one improve their tolerance to EMF.
>I didn't believe it. So I spent the next several months on
>medical disability from work, until I met someone who recommended
>this company's products (Quantum Products) to me.
>
>So I tried these products, and amazingly they worked. Even
>the piece of software which I didn't believe in worked!
>And I was able to return to work part-time almost immediately.
>
>If I had only been more open-minded in the first place,
>I could have saved myself months of being on medical
>disability....
>
>Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Beliefs

Benson, Sarah (Sen L. Allison)
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Marc I'm not clear which posting you are replying to here - however I
think there is definitely a case for distinguishing between what
is/causes a detox reaction and what is merely 'energy' or frequency
overload. I think Beau makes several a very valid and sensible points
about tbis in his recent posting- and I agree with him about energy
overload, as it has also been my experience. We are dealing
specifically on this list with people whose nervous systems are
sensitive or incompaible with/to certain energies, and have trouble (or
are super-aware of) with electricity or other high frequency emissions.
(My theory is that all humans are sensitive to energy - and that for
most man-generated electricity is incompatible with the organism - but
that some are more aware of this than others. In some people it
manifests differently....)

However it is also possible that as a result of an energy
incompatibility or overload this could cause a de-tox, complicating
things.  

Sarah


-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Martin [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, 12 January 2005 9:10 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [eSens] Beliefs



> I don't believe much in the theories of detoxing, chelation, diets

Be careful what you don't believe in... it may prevent you
from becoming well again!

I remember back in early 2001, when I first read about a piece of
software that could help one improve their tolerance to EMF. I didn't
believe it. So I spent the next several months on medical disability
from work, until I met someone who recommended
this company's products (Quantum Products) to me.  

So I tried these products, and amazingly they worked. Even
the piece of software which I didn't believe in worked!
And I was able to return to work part-time almost immediately.

If I had only been more open-minded in the first place,
I could have saved myself months of being on medical disability....

Marc



 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Beliefs

franspppp
In reply to this post by Glenn Coleman

I did not mention quantum products or software, I have a Qlink and I
think it has helped me (could have been suggestion), until my company
moved to the top of a building 100 metres from a large tower with
radio/tv/beam transmitters/dvb-t/other antennas, and the office has
HF TL.

I have several tachyon products, they don't seem to help much. I have
tried praying a lot, no effect. I have tried electro-acupuncture and
homeopathy, seemed to help temporarily (could have been suggestion).
I have tried regular medicine and psychiatry, pills and cognitive
therapy. I have tried moving, partly succesfull since a neighbour is
using DECT telephone again. I have tried music, candles, healing
(many different kinds), detoxification, detection of EMF and
protection, I had special protection stickers and now I try crystall
and anti-esmog stickers. And much more (light, small 8's, ..). So,
you can't say I try nothing. Probably now you will say I tried all
the wrong things ....

And I did not mention positive thinking neither; in my view cognitive
therapy and positive thinking are very helpful indeed; but it is not
possible to force your body into well being.

There are many ES who do not easily recover or do not recover at all;
you can not blame them for their misery because they did try a, b and
c and not x, y and z; in this list one is trying this, the other
that, and most results are none or contradictionary, the only thing
that helps everybody is keeping distance from sources of EMF, which
is impossible in modern life.

--- In [hidden email], "Glenn Coleman" <glennhcoleman@h...>
wrote:
> Very well said Marc.
>
> I believe this is the #1 cause for people staying ill or recovering
very
> slowly.
>
> For me I have always been one that believed I heal very quickly,
and always
> took it on as a challenge to see how fast I could heal. I just
hating being
> sick, so bounce out of it ASAP anytime it occurs.
>
> I'm currently copywriting a website for Anne Marie Evers, a popular
author
> of books on affirmations, and she goes into great depth on this
concept of .
> It was most interesting to read Anne Marie's view on how our
subconsious
> responds directly to our thoughts, and causes our body to respond
directly
> to those thoughts. So positive thoughts about healing dramatically
impact

> healing.
>
> Glenn
>
> >From: "Marc Martin" <marc@u...>
> >Reply-To: [hidden email]
> >To: [hidden email]
> >Subject: Re: [eSens] Beliefs
> >Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:09:48 -0800
> >
> > > I don't believe much in the theories of detoxing, chelation,
diets

> >
> >Be careful what you don't believe in... it may prevent you
> >from becoming well again!
> >
> >I remember back in early 2001, when I first read about a piece
> >of software that could help one improve their tolerance to EMF.
> >I didn't believe it. So I spent the next several months on
> >medical disability from work, until I met someone who recommended
> >this company's products (Quantum Products) to me.
> >
> >So I tried these products, and amazingly they worked. Even
> >the piece of software which I didn't believe in worked!
> >And I was able to return to work part-time almost immediately.
> >
> >If I had only been more open-minded in the first place,
> >I could have saved myself months of being on medical
> >disability....
> >
> >Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Beliefs

Marc Martin
Administrator
> protection, I had special protection stickers and now I try crystall
> and anti-esmog stickers. And much more (light, small 8's, ..). So,
> you can't say I try nothing. Probably now you will say I tried all
> the wrong things ....

from your previous comments, I wouldn't have expected that you had
tried so many things. Sorry about that -- I stand corrected! But
thanks for listing the things that did not help you -- it's good
information to know both what does and what does not help people.

And I also had similarly bad luck -- I tried hundreds of things,
but only a handful of things were a significant help. That's
why I created this list -- if people start with the things that
helped others, then they may not have to waste as much time and
money searching for solutions. There are no guarantees of
course, but I see that in at least a few cases we've had some
successes with people trying out list suggestions.

I have never tried the "green 8" stickers, so I'd be interested
in hearing if they help you or not.

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Beliefs

Marc Martin
Administrator
> I have never tried the "green 8" stickers, so I'd be interested
> in hearing if they help you or not.

Oh, and anyone else, if you've tried the "green 8" stickers,
did they help or not?

Here is a link to what I'm talking about:

http://futuretechtoday.com/green8/green8.htm

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Beliefs

franspppp
In reply to this post by Marc Martin

The 8's (bent in a special way) were made of electricity wire and
they hung on copper nails in small standing pieces of wood. A dowser
with a pendulum placed them in our appartment. He also draw an 8 by
pencil on a white paper sticker and put it on a laptop. Also I took
an 8 in a carton box to my office and one in my car (it is still
there, I believe). This should take away (part of) the radiation. I
don't know if it works, he used the pendulum to ask how big and where
the 8's should be and he used the pendulum again to check and he said
they worked. My symptoms did not become less. It was expensive and it
did ruin my CD-player, probably because he hammered a copper nail in
the wood of the cupboard :-(

--- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@u...> wrote:
> > protection, I had special protection stickers and now I try
crystall
> > and anti-esmog stickers. And much more (light, small 8's, ..).
So,
> > you can't say I try nothing. Probably now you will say I tried
all

> > the wrong things ....
>
> From your previous comments, I wouldn't have expected that you had
> tried so many things. Sorry about that -- I stand corrected! But
> thanks for listing the things that did not help you -- it's good
> information to know both what does and what does not help people.
>
> And I also had similarly bad luck -- I tried hundreds of things,
> but only a handful of things were a significant help. That's
> why I created this list -- if people start with the things that
> helped others, then they may not have to waste as much time and
> money searching for solutions. There are no guarantees of
> course, but I see that in at least a few cases we've had some
> successes with people trying out list suggestions.
>
> I have never tried the "green 8" stickers, so I'd be interested
> in hearing if they help you or not.
>
> Marc

12