Shuzi review

>
> Alexa,
>  
> Thanks for that review. I am wearing the QLink & I am handling the emf a little better. Computer is still hard. I am sleeping the house last 4 days so I am hopeful.
>  
> I wonder if you can use both of these together?  The shuzi & the QLink???
>  
> Or wearing two of the same?????
>  
> Would you say you prefer the Shuzi Alexa?
>  
> Anyone know?  Loni
>
> --- On Mon, 12/28/09, roxalis@... <roxalis@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: roxalis@... <roxalis@...>
> Subject: [eSens] Shuzi review
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Monday, December 28, 2009, 11:03 PM
>
>
>  
>
>
>
> So I've had the Shuzi bracelet for about a week and it's a keeper! I've found that it definitely has a strengthening and calming effect on the body and the mind. In fact it was so strong the first couple times I wore it that I questioned whether it would be wearable long term. I've adapted to it now though and find it quite beneficial. When I was first adjusting to it itproduced some pretty unusual sensations at the top of the head and back ofthe head and visual field opened up - it was as if I could see better and my peripheral vision expanded. The vision effect has continued - and is quite nice - even when I take it off for a few hours.
>
> In comparison to the QLink there are similarities to the feel but it is different. The QLink produces more of a feeling of alertness and doesn't come on quite so strong in the beginning. Given the appearance of the chip andthat QLink uses the word "sympathetic resonance technology" and Shuzi uses"nano vibrational technology" I'm thinking they are in cahoots on some level.
>
> Alexa
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>      
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> Alexa,
>  
> Thanks for that review. I am wearing the QLink & I am handling the emf a little better. Computer is still hard. I am sleeping the house last 4 days so I am hopeful.
>  
> I wonder if you can use both of these together?  The shuzi & the QLink???
>  
> Or wearing two of the same?????
>  
> Would you say you prefer the Shuzi Alexa?
>  
> Anyone know?  Loni
>
> --- On Mon, 12/28/09, roxalis@... <roxalis@... > wrote:
>
>
> From: roxalis@... <roxalis@... >
> Subject: [eSens] Shuzi review
> To: eSens@yahoogroups. com
> Date: Monday, December 28, 2009, 11:03 PM
>
>
>  
>
>
>
> So I've had the Shuzi bracelet for about a week and it's a keeper! I've found that it definitely has a strengthening and calming effect on the body and the mind. In fact it was so strong the first couple times I wore it that I questioned whether it would be wearable long term. I've adapted to it now though and find it quite beneficial. When I was first adjusting to it itproduced some pretty unusual sensations at the top of the head and back ofthe head and visual field opened up - it was as if I could see better and my peripheral vision expanded. The vision effect has continued - and is quite nice - even when I take it off for a few hours.
>
> In comparison to the QLink there are similarities to the feel but it is different. The QLink produces more of a feeling of alertness and doesn't come on quite so strong in the beginning. Given the appearance of the chip andthat QLink uses the word "sympathetic resonance technology" and Shuzi uses"nano vibrational technology" I'm thinking they are in cahoots on some level.
>
> Alexa
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
>
> > Great Alexa & Marc, thank you for your response. I guess I'll order
> > another and try. Just have to find out which one. I'll call &
> > investigate.
>
> Heh, heh... unfortunately, I've not had much luck with investigating
> devices. Some devices which appear like they will work well end up not
> working at all. And some devices which seem absolutely absurd end up
> doing a good job. It's almost like I'm getting a "reverse placebo
> effect"! :-)
>
> Marc
>  
>

>
>
> > Hey Marc,
> > Is it easy to turn the Quantum Byte software on and off?
> > I wonder if you see a change in the CPU load (measured
> > with very fast update setting) or can measure RF emissions
> > (maybe AM radio even?). I imagine that some rhythmic aspect
> > of the emissions, like spikes in CPU or sound on radio might
> > change...
>
> It is very easy to turn the Quantum Byte software on and off,
> but the most CPU load I can see from it (using the Windows
> Task Manager) is 1%. Mostly it registers at 0% though.
>
> I haven't tested it with an AM radio or anything...
>
> Marc
>  
>

>
> But if you turn it off does the cpu load of other processes
> increase? I don't know Windows so I don't know how
> well the task manager can see anything.
> Bill
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > Hey Marc,
> > > Is it easy to turn the Quantum Byte software on and off?
> > > I wonder if you see a change in the CPU load (measured
> > > with very fast update setting) or can measure RF emissions
> > > (maybe AM radio even?). I imagine that some rhythmic aspect
> > > of the emissions, like spikes in CPU or sound on radio might
> > > change...
> >
> > It is very easy to turn the Quantum Byte software on and off,
> > but the most CPU load I can see from it (using the Windows
> > Task Manager) is 1%. Mostly it registers at 0% though.
> >
> > I haven't tested it with an AM radio or anything...
> >
> > Marc
> >  
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> Hi, John,
>  
> I vaguely remember promising to send you this info prior to Thanksgiving!  So sorry I am just now able to send it!  We had severe illness in my extended family which meant I had to stay in an area without internetaccess.  Hope this helps you, if you haven’t already been detoxed by now, that is!  Again, please accept my apologies for lateness.
>  
>  
> Preparing Oneself for Detoxing:
>  
> Ahead of time:
> Quit eating overly-processed foods and foods w chemical additives, sugar,refined carbs, and glutens, in them.  Eat organic foods to avoid pesticides and other chemicals.  No sodas, alcoholic beverages, recreational drugs, or cigarettes.  Limit yeasts and even natural sugars in foods.
>  
> Limit coffee and tea (except herbal, sugarfree types) to one cup in the morning, only.  Use no more caffeine than this and avoid other stimulants.
>  
> Maximize the quality and quantity of your drinking water and begin a goodmultiple vitamin/mineral supplement regimen.
>  
> Get ample sleep +/or rest.
>  
> Begin unplugging all appliances (which can be unplugged) when not in use.
>  
> Move to the safest area you can find to sleepâ€"not above, below, or next to rooms with tvs, wireless, computers, or other electronics.  Otherwise, turn off circuits to those rooms while sleeping.  Do not havewireless devices, TVs, or anything which can transmit frequencies while unplugged in or near your bedroom.
>  
> Pull your bed away from the walls by 1 or 2 feet.  Keep only a battery alarm clock and battery candles to see by in your bedroom or otherwise turn off circuits to the room at night when you are sleeping.
>  
> Also avoid sleeping above metal pipes and incoming water or gas lines, ifthose have the potential to have electrical current running on them.
>  
>  
> During detoxing:
> Continue the previous list.
>  
> Avoid electromagnetic fields: while detoxing stay out of areas high in emfs.  Do not drive or visit others.
>  
> Do not talk on phonesâ€"use only a speakerphone and limit calls to a couple minutes while detoxing.
>  
> Temporarily quit using magnets.
>  
> Do not have dental work of any kind done if you have mercury and amalgam fillings while doing detoxing. (unless amalgam removal and detoxing mercuryand silver is what you are preparing for.)    
>  
> Begin use of glandulars to support the organs, such as thymus and adrenalglandular.  Use supplemental support for the kidneys, liver, and adrenals, if glandulars are not preferred.
>  
> If you are within 15-20 minutes of a large park, forest, or natural watersource, spend as much time in nature there, where emfs are low.  “Ground” yourself when possible in such places.
>  
>  
> I wish you the best,
> Diane
>
>
>      
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>