School issues

Well the principle called. They will plug him in.

  They need an ethernet to USB adaptor.

They
 are writing a contract that states no assignments will be done w wi-fi,
 since they're  new contract for parents to sign states using wi-fi.

They're checking his classrooms for routers. If there are any, he will get a new class.

So, I'm very relieved.  It's not in my son's best interest to be home schooled for high school.



Kathy



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On September  7, KathyB <[hidden email]> wrote:
> So, I'm very relieved.  It's not in my son's best interest to be home schooled for high school.

Still, he'll be made fun of for not using the wi-fi like everyone else.

And his exposure won't be reduced much, since everyone around
him will still be using the wi-fi.

Marc

They can  make fun of him now. He has autism. still rocks on his feet sometimes. We can't fix all his sensory issues, or haven't been able to.

He's verbal, can carry on aconversation. Scored advanced on the state's science test. Almost at proficient on others.

Yes he will be still be exposed

But isn't it less not using a laptop wi-fi? 



From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] School issues

















 



 


   
     
     
      On September  7, KathyB <[hidden email]> wrote:

>



Still, he'll be made fun of for not using the wi-fi like everyone else.



And his exposure won't be reduced much, since everyone around

him will still be using the wi-fi.



Marc



   
     

   
   






 










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On September  7, KathyB <[hidden email]> wrote:
> But isn't it less not using a laptop wi-fi? 

Well, is he going to be surrounded by other kids using
the wi-fi on their laptops?  If so, then the reduction in
exposure isn't much.

Now, if there's nobody nearby using a wi-fi laptop, then
I agree that there would be significantly less exposure.

Marc

Marc,

How far away would he need to be from a wi-fi active laptop?



 Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:
: Re: [eSens] Re: School issues

















 



 


   
     
     
      On September  7, KathyB <[hidden email]> wrote:

> But isn't it less not using a laptop wi-fi? 



Well, is he going to be surrounded by other kids using

the wi-fi on their laptops?  If so, then the reduction in

exposure isn't much.



Now, if there's nobody nearby using a wi-fi laptop, then

I agree that there would be significantly less exposure.



Marc



   
     

   
   






 










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On September  7, KathyB <[hidden email]> wrote:
> How far away would he need to be from a wi-fi active laptop?

Well, that's a question that perhaps has no good answer... :-)

We see people here who are sensitive to wi-fi signals even
when they are over 100 feet away.

However, that's not nearly as bad as using a wi-fi laptop,
where the transmitter is only a few inches away from your
hands.

So I guess I'd have to say, the further away, the better.

When I'm on travel and have to use wi-fi myself for
internet access, I use a USB extension cable for the
wi-fi (or 3G) transmitter/receiver.  At the airports, I
typically put the transmitter/receiver 5 feet away from
me.  At the hotel, I typically put it 15 feet away from me.

Marc

Marc,

Thanks for your help. My son feels  very mild symptoms,  but naturally I don't want them to increase. He feels mild sensations & a mild headache.


I"m going to look at his vitamins * nutritional needs.



--- On Fri, 9/7/12, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:

From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] School issues
To: [hidden email]
Date: Friday, September 7, 2012, 5:01 PM
















 



 


   
     
     
      On September  7, KathyB <[hidden email]> wrote:

> How far away would he need to be from a wi-fi active laptop?



Well, that's a question that perhaps has no good answer... :-)



We see people here who are sensitive to wi-fi signals even

when they are over 100 feet away.



However, that's not nearly as bad as using a wi-fi laptop,

where the transmitter is only a few inches away from your

hands.



So I guess I'd have to say, the further away, the better.



When I'm on travel and have to use wi-fi myself for

internet access, I use a USB extension cable for the

wi-fi (or 3G) transmitter/receiver.  At the airports, I

typically put the transmitter/receiver 5 feet away from

me.  At the hotel, I typically put it 15 feet away from me.



Marc



   
     

   
   






 










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

You can get him a Resonator Pendant on earthcalm.ca
It helps me alot.  Sometimes it takes some time tho. It won't protect him overnight but it's worth a try.  They do have a return policy.  In the US it's earthcalm.com.  I'm in Canada.
 
Aimee

--- On Fri, 9/7/12, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: School issues
To: [hidden email]
Date: Friday, September 7, 2012, 3:37 PM


On September  7, KathyB <[hidden email]> wrote:
> But isn't it less not using a laptop wi-fi? 

Well, is he going to be surrounded by other kids using
the wi-fi on their laptops?  If so, then the reduction in
exposure isn't much.

Now, if there's nobody nearby using a wi-fi laptop, then
I agree that there would be significantly less exposure.

Marc


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]