Amazon sells the Isobar, I guess i could try that first and if it doesn't do the job return it for the Furman. They sell that one also for $140 or so.
--- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@...> wrote: > > > I have a Brick Wall Line Conditioner on my TV, VCR, etc and when my > > neighbor uses her treadmill I get static on the TV. I was disappointed. I > > was thinking of getting the Furman then I started reading reviews of the > > Tripplite Isobar surge line and people are getting good results for only > > around 70 bucks. > > Hmmm, I would have thought the Brick Wall would have been pretty good. > In my power strip testing, the Furman reduced more noise than the IsoBar > or the Brick Wall. > > Marc > |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
--- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@...> wrote: > > > So it seems to me that the RxDNA might be somewhat like the Noise > > Harvesters > > Doing a bit of searching on the Noise Harvesters, I find sketchy > and conflicting information, but according to some sources, the > Noise Harvesters only focus on noise in a very narrow range: > 8 khz - 15 khz (and presumably higher frequency harmonics from > this), and remove "8 - 10 watts of line noise per day". Wow ! Just like you've said ,the band is pretty narrow !!! If it would work like in the 5-500 kHz of the RxDNA i bet the capacitor would load up pretty quickly and then you would need to pack-up on more unit to do the higher demand on filtering ? Its almost like pushing full range to a sub woofer speaker and then switching to low pass only ! Way less load on the speaker when the range is narrow ... > > The information on the RxDNA is more specific -- works in a > much larger frequency range (5 - 500 khz), and removes 60 watts > of line noise. (I don't know if this 60 watt number can > be directly compared with the 8 - 10 watts PER DAY number). > > Also, for the Noise Harvesters, they recommend 5 per house > ($500), while for the RxDNA they recommend 2 per house > ($1400). > > (with Stetzerizer filters recommended at 20 per house, > and the Quantum Home recommended at 1 per house). > > Marc > |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
--- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@...> wrote: > > > Well are all the devices you tried an kinna fail your testing all base on > > Capacitor storing,filtering or converting to good energy ? > > The filters which make me feel worse are the type that collect > the noise on the hot line and then transfer that noise to the neutral > line ("shunt capacitor filter"). The Stetzerizer filter and the > Blue Circle Audio BC86 fall into this category. This is also > how a lot of "hardware store" power strips with EMI filtering work. > > However, I have no worsening of symptoms with Furman linear filtering > powers strips, or the PS Audio Noise Harvesters. > > > Are these units also have a capacitor system to store and then burn (in a > > way of saying it)the extra into light ? > > If the light flash it should be store till enough then discharge the > > capacitor into a flash of light! > > Yes, this is how the Noise Harvesters work -- they store the noise, > and when the capacitor is full, an LED flight flashes. When there > is a lot of noise on the line, those things will flash so often > that it almost appears to be continuous light. In such cases, > the company recommends that you buy more Noise Harvesters. And > indeed, if I plug in a second Noise Harvester next to the first, > the rate of flashing on the first Noise Harvester decreases. > > So it seems to me that the RxDNA might be somewhat like the Noise > Harvesters, except maybe that it turns the noise into heat rather > than light, and also that they recommend fewer per house, so > it must have more noise removal capacity. > > But like I said, I never noticed any improvement in my health > from the Noise Harvesters, so I wonder if the RxDNA would be > any different? > > Marc > Well if i got this wright the RxDNA does not store in a capacitor like the Noise Harvesters does ... It just convert it to heat and dissipate it as soon noise happen ! I'm gonna send you a mail on the subject and personal experience from people ... you decide as a moderator if you want to post it here afterword . |
Administrator
|
> I'm gonna send you a mail on the subject and personal experience from
> people ... you decide as a moderator if you want to post it here > afterword. And here is that email... ************************************************************************ It goes like this! I PERSONALLY DO NOT RECOMMEND THE FILTERS, MY EXPERIENCES RESULTED IN MANY ISSUES WITH THESE THINGS, I BOUGHT QUITE A FEW AT THE TIME, I DO RECOMMEND THE METER - YOU MUST CONSIDER THE DIRTY ELECTRICITY. JUST HAD A FELLOW BACK EAST GET A METER AND HE PHONED ME CONFUSED BECAUSE HE WAS GETTING A READING OF 1700, HE COULDN'T BELIEVE IT - HE IS ALSO EXPERIENCEING HIGH ANIEXTY FOR THE SAKE OF HAVING TO REPEAT MYSELF - I AM COPYING AND PASTING MY EXPERIECE WITH STETZER FILTERS WHEN RESPONDING TO ANOTHER CUSTOMER - I HAVE ALSO INCLUDED HIS COMMENTS (HE BOUGHT MY STETZER FILTERS WHEN I SOLD THEM USED ON EBAY - WE HAD SEVERAL CONVERSATIONS ABOUT THEM - HE SAYS HE IS A DOWSER SO TAKE IT FOR WHAT ITS WORTH AND YOU DECIDE) I ALSO INCLUDED INFO ABOUT THE RXDNA WHICH IS WHAT I AM USING NOW FOR MY DIRTY ELECTRICITY AN D AM VERY HAPPY WITH IT, I ALSO SUPPORT AND SELL THE RXDNA. I BELIEVE ITS THE SAFEST WAY TO REDUCE DIRTY ELECTRICY/ My copy of my email sent: I use to use the Stetzer filters in my home to get rid of the dirty electricity as I've mentioned before, but I also had a problem with very high magnetic fields in different spots in my home during the time of using the filters. I had a building biologist come in and inspect my home to find out what I could do about these fields, I thought I had a bad wiring problem. But during his extensive research, he saw I had the filters and suggested I take them all out and test the the magnetic fields again. And what we both discovered is the filters actually enhanced dramatically the magnetic fields I already had. Once removed, the area of magnetic fields reduced to a normal range, 1-3milligauss. The magnetic fields was coming from under the ground along a pipe that was buried. (I live in an apartment) so these fields could not be remedied. I was so surprised to find the filters helped with one thing, but then also created another problem. I could feel a big difference in my home once removed. He said he found this to be a problem in some homes while using the filters. Well this left me without a way to reduce my dirty electricity which was also high. After plugging in the RXDNA to get rid of the dirty electricity and for almost one full day, I could feel energy moving in my house that I never felt before. It was absolutely amazing and shocking. It was like someone had released a dam in my home. I know this may sound strange, but its the best way to describe it. It seemed very odd, then my house felt like it had a dampness I'd never experienced before either. Then it all stopped and my home calmed way down. Somehow or another - the stetzer filters created some sort of electrical damming. This was my experience. No technical explanation. Now all the dirty electricity is dissipated using the rxdna, yes it may be also dissapating the extra current coming in also, I don't know, but my electric bill did not increase. This other unit may be good regarding dirty electricity - I would want to consult with the founder of rxdna for his opinion, I trust his abilities - and I have my own personal experiences with it. My home is very calm. Have you seen this on the powergard http://open4energy.com/forum/home/scam/nevvus_powergard very interesting site you may want to save. Very informative. Oh my, I just went back and re-read the information about other filters on my site for the rxdna, because I wanted to review what was said about other types of filters for getting rid of dirty electricity. Here is a copy of it from my site: What is shocking to me, is that it is exactly what happened in my home, I had a sense of a dam being released once I installed the rxdna unit. It had released this dam. IT WAS A VERY, VERY PROFOUND EXPERIENCE. So you may want to review this information below about Filter products. (Can find this info on my site under rxdna) 1.2.2 Filter Products "Power conditioning" is the broad umbrella of a wide variety of techniques, circuits and systems that filter, smooth, regulate, limit, compensate and adjust AC and DC power to accomplish optimum system performance. In the arena of removing noise, most such conditioning products filter noise. This means that they stop or arrest the noise. It is somewhat akin to damming a river. The problem with the filter approach (and the dam for that matter) is that the pressure is always there. There is something that is always trying to get through. There are various things that can change that will alter the effectiveness of the filter, most notably the load impedance. Simply turning loads off or on, by definition, changes the load impedance, so the effectiveness of a filter, typically varies. Care must be taken in the design and use of filters since they frequently have high-Q circuits. This allows them to have sharp pass bands or stop bands, but has the decided disadvantage that high-Q circuits typically develop very high internal voltages. These internal voltages are Q-times the applied voltage. So a filter with a Q of 10 (not a particularly high Q) that is powered from 120 VAC, will have (10 * 120) 1200 volts AC internal to the filter. Now, moisture, dust and other debris become a problem since they can cause arcing in the filter. In addition to precipitating component breakdown, and causing a fire hazard, electrical arcs are perhaps the most powerful generator of broadband noise that mankind has ever invented. Filters require that they carry the power that they are filtering. So all of the power that needs to be filtered passes through the filter. If a filter is added to a major utility power feed after the fact, it will require quite a bit of efforts to reroute the power through the filter. So thank you I hope to speak to my friend about this unit too hopefully soon to get his take on it. Response from my customer who bought the stetzer filters I don't want to sound mean, but I was going to actually return the Stetzers to you. I felt this sort of 'backing up' of energy almost immediately, it was difficult to explain. But I am torn because I do feel an improvement in the harmonics of the line, something else felt off. It is sad, often solutions to problems, bring about more problems themselves! What a conundrum. Here is something really odd.. Yesterday I saw the power company parked with a van on the street, and a diagnostics expert walking around. I asked the lady across the street what was going on, and she said "Everyone on the street is having some sort of power issue, like surges or something."... Ugh, I wasn't having these issues, but everyone else was! Is it possible the Stetzers were pushing so much noise back into the system it was damning up, overflowing, and blowing back to my neighbors? The timing is interesting, this was exactly 1 day after installing the filters. This is not good, they were out all day trying to find the issues, and I do not think they resolved it. I am also a dowser, intuitive, and energy aware person as I explained. So I certainly dowsed the situation, and the results were, interesting... Percentage improvement in electricity after installing stetzers - 425% Percentage improvement after re-allocating them to current locations - 465% Impediment to flow of improper/dangerous energies - 41% Impediment to flow of beneficial energies - 30% Where is the damned up energy going? Back into mains - 21 Stuck in filters - 45 Stuck in lines somewhere - 11 Re-routed through something else - 36 Ground rods - 99 Pipes - 0 HVAC Vents - 0 So from this, it looks like Stetzers are cleaning up the power, and improving perhaps only 1-2 aspects of the power. But they are also impeding the flow of natural energies. (30%) Also damning up energy (74%). Most of this appears to be stuck in the filters, followed by some going back into the mains, and others finding expression somewhere else (possibly through pipes, as you found). I will ask, did you have ANY grounding connected to pipes? I had all of my electricity re-constructed a couple years ago, and had huge double grounding rods installed out in the yard, before it grounded to pipes, and caused many issues. However, even with this done, I can still trigger mild current through the pipes because they still pick up current from the ground. So from the above, it looks like the filters are holding a lot (capacitors?), 1 is bleeding through possibly heat loss, or natural decay. Some going back into the mains to other homes, or power company. A small amount stuck in the lines somewhere (Between filters?), and a whole bunch going back into the ground rod system I have in place. With your case, it might have been that the 'closest' method to burn off those fields, were the pipes right under you. For me, it would be the 30 feet deep grounding rods in my yard and double grounding array cables run directly in to the mains. This makes sense. I took the liberty of checking your situation from remote (dowser). This is for your location: Percentage improvement in electricity after installing RxDNA - 205% Percentage improvement when you had Stetzers installed - 400% Impediment to flow of improper/dangerous energies with RxDNA - 55% Impediment to flow of improper/dangerous energies with Stetzers - 43% Impediment to flow of beneficial energies with RxDNA- 27% Impediment to flow of beneficial energies with Stetzers- 28% Energy Damning up with RxDNA - 11% Energy Damning up with Stetzers - 94% (average, surges and non surges) So from this, we can tell a few things.. The Stetzer was more effective at blocking a wider range of things, and overall improvement, at the core, was much higher (double). However the RxDNA is slightly better at the more dangerous energies, but less overall spectrum of coverage. But in your case, 94% energy damning of what was filtered, with virtually no good expression of those energies, so you were right, 94% backup of this stuff in your apartment! Remember, you cannot stop energy, you can only alter, or divert it. Cosmic law. I can move a "Ley Line" from a home, but I cannot block it, or a vortex will form, and often those can be more trouble than they are worth, and most people have vortexes in their homes because of improper considerations of natural energies. It's easy to re-locate Ley Lines around a home, and often people experience huge, dramatic increases in well being. So anything a filter like Stetzer does, will have to find expression somewhere else. The RxDNA appears to be able to internally deal with the excess energy somehow, whereas the Stetzers did not, they created 'blockages' in your system, which expressed down to your pipes, and closest grounds. (which might be you walking past too) Since the maximum for me was 74%, let's check overall. After installation of filters - 87% Within 1 hour - 42% Within 12 hours - 11% Within 24 hours - 8% Today - 3% For you, back when you installed the Stetzers. After installation of filters - 100% Within 1 hour - 96% Within 12 hours - 88% Within 24 hours - 88% So it looks like no proper expression of the excess stuff was found in your home, so everything sort of 'charged up', and maintained at 88% inability to dissipate. Right now in your home/apartment. After installation of RxDNA - 28% Within 1 hour - 11% Within 12 hours - 11% Within 24 hours - 11% So I suspect, you felt an improvement after about an hour of RxDNA being plugged it, and it is no wonder why. Interesting, it appears after an initial phase of introduction, the Stetzers actually improve function over time. I searched videos, and found this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2uXJFwc5gM&feature=related these dowsings fall in line with that, as the guy indicates, the filter actually improves over time. I've found the same thing with Stetzers. In your case, I think the issue was, there just wasn't a place for natural expression, nowhere for it to go properly, so it pushed it to your pipes. Do you think that sounds feasible? So what's the answer? RxDNA is interesting, and in theory, makes sense. Convert the extra rubbish to heat, and dissapate the heat. ************************************************************************ |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Does the Furman make you feel less reactive or just the same? Loni
--- On Fri, 1/14/11, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Dirty Electricity Removal To: [hidden email] Date: Friday, January 14, 2011, 1:16 PM > Don't know you guys if you got any luck or what have you come up to > as for witch device work the best for EMF or Dirty Electricity > removal ??? I suppose it depends on what your goal is -- to reduce the readings on your meter, or to feel better? I've tried various filters that measurably reduce the dirty electricity meter readings (Stetzerizer meter, Entech meter), but sometimes that makes no difference in how I feel, and sometimes I actually feel worse from these filters! Meanwhile there are things like the Quantum Home and Earthcalm Home which have NO impact on these meters, yet do make me feel better. That said, I do use a Furman "linear filter" power strip (PST-8,PST-10) for my computer & TV stuff, which does reduce the meter readings without making me feel worse. :-) Marc [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by PUK
What are harmonics? Loni
--- On Sat, 1/15/11, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote: From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: AM radio To: [hidden email] Date: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 3:38 AM The AM radio will pick up harmonics emited by the filters - puk In a message dated 15/01/2011 07:28:13 GMT Standard Time, [hidden email] writes: Isn't the Stetzer filter in a working range of 4kHz to 100kHz so Isn't > the AM radio a bit out of range with its 500 - 1600 khz Marc ? Only if one is using an AM radio to test Stetzer filters... :-) I'm more interested in using AM radios to test unfiltered electronics. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Loni Rosser
> Does the Furman make you feel less reactive or just the same? Loni
The Furman power strip gave the lowest noise reading on the Stetzerizer/Entech meters, but I was never convinced that it made any difference in my symptoms. Compare that with finding a tolerable Blu-ray player vs. not, which makes a *huge* difference. Marc |
In reply to this post by Loni Rosser
By harmonics is meant the integer multiples of 60 Hz, where 60 Hz = 60 cycles per second. Thus, * 120Hz is the 2nd harmonic on the 60 Hz system, and * 180 Hz is the 3rd harmonic on the 60 Hz system, etc. It's also used analogously as a a musical term. You can see what it might look like pictorially at http://library.thinkquest.org/C005705/English/sound/sound5.htm --- In [hidden email], Loni <loni326@...> wrote: > > What are harmonics? Loni > > --- On Sat, 1/15/11, paulpjc@... <paulpjc@...> wrote: > > > From: paulpjc@... <paulpjc@...> > Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: AM radio > To: [hidden email] > Date: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 3:38 AM > The AM radio will pick up harmonics emited by the filters - puk > |
In reply to this post by wabobill
Remember that EMF is a multi-faceted monster.
Thus, while a capacitative filter may reduce voltage pulses, it may be at expense of increasing current pulses. See: http://www.emfrelief.com/capacitive-filters.html --- In [hidden email], "wabobill" <wabobill@...> wrote: > > --- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@> wrote: > > > > > Isn't the Stetzer filter in a working range of 4kHz to 100kHz so Isn't > > > the AM radio a bit out of range with its 500 - 1600 khz Marc ? > > > > Only if one is using an AM radio to test Stetzer filters... :-) > > I'm more interested in using AM radios to test unfiltered electronics. > > > > > The RxDNA is approximately 5 Khz to 500 Khz in range ...maybe this does > > > make a difference for some ! > > > > Hmmm, I've got a filter which has a far greater range than the Stetzerizer > > filter, but it makes me feel worse in the same way as the Stetzer filter. > > So there's more to it than simply frequency range -- I just don't > > seem to do well with the parallel capacitor shunt filters. > > Well are all the devices you tried an kinna fail your testing all base on Capacitor storing,filtering or converting to good energy ? > > This seems to be the problem so far ... > > > > > > The guy who prone me these one told me about his particular home > > > condition and the bad feeling he got with the Stetzer filter as they > > > actually worsen the problem (more EMF)and then install the RxDNA and had > > > such a calm feeling after installing them so that's why I was asking if > > > they where really that good ! > > > > See, now that's a more interesting testimony -- someone who felt > > bad from the Stetzer filter but better with the RxDNA. > > > > (I've got some "Noise Harvesters" from PS Audio, which > > turn noise into light instead of heat, but never noticed any > > improvement from these) > > Are these units also have a capacitor system to store and then burn (in a way of saying it)the extra into light ? > If the light flash it should be store till enough then discharge the capacitor into a flash of light! > > > > > Marc > > > > Funny what you can do with energy ... > > I use to test a tiny radiant energy device that with only 30 milliamps DC ,I can load a big capacitor by capturing the energy spikes with it up to 200-300 Volts and made a heck of a snap when discharging it ! > The capacitor or a lead battery is able to store and change that useless to mankind energy to useful one but Is the process EMF free ? > > So I'm am wondering with all the spikes of energy in the wiring how can a tiny led light do much good as can it burn all that energy with just one unit ???? Yes maybe with 20 or 30 units ???...Correct me if I'm wrong ! > But is the processing EMF free ? > |
In reply to this post by BiBrun
--- In [hidden email], Bill Bruno <wbruno@...> wrote: > > Richard Conrad tells me the "Audio Power Industries" Ultra series > may be the best fitlers. He said they start at about $500. May be some nice units but theses looks like plug trough Type ... The higher the wattage you need the $$$ of a units you will also need ... Good for sound system ,computer etc. but what about a whole house with electric base board heating system and all the other stuff ... A bit more complicated to work with ! > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > The information on the RxDNA is more specific -- works in a > > > much larger frequency range (5 - 500 khz), and removes 60 watts > > > of line noise. > > > > And the cheapest price I can find for an RxDNA is US$599: > > > > http://us.ebid.net/for-sale/reduce-emf-dirty-electricity-27103461.htm > > > > Seems interesting, although I don't know if it would be > > good/bad/indifferent. > > > > Marc > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
In reply to this post by charles-4
--- In [hidden email], "charles" <charles@...> wrote: > > You cannot measure dirty electricity with a Trifield meter. So is an AM radio the best for measuring the radiation part ? |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Dear all,
I had the stetzer filters in my home in Australia that had high magnetic fields. I could physically feel the difference straight away after installation. My dog, who could hardly walk due to EMR effects, got up and walked again and could go for quite a few kilometres. Must work! Cheers, Helen On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > Does the Furman make you feel less reactive or just the same? Loni > > The Furman power strip gave the lowest noise reading on the > Stetzerizer/Entech meters, but I was never convinced that it > made any difference in my symptoms. > > Compare that with finding a tolerable Blu-ray player vs. not, > which makes a *huge* difference. > > Marc > > > -- Helen A Murphy Environomics.com.au <http://environomics.com.au/> 0448 877 384 03 9376 6338 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [hidden email] [hidden email] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [hidden email] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
> My dog, who could hardly walk due to EMR effects, got up and walked
> again and could go for quite a few kilometres. Funny that your dog likes it too! Are you sure there s no placebo effect with your dog?! ;-) --- In [hidden email], Helen Murphy <helenmurphybb@...> wrote: > > Dear all, > > I had the stetzer filters in my home in Australia that had high magnetic > fields. I could physically feel the difference straight away after > installation. > My dog, who could hardly walk due to EMR effects, got up and walked again > and could go for quite a few kilometres. > > Must work! > Cheers, Helen > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Does the Furman make you feel less reactive or just the same? Loni > > > > The Furman power strip gave the lowest noise reading on the > > Stetzerizer/Entech meters, but I was never convinced that it > > made any difference in my symptoms. > > > > Compare that with finding a tolerable Blu-ray player vs. not, > > which makes a *huge* difference. > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > -- > Helen A Murphy > > Environomics.com.au <http://environomics.com.au/> > 0448 877 384 > 03 9376 6338 > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
I found that the stetzer's actually increased the emf in my house. I had more severe symptoms plus I had more fatigue so I sent them back. Wish they would have worked for me. Loni
--- On Wed, 1/19/11, stephen_vandevijvere <[hidden email]> wrote: From: stephen_vandevijvere <[hidden email]> Subject: [eSens] Re: Dirty Electricity Removal To: [hidden email] Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2011, 2:57 PM > My dog, who could hardly walk due to EMR effects, got up and walked > again and could go for quite a few kilometres. Funny that your dog likes it too! Are you sure there s no placebo effect with your dog?! ;-) --- In [hidden email], Helen Murphy <helenmurphybb@...> wrote: > > Dear all, > > I had the stetzer filters in my home in Australia that had high magnetic > fields. I could physically feel the difference straight away after > installation. > My dog, who could hardly walk due to EMR effects, got up and walked again > and could go for quite a few kilometres. > > Must work! > Cheers, Helen > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Does the Furman make you feel less reactive or just the same? Loni > > > > The Furman power strip gave the lowest noise reading on the > > Stetzerizer/Entech meters, but I was never convinced that it > > made any difference in my symptoms. > > > > Compare that with finding a tolerable Blu-ray player vs. not, > > which makes a *huge* difference. > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > -- > Helen A Murphy > > Environomics.com.au <http://environomics.com.au/> > 0448 877 384 > 03 9376 6338 > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
I didn't feel much of an effect from the stetzer filters. I had them about a month. I sent them back. They were really expensive too. So far the only thing that has worked for me is 5 days on the beach in Mexico. Very little electricity there and no cell service. Not where I go anyway. I went on a cruse to Hawaii about 2 years ago. I almost felt normal in a good way. Normal for me now is bad and sometimes worse. :)
--- In [hidden email], Loni <loni326@...> wrote: > > I found that the stetzer's actually increased the emf in my house. I had more severe symptoms plus I had more fatigue so I sent them back. Wish they would have worked for me. Loni > > --- On Wed, 1/19/11, stephen_vandevijvere <stephen_vandevijvere@...> wrote: > > > From: stephen_vandevijvere <stephen_vandevijvere@...> > Subject: [eSens] Re: Dirty Electricity Removal > To: [hidden email] > Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2011, 2:57 PM > > > Â > > > > > My dog, who could hardly walk due to EMR effects, got up and walked > > again and could go for quite a few kilometres. > > Funny that your dog likes it too! Are you sure there s no placebo effect with your dog?! > ;-) > > --- In [hidden email], Helen Murphy <helenmurphybb@> wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > I had the stetzer filters in my home in Australia that had high magnetic > > fields. I could physically feel the difference straight away after > > installation. > > My dog, who could hardly walk due to EMR effects, got up and walked again > > and could go for quite a few kilometres. > > > > Must work! > > Cheers, Helen > > > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Marc Martin <marc@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Does the Furman make you feel less reactive or just the same? Loni > > > > > > The Furman power strip gave the lowest noise reading on the > > > Stetzerizer/Entech meters, but I was never convinced that it > > > made any difference in my symptoms. > > > > > > Compare that with finding a tolerable Blu-ray player vs. not, > > > which makes a *huge* difference. > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Helen A Murphy > > > > Environomics.com.au <http://environomics.com.au/> > > 0448 877 384 > > 03 9376 6338 > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Loni wrote that using Stetzer meters increased EMF in her house. Please share details about what kind of metering you used, Loni. EMF means electromagnetic field and indicates "the field of force associated with electric charge in motion, havingboth electric and magnetic components and containing a definite amountof electromagnetic energy." Many people initially use a Gauss meter, but these only meter magnetic fields of 50-60 Hz. This frequency is not what causes EHS symptoms. There is a magnetic field in the immediate vicinity of installed Stetzer filters, but it only extends a few inches. And the harmful frequencies have been greatly reduced. EHS symptoms are caused by radio and microwave frequencies. The Stetzer meters very efficiently reduce frequencies in the "dirty electricity" range of 4-100KHz in the electricty of the circuits they are plugged into. They are not designed to affect other frequencies, nor can they affect frequencies of current on your water pipes, phone lines, ductwork, etc. They do a specific job and they do it very well. To reduce exposure to harmful frequencies other than 4-100 KHz in building wiring circuits, other measures than installing Stetzer filters must be undertaken. Shivani Arjuna www.LifeEnergies.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
I also heard cases where people got worse from GS filters. Thus, we need to be careful before advertising GS filter until we have more information. A few limited studies is not enough evidence here. (If anything, we have a few limited studies on Q-Link, but Alasdair Philips who is helping ES, says he took it apart, and doesn't believe it can help.)
My AM radio showed that GS filter doesn't fix the source's "dirty electricity" itself. E.g., Stetzer filter does not cancel out bad effects of CFL bulb itself, which is still measurable by AM radio. It can't justify keeping the CFL bulb. Additionally, 4-100 KHz range is not enough if the harmonics go into the MHz range. I also read that it can make the dirty electricity dirtier: http://www.emfrelief.com/capacitive-filters.html --- In [hidden email], SArjuna@... wrote: > > > Loni wrote that using Stetzer meters increased EMF in her house. Please share details about what kind of metering you used, Loni. > > EMF means electromagnetic field and indicates "the field of force associated with electric charge in motion, havingboth electric and magnetic components and containing a definite amountof electromagnetic energy." > > Many people initially use a Gauss meter, but these only meter magnetic fields of 50-60 Hz. This frequency is not what causes EHS symptoms. > > There is a magnetic field in the immediate vicinity of installed Stetzer filters, but it only extends a few inches. And the harmful frequencies have been greatly reduced. > > EHS symptoms are caused by radio and microwave frequencies. > > The Stetzer meters very efficiently reduce frequencies in the "dirty electricity" range of 4-100KHz in the electricty of the circuits they are plugged into. They are not designed to affect other frequencies, nor can they affect frequencies of current on your water pipes, phone lines, ductwork, etc. They do a specific job and they do it very well. > > To reduce exposure to harmful frequencies other than 4-100 KHz in building wiring circuits, other measures than installing Stetzer filters must be undertaken. > > Shivani Arjuna > www.LifeEnergies.com > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
Shivani wrote: "Many people initially use
a Gauss meter, but these only meter magnetic fields of 50-60 Hz. This frequency is not what causes EHS symptoms." You wrong Shivani. I'm hypersensitive to 60 Hz - ever since injury from CRT monitors. I get chest pains and a headache. Also, there are gauss meters that measure frequencies higher than 60 Hz. And remember, Stetzer bypass capacitors only address differential noise - what about common-mode noise? They really shouldn't be called filters - a nomenclature for multi-stage in-line units which have large inductors and are grounded. With that said, I use a few home-made bypass capacitors (Panasonic) and they do clean differential noise quite well into 1 megahertz. The capacitor generates a magnetic field and there is also causes some AM interference. I keep them as far away as possible. Eli --- In [hidden email], "emraware" <emraware@...> wrote: > > I also heard cases where people got worse from GS filters. Thus, we need to be careful before advertising GS filter until we have more information. A few limited studies is not enough evidence here. (If anything, we have a few limited studies on Q-Link, but Alasdair Philips who is helping ES, says he took it apart, and doesn't believe it can help.) > > My AM radio showed that GS filter doesn't fix the source's "dirty electricity" itself. E.g., Stetzer filter does not cancel out bad effects of CFL bulb itself, which is still measurable by AM radio. It can't justify keeping the CFL bulb. > > Additionally, 4-100 KHz range is not enough if the harmonics go into the MHz range. I also read that it can make the dirty electricity dirtier: http://www.emfrelief.com/capacitive-filters.html > > > --- In [hidden email], SArjuna@ wrote: > > > > > > Loni wrote that using Stetzer meters increased EMF in her house. Please share details about what kind of metering you used, Loni. > > > > EMF means electromagnetic field and indicates "the field of force associated with electric charge in motion, havingboth electric and magnetic components and containing a definite amountof electromagnetic energy." > > > > Many people initially use a Gauss meter, but these only meter magnetic fields of 50-60 Hz. This frequency is not what causes EHS symptoms. > > > > There is a magnetic field in the immediate vicinity of installed Stetzer filters, but it only extends a few inches. And the harmful frequencies have been greatly reduced. > > > > EHS symptoms are caused by radio and microwave frequencies. > > > > The Stetzer meters very efficiently reduce frequencies in the "dirty electricity" range of 4-100KHz in the electricty of the circuits they are plugged into. They are not designed to affect other frequencies, nor can they affect frequencies of current on your water pipes, phone lines, ductwork, etc. They do a specific job and they do it very well. > > > > To reduce exposure to harmful frequencies other than 4-100 KHz in building wiring circuits, other measures than installing Stetzer filters must be undertaken. > > > > Shivani Arjuna > > www.LifeEnergies.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > |
Eli,
Please chill with the direct attack. > You wrong Shivani. I'd like to think we are working together to help each other. Shivani is posting what she believes is correct. I too get ES symptoms around electricity and I don't know how much of it is from the dirty electricity or something else that I have no idea about. Please let's not attack each other. That is what "they" want us to do so we weaken our power. I am not the moderator and please forgive me if this post is not warranted from my role. Just can't let this go on a list that I care so much about and that has helped me so much. Many thanks to Marc. Thank you, Andrew On Jan 22, 2011, at 10:15 AM, jaime_schunkewitz wrote: > Shivani wrote: "Many people initially use > a Gauss meter, but these only meter magnetic > fields of 50-60 Hz. This frequency is not > what causes EHS symptoms." > > You wrong Shivani. I'm hypersensitive to > 60 Hz - ever since injury from CRT monitors. > I get chest pains and a headache. > > Also, there are gauss meters that > measure frequencies higher than 60 Hz. > > And remember, Stetzer bypass capacitors > only address differential noise - what > about common-mode noise? They really > shouldn't be called filters - a nomenclature > for multi-stage in-line units which have > large inductors and are grounded. > > With that said, I use a few home-made bypass > capacitors (Panasonic) and they do clean > differential noise quite well into 1 megahertz. > The capacitor generates a magnetic field and > there is also causes some AM interference. > I keep them as far away as possible. > > Eli > > > > --- In [hidden email], "emraware" <emraware@...> wrote: >> >> I also heard cases where people got worse from GS filters. Thus, >> we need to be careful before advertising GS filter until we have >> more information. A few limited studies is not enough evidence >> here. (If anything, we have a few limited studies on Q-Link, but >> Alasdair Philips who is helping ES, says he took it apart, and >> doesn't believe it can help.) >> >> My AM radio showed that GS filter doesn't fix the source's "dirty >> electricity" itself. E.g., Stetzer filter does not cancel out bad >> effects of CFL bulb itself, which is still measurable by AM >> radio. It can't justify keeping the CFL bulb. >> >> Additionally, 4-100 KHz range is not enough if the harmonics go >> into the MHz range. I also read that it can make the dirty >> electricity dirtier: http://www.emfrelief.com/capacitive- >> filters.html >> >> >> --- In [hidden email], SArjuna@ wrote: >>> >>> >>> Loni wrote that using Stetzer meters increased EMF in her >>> house. Please share details about what kind of metering you >>> used, Loni. >>> >>> EMF means electromagnetic field and indicates "the field of force >>> associated with electric charge in motion, havingboth electric >>> and magnetic components and containing a definite amountof >>> electromagnetic energy." >>> >>> Many people initially use a Gauss meter, but these only meter >>> magnetic fields of 50-60 Hz. This frequency is not what causes >>> EHS symptoms. >>> >>> There is a magnetic field in the immediate vicinity of installed >>> Stetzer filters, but it only extends a few inches. And the >>> harmful frequencies have been greatly reduced. >>> >>> EHS symptoms are caused by radio and microwave frequencies. >>> >>> The Stetzer meters very efficiently reduce frequencies in the >>> "dirty electricity" range of 4-100KHz in the electricty of the >>> circuits they are plugged into. They are not designed to affect >>> other frequencies, nor can they affect frequencies of current on >>> your water pipes, phone lines, ductwork, etc. They do a specific >>> job and they do it very well. >>> >>> To reduce exposure to harmful frequencies other than 4-100 KHz in >>> building wiring circuits, other measures than installing Stetzer >>> filters must be undertaken. >>> >>> Shivani Arjuna >>> www.LifeEnergies.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>> >> > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > Andrew McAfee Lecturer/Horn Instructor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Music Director/Conductor Triangle Youth Ballet Former Principal Horn, North Carolina Symphony (1992-2007) 919.787.3022 (home) 919.962-2492 (office) [hidden email] www.hornlessons.org [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
> Eli,
> Please chill with the direct attack. > > You wrong Shivani. I guess you must be more sensitive than I am Andrew, because I would not consider that to be an "attack". On every discussion group, you will find people who disagree with each other. For the most part we're pretty good here... I can't recall having to ban anyone for attacking someone else in years! But yes, as long as we've got Shivani and Charles and me all together on one group, there are bound to be disagreements... :-) Marc |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |