Remote meter reading

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Remote meter reading

johnlankes
Has anyone heard of remote meter reading? The electric company
replaces your electric meter with a meter equipped with a radio
transmitter. The meter-reading person no longer visually inspects the
meter; they drive by in a truck and receive the information via radio
waves. I recently got one of these. I was not given a choice: either
get the meter or have the electricity disconnected. I was afraid I
would not be able to tolerate this thing and would be made homeless
because of it. I felt awful the first day, but my body eventually
adapted to it somewhat. I still feel lousy, but at least I still have
a roof over my head. I live in Virginia (USA) but I think this is
gradually happening all over, mainly because there is no one who
cares enough to try to stop it.

John Lankes

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Remote meter reading

charles-4
Hello John,

yes they want to use it more and more.

However, those signals are not pulsed.
And they use 433 MHz as carrier frequency.

So, the electrosmog should be very low.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus




----- Original Message -----
From: "johnlankes" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 21:13
Subject: [eSens] Remote meter reading


> Has anyone heard of remote meter reading? The electric company
> replaces your electric meter with a meter equipped with a radio
> transmitter. The meter-reading person no longer visually inspects the
> meter; they drive by in a truck and receive the information via radio
> waves. I recently got one of these. I was not given a choice: either
> get the meter or have the electricity disconnected. I was afraid I
> would not be able to tolerate this thing and would be made homeless
> because of it. I felt awful the first day, but my body eventually
> adapted to it somewhat. I still feel lousy, but at least I still have
> a roof over my head. I live in Virginia (USA) but I think this is
> gradually happening all over, mainly because there is no one who
> cares enough to try to stop it.
>
> John Lankes
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Remote meter reading

Andrew McAfee
In reply to this post by johnlankes
I have read that they are installing them in NC also. Fortunately not
in the Raleigh area yet. I am going to have to jump up and scream to
raise awareness around here before it happen.
The meter on the gas valve on the house I think has the radiation
producing source, correct?
Andrew
On Sep 2, 2005, at 3:13 PM, johnlankes wrote:

> Has anyone heard of remote meter reading? The electric company
> replaces your electric meter with a meter equipped with a radio
> transmitter. The meter-reading person no longer visually inspects the
> meter; they drive by in a truck and receive the information via radio
> waves. I recently got one of these. I was not given a choice: either
> get the meter or have the electricity disconnected. I was afraid I
> would not be able to tolerate this thing and would be made homeless
> because of it. I felt awful the first day, but my body eventually
> adapted to it somewhat. I still feel lousy, but at least I still have
> a roof over my head. I live in Virginia (USA) but I think this is
> gradually happening all over, mainly because there is no one who
> cares enough to try to stop it.
>
> John Lankes
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Remote meter reading

Andrew McAfee
In reply to this post by charles-4
Isn't 433 MHz right around the frequency of a human body?
On Sep 2, 2005, at 3:22 PM, charles wrote:

> Hello John,
>
> yes they want to use it more and more.
>
> However, those signals are not pulsed.
> And they use 433 MHz as carrier frequency.
>
> So, the electrosmog should be very low.
>
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> www.milieuziektes.nl
> www.milieuziektes.be
> www.hetbitje.nl
> checked by Norton Antivirus
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "johnlankes" <[hidden email]>
> To: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 21:13
> Subject: [eSens] Remote meter reading
>
>
>> Has anyone heard of remote meter reading? The electric company
>> replaces your electric meter with a meter equipped with a radio
>> transmitter. The meter-reading person no longer visually inspects the
>> meter; they drive by in a truck and receive the information via radio
>> waves. I recently got one of these. I was not given a choice: either
>> get the meter or have the electricity disconnected. I was afraid I
>> would not be able to tolerate this thing and would be made homeless
>> because of it. I felt awful the first day, but my body eventually
>> adapted to it somewhat. I still feel lousy, but at least I still have
>> a roof over my head. I live in Virginia (USA) but I think this is
>> gradually happening all over, mainly because there is no one who
>> cares enough to try to stop it.
>>
>> John Lankes
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Remote meter reading

charles-4
Hello Andrew,

if you inject a glucoseblocker in your body and radiate that part of your
body with 434 MHz, you can cure cancer at that part of your body.
As Dr. John Holt in Australia has done for over 3 (three) decades and cured
a lot of cancers.
(Google for dr. John Holt)

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus



----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew McAfee" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 23:10
Subject: Re: [eSens] Remote meter reading


> Isn't 433 MHz right around the frequency of a human body?
> On Sep 2, 2005, at 3:22 PM, charles wrote:
>
> > Hello John,
> >
> > yes they want to use it more and more.
> >
> > However, those signals are not pulsed.
> > And they use 433 MHz as carrier frequency.
> >
> > So, the electrosmog should be very low.
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Charles Claessens
> > member Verband Baubiologie
> > www.milieuziektes.nl
> > www.milieuziektes.be
> > www.hetbitje.nl
> > checked by Norton Antivirus
> >
> >

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Remote meter reading

snoshoe_2
In reply to this post by johnlankes
A few yrs. ago here (MT), they started making the meters automatically
report to the office. No one even comes by here. We use to read our
own, write it on the current bill, and they'd figure it from that.

I'm sure it does make it worse, but no choice here either where it's
available.

~Snoshoe

--- In [hidden email], "johnlankes" <johnlankes@y...> wrote:
> Has anyone heard of remote meter reading? The electric company
> replaces your electric meter with a meter equipped with a radio
> transmitter. The meter-reading person no longer visually inspects
the
> meter; they drive by in a truck and receive the information via
radio
> waves. I recently got one of these. I was not given a choice: either
> get the meter or have the electricity disconnected. I was afraid I
> would not be able to tolerate this thing and would be made homeless
> because of it. I felt awful the first day, but my body eventually
> adapted to it somewhat. I still feel lousy, but at least I still
have
> a roof over my head. I live in Virginia (USA) but I think this is
> gradually happening all over, mainly because there is no one who
> cares enough to try to stop it.
>
> John Lankes

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Remote meter reading

johnlankes
In reply to this post by charles-4
- The wireless remote meters are 910-920 MHz frequency hopping.
According to an item in the November 2001 issue of NO PLACE TO
HIDE, the total peak exposure is 0.06 uW/cm sq at 10 feet and
0.003 uW/cm sq at 50 feet.

John

-- In [hidden email], "charles" <charles@m...> wrote:

> Hello John,
>
> yes they want to use it more and more.
>
> However, those signals are not pulsed.
> And they use 433 MHz as carrier frequency.
>
> So, the electrosmog should be very low.
>
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> www.milieuziektes.nl
> www.milieuziektes.be
> www.hetbitje.nl
> checked by Norton Antivirus
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "johnlankes" <johnlankes@y...>
> To: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 21:13
> Subject: [eSens] Remote meter reading
>
>
> > Has anyone heard of remote meter reading? The electric company
> > replaces your electric meter with a meter equipped with a radio
> > transmitter. The meter-reading person no longer visually inspects
the
> > meter; they drive by in a truck and receive the information via
radio
> > waves. I recently got one of these. I was not given a choice:
either
> > get the meter or have the electricity disconnected. I was afraid I
> > would not be able to tolerate this thing and would be made
homeless
> > because of it. I felt awful the first day, but my body eventually
> > adapted to it somewhat. I still feel lousy, but at least I still
have

> > a roof over my head. I live in Virginia (USA) but I think this is
> > gradually happening all over, mainly because there is no one who
> > cares enough to try to stop it.
> >
> > John Lankes
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Remote meter reading

Andrew McAfee
I wonder if putting a shield next to it will keep the majority of it
out of the house. Of course that wouldn't help the neighbor's one that
would be blasting into my house.
Andrew
On Sep 4, 2005, at 1:18 PM, johnlankes wrote:

> - The wireless remote meters are 910-920 MHz frequency hopping.
> According to an item in the November 2001 issue of NO PLACE TO
> HIDE, the total peak exposure is 0.06 uW/cm sq at 10 feet and
> 0.003 uW/cm sq at 50 feet.
>
> John
>
> -- In [hidden email], "charles" <charles@m...> wrote:
>> Hello John,
>>
>> yes they want to use it more and more.
>>
>> However, those signals are not pulsed.
>> And they use 433 MHz as carrier frequency.
>>
>> So, the electrosmog should be very low.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Charles Claessens
>> member Verband Baubiologie
>> www.milieuziektes.nl
>> www.milieuziektes.be
>> www.hetbitje.nl
>> checked by Norton Antivirus
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "johnlankes" <johnlankes@y...>
>> To: <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 21:13
>> Subject: [eSens] Remote meter reading
>>
>>
>>> Has anyone heard of remote meter reading? The electric company
>>> replaces your electric meter with a meter equipped with a radio
>>> transmitter. The meter-reading person no longer visually inspects
> the
>>> meter; they drive by in a truck and receive the information via
> radio
>>> waves. I recently got one of these. I was not given a choice:
> either
>>> get the meter or have the electricity disconnected. I was afraid I
>>> would not be able to tolerate this thing and would be made
> homeless
>>> because of it. I felt awful the first day, but my body eventually
>>> adapted to it somewhat. I still feel lousy, but at least I still
> have
>>> a roof over my head. I live in Virginia (USA) but I think this is
>>> gradually happening all over, mainly because there is no one who
>>> cares enough to try to stop it.
>>>
>>> John Lankes
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Remote meter reading

Benson, Sarah (Sen L. Allison)
In reply to this post by johnlankes
Dr John Holt has done much remarkable work here in Australia - he is
elderly now, but unfortunately has not been successful in getting any
funding for training future doctors in this area.

The governent feel that his work is not worthy enough.

Sarah

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
charles
Sent: Sunday, 4 September 2005 1:46 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [eSens] Remote meter reading


Hello Andrew,

if you inject a glucoseblocker in your body and radiate that part of
your body with 434 MHz, you can cure cancer at that part of your body.
As Dr. John Holt in Australia has done for over 3 (three) decades and
cured a lot of cancers. (Google for dr. John Holt)

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus



----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew McAfee" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 23:10
Subject: Re: [eSens] Remote meter reading


> Isn't 433 MHz right around the frequency of a human body?
> On Sep 2, 2005, at 3:22 PM, charles wrote:
>
> > Hello John,
> >
> > yes they want to use it more and more.
> >
> > However, those signals are not pulsed.
> > And they use 433 MHz as carrier frequency.
> >
> > So, the electrosmog should be very low.
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Charles Claessens
> > member Verband Baubiologie
> > www.milieuziektes.nl
> > www.milieuziektes.be
> > www.hetbitje.nl
> > checked by Norton Antivirus
> >
> >





 
Yahoo! Groups Links