Re: grounding technique

Someone suggested standing on the ground to ground away electrical
charges one has taken on. This is a great technique, but can be like Russian
roulette these days because of the fact that the American electrical utilities are
using the ground to return so much of the current to their substations. If
one happens to be standing in a pathway of current returning to a substation,
one will take in, not discharge, and unfortunately the current will be mostly
the health-damaging high frequencies.
As the electrical loads have become more host to more and more high
frequency pollution, less and less of the return current has been able to be
carried back to the substations via the utility wiring systems, which are extremely
outdated. Rather than redo their system the utilities have gotten
permission from the PSCs to ground all their poles, giving the return current free
access to the ground. High frequency current behaves differently from 60 Hz,
being subject to what is called the “skin effect.” It spreads out, is not
easily contained in wires. So these high frequencies are far more prone to
become ground currents than the 60 Hz portion of the loads is. (This is also why
they skim over surfaces in your home that you would not think of as being
conductive.)
The percentage of the loads that is RF has been steadily increasing, as
more and more wave-chopping electronic equipment is used. In 1998 American
electrical loads averaged 30% high frequency. By 2002 it had increased to
70%, as noted by the Science Advisors to the Minnesota Public Utilities
Commission. E.P.R.I., the research arm of the American electrical utilities, also
admits this.
One can trace such streams of ground current using an oscilloscope.  
You stick a conductive rod attached to one of the 'scopes leads into the ground.
Then you insert a rod attached to the second lead into the ground a few
feet away, say four feet. You note any current detected. Leaving rod #1 inthe
same place, you proceed to take readings as you move rod #2 to different spots
that form a circle around rod #1, which sits at the center of your circle,
noting all your readings. You then move your entire operation to the adjoining
section of yard and repeat the process. If there is a current flow across
your yard you will soon have mapped out its path.
This process can be done using a multimeter, but unfortunately will not
be nearly as accurate.
A general rule of thumb is not to spend time directly on the ground on
the side of your house where the electrical main comes in.
Another good idea is not to use grounding to earth for bed and personal
tethers, unless you are able to test that current is not flowing back through
them from the ground.
In many areas, standing on the ground is not an option much of the year,
anyway. A handier technique is to stand on metal foil, or in Epsom salts
water for 5 or 10 minutes. Here again, you must be sure that the place you
have set the foil or water is not in a field.
If you use foil, you must be barefoot and it helps if your feet are
moist. Do not touch anything but the foil or water during the time you are
grounding.
Using the B&E meter he got in Russia, Dave Stetzer has found that the
human body does indeed store AC. This is due to resonance, as explained by Dr.
Robert Becker in his book Cross Currents.    
Someone who has worked all day on a computer still has almost as many
volts per meter charge the next morning as he/she does at the end of the
workday. This means that the damaging RF is continually “doing its thing” in the
body, even after the individual has moved away from the area of exposure.  
Hence, daily grounding is an excellent technique to practice.  
And of course, so is simple avoidance of RF exposure, or removal of the
RF through use of the Graham Stetzer filters. Clean 60 Hz has far less
ability to induce/transmit current into our bodies than high frequency current
does, and does less damage as well.  
Regards,
Shivani Arjuna Small
     
     
     


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> Clean 60 Hz has far less ability to induce/transmit current
> into our bodies than high frequency current does, and does
> less damage as well.

Of course, the problem these days is that we are exposed
to high frequencies from all sorts of sources these days,
so cleaning up your power lines will still leave you
exposed to high frequencies from cellphone towers,
your neighbor's wireless internet transmitters,
your neighbor's wireless telephones & cellphones,
you local HDTV transmissions, satellite transmissions
of DirecTV and XM Radio, etc., etc.

So one really needs some form a protection that stays
with you wherever you go.

BTW, one item I rarely mention (and it seems that nobody
else here has tried) is the Earthcalm resonator (Earthcalm.com).
This item has a rather unique (for me) property that I really
feel like I'm encased in a protective bubble while I'm
wearing it. The drawbacks to it is that after wearing
it for too long I get nausea, sweatiness, and chest pains
(although these are diminished if I put it inside my socks
instead of wearing it around my neck). I mention
this because it describes itself as grounding you
without you actually having to make contact with the
Earth.

Marc

Interesting. My husband and I have our mattress grounded to earth,
and my husband uses a tether attached to the earth when he works at
his computer and sometimes also when he sleeps. Our experience seems
to support the statement that the ground does not always work
consistently to draw electrical charges away from the body. For us,
sometimes this measure is extremely useful (gives strong relief) --
and sometimes it feels as if bad energy is being drawn into the body
instead. Very nasty when that happens.

What is not clear to me from your post, Shivani, is whether the same
patch of earth can be sometimes safe for grounding, and sometimes
not. We use the same patch of earth all the time (right outside our
bedroom window) -- have never moved the grounding rods. In theory, we
could follow your directions and test that entire area -- but if the
flow of electrical current moves from day to day (or hour to hour, or
varies according to moisture content in the ground), that means we
would need to test constantly -- because a piece of earth that tests
well one day could be full of toxic energy the next...?

Just trying to get clear on the implications of your post. If I
understand you correctly, the only "safe" alternative to grounding to
the earth would be to stand in an Epsom salt bath. But again, based
on your description I wasn't sure if you meant the salt bath had to
be set on an area of the ground which had been recently tested (as
not being in an EM field). Is this correct?

Thanks,
Cara

--- In [hidden email], SArjuna@a... wrote:
>
> Someone suggested standing on the ground to ground away
electrical
> charges one has taken on. This is a great technique, but can be
like Russian
> roulette these days because of the fact that the American
electrical utilities are
> using the ground to return so much of the current to their
substations. If
> one happens to be standing in a pathway of current returning to a
substation,
> one will take in, not discharge, and unfortunately the current will
be mostly
> the health-damaging high frequencies.
> As the electrical loads have become more host to more and more
high
> frequency pollution, less and less of the return current has been
able to be
> carried back to the substations via the utility wiring systems,
which are extremely
> outdated. Rather than redo their system the utilities have gotten
> permission from the PSCs to ground all their poles, giving the
return current free
> access to the ground. High frequency current behaves differently
from 60 Hz,
> being subject to what is called the “skin effect.” It spreads
out, is not
> easily contained in wires. So these high frequencies are far more
prone to
> become ground currents than the 60 Hz portion of the loads is.  
(This is also why
> they skim over surfaces in your home that you would not think of as
being
> conductive.)
> The percentage of the loads that is RF has been steadily
increasing, as
> more and more wave-chopping electronic equipment is used. In 1998
American
> electrical loads averaged 30% high frequency. By 2002 it had
increased to
> 70%, as noted by the Science Advisors to the Minnesota Public
Utilities
> Commission. E.P.R.I., the research arm of the American electrical
utilities, also
> admits this.
> One can trace such streams of ground current using an
oscilloscope.  
> You stick a conductive rod attached to one of the 'scopes leads
into the ground.
> Then you insert a rod attached to the second lead into the ground
a few
> feet away, say four feet. You note any current detected. Leaving
rod #1 in the
> same place, you proceed to take readings as you move rod #2 to
different spots
> that form a circle around rod #1, which sits at the center of your
circle,
> noting all your readings. You then move your entire operation to
the adjoining
> section of yard and repeat the process. If there is a current
flow across
> your yard you will soon have mapped out its path.
> This process can be done using a multimeter, but unfortunately
will not
> be nearly as accurate.
> A general rule of thumb is not to spend time directly on the
ground on
> the side of your house where the electrical main comes in.
> Another good idea is not to use grounding to earth for bed and
personal
> tethers, unless you are able to test that current is not flowing
back through
> them from the ground.
> In many areas, standing on the ground is not an option much of
the year,
> anyway. A handier technique is to stand on metal foil, or in
Epsom salts
> water for 5 or 10 minutes. Here again, you must be sure that the
place you
> have set the foil or water is not in a field.
> If you use foil, you must be barefoot and it helps if your
feet are
> moist. Do not touch anything but the foil or water during the
time you are
> grounding.
> Using the B&E meter he got in Russia, Dave Stetzer has found
that the
> human body does indeed store AC. This is due to resonance, as
explained by Dr.
> Robert Becker in his book Cross Currents.    
> Someone who has worked all day on a computer still has almost
as many
> volts per meter charge the next morning as he/she does at the end
of the
> workday. This means that the damaging RF is continually “doing
its thing” in the
> body, even after the individual has moved away from the area of
exposure.  
> Hence, daily grounding is an excellent technique to practice.  
> And of course, so is simple avoidance of RF exposure, or
removal of the
> RF through use of the Graham Stetzer filters. Clean 60 Hz has far
less
> ability to induce/transmit current into our bodies than high
frequency current
> does, and does less damage as well.  
> Regards,
> Shivani Arjuna Small
>      
>      
>      
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]