I wish I'd read your message a month ago when you posted it. I hope
others gave you an earful abut the dangers of root canals. Read Root Canal Coverup. And The Tooth Truth. I had a root canal tooth removed after I learned how harmful they are, and experienced immediate cessation of incapacitating symptoms I'd been experiencing about one day a week. The stories of such experiences are myriad. Regarding dental materials, please see the website of Dr. Douglas Cook, www.dentistryhealth.com/. (He's my dentist. I drive over 2 hrs. to see him, but others come from other states and have to stay over. He's booked a year ahead, but you'll find great info. on his website.) Shivani Arjuna www.LifeEnergies.com . [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Oh swell. More EMFs that we can't escape. This will most likely kill off all the people with pacemakers. Among others.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/09/02/wireless.electricity/index.html Donnie |
Gosh Donnie that is very scary. Loni
--- On Wed, 9/2/09, Donnie <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Donnie <[hidden email]> Subject: [eSens] A cordless future for electricity To: Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2009, 9:10 AM Oh swell. More EMFs that we can't escape. This will most likely kill off all the people with pacemakers. Among others. http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/09/02/wireless.electricity/index.html Donnie ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by SArjuna
Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users.
The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some scientists and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the cell phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia Bulletin, PA. http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/08/31/top_stories/doc4a9aa14099aa7897239842.txt Or use this link, if the above url wraps. http://tinyurl.com/nxoo7d Donnie |
Mercola wrote along the same lines as this only yesterday - he showed brainscan imaging of what cell phone use does to the brain of a child under 10 years old - compared to the impact on an adult - the radiation penetrates the brain of a child much deeper than that for an adult. If you saw those images you would not let your child near a cell phone. But the more shocking thing was [as we here already know] the greater damage is done by dect phones. I didn't become ES until after I had installed a dect phone in my home - within 4 months I was ES - I don't have it any more.
--- On Thu, 3/9/09, Donnie <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Donnie <[hidden email]> Subject: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users To: [hidden email] Date: Thursday, 3 September, 2009, 9:41 PM Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users. The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some scientists and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the cell phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia Bulletin, PA. http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/08/31/top_stories/doc4a9aa14099aa7897239842.txt Or use this link, if the above url wraps. http://tinyurl.com/nxoo7d Donnie ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
Note that, as the group creator/moderator, I don't want "eSens" to dwell
too much on EMF causing cancer -- there are plenty of forums which focus on the dangers of EMF -- what makes "eSens" unique is that it is for people who are having obvious, immediate bad reactions to EMF, and are trying to find ways to cope / get better. Thanks! Marc |
In reply to this post by Steph Smith
I saw images of cell phone radiation penetration into the brains of children. That is horrifying. Unfortunately, even if parents know about the risks, they ignore them, and let the kiddies do what they want.
Donnie |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
I apologize for sending the cancer risk post to the list. I misunderstood the rules, and assumed that all dangers of cell phones and EMFs were permitted. I won't send any more of them.
Donnie |
In reply to this post by Steph Smith
What is a dect phone?
--- On Fri, 9/4/09, Stephanie Smith <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Stephanie Smith <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users To: [hidden email] Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 11:45 AM Mercola wrote along the same lines as this only yesterday - he showed brainscan imaging of what cell phone use does to the brain of a child under 10 years old - compared to the impact on an adult - the radiation penetrates the brain of a child much deeper than that for an adult. If you saw those images you would not let your child near a cell phone. But the more shocking thing was [as we here already know] the greater damage is done by dect phones. I didn't become ES until after I had installed a dect phone in my home - within 4 months I was ES - I don't have it any more. --- On Thu, 3/9/09, Donnie <mickiemc@frontierne t.net> wrote: From: Donnie <mickiemc@frontierne t.net> Subject: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users To: eSens@yahoogroups. com Date: Thursday, 3 September, 2009, 9:41 PM Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users. The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some scientists and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the cell phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia Bulletin, PA. http://thebulletin. us/articles/ 2009/08/31/ top_stories/ doc4a9aa14099aa7 897239842. txt Or use this link, if the above url wraps. http://tinyurl. com/nxoo7d Donnie ------------ --------- --------- ------ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
A DECT 6.0 (1.9 GHz) phone broadcasts it's signal 24/7, whereas a 5.8 GHz, 2.4 GHz, or 900 MHz phone only broadcasts a signal when it's being used to make a call. Hope this helps, Loni.
Rob --- In [hidden email], Loni <loni326@...> wrote: > > What is a dect phone? > > --- On Fri, 9/4/09, Stephanie Smith <reader41@...> wrote: > > > From: Stephanie Smith <reader41@...> > Subject: Re: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users > To: [hidden email] > Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 11:45 AM > > > > > > > Mercola wrote along the same lines as this only yesterday - he showed brain scan imaging of what cell phone use does to the brain of a child under 10 years old - compared to the impact on an adult - the radiation penetratesthe brain of a child much deeper than that for an adult. If you saw those images you would not let your child near a cell phone. But the more shocking thing was [as we here already know] the greater damage is done by dect phones. I didn't become ES until after I had installed a dect phone in my home - within 4 months I was ES - I don't have it any more. > > --- On Thu, 3/9/09, Donnie <mickiemc@frontierne t.net> wrote: > > From: Donnie <mickiemc@frontierne t.net> > Subject: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users > To: eSens@yahoogroups. com > Date: Thursday, 3 September, 2009, 9:41 PM > > Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users. > > The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some scientists and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the cell phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia Bulletin, PA. > > http://thebulletin. us/articles/ 2009/08/31/ top_stories/ doc4a9aa14099aa7 897239842. txt > > Or use this link, if the above url wraps. > > http://tinyurl. com/nxoo7d > > Donnie > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Sorry Marc
You are right and I didn't mean to spark anything off on this - it is just that part of my motivation for wanting to get well is to not end up with anuntreatable cancer so it is hard for me to not see the two as going hand in hand. But you are right - we should focus on treating and improving our condition. BW Steph --- On Fri, 4/9/09, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users To: [hidden email] Date: Friday, 4 September, 2009, 6:54 PM Note that, as the group creator/moderator, I don't want "eSens" to dwell too much on EMF causing cancer -- there are plenty of forums which focus on the dangers of EMF -- what makes "eSens" unique is that it is for people who are having obvious, immediate bad reactions to EMF, and are trying to find ways to cope / get better. Thanks! Marc [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |