Re:Need dental work

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
11 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re:Need dental work

SArjuna
I wish I'd read your message a month ago when you posted it. I hope
others gave you an earful abut the dangers of root canals. Read Root Canal
Coverup. And The Tooth Truth.

I had a root canal tooth removed after I learned how harmful they are, and
experienced immediate cessation of incapacitating symptoms I'd been
experiencing about one day a week. The stories of such experiences are myriad.

Regarding dental materials, please see the website of Dr. Douglas Cook,
www.dentistryhealth.com/. (He's my dentist. I drive over 2 hrs. to see
him, but others come from other states and have to stay over. He's
booked a year ahead, but you'll find great info. on his website.)

Shivani Arjuna
www.LifeEnergies.com










.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

A cordless future for electricity

Donnie
Oh swell. More EMFs that we can't escape. This will most likely kill off all the people with pacemakers. Among others.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/09/02/wireless.electricity/index.html

Donnie

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: A cordless future for electricity

Loni Rosser
Gosh Donnie that is very scary. Loni

--- On Wed, 9/2/09, Donnie <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Donnie <[hidden email]>
Subject: [eSens] A cordless future for electricity
To:
Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2009, 9:10 AM


Oh swell. More EMFs that we can't escape. This will most likely kill off all the people with pacemakers. Among others.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/09/02/wireless.electricity/index.html

Donnie


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links






     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users

Donnie
In reply to this post by SArjuna
Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users.

The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some scientists and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the cell phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia Bulletin, PA.

http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/08/31/top_stories/doc4a9aa14099aa7897239842.txt

Or use this link, if the above url wraps.

http://tinyurl.com/nxoo7d

Donnie

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users

Steph Smith
Mercola wrote along the same lines as this only yesterday - he showed brainscan imaging of what cell phone use does to the brain of a child under 10 years old - compared to the impact on an adult - the radiation penetrates the brain of a child much deeper than that for an adult. If you saw those images you would not let your child near a cell phone. But the more shocking thing was [as we here already know] the greater damage is done by dect phones. I didn't become ES until after I had installed a dect phone in my home - within 4 months I was ES - I don't have it any more.

--- On Thu, 3/9/09, Donnie <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Donnie <[hidden email]>
Subject: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users
To: [hidden email]
Date: Thursday, 3 September, 2009, 9:41 PM


Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users.

The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some scientists and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the cell phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia Bulletin, PA.

http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/08/31/top_stories/doc4a9aa14099aa7897239842.txt

Or use this link, if the above url wraps.

http://tinyurl.com/nxoo7d

Donnie


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links






     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users

Marc Martin
Administrator
Note that, as the group creator/moderator, I don't want "eSens" to dwell
too much on EMF causing cancer -- there are plenty of forums which focus
on the dangers of EMF -- what makes "eSens" unique is that it is for
people who are having obvious, immediate bad reactions to EMF, and are
trying to find ways to cope / get better.

Thanks!

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users

Donnie
In reply to this post by Steph Smith
I saw images of cell phone radiation penetration into the brains of children. That is horrifying. Unfortunately, even if parents know about the risks, they ignore them, and let the kiddies do what they want.

Donnie

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users

Donnie
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
I apologize for sending the cancer risk post to the list. I misunderstood the rules, and assumed that all dangers of cell phones and EMFs were permitted. I won't send any more of them.

Donnie

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users

Loni Rosser
In reply to this post by Steph Smith
What is a dect phone?

--- On Fri, 9/4/09, Stephanie Smith <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Stephanie Smith <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users
To: [hidden email]
Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 11:45 AM


 



Mercola wrote along the same lines as this only yesterday - he showed brainscan imaging of what cell phone use does to the brain of a child under 10 years old - compared to the impact on an adult - the radiation penetrates the brain of a child much deeper than that for an adult. If you saw those images you would not let your child near a cell phone. But the more shocking thing was [as we here already know] the greater damage is done by dect phones. I didn't become ES until after I had installed a dect phone in my home - within 4 months I was ES - I don't have it any more.

--- On Thu, 3/9/09, Donnie <mickiemc@frontierne t.net> wrote:

From: Donnie <mickiemc@frontierne t.net>
Subject: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users
To: eSens@yahoogroups. com
Date: Thursday, 3 September, 2009, 9:41 PM

Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users.

The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some scientists and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the cell phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia Bulletin, PA.

http://thebulletin. us/articles/ 2009/08/31/ top_stories/ doc4a9aa14099aa7 897239842. txt

Or use this link, if the above url wraps.

http://tinyurl. com/nxoo7d

Donnie

------------ --------- --------- ------

Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

















     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users

rob77max
A DECT 6.0 (1.9 GHz) phone broadcasts it's signal 24/7, whereas a 5.8 GHz, 2.4 GHz, or 900 MHz phone only broadcasts a signal when it's being used to make a call. Hope this helps, Loni.

Rob  

--- In [hidden email], Loni <loni326@...> wrote:

>
> What is a dect phone?
>
> --- On Fri, 9/4/09, Stephanie Smith <reader41@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Stephanie Smith <reader41@...>
> Subject: Re: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 11:45 AM
>
>
>  
>
>
>
> Mercola wrote along the same lines as this only yesterday - he showed brain scan imaging of what cell phone use does to the brain of a child under 10 years old - compared to the impact on an adult - the radiation penetratesthe brain of a child much deeper than that for an adult. If you saw those images you would not let your child near a cell phone. But the more shocking thing was [as we here already know] the greater damage is done by dect phones. I didn't become ES until after I had installed a dect phone in my home - within 4 months I was ES - I don't have it any more.
>
> --- On Thu, 3/9/09, Donnie <mickiemc@frontierne t.net> wrote:
>
> From: Donnie <mickiemc@frontierne t.net>
> Subject: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users
> To: eSens@yahoogroups. com
> Date: Thursday, 3 September, 2009, 9:41 PM
>
> Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users.
>
> The cancer threat of cell phone use has been recognized by some scientists and critics for decades, but has, essentially, been covered up by the cell phone industry and by much of the mainstream media. Philadelphia Bulletin, PA.
>
> http://thebulletin. us/articles/ 2009/08/31/ top_stories/ doc4a9aa14099aa7 897239842. txt
>
> Or use this link, if the above url wraps.
>
> http://tinyurl. com/nxoo7d
>
> Donnie
>
> ------------ --------- --------- ------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>      
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users

Steph Smith
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Sorry Marc
 
You are right and I didn't mean to spark anything off on this - it is just that part of my motivation for wanting to get well is to not end up with anuntreatable cancer so it is hard for me to not see the two as going hand in hand.
 
But you are right - we should focus on treating and improving our condition.
 
BW
 
Steph

--- On Fri, 4/9/09, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] Higher cancer rates in under-18 cell phone users
To: [hidden email]
Date: Friday, 4 September, 2009, 6:54 PM


 



Note that, as the group creator/moderator, I don't want "eSens" to dwell
too much on EMF causing cancer -- there are plenty of forums which focus
on the dangers of EMF -- what makes "eSens" unique is that it is for
people who are having obvious, immediate bad reactions to EMF, and are
trying to find ways to cope / get better.

Thanks!

Marc
















     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]