Re: Hello everyone-an introduction/Stewart

>
> Hi Karen,
>
> No, new paragraph is < p >
> &nbsp ; is a non-breaking or Hard space, which can be generated by
> Shift-Spacebar
>
> Also, it seems to be happening where two spaces were typed. This would
> be consistant with Some programs that change one space out of a pair to
> &nbsp ; to keep the extra space.
>
> Stewart
>
> Karen Eck wrote:
> > &nbsp is html for non-breaking space like you use to make horizontal
> > spaces, such as between paragraphs. Try not hitting enter as you
> > type. Just make it one long string of text with all the normal
> > punctuation and see what happens.
> >
> >
>

>
> I can guarantee you that wired is much better than wireless.
>
> A lot of electrosensibles are succeptable to *dirty power*.
>
> Dirty power is not only in the *mains*, but also *in the air*.
>
> A number of electrical appliances may produce those frequencies.
>
> Especially TV sets do.
> They have frequencies for producing the images, but others for digital
> images.
> So there are very different frequencies used for the image building on
> television screens.
>
> Most of them are between 5 kHz and 200 kHz.
>
> I use for detection a VLF Spion with a small digital antenna. With it, I can
> measure the total surface of e LCD television,and that way can find any
> disturbing spots, for which electrosensibles can have adverse health
> reactions.
> Some television sets are fine, while others are really a disaster.
>
> Listen to some modulations on:
> http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Pagina109.html
>
> Electrosensibles beware !!
>
> Those sounds are audible, so the frequencies may be between 20 Hz and 20.000
> Hz.
> So technically, high frequency carrier frequencies cannot be there included,
> like 900 MHz or 1800 MHz.
> Stiil, electrosensible people may experience trouble while just listeningto
> these sounds.
> The original source is not present, and neither are the Hf carrier
> frequencies.
>
> That is the proof of the pudding, that the pulsrates, or modulations, which
> are lowfrequent, do the harm to people.
>
>
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> www.milieuziektes.nl
> www.milieuziektes.be
> www.hetbitje.nl
> checked by Bitdefender
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Evie" <evie15422@...>
> To: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [eSens] Hello everyone-an introduction/Stewart
>
>
> > Hi, Amy,
> > &nbsp;
> > Sorry the last reply got sent without anything in it!&nbsp;
> > &nbsp;
> > I am not totally sure all wired is better than wireless.&nbsp; For me
> > personally, I see a diffference between analog and digital signals.&nbsp;
> > This comes into play particularly with the tv sets now.&nbsp; I see a
> > difference with "high definition" tv programs&nbsp;playing on my analogtv
> > too.&nbsp; I think what&nbsp;the govt is&nbsp;trying to do is phase out
> > analog transmittions altogether.&nbsp; I now have an analog cordless
> > phone--it doesn't bother me at all.&nbsp; But I cannot go near my
> > brother's digital&nbsp;phone in his home.&nbsp; Same with tv, my analog
> > set usually doesn't bother me, except when you go into the settings and
> > get the"blue screen".&nbsp; However,&nbsp;when a high def tv program comes
> > on, I get headaches and dizzy.&nbsp; (Followed by turning it off.)&nbsp;
> > &nbsp;
> > I was thinking I'd be ok&nbsp;with a&nbsp;cable connection&nbsp;with my
> > analog/digital set tuned into analog once they do away with analog next
> > year, but now I am wondering whether that will work either.&nbsp; (Since I
> > can still react to hi def programs with it set to analog.)&nbsp;
> > &nbsp;
> > So much of this is not known until you get into the situation and you just
> > have to play around with fixes or get rid of particular things you can
> > live without.&nbsp; But do not assume a corded item is better, because you
> > may be like me and react to digital frequencies.&nbsp; You may need to
> > experiment some with the electronics of friends to see what you can
> > tolerate best.&nbsp; But know that that can also change.&nbsp; There are
> > things I once tolerated well that have now become less tolerable.
> > &nbsp;
> > Also, you mentioned about wi-max towers affecting the out-lying areas of
> > the country.&nbsp; That is true.&nbsp; I live in a rural area and it can
> > be bad in much of the mountainous areas.&nbsp; But since you are house
> > hunting....&nbsp; If you can, try out either the highest points in your
> > area, where no other mtn ranges are even close.&nbsp; (They position most
> > towers on mtn ranges and position them so the frequencies are somewhat
> > pointed down, rather than out--at least that is my experience here.&nbsp;
> > So on mountains some ways away from towers can be quite peaceful,
> > es-wise.)&nbsp; OR, if you can find valleys where there are twists and
> > turns in the topography--no long straight valley where a tower at either
> > end would affect you--that can also sometimes work well as long as there
> > are no towers above.&nbsp; In a city setting, many buildings can also be
> > shielding, but then you have to be concerned about what electronics the
> > occupants are using.
> > &nbsp;
> > Also there is this site, sent to us by another member here, which&nbsp;you
> > can use to tell where towers are:
> > &nbsp;
> > http://www.antennasearch.com/
> > &nbsp;
> > Good luck,
> > Diane
> > &nbsp;
> >
> >
> > --- On Tue, 6/10/08, javamdnss@... javamdnss@... wrote:
> >
> > From: javamdnss@... javamdnss@...
> > Subject: Re: [eSens] Hello everyone-an introduction/Stewart
> > To: [hidden email]
> > Date: Tuesday, June 10, 2008, 12:55 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for all the info you gave. That's one thing I can't see about
> > moving
> > to the middle of nowhere. Now they are planning these WIMAX towers, I
> > don't
> > see why it would even matter. And right now we have a cordless phone, but
> > when
> > we move I'm changing that. So would you all say that wireless devices are
> > worse than nonwireless?
> > Amy
> >
> > ************ **Vote for your city's best dining and nightlife. City's Best
> > 2008. (http://citysbest. aol.com?ncid= aolacg0005000000 0102)
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

> Hi,
>
> I've been listening to the VLF-sounds from Charles' site:
> http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Pagina109.html
>
> I felt really sick when listening to the sounds:
> -HAARP2
> -HAARP3
>
> I have only listened to it for like 2 minutes (to each file), my immediate
> symptoms were:
> -pain in heart
> -a bit of a headache/migraine
>
> The pain in my chest/heart remained the following hours and slowly
> disappeared... I also had tingling feet (and legs!).