Q-link, anybody?

I was just wondering if anyone here has had luck with any Q-link jewelry (I'm especially thinking of you, Elysia.  We seem to have similar problems with sensitivities and treatment, ie neither of us can tolerate sheilding material, etc.)  This is so frustrating because my mom knows this lady she used to work with uses this and now she can't find her address or phone # (private)

On 7/30/2011 9:20 AM, Glitter wrote:
>I was just wondering if anyone here has had luck with any Q-link jewelry
>(I'm especially thinking of you, Elysia.  We seem to have similar
problems
>with sensitivities and treatment, ie neither of us can tolerate
sheilding
>material, etc.)  This is so frustrating because my mom knows this lady
>she used to work with uses this and now she can't find her address or
>phone # (private)

We've had some positive reports on the Q-Link pendants.  Personally,
I've found them too weak to be useful -- maybe if I had about 100 of
them on my person they'd help me with computers, florescent lights,
etc., but wearing one of them doesn't make much difference for me.

Marc

I found that they made matters worse, which kinda makes sense if they are what they appear to be: a coil of wire that acts as an antenna.

Pendants, in my experience, have mainly been expensive offers of false hope.

--- In [hidden email], "Glitter" <glitterglitter13@...> wrote:
>
> I was just wondering if anyone here has had luck with any Q-link jewelry (I'm especially thinking of you, Elysia.  We seem to have similar problems with sensitivities and treatment, ie neither of us can tolerate sheilding material, etc.)  This is so frustrating because my mom knows this lady she used to work with uses this and now she can't find her address or phone # (private)
>

Hi Glitter,

I use the q-link and have done so for years. I wear it daily and it does seem to help as I miss it a lot if I temporally misplace it. Of course everyone is different. We had this same discussion a few months ago in detail. You may be able to locate it in the archieves for additional info.

Cheryl

--- On Sat, 7/30/11, Glitter <[hidden email]> wrote:

From: Glitter <[hidden email]>
Subject: [eSens] Q-link, anybody?
To: [hidden email]
Date: Saturday, July 30, 2011, 9:20 AM







 



 


   
     
     
      I was just wondering if anyone here has had luck with any Q-link jewelry (I'm especially thinking of you, Elysia.  We seem to have similar problems with sensitivities and treatment, ie neither of us can tolerate sheilding material, etc.)  This is so frustrating because my mom knows this lady she used to work with uses this and now she can't find her address or phone # (private)





   
     

   
   


 



 





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I have one, but haven't used it for a long time. In the beginning it
seemed to have some effect, but that effect wore off quickly. I threw it
into the drawer and might try it again at a later stage. You never know.
Considering the very different experiences and the small price I think
it's worth a try.

Rixta
--
Our website: http://members.westnet.com.au/rixta.francis

I had a good experience with it in the beginning as well but now I'm not so sure. I am more sensitive now too. I lost the first one and ordered another one. This one just hasn't done much of anything and am thinking about returning it.
 
LOni

--- On Sat, 7/30/11, Rixta Francis <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Rixta Francis <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] Q-link, anybody?
To: [hidden email]
Date: Saturday, July 30, 2011, 1:37 PM


 



I have one, but haven't used it for a long time. In the beginning it
seemed to have some effect, but that effect wore off quickly. I threw it
into the drawer and might try it again at a later stage. You never know.
Considering the very different experiences and the small price I think
it's worth a try.

Rixta
--
Our website: http://members.westnet.com.au/rixta.francis







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]