No sleep at airplanes any longer

Perhaps you have some more data on this and can help. Thank you.

Best!
Klaus


No sleep at airplanes any longer

Since three years I can never sleep on long flights over the Atlantic. I
have talked to other people who say the same thing.

I think it changed when the airlines installed flat screen monitors in
the seats. Now each passenger has high frequency electronics a few
centimeters away from the head.

More info is needed. Do other normal passengers notice the same thing?


/J

Sleep on planes! Hell, I'm elated that I survived
a flight from the New Jersey to Florida nearly
unscathed.

The magnetic field in-flight pulsed from 5-10 mili
gauss at my seat (much higher a few feet above). But
thankfully I didn't get chest pains or tinnitus. Zero
electic field and very low RF. I used a Trifield meter.

8 miligauss from a land power line usually gives me
clinshing chest pains, and the hotel had more RF than
the plane. The airports were also relatively mild.

So overall air travel is OK for this electo sensitive.

Eli

Hi Jaime,

I can top that...Twice a plane that I was riding in was struck by lightening right outside the window that I was sitting next to. Once I experienced the lightening
strike in a private plane and once in a commercial airline. However, I still love
to fly, and I can sleep on airplanes.
Best regards,
Phyllicia

jaime_schunkewitz <[hidden email]> wrote: Sleep on planes! Hell, I'm elated that I survived
a flight from the New Jersey to Florida nearly
unscathed.

The magnetic field in-flight pulsed from 5-10 mili
gauss at my seat (much higher a few feet above). But
thankfully I didn't get chest pains or tinnitus. Zero
electic field and very low RF. I used a Trifield meter.

8 miligauss from a land power line usually gives me
clinshing chest pains, and the hotel had more RF than
the plane. The airports were also relatively mild.

So overall air travel is OK for this electo sensitive.

Eli






---------------------------------
Have a burning question? Go to Yahoo! Answers and get answers from real people who know.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

If you only had a Trifield meter, you could not meter the high
frequencies you were exposed to. Even the so-called 100 times-more-sensistive
Trifield is not very sensitive at reading electric fields, and has next to nil
ability to pick up RF/MW.
There is another model of Trifield that costs much more that I have not
tried, that is supposed to do this better, but the two lower priced ones are
really only good at reading 60 Hz magnetic fields. (IMHO, of course. But
just compare them to other meters to see the difference.)

Shivani
www.LifeEnergies.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]