New here

Hi,
My name is Shawn and I live in Portland, OR. I have been sensitive to
EMF for years, so I jumped at the chance to work in the field. I
represent a company with products to harmonize and stabilize the EMF
waves in common devices. I really look forward to participating in
the group.

Shawn
www.mybiopro.com/shawnhorn

Hi Shawn,

Interesting site - my comments re the following article..
-----------
*Men and mobiles: calls to take caution*

Mobile phones bring convenience and peace of mind, but the benefit of
always being contactable may have a downside. New research shows men who
regularly carry their mobiles near the groin, on a belt or in a pocket
could potentially have their sperm count reduced by as much as 30
percent, ACA reports.

The study, conducted by Hungarian researchers, suggests male fertility
could be affected by the radiation emitted by mobile phones. It also
found the sperm that did survive exposure to radiation showed abnormal
movements.

Dr Chris Merry, vice-president of the Australian Medical Association
(AMA), says men shouldn't panic; rather the findings serve as a warning
to think carefully about what they do with their mobile phone.

"You want to be safe rather than sorry," says Dr Merry. "Who knows if
this will have long-term implications for Australia's reproductive
future? _I think in the short term it's probably better to keep your
mobile phone in your jacket pocket or somewhere away from your groin._"

---------------

So Dr Merry.. should I keep it near my heart then? - or my kidneys? - or
my liver, or lungs, or where exactly?, Or does the mobile phone only
single out and do damage to sperm?? Dr Merry sounds like he lost the
plot a long time ago.. They have solid evidence of cellular (no pun
intended) destruction and the concnsus us to move the damaging item to
somewhere less likely to be attributable to damage by mobile..

Ack - its so mindless..

Anyhow - I look forward to your progress in this field :-)

Cheers
Pete

nyapshawn wrote:

Sorry it's taken me a few days to get back online. Excellent point.
However, there would be no reason to move the phone anywhere if
people used a Cell Chip :) Clearly, this is one reason why my company
reprints this article!

I'm still learning, so I really appreciate the knowledge here. Maybe
you can help me understand why so many people flat out refuse to
believe that EMF is dangerous? It seems like some have never heard of
EMF and others choose not believe. I cringe every time I see children
on a phone, but I don't feel comfortable saying anything. What is a
good way to get the information out?

Shawn
http://www.mybiopro.com/shawnhorn

--- In [hidden email], xmanflash2001 <xmanflash2001@y...>
wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> Interesting site - my comments re the following article..
> -----------
> *Men and mobiles: calls to take caution*
>
> Mobile phones bring convenience and peace of mind, but the benefit
of
> always being contactable may have a downside. New research shows
men who
> regularly carry their mobiles near the groin, on a belt or in a
pocket
> could potentially have their sperm count reduced by as much as 30
> percent, ACA reports.
>
> The study, conducted by Hungarian researchers, suggests male
fertility
> could be affected by the radiation emitted by mobile phones. It
also
> found the sperm that did survive exposure to radiation showed
abnormal
> movements.
>
> Dr Chris Merry, vice-president of the Australian Medical
Association
> (AMA), says men shouldn't panic; rather the findings serve as a
warning
> to think carefully about what they do with their mobile phone.
>
> "You want to be safe rather than sorry," says Dr Merry. "Who knows
if
> this will have long-term implications for Australia's reproductive
> future? _I think in the short term it's probably better to keep
your
> mobile phone in your jacket pocket or somewhere away from your
groin._"
>
> ---------------
>
> So Dr Merry.. should I keep it near my heart then? - or my
kidneys? - or
> my liver, or lungs, or where exactly?, Or does the mobile phone
only
> single out and do damage to sperm?? Dr Merry sounds like he lost
the
> plot a long time ago.. They have solid evidence of cellular (no
pun
> intended) destruction and the concnsus us to move the damaging item
to sensitive to
> > EMF for years, so I jumped at the chance to work in the field. I
> > represent a company with products to harmonize and stabilize the
EMF <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12ca9nhsr/M=315388.5455590.6541273.190163
0/D=grphealth/S=1705062215:HM/EXP=1097280177/A=2372349/R=0/SIG=12idgqp
gc/*https://www.orchardbank.com/hcs/hcsapplication?
pf=PLApply&media=EMYHNL40WL1004SS>
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> > *Yahoo! Groups Links*
> >
> > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/
> >
> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > [hidden email]
> > <mailto:[hidden email]?
subject=Unsubscribe>
> >
> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> >
> >

>I'm still learning, so I really appreciate the knowledge here. Maybe
>you can help me understand why so many people flat out refuse to
>believe that EMF is dangerous? It seems like some have never heard of
>EMF and others choose not believe. I cringe every time I see children
>on a phone, but I don't feel comfortable saying anything. What is a
>good way to get the information out?

Unless people experience illness due to EMF and realize it is causing it, it
is a big challenge to convince people that EMF is bad, and all those
convenient devices are causing illness.

My wife, even after she has seen how bad EMF has been for me, still walks
around with two cell phones turned on (one personal, one work). She wanted
to give my son a cell phone and I put a ban on that idea.

I think it is difficult to force-feed people that EMF is bad for them. We
can just hope that if information is presented the right way, and people
that get sick from EMF notice this valuable information so they can get
relief, that the word will continue to spread. Perhaps it will take
somebody in a very influential position or a major lawsuite to open up the
general populations eyes to the magnitude of this problem.

It seems that Europe is leading the way with governments noticing this EMF
issue.

Regards,

Glenn

Any body have a lead on Satellite radiation? I don't know how Digital
TV dishes work. I know they put out some radiation. Do they beam
something into space to try and connect with a signal?
Or do they just point in the direction of a satellite and collect the
radiation?

Any body know a website that can explain this stuff?
Thanks,
Andrew

Hello,

a satellite dish does not radiate or send a beam.
They only receive signals and catch them via the LNB and cable to the
satellite receiver to the TV.

However, like many other large metal surfaces, they can reflect radiation
from a mobile phone mast, like a secondairy antenna.
The quantity of radiation is small, but still for electrosensibles feelable.

On the other hand, satellite dishes can have a turbulence of longitudinal
waves around them, which can go right through the metal surface.
I have found, that these longitudinal waves can emit from the backside of
the dish and cause reactions from electrosensibles.

People with pendulars talk about regions of 4 to 8 meters around dishes,
where some sort of fields may occur.

And, no, there are no websites about this, except my own.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus


----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew McAfee" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 04:31
Subject: [eSens] Satellite radiation?