Hi, My name is Shawn and I live in Portland, OR. I have been sensitive to EMF for years, so I jumped at the chance to work in the field. I represent a company with products to harmonize and stabilize the EMF waves in common devices. I really look forward to participating in the group. Shawn www.mybiopro.com/shawnhorn |
Hi Shawn,
Interesting site - my comments re the following article.. ----------- *Men and mobiles: calls to take caution* Mobile phones bring convenience and peace of mind, but the benefit of always being contactable may have a downside. New research shows men who regularly carry their mobiles near the groin, on a belt or in a pocket could potentially have their sperm count reduced by as much as 30 percent, ACA reports. The study, conducted by Hungarian researchers, suggests male fertility could be affected by the radiation emitted by mobile phones. It also found the sperm that did survive exposure to radiation showed abnormal movements. Dr Chris Merry, vice-president of the Australian Medical Association (AMA), says men shouldn't panic; rather the findings serve as a warning to think carefully about what they do with their mobile phone. "You want to be safe rather than sorry," says Dr Merry. "Who knows if this will have long-term implications for Australia's reproductive future? _I think in the short term it's probably better to keep your mobile phone in your jacket pocket or somewhere away from your groin._" --------------- So Dr Merry.. should I keep it near my heart then? - or my kidneys? - or my liver, or lungs, or where exactly?, Or does the mobile phone only single out and do damage to sperm?? Dr Merry sounds like he lost the plot a long time ago.. They have solid evidence of cellular (no pun intended) destruction and the concnsus us to move the damaging item to somewhere less likely to be attributable to damage by mobile.. Ack - its so mindless.. Anyhow - I look forward to your progress in this field :-) Cheers Pete nyapshawn wrote: > > > Hi, > My name is Shawn and I live in Portland, OR. I have been sensitive to > EMF for years, so I jumped at the chance to work in the field. I > represent a company with products to harmonize and stabilize the EMF > waves in common devices. I really look forward to participating in > the group. > > Shawn > www.mybiopro.com/shawnhorn > > > > > > > > *Yahoo! Groups Sponsor* > ADVERTISEMENT > click here > <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12ca9nhsr/M=315388.5455590.6541273.1901630/D=grphealth/S=1705062215:HM/EXP=1097280177/A=2372349/R=0/SIG=12idgqpgc/*https://www.orchardbank.com/hcs/hcsapplication?pf=PLApply&media=EMYHNL40WL1004SS> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *Yahoo! Groups Links* > > * To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/ > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > [hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]?subject=Unsubscribe> > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>. > > |
Sorry it's taken me a few days to get back online. Excellent point. However, there would be no reason to move the phone anywhere if people used a Cell Chip :) Clearly, this is one reason why my company reprints this article! I'm still learning, so I really appreciate the knowledge here. Maybe you can help me understand why so many people flat out refuse to believe that EMF is dangerous? It seems like some have never heard of EMF and others choose not believe. I cringe every time I see children on a phone, but I don't feel comfortable saying anything. What is a good way to get the information out? Shawn http://www.mybiopro.com/shawnhorn --- In [hidden email], xmanflash2001 <xmanflash2001@y...> wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > Interesting site - my comments re the following article.. > ----------- > *Men and mobiles: calls to take caution* > > Mobile phones bring convenience and peace of mind, but the benefit of > always being contactable may have a downside. New research shows men who > regularly carry their mobiles near the groin, on a belt or in a > could potentially have their sperm count reduced by as much as 30 > percent, ACA reports. > > The study, conducted by Hungarian researchers, suggests male fertility > could be affected by the radiation emitted by mobile phones. It also > found the sperm that did survive exposure to radiation showed abnormal > movements. > > Dr Chris Merry, vice-president of the Australian Medical Association > (AMA), says men shouldn't panic; rather the findings serve as a warning > to think carefully about what they do with their mobile phone. > > "You want to be safe rather than sorry," says Dr Merry. "Who knows if > this will have long-term implications for Australia's reproductive > future? _I think in the short term it's probably better to keep your > mobile phone in your jacket pocket or somewhere away from your groin._" > > --------------- > > So Dr Merry.. should I keep it near my heart then? - or my kidneys? - or > my liver, or lungs, or where exactly?, Or does the mobile phone only > single out and do damage to sperm?? Dr Merry sounds like he lost the > plot a long time ago.. They have solid evidence of cellular (no pun > intended) destruction and the concnsus us to move the damaging item to > somewhere less likely to be attributable to damage by mobile.. > > Ack - its so mindless.. > > Anyhow - I look forward to your progress in this field :-) > > Cheers > Pete > > nyapshawn wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > My name is Shawn and I live in Portland, OR. I have been > > EMF for years, so I jumped at the chance to work in the field. I > > represent a company with products to harmonize and stabilize the EMF > > waves in common devices. I really look forward to participating in > > the group. > > > > Shawn > > www.mybiopro.com/shawnhorn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Yahoo! Groups Sponsor* > > ADVERTISEMENT > > click here > > 0/D=grphealth/S=1705062215:HM/EXP=1097280177/A=2372349/R=0/SIG=12idgqp gc/*https://www.orchardbank.com/hcs/hcsapplication? pf=PLApply&media=EMYHNL40WL1004SS> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ > > *Yahoo! Groups Links* > > > > * To visit your group on the web, go to: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/ > > > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > [hidden email] > > <mailto:[hidden email]? subject=Unsubscribe> > > > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>. > > > > |
In reply to this post by nyapshawn
>I'm still learning, so I really appreciate the knowledge here. Maybe
>you can help me understand why so many people flat out refuse to >believe that EMF is dangerous? It seems like some have never heard of >EMF and others choose not believe. I cringe every time I see children >on a phone, but I don't feel comfortable saying anything. What is a >good way to get the information out? Unless people experience illness due to EMF and realize it is causing it, it is a big challenge to convince people that EMF is bad, and all those convenient devices are causing illness. My wife, even after she has seen how bad EMF has been for me, still walks around with two cell phones turned on (one personal, one work). She wanted to give my son a cell phone and I put a ban on that idea. I think it is difficult to force-feed people that EMF is bad for them. We can just hope that if information is presented the right way, and people that get sick from EMF notice this valuable information so they can get relief, that the word will continue to spread. Perhaps it will take somebody in a very influential position or a major lawsuite to open up the general populations eyes to the magnitude of this problem. It seems that Europe is leading the way with governments noticing this EMF issue. Regards, Glenn |
In reply to this post by nyapshawn
Any body have a lead on Satellite radiation? I don't know how Digital
TV dishes work. I know they put out some radiation. Do they beam something into space to try and connect with a signal? Or do they just point in the direction of a satellite and collect the radiation? Any body know a website that can explain this stuff? Thanks, Andrew |
Hello,
a satellite dish does not radiate or send a beam. They only receive signals and catch them via the LNB and cable to the satellite receiver to the TV. However, like many other large metal surfaces, they can reflect radiation from a mobile phone mast, like a secondairy antenna. The quantity of radiation is small, but still for electrosensibles feelable. On the other hand, satellite dishes can have a turbulence of longitudinal waves around them, which can go right through the metal surface. I have found, that these longitudinal waves can emit from the backside of the dish and cause reactions from electrosensibles. People with pendulars talk about regions of 4 to 8 meters around dishes, where some sort of fields may occur. And, no, there are no websites about this, except my own. Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton Antivirus ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew McAfee" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 04:31 Subject: [eSens] Satellite radiation? > > Any body have a lead on Satellite radiation? I don't know how Digital > TV dishes work. I know they put out some radiation. Do they beam > something into space to try and connect with a signal? > Or do they just point in the direction of a satellite and collect the > radiation? > > Any body know a website that can explain this stuff? > Thanks, > Andrew > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |