Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
31 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

muii20


Barrie Trower said photon transmission is safer than microwave rf; not sure how true is it.

this article talks of micro led Li-Fi:

http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/147339-micro-led-lifi-where-every-light-source-in-the-world-is-also-tv-and-provides-gigabit-internet-access



alice
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

sleepbiology


Microwaves are absorbed by water and penetrate the skin. I dont believe that led has the same destructive signal?


------------------------------
On Wed, May 29, 2013 9:43 AM PDT muii20 wrote:

>
>
>Barrie Trower said photon transmission is safer than microwave rf; not sure how true is it.
>
>this article talks of micro led Li-Fi:
>
>http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/147339-micro-led-lifi-where-every-light-source-in-the-world-is-also-tv-and-provides-gigabit-internet-access
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

BiBrun
I expect it to be far better.  Right about not penetrating.  Even above 10
GHz penetration is
much less.  The modems themselves are probably bad though and probably
radiate broadband pulses
just like most digital electronics.  With fiber optic less power is needed
but still these fiber converters radiate a lot if you are close to them.

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Al Harding <[hidden email]> wrote:

> **
>
>
>
>
> Microwaves are absorbed by water and penetrate the skin. I dont believe
> that led has the same destructive signal?
>
> ------------------------------
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 9:43 AM PDT muii20 wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Barrie Trower said photon transmission is safer than microwave rf; not
> sure how true is it.
> >
> >this article talks of micro led Li-Fi:
> >
> >
> http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/147339-micro-led-lifi-where-every-light-source-in-the-world-is-also-tv-and-provides-gigabit-internet-access
> >
> >
> >
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [hidden email]
    [hidden email]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [hidden email]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

John Puccetti
In reply to this post by sleepbiology
Got this on Prius chat my 2012 plug in does not measure more than 3 mG any place
in the car.
Vehicle testedPeak EMF reading at driver's feet (milligauss)
2008 Chevrolet Cobalt 30 mG
2008 Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid 14 mG
2008 Subaru Impreza 6 mG
2006 Toyota Prius (hybrid) 4 mG
2008 Subaru Legacy 4 mG
2008 Toyota Prius (hybrid) 4 mG
2008 Mini Cooper Clubman 3 mG
2008 Nissan Altima Hybrid 3 mG
2008 Toyota Highlander Hybrid 2 mG
2008 Nissan Murano 1.3 mG
2008 Toyota Sequoia 1 mG
2007 Chevrolet Suburban 0.8 mG
2008 Toyota Highlander 0.5 mG



Read more: http://priuschat.com/threads/mythbusters-emf.83240/#ixzz2UnRTCIJE
 
Sent from a Hard-Wired Computer and a low RF environment. John Puccetti
805-642-0546
[hidden email]




________________________________
From: Al Harding <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Wed, May 29, 2013 10:15:59 AM
Subject: Re: [eSens] Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

 


Microwaves are absorbed by water and penetrate the skin. I dont believe that led
has the same destructive signal?


------------------------------
On Wed, May 29, 2013 9:43 AM PDT muii20 wrote:

>
>
>Barrie Trower said photon transmission is safer than microwave rf; not sure how
>true is it.
>
>this article talks of micro led Li-Fi:
>
>http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/147339-micro-led-lifi-where-every-light-source-in-the-world-is-also-tv-and-provides-gigabit-internet-access
>
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

Marc Martin
Administrator
On May 30, John Puccetti <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Got this on Prius chat my 2012 plug in does not measure more than 3 mG any place
> in the car.
> Vehicle testedPeak EMF reading at driver's feet (milligauss)
> 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt 30 mG

Well, mG isn't particularly useful... one has to take into account
the magnetic fields, electric fields, the frequencies emitted in the
khz, Mhz, Ghz frequencies, and especially whatever range of
frequencies the ES person is most reactive to.  Plus whatever
sorts of information (analog or digital) that is riding
along those frequencies.

Marc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

John Puccetti
What meter would you use? My HF 35 C 800 MHZ  to 2500 shows nothing? I don't
understand what you are looking for could you tell me what meter you would use?
 
Sent from a Hard-Wired Computer and a low RF environment. John Puccetti
805-642-0546
[hidden email]




________________________________
From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Thu, May 30, 2013 10:56:03 AM
Subject: Re: [eSens] Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

 
On May 30, John Puccetti <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Got this on Prius chat my 2012 plug in does not measure more than 3 mG any
>place
>
> in the car.
> Vehicle testedPeak EMF reading at driver's feet (milligauss)
> 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt 30 mG

Well, mG isn't particularly useful... one has to take into account
the magnetic fields, electric fields, the frequencies emitted in the
khz, Mhz, Ghz frequencies, and especially whatever range of
frequencies the ES person is most reactive to. Plus whatever
sorts of information (analog or digital) that is riding
along those frequencies.

Marc



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

Marc Martin
Administrator
On May 30, John Puccetti <[hidden email]> wrote:
> What meter would you use? My HF 35 C 800 MHZ  to 2500 shows nothing? I don't
> understand what you are looking for could you tell me what meter you would use?

Well... there are people on this list who have (apparently) invested thousands
and thousands of dollars on EMF meters (maybe even more than ten thousand?),
and yet even they say that they cannot measure everything that they want to
measure.

I, on the other hand, have taken the approach that *I* am the meter -- if
it's bothering me, then I should do something about it.  If it's not, then I
don't.  That is the most relevant "meter" for me personally, but does leave
me "in the dark" about how things measure on various meters.

And personally, I have found electronics that are totally unbearable to me
when turned on, and yet none of the meters I own (admittedly few) indicate
anything at all coming from them.  So to me, a "zero" reading is meaningless.

Marc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

Elizabeth thode
That's an excellent point you make Marc!
Listen to your body...it is the most sensitive meter
of all.
but I would imagine that  in some cases when the body is very toxic,
it is possible for symptoms to be masked, hidden. Or for a person to
not be able to recognize where the symptoms are coming from.
 
Until they start doing all the experiments we have learned to do.....
turn things off and on and see what happens and pay attention.
 
Lizzie
 
To: [hidden email]
From: [hidden email]
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 11:39:56 -0700
Subject: Re: [eSens] Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?
















 



 


   
     
     
      On May 30, John Puccetti <[hidden email]> wrote:

> What meter would you use? My HF 35 C 800 MHZ  to 2500 shows nothing? I don't

> understand what you are looking for could you tell me what meter you would use?



Well... there are people on this list who have (apparently) invested thousands

and thousands of dollars on EMF meters (maybe even more than ten thousand?),

and yet even they say that they cannot measure everything that they want to

measure.



I, on the other hand, have taken the approach that *I* am the meter -- if

it's bothering me, then I should do something about it.  If it's not, then I

don't.  That is the most relevant "meter" for me personally, but does leave

me "in the dark" about how things measure on various meters.



And personally, I have found electronics that are totally unbearable to me

when turned on, and yet none of the meters I own (admittedly few) indicate

anything at all coming from them.  So to me, a "zero" reading is meaningless.



Marc




   
     

   
   






       

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

Elizabeth thode
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
P.S.
Forgot to add:
Some of us have "delayed symptoms"...they don't show up until the next day,
or the day after...this is part of what makes ES so tricky.
 
Lizzie
 
To: [hidden email]
From: [hidden email]
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 11:39:56 -0700
Subject: Re: [eSens] Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?
















 



 


   
     
     
      On May 30, John Puccetti <[hidden email]> wrote:

> What meter would you use? My HF 35 C 800 MHZ  to 2500 shows nothing? I don't

> understand what you are looking for could you tell me what meter you would use?



Well... there are people on this list who have (apparently) invested thousands

and thousands of dollars on EMF meters (maybe even more than ten thousand?),

and yet even they say that they cannot measure everything that they want to

measure.



I, on the other hand, have taken the approach that *I* am the meter -- if

it's bothering me, then I should do something about it.  If it's not, then I

don't.  That is the most relevant "meter" for me personally, but does leave

me "in the dark" about how things measure on various meters.



And personally, I have found electronics that are totally unbearable to me

when turned on, and yet none of the meters I own (admittedly few) indicate

anything at all coming from them.  So to me, a "zero" reading is meaningless.



Marc




   
     

   
   






       

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

John Puccetti
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Thanks I understand. I am looking for the usual RF, wifi smart meters cell
towers, dirty electricity.
 
Sent from a Hard-Wired Computer and a low RF environment. John Puccetti
805-642-0546
[hidden email]




________________________________
From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Thu, May 30, 2013 11:41:24 AM
Subject: Re: [eSens] Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

 
On May 30, John Puccetti <[hidden email]> wrote:
> What meter would you use? My HF 35 C 800 MHZ to 2500 shows nothing? I don't
> understand what you are looking for could you tell me what meter you would
use?

Well... there are people on this list who have (apparently) invested thousands
and thousands of dollars on EMF meters (maybe even more than ten thousand?),
and yet even they say that they cannot measure everything that they want to
measure.

I, on the other hand, have taken the approach that *I* am the meter -- if
it's bothering me, then I should do something about it. If it's not, then I
don't. That is the most relevant "meter" for me personally, but does leave
me "in the dark" about how things measure on various meters.

And personally, I have found electronics that are totally unbearable to me
when turned on, and yet none of the meters I own (admittedly few) indicate
anything at all coming from them. So to me, a "zero" reading is meaningless.

Marc



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Fwd: [eSens] Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

Patricia
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
i agree, marc.  
i used meters to confirm what i felt...
now i feel that i am a meter, myself.  
if i get cramps, i KNOW that a cell phone
is in use in the next room or nearby when
i am out... or that the frig is on in the
room under my hotel room... or whatever.
i do reality checks - with my meters or i
ask people who know what's going on
electronically in a building, but i don't
need a lot of 'proof' for my own sake.  
if i feel uncomfortable, i simply do what i
need to do to protect myself.    
love, patricia


Begin forwarded message:

> I, on the other hand, have taken the approach that *I* am the meter -- if
> it's bothering me, then I should do something about it.  If it's not, then I
> don't.  That is the most relevant "meter" for me personally, but does leave
> me "in the dark" about how things measure on various meters.
>
> And personally, I have found electronics that are totally unbearable to me
> when turned on, and yet none of the meters I own (admittedly few) indicate
> anything at all coming from them.  So to me, a "zero" reading is meaningless.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

judyl_nev
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
I have just ordered my third meter. Total cost for 3 about $700.

I have spent THOUSANDS trying to find out what was the matter with me, trying to fix me and buying pendants and gadgets trying to shield me. Money is always an issue.

The meters are a huge help because now I'm able to measure and verify what I feel. And I CAN SHOW others what the heck I'm talking about. And I can measure others' homes or offices. I recently had an electrician over to check the electrical on the house. I could show him readings. He suffers seizures, and I'm hoping that what I taught him (!) will be helpful to HIM.

But, like Marc says, there are things that bother me still, and I don't know what it is! It is maddening. My situation is complicated by other health issues. But now I've become much better at ferreting out which field is the problem.. Then you can learn how to remediate it.

I have a Trifield meter :.. very helpful. I discovered that magnetic fields appear to be my greatest problem. I have overhead power lines, and the magnetic field is terrible. I'm visiting my sister's house right now, and powerlines are buried. Magnetic field reading is near zero.

 I might have been better off buying a quality Gaussmeter instead of the Trifield?

I have a Stetzerizer... very helpful! I had readings in some rooms of 1500 to 1900!! Caused by (believe it or not) poor quality LED lightbulbs I bought, thinking I was doing the right thing... once they were removed, and I put back incandescent bulbs, the Dirty Electricity readings went to reasonable. Still need to do a little more on that.

I have an acoustimeter on order. That should prove to be fun!

I have a so-called Analog meter replacement for a smart meter. It is terrible. It makes me feel awful. The only thing measured so far is with a voltmeter. It puts through very irregular voltage.

My property has underground water, probably odd somehing and stray voltage, I believe. Got shocked grounding one day! Came up through the grounding rod. My body measured that!!


Judy




--- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote:

>
> On May 30, John Puccetti <johnpuccetti@...> wrote:
> > What meter would you use? My HF 35 C 800 MHZ  to 2500 shows nothing? I don't
> > understand what you are looking for could you tell me what meter you would use?
>
> Well... there are people on this list who have (apparently) invested thousands
> and thousands of dollars on EMF meters (maybe even more than ten thousand?),
> and yet even they say that they cannot measure everything that they want to
> measure.
>
> I, on the other hand, have taken the approach that *I* am the meter -- if
> it's bothering me, then I should do something about it.  If it's not, then I
> don't.  That is the most relevant "meter" for me personally, but does leave
> me "in the dark" about how things measure on various meters.
>
> And personally, I have found electronics that are totally unbearable to me
> when turned on, and yet none of the meters I own (admittedly few) indicate
> anything at all coming from them.  So to me, a "zero" reading is meaningless.
>
> Marc
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

John Puccetti
I am a general contractor electrician specializing in emf and rf detection and
mitigation. LED lights, good ones have no dirty electricity and very low rf but
some people have a problem with less than 100 hz. www.ledwholesalers.com has
quality LEDs.
You should never get a shock from a ground rod. Have that looked at. Water pipes
can carry stray voltage. But your EMF tester should show you Trifield is not bad
I like digital meters better.That is a funny term (stray voltage) because the
electric utilities ground a live wire the white neutral to ground. All states
except CA have no neutral on high tension lines which means they use the earth
to carry voltage between towers nine grounding rods per mile. 
Sent from a Hard-Wired Computer and a low RF environment. John Puccetti
805-642-0546
[hidden email]




________________________________
From: judyl_nev <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Fri, May 31, 2013 5:33:26 PM
Subject: [eSens] Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

 
I have just ordered my third meter. Total cost for 3 about $700.

I have spent THOUSANDS trying to find out what was the matter with me, trying to
fix me and buying pendants and gadgets trying to shield me. Money is always an
issue.

The meters are a huge help because now I'm able to measure and verify what I
feel. And I CAN SHOW others what the heck I'm talking about. And I can measure
others' homes or offices. I recently had an electrician over to check the
electrical on the house. I could show him readings. He suffers seizures, and I'm
hoping that what I taught him (!) will be helpful to HIM.

But, like Marc says, there are things that bother me still, and I don't know
what it is! It is maddening. My situation is complicated by other health issues.
But now I've become much better at ferreting out which field is the problem..
Then you can learn how to remediate it.


I have a Trifield meter :.. very helpful. I discovered that magnetic fields
appear to be my greatest problem. I have overhead power lines, and the magnetic
field is terrible. I'm visiting my sister's house right now, and powerlines are
buried. Magnetic field reading is near zero.


I might have been better off buying a quality Gaussmeter instead of the
Trifield?

I have a Stetzerizer... very helpful! I had readings in some rooms of 1500 to
1900!! Caused by (believe it or not) poor quality LED lightbulbs I bought,
thinking I was doing the right thing... once they were removed, and I put back
incandescent bulbs, the Dirty Electricity readings went to reasonable. Still
need to do a little more on that.


I have an acoustimeter on order. That should prove to be fun!

I have a so-called Analog meter replacement for a smart meter. It is terrible.
It makes me feel awful. The only thing measured so far is with a voltmeter. It
puts through very irregular voltage.


My property has underground water, probably odd somehing and stray voltage, I
believe. Got shocked grounding one day! Came up through the grounding rod. My
body measured that!!

Judy

--- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote:
>
> On May 30, John Puccetti <johnpuccetti@...> wrote:
> > What meter would you use? My HF 35 C 800 MHZ  to 2500 shows nothing? I don't

> > understand what you are looking for could you tell me what meter you would
>use?
>
> Well... there are people on this list who have (apparently) invested thousands
> and thousands of dollars on EMF meters (maybe even more than ten thousand?),
> and yet even they say that they cannot measure everything that they want to
> measure.
>
> I, on the other hand, have taken the approach that *I* am the meter -- if
> it's bothering me, then I should do something about it. If it's not, then I
> don't. That is the most relevant "meter" for me personally, but does leave
> me "in the dark" about how things measure on various meters.
>
> And personally, I have found electronics that are totally unbearable to me
> when turned on, and yet none of the meters I own (admittedly few) indicate
> anything at all coming from them. So to me, a "zero" reading is meaningless.
>
> Marc
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

Elizabeth thode
In reply to this post by judyl_nev
My property has underground water, probably odd somehing and stray voltage, I believe. Got shocked grounding one day! Came up through the grounding rod. My body measured that!!
 
Yes, that is a huge problem and it goes mainly unrecognized....that is not really stray voltage, it is live current.
Check out this website: www.streetzaps.com
 
 
And read Dave Steizers testimony on stray voltage.


1.  
David Stetzer – Testimony Transcript -
Stetzer Electric
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



www.stetzerelectric.com/david-stetzer-testimony-transcript/


 
 
The utility co's use the "earth" to ground the power poles.
Electricity will always follow the path of least resistance.
 
I have sent you an attachment on how to use a grounding rod on your bed, without using the "earth" as so called "ground".
this is a technology, easy to DO, not expensive, works very well, and was given to me by my Irish Healer Colleague, Ciaran.
(thank you soo much Ciaran!)
I have used this system for 3 years for both my daughter and myself.
 
You have underground water, this is underground subterranean caverns. And these earth stress lines, put out HUGELY
powerful geopathic stress- especially when sleeping over these lines. Which is just about everyone on the planet!
And the practice known as Fracking, has been documented to cause more earthquakes...not really a surpreise when
you think about how frackign is done.
 
See:
Geopathic Stress - Land & Spirit www.landandspirit.net/html/body_geopathic_stress.htmlýI would suggest you place MIRRORS FACING DOWN, under your bed.
This will reflect the geopathic stress coming up from the subterranean water....
AWAY from you during sleep.
I bought those door mirrors at Target, for 6 bucks a piece, depending on how big your bed is..
I laid 3 down MIRROR FACING DOWN...and layered them slightly, and used duct tape to hold them
in place. Then I taped bubble wrap at the floor, at the edge of the bed, so I wouldn't step on the edge of the mirror.
 
Geopathic stress is the original source of ES...because it is the ORIGINAL source of radiation
we were heavily exposed to.
This is my working theory, the geopathic stress was here way before the cell phones were.
This info gets ignored often, especially on this esens site.
All I can tell you, try the mirrors and this willl be your proof!
 
For some, it only takes a night to know this makes a big difference.....
for others, it takes a few nights to see the results.
And too, geopathic stress is made MUCH worse by earthquakes.
The more earthquakes, the more geopathic stress.
SEE: http://earthquake-report.com
 
Radiation IS strong magnetic fields.
And the equipment to measure geopathic stress is highly specialized, and not  easily available .....
unless you happpen to be near Dr. Klinghardts's Seattle office, he does have this equipt
that he rents out to his patients. (If you haven't heard of Dr. Klinghardt, google him,
he is a well known alternative doctor, who has two offices, one here in the states, and the other
in Europe. He says 80% of chronic diseases/conditions are caused from emfs.
See:


Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt - Smart Meters & EMR: The Health
Crisis Of Our Time

>

> http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/dr-dietrich-klinghardt-smart-meters-emr-the-health-crisis-of-our-time/


That equip to measure geopathic stress probably came from Europe (probably Vienna, Austria)...where geopathic stress is much better recognized.
SEe also book: Earth Radiation by Kathe Bachler (amazon)
There is PLENTY of documentation to prove how harmful geopathic stress IS.
 
P.s.
ONe day my dog peed on a tree, got zapped so strong, this live current picked up my 90 lb dog and tossed her
at the back of my ankles...just about knocked me down! Up above the tree branches, I saw a telephone line!
 
Blessings,
Lizzie
To: [hidden email]
From: [hidden email]
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 00:33:23 +0000
Subject: [eSens] Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?
















 



 


   
     
     
      I have just ordered my third meter. Total cost for 3 about $700.



I have spent THOUSANDS trying to find out what was the matter with me, trying to fix me and buying pendants and gadgets trying to shield me. Money is always an issue.



The meters are a huge help because now I'm able to measure and verify what I feel. And I CAN SHOW others what the heck I'm talking about. And I can measure others' homes or offices. I recently had an electrician over to check the electrical on the house. I could show him readings. He suffers seizures, and I'm hoping that what I taught him (!) will be helpful to HIM.



But, like Marc says, there are things that bother me still, and I don't know what it is! It is maddening. My situation is complicated by other health issues. But now I've become much better at ferreting out which field is the problem.. Then you can learn how to remediate it.



I have a Trifield meter :.. very helpful. I discovered that magnetic fields appear to be my greatest problem. I have overhead power lines, and the magnetic field is terrible. I'm visiting my sister's house right now, and powerlines are buried. Magnetic field reading is near zero.



I might have been better off buying a quality Gaussmeter instead of the Trifield?



I have a Stetzerizer... very helpful! I had readings in some rooms of 1500 to 1900!! Caused by (believe it or not) poor quality LED lightbulbs I bought, thinking I was doing the right thing... once they were removed, and I put back incandescent bulbs, the Dirty Electricity readings went to reasonable. Still need to do a little more on that.



I have an acoustimeter on order. That should prove to be fun!



I have a so-called Analog meter replacement for a smart meter. It is terrible. It makes me feel awful. The only thing measured so far is with a voltmeter. It puts through very irregular voltage.



My property has underground water, probably odd somehing and stray voltage, I believe. Got shocked grounding one day! Came up through the grounding rod. My body measured that!!



Judy



--- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote:

>

> On May 30, John Puccetti <johnpuccetti@...> wrote:

> > What meter would you use? My HF 35 C 800 MHZ  to 2500 shows nothing? I don't

> > understand what you are looking for could you tell me what meter you would use?

>

> Well... there are people on this list who have (apparently) invested thousands

> and thousands of dollars on EMF meters (maybe even more than ten thousand?),

> and yet even they say that they cannot measure everything that they want to

> measure.

>

> I, on the other hand, have taken the approach that *I* am the meter -- if

> it's bothering me, then I should do something about it.  If it's not, then I

> don't.  That is the most relevant "meter" for me personally, but does leave

> me "in the dark" about how things measure on various meters.

>

> And personally, I have found electronics that are totally unbearable to me

> when turned on, and yet none of the meters I own (admittedly few) indicate

> anything at all coming from them.  So to me, a "zero" reading is meaningless.

>

> Marc

>






   
     

   
   






       

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [hidden email]
    [hidden email]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [hidden email]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

Patricia
In reply to this post by John Puccetti
i experienced that at my condo.  
the company rep said that the lines
from the big transformer in the sky
behind my place did not service my
building and would have no effect
on my area, but there was something
undergrond that measured off my
EMF meter's scale - 5mg.  never did
measure it with the tri-field meter....
should have.  the power companies
have a lot invested in NOT admitting
that their system has wreaked havoc
with the safety of our cities.  they
will deny, deny, deny.  they refused
to come and check once i had
figured it all out.  and i noticed later
that the transformer had been
replaced by a newer one...  so
maybe they heard me but could
not admit it... corporations are NOT
people.  :)  AND the same power
companies are putting themselves
in jeopardy by promoting smart
meters.  someday that's going to bite
them in the rear, just like the tobacco
and asbestos industries.
love, patricia


On May 31, 2013, at 8:58 PM, John Puccetti wrote:

> I am a general contractor electrician specializing in emf and rf detection and
> mitigation. LED lights, good ones have no dirty electricity and very low rf but
> some people have a problem with less than 100 hz. www.ledwholesalers.com has
> quality LEDs.
> You should never get a shock from a ground rod. Have that looked at. Water pipes
> can carry stray voltage. But your EMF tester should show you Trifield is not bad
> I like digital meters better.That is a funny term (stray voltage) because the
> electric utilities ground a live wire the white neutral to ground. All states
> except CA have no neutral on high tension lines which means they use the earth
> to carry voltage between towers nine grounding rods per mile.
> Sent from a Hard-Wired Computer and a low RF environment. John Puccetti
> 805-642-0546
> [hidden email]
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

Marc Martin
Administrator
In reply to this post by John Puccetti
On May 31, John Puccetti <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I am a general contractor electrician specializing in emf and rf detection and
> mitigation. LED lights, good ones have no dirty electricity and very low rf but
> some people have a problem with less than 100 hz. www.ledwholesalers.com has
> quality LEDs.

We've had people here complain about LED lights, due the transformers from
line voltage down to the LED voltage (12v?).  Seems like the safest lighting
is still incandescent, although it sounds like there is line voltage halogen
lighting as well.

Marc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

John Puccetti
In reply to this post by Patricia

The more informed I become the more I try to explain to people in general and my
friends but I do get disheartened. But I keep trying. The electric utilities in
many cases have not upgraded there distribution system since world war two.
 Thomas Edison designed the first city wide grid. He warned at that time that
corporations would try to save money and eliminate the neutral on the grid and
use the earth as a conductor. But many of the problems now are the wires are
over loaded and split bolt connectors are corroding. At the same time demand is
up. What state do you live in?
Sent from a Hard-Wired Computer and a low RF environment. John Puccetti
805-642-0546
[hidden email]




________________________________
From: Patricia Robinett <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Sat, June 1, 2013 8:49:46 AM
Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

 
i experienced that at my condo.
the company rep said that the lines
from the big transformer in the sky
behind my place did not service my
building and would have no effect
on my area, but there was something
undergrond that measured off my
EMF meter's scale - 5mg. never did
measure it with the tri-field meter....
should have. the power companies
have a lot invested in NOT admitting
that their system has wreaked havoc
with the safety of our cities. they
will deny, deny, deny. they refused
to come and check once i had
figured it all out. and i noticed later
that the transformer had been
replaced by a newer one... so
maybe they heard me but could
not admit it... corporations are NOT
people. :) AND the same power
companies are putting themselves
in jeopardy by promoting smart
meters. someday that's going to bite
them in the rear, just like the tobacco
and asbestos industries.
love, patricia

On May 31, 2013, at 8:58 PM, John Puccetti wrote:

> I am a general contractor electrician specializing in emf and rf detection and

> mitigation. LED lights, good ones have no dirty electricity and very low rf but
>
> some people have a problem with less than 100 hz. www.ledwholesalers.com has
> quality LEDs.
> You should never get a shock from a ground rod. Have that looked at. Water
>pipes
>
> can carry stray voltage. But your EMF tester should show you Trifield is not
>bad
>
> I like digital meters better.That is a funny term (stray voltage) because the
> electric utilities ground a live wire the white neutral to ground. All states
> except CA have no neutral on high tension lines which means they use the earth

> to carry voltage between towers nine grounding rods per mile.
> Sent from a Hard-Wired Computer and a low RF environment. John Puccetti
> 805-642-0546
> [hidden email]
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

John Puccetti
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
LED's are not perfect but in my mind they are the best option at the moment. I
have solar panels and they create a lot of dirty electricity. But I still feel
the goal is to be as clean as possible and as independent as possible from the
grid.
1. I minimize my usage unplug all those ac to dc transformers that you can. Do
not use dimmer switches.
2. Then I try to clean up the dirty electricity. with GS filters. You can twist
the hot and neutral wires from panels or in your wiring to eliminate EMF. But
you must have wiring in conduit to do that. Hard to do with existing wiring.
3. With 12 GS filters I have our house down to 40 gs. That is what is
recomended. 
Sent from a Hard-Wired Computer and a low RF environment. John Puccetti
805-642-0546
[hidden email]




________________________________
From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Sat, June 1, 2013 9:22:04 AM
Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

 
On May 31, John Puccetti <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I am a general contractor electrician specializing in emf and rf detection and

> mitigation. LED lights, good ones have no dirty electricity and very low rf but
>
> some people have a problem with less than 100 hz. www.ledwholesalers.com has
> quality LEDs.

We've had people here complain about LED lights, due the transformers from
line voltage down to the LED voltage (12v?). Seems like the safest lighting
is still incandescent, although it sounds like there is line voltage halogen
lighting as well.

Marc



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

ad
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

ad
In reply to this post by Elizabeth thode
thanks for the link :
http://www.landandspirit.net/html/body_geopathic_stress.html
it's a long page and i may be a bit blind but what did it say exactly about using mirror under the bed ?
laying them facing down ? same surface as the bed ? what happens in a room underneath, will the geopathic stress from water currents get worse there then ?
and another question, has anyone any idea what kind of meters are used to measure disturbances in natural emf ?
perhaps an ordinary low-hertz magnetic field meter should do the trick, although i guess given the mentioned strength in nT that fluctuations in static fields are to be looked at.
the Genitron Felix-3 is a fictional instrument that people talk about but never have seen, also not in german universities and research institutes, according to the book Underground Rivers by Richard J. Heggen ( page 1265 ), which is highly skeptical but the question remains : what meters and where to buy ?
besides all this, a lot of subtle energies may not be measurable anyway, although there could be a relation between what a meter shows and what it doesn't.


--- In [hidden email], Elizabeth thode <lizt777@...> wrote:

>
> My property has underground water, probably odd somehing and stray voltage, I believe. Got shocked grounding one day! Came up through the grounding rod. My body measured that!!
>  
> Yes, that is a huge problem and it goes mainly unrecognized....that is not really stray voltage, it is live current.
> Check out this website: www.streetzaps.com
>  
>  
> And read Dave Steizers testimony on stray voltage.
>
>
> 1.  
> David Stetzer � Testimony Transcript -
> Stetzer Electric
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>
>
>
> www.stetzerelectric.com/david-stetzer-testimony-transcript/
>
>
>  
>  
> The utility co's use the "earth" to ground the power poles.
> Electricity will always follow the path of least resistance.
>  
> I have sent you an attachment on how to use a grounding rod on your bed, without using the "earth" as so called "ground".
> this is a technology, easy to DO, not expensive, works very well, and was given to me by my Irish Healer Colleague, Ciaran.
> (thank you soo much Ciaran!)
> I have used this system for 3 years for both my daughter and myself.
>  
> You have underground water, this is underground subterranean caverns. And these earth stress lines, put out HUGELY
> powerful geopathic stress- especially when sleeping over these lines. Which is just about everyone on the planet!
> And the practice known as Fracking, has been documented to cause more earthquakes...not really a surpreise when
> you think about how frackign is done.
>  
> See:
> Geopathic Stress - Land & Spirit www.landandspirit.net/html/body_geopathic_stress.html�I would suggest you place MIRRORS FACING DOWN, under your bed.
> This will reflect the geopathic stress coming up from the subterranean water....
> AWAY from you during sleep.
> I bought those door mirrors at Target, for 6 bucks a piece, depending on how big your bed is..
> I laid 3 down MIRROR FACING DOWN...and layered them slightly, and used duct tape to hold them
> in place. Then I taped bubble wrap at the floor, at the edge of the bed, so I wouldn't step on the edge of the mirror.
>  
> Geopathic stress is the original source of ES...because it is the ORIGINAL source of radiation
> we were heavily exposed to.
> This is my working theory, the geopathic stress was here way before the cell phones were.
> This info gets ignored often, especially on this esens site.
> All I can tell you, try the mirrors and this willl be your proof!
>  
> For some, it only takes a night to know this makes a big difference.....
> for others, it takes a few nights to see the results.
> And too, geopathic stress is made MUCH worse by earthquakes.
> The more earthquakes, the more geopathic stress.
> SEE: http://earthquake-report.com
>  
> Radiation IS strong magnetic fields.
> And the equipment to measure geopathic stress is highly specialized, and not  easily available .....
> unless you happpen to be near Dr. Klinghardts's Seattle office, he does have this equipt
> that he rents out to his patients. (If you haven't heard of Dr. Klinghardt, google him,
> he is a well known alternative doctor, who has two offices, one here in the states, and the other
> in Europe. He says 80% of chronic diseases/conditions are caused from emfs.
> See:
>
>
> Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt - Smart Meters & EMR: The Health
> Crisis Of Our Time
>
> >
>
> > http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/dr-dietrich-klinghardt-smart-meters-emr-the-health-crisis-of-our-time/
>
>
> That equip to measure geopathic stress probably came from Europe (probably Vienna, Austria)...where geopathic stress is much better recognized.
> SEe also book: Earth Radiation by Kathe Bachler (amazon)
> There is PLENTY of documentation to prove how harmful geopathic stress IS.
>  
> P.s.
> ONe day my dog peed on a tree, got zapped so strong, this live current picked up my 90 lb dog and tossed her
> at the back of my ankles...just about knocked me down! Up above the tree branches, I saw a telephone line!
>  
> Blessings,
> Lizzie
> To: [hidden email]
> From: judyl_nev@...
> Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 00:33:23 +0000
> Subject: [eSens] Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>    
>      
>      
>       I have just ordered my third meter. Total cost for 3 about $700.
>
>
>
> I have spent THOUSANDS trying to find out what was the matter with me, trying to fix me and buying pendants and gadgets trying to shield me. Money is always an issue.
>
>
>
> The meters are a huge help because now I'm able to measure and verify what I feel. And I CAN SHOW others what the heck I'm talking about. And I can measure others' homes or offices. I recently had an electrician over to check the electrical on the house. I could show him readings. He suffers seizures, and I'm hoping that what I taught him (!) will be helpful to HIM.
>
>
>
> But, like Marc says, there are things that bother me still, and I don't know what it is! It is maddening. My situation is complicated by other health issues. But now I've become much better at ferreting out which field is the problem.. Then you can learn how to remediate it.
>
>
>
> I have a Trifield meter :.. very helpful. I discovered that magnetic fields appear to be my greatest problem. I have overhead power lines, and the magnetic field is terrible. I'm visiting my sister's house right now, and powerlines are buried. Magnetic field reading is near zero.
>
>
>
> I might have been better off buying a quality Gaussmeter instead of the Trifield?
>
>
>
> I have a Stetzerizer... very helpful! I had readings in some rooms of 1500 to 1900!! Caused by (believe it or not) poor quality LED lightbulbs I bought, thinking I was doing the right thing... once they were removed, and I put back incandescent bulbs, the Dirty Electricity readings went to reasonable. Still need to do a little more on that.
>
>
>
> I have an acoustimeter on order. That should prove to be fun!
>
>
>
> I have a so-called Analog meter replacement for a smart meter. It is terrible. It makes me feel awful. The only thing measured so far is with a voltmeter. It puts through very irregular voltage.
>
>
>
> My property has underground water, probably odd somehing and stray voltage, I believe. Got shocked grounding one day! Came up through the grounding rod. My body measured that!!
>
>
>
> Judy
>
>
>
> --- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > On May 30, John Puccetti <johnpuccetti@> wrote:
>
> > > What meter would you use? My HF 35 C 800 MHZ  to 2500 shows nothing? I don't
>
> > > understand what you are looking for could you tell me what meter you would use?
>
> >
>
> > Well... there are people on this list who have (apparently) invested thousands
>
> > and thousands of dollars on EMF meters (maybe even more than ten thousand?),
>
> > and yet even they say that they cannot measure everything that they want to
>
> > measure.
>
> >
>
> > I, on the other hand, have taken the approach that *I* am the meter -- if
>
> > it's bothering me, then I should do something about it.  If it's not, then I
>
> > don't.  That is the most relevant "meter" for me personally, but does leave
>
> > me "in the dark" about how things measure on various meters.
>
> >
>
> > And personally, I have found electronics that are totally unbearable to me
>
> > when turned on, and yet none of the meters I own (admittedly few) indicate
>
> > anything at all coming from them.  So to me, a "zero" reading is meaningless.
>
> >
>
> > Marc
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    
>      
>
>    
>    
>
>
>
>
>
>
>        
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


ad
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?

ad
In reply to this post by John Puccetti
led's are horrible, they emit a completely unnatural and idiotical spectrum, just like fluorescent lamps.
our brains turn it into something that resembles day-light but it isn't.
i doubt it is healthy, even apart from emf, and at any rate they are disgustable, well, that's in my view of course.
in europe new incandescent bulbs are illegal now ( how crazy ! ), but for another few years halogen light-bulbs ( which are basically the same, only a bit brighter and more efficiënt ) are still available.
for those unfamiliar with halogen lamps, there are 12 volt ones that run either on a battery or need a transformer ( which gives emf ) and high voltage ones that can be used as a regular bulb.
the most ideal seems a 12 volt system with solar panels and no ac-current, but in the dark winterdays that may be a bit problematic.

--- In [hidden email], John Puccetti <johnpuccetti@...> wrote:

>
> LED's are not perfect but in my mind they are the best option at the moment. I
> have solar panels and they create a lot of dirty electricity. But I still feel
> the goal is to be as clean as possible and as independent as possible from the
> grid.
> 1. I minimize my usage unplug all those ac to dc transformers that you can. Do
> not use dimmer switches.
> 2. Then I try to clean up the dirty electricity. with GS filters. You can twist
> the hot and neutral wires from panels or in your wiring to eliminate EMF. But
> you must have wiring in conduit to do that. Hard to do with existing wiring.
> 3. With 12 GS filters I have our house down to 40 gs. That is what is
> recomended. 
> Sent from a Hard-Wired Computer and a low RF environment. John Puccetti
> 805-642-0546
> johnpuccetti@...
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Marc Martin <marc@...>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Sat, June 1, 2013 9:22:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: Li-Fi better than wi-fi ?
>
>  
> On May 31, John Puccetti <johnpuccetti@...> wrote:
> > I am a general contractor electrician specializing in emf and rf detection and
>
> > mitigation. LED lights, good ones have no dirty electricity and very low rf but
> >
> > some people have a problem with less than 100 hz. www.ledwholesalers.com has
> > quality LEDs.
>
> We've had people here complain about LED lights, due the transformers from
> line voltage down to the LED voltage (12v?). Seems like the safest lighting
> is still incandescent, although it sounds like there is line voltage halogen
> lighting as well.
>
> Marc
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


12