JAMMING OF DECT SIGNALS

>
> It is like chasing the devil with Satan.
>
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> www.milieuziektes.nl
> www.milieuziektes.be
> www.hetbitje.nl
> checked by Norton Antivirus
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marc Martin" <marc@...>
> To: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 21:16
> Subject: Re: [eSens] JAMMING OF DECT SIGNALS
>
>
> >> I KNOW THAT WIFI CAN BE JAMMED OR WOBBLED BY DECT SIGNALS IS

> That was my first thought ! Jamming includes still more em emissions
> I imagine. Now, I wouldn't say no to a dedicated machine use for
> targeting the emf, ahahah. In fact that would be the best thing we
> could come up with. Smart sabotage of phone mast, dect phone, wifi.
>
> Yesterday, I measured a peak at 50 uW for the dect signal. No wonder
> I need a lot of coffee in the morning to wake up. But today I feel a
> little bit better, because I put an aluminium paper shield against
> the dect signal(I measured that it didn't make much worse the phone
> mast signal coming from the opposite direction). But I doubt I'm
> gonna have a lasting break.
>
> jean.
>
> --- In [hidden email], "charles" <charles@...> wrote:
>>
>> It is like chasing the devil with Satan.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Charles Claessens
>> member Verband Baubiologie
>> www.milieuziektes.nl
>> www.milieuziektes.be
>> www.hetbitje.nl
>> checked by Norton Antivirus
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Marc Martin" <marc@...>
>> To: <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 21:16
>> Subject: Re: [eSens] JAMMING OF DECT SIGNALS
>>
>>
>> >> I KNOW THAT WIFI CAN BE JAMMED OR WOBBLED BY DECT SIGNALS IS
> THERE A
>> >> DEVICE THAT CAN INTERFERE WITH DECT ? HOW ABOUT AN AM CB
> RADIO. !!!
>> >
>> > Wouldn't a person with ES have trouble tolerating the jamming
> device?
>> >
>> > It seems like you'd want fewer signals, not more...
>> >
>> > Marc
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> They mostly give signals from 2.000 up to 20.000 uW/m2 or more.
>
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> www.milieuziektes.nl
> www.milieuziektes.be
> www.hetbitje.nl
> checked by Norton Antivirus
>  

>
> Hi Charles,
>
> yes I understand my meter is very unprecise.  
>
> Also so far I have not been able to measure one single channel, it
> goes on scanning all the predefined dect channels.  
>
> But for the values, the scales are the same as for the other
> frequencies. I can measure values in the magnitude of the uW/m2,

> can measure still below, like in the nW/m2. 2000 uW/m2 !!! I'm
> scared, you mean that the measures on the display are wrong ????
>
> jean.
>  
>
> --- In [hidden email], "charles" <charles@> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Jean,
> >
> > You do know that your HF meter has great trouble in detecting

> signals.
> > They mostly give signals from 2.000 up to 20.000 uW/m2 or more.
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Charles Claessens
> > member Verband Baubiologie
> > www.milieuziektes.nl
> > www.milieuziektes.be
> > www.hetbitje.nl
> > checked by Norton Antivirus
> >
>

> Hi Charles,
>
> yes I understand my meter is very unprecise.
>
> Also so far I have not been able to measure one single channel, it
> goes on scanning all the predefined dect channels.
>
> But for the values, the scales are the same as for the other
> frequencies. I can measure values in the magnitude of the uW/m2, it
> can measure still below, like in the nW/m2. 2000 uW/m2 !!! I'm
> scared, you mean that the measures on the display are wrong ????
>
> jean.
>
>
> --- In [hidden email], "charles" <charles@...> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Jean,
>>
>> You do know that your HF meter has great trouble in detecting DECT
> signals.
>> They mostly give signals from 2.000 up to 20.000 uW/m2 or more.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Charles Claessens
>> member Verband Baubiologie
>> www.milieuziektes.nl
>> www.milieuziektes.be
>> www.hetbitje.nl
>> checked by Norton Antivirus
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> little bit better, because I put an aluminium paper shield against
> the dect signal(I measured that it didn't make much worse the phone
> mast signal coming from the opposite direction). But I doubt I'm
> gonna have a lasting break.  
>
> jean.
>
> --- In [hidden email], "charles" <charles@> wrote:
> >
> > It is like chasing the devil with Satan.
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Charles Claessens
> > member Verband Baubiologie
> > www.milieuziektes.nl
> > www.milieuziektes.be
> > www.hetbitje.nl
> > checked by Norton Antivirus
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Marc Martin" <marc@>
> > To: <[hidden email]>
> > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 21:16
> > Subject: Re: [eSens] JAMMING OF DECT SIGNALS
> >
> >
> > >> I KNOW THAT WIFI CAN BE JAMMED OR WOBBLED BY DECT SIGNALS IS
> THERE A
> > >> DEVICE THAT CAN INTERFERE WITH DECT ? HOW ABOUT AN AM CB
> RADIO. !!!
> > >
> > > Wouldn't a person with ES have trouble tolerating the jamming
> device?
> > >
> > > It seems like you'd want fewer signals, not more...
> > >
> > > Marc
> > >
> >
>

> I am sorry for you, but that is the case.
>
>
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> www.milieuziektes.nl
> www.milieuziektes.be
> www.hetbitje.nl
> checked by Norton Antivirus
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "jean" <tdx244@...>
> To: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 16:29
> Subject: [eSens] Re: JAMMING OF DECT SIGNALS
>
>
> > Hi Charles,
> >
> > yes I understand my meter is very unprecise.  
> >
> > Also so far I have not been able to measure one single channel,