Is all zeolite the same?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Is all zeolite the same?

jbbolden24
Hello everyone this is John. I don't post here often, but I browse the
messages from time to time, and I had to ask everyone a question. As
you all know, I have a stubborn case of ES that seems to never get too
much worse, but it never seems to get better either.

The funny thing is, when I sleep at night, my body seems to be able to
recuperate and do some healing. However, as the day progresses, it
never gets too far beyond that.

I have constant pain coming from my buccal nerve in the upper part of
my gums; however, I think the whole trigeminal nerve in my head, as
well as my central nervous system, has become ES sensitive.

I have tried everything possible to get rid of my ES, and nothing has
really worked. The only time I get relief, is when I either go to
sleep at night, go outside, or take a shower full of hot steam.

I have been driving myself crazy trying to figure out how to stop this
problem. The only thing that I haven't tried is liquid zeolite. I
remember Marc Martin saying something to me about this a long time ago.

I am about to try it. What I wanted to know, was is all zeolite the
same? Should I only buy liquid zeolite from the company waioria, or
would it also be the same if I bought it from the company at this website:

http://www.zeolitesupplement.com/index.htm

Somebody please get back to me so that I can make my choice.

Thanks,

John

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Stanford Researcher Says EM Waves May Predict Large Earthquakes

Emil at Less EMF Inc
from http://www.interferencetechnology.com/emcnews/id1411

Stanford University researcher believes that large earthquakes can be
predicted by detecting ultra-low frequency electromagnetic waves days or
even weeks before they take place. Antony Fraser-Smith, emeritus professor
of electrical engineering and geophysics, has long been interested in
electromagnetic signals, most of which come from space where they are
generated in the upper atmosphere by the sun and then beamed down to Earth.
In 1989 Fraser-Smith and his research team were monitoring such waves in the
Yorba Linda Mountains. On October 5, 1989 their monitoring equipment
detected a large signal, which stayed constant for the next 12 days. The
radio wave spiked at 2 p.m. on October 17, increasing in magnitude by 20 or
30 times. The Loma Prieta earthquake struck three hours later at 5:04 p.m.,
inflicting 63 fatalities and extensive damage across the San Francisco and
Monterey Bay regions.


Fraser-Smith concedes that because background EM waves would mask signals
from small quakes, only significant quakes of 7.0 or above could be
detected. Since it is precisely those quakes that cause the most damage,
forewarnings could prove invaluable. He has called for federal funding to
place 30 ultra-low-frequency monitoring equipment in 30 earthquake-prone
locations around the globe. Find more details on this research on the
Stanford University website at
http://news-service.stanford.edu/pr/2007/pr-agufraser-010908.html.



Best Regards,

Emil DeToffol
Less EMF Inc.
tel: +1-518-432-1550
fax: +1-309-422-4355
www.lessemf.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Stanford Researcher Says EM Waves May Predict Large Earthquakes

BiBrun
Maybe this can explain the Charlotte
King<http://www.viser.net/%7Echarking/story.html>effect?

On Dec 21, 2007 8:29 AM, Less EMF Inc <[hidden email]> wrote:

> from http://www.interferencetechnology.com/emcnews/id1411
>
> Stanford University researcher believes that large earthquakes can be
> predicted by detecting ultra-low frequency electromagnetic waves days or
> even weeks before they take place. Antony Fraser-Smith, emeritus professor
> of electrical engineering and geophysics, has long been interested in
> electromagnetic signals, most of which come from space where they are
> generated in the upper atmosphere by the sun and then beamed down to
> Earth.
> In 1989 Fraser-Smith and his research team were monitoring such waves in
> the
> Yorba Linda Mountains. On October 5, 1989 their monitoring equipment
> detected a large signal, which stayed constant for the next 12 days. The
> radio wave spiked at 2 p.m. on October 17, increasing in magnitude by 20
> or
> 30 times. The Loma Prieta earthquake struck three hours later at 5:04 p.m
> .,
> inflicting 63 fatalities and extensive damage across the San Francisco and
> Monterey Bay regions.
>
> Fraser-Smith concedes that because background EM waves would mask signals
> from small quakes, only significant quakes of 7.0 or above could be
> detected. Since it is precisely those quakes that cause the most damage,
> forewarnings could prove invaluable. He has called for federal funding to
> place 30 ultra-low-frequency monitoring equipment in 30 earthquake-prone
> locations around the globe. Find more details on this research on the
> Stanford University website at
> http://news-service.stanford.edu/pr/2007/pr-agufraser-010908.html.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Emil DeToffol
> Less EMF Inc.
> tel: +1-518-432-1550
> fax: +1-309-422-4355
> www.lessemf.com
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Is all zeolite the same?

Marc Martin
Administrator
In reply to this post by jbbolden24
> I am about to try it. What I wanted to know, was is all zeolite the
> same? Should I only buy liquid zeolite from the company waioria, or
> would it also be the same if I bought it from the company at this
> website:
>
> http://www.zeolitesupplement.com/index.htm

I haven't seen much in the way of comparisons between the various
zeolite supplements on the market. Certainly most people are
taking the Waioria version, but that of course doesn't mean it
is the best! I've only tried two companies zeolite formulas,
Waioria and Denali, and had equally bad reactions to both. :-(

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Stanford Researcher Says EM Waves May Predict Large Earthquakes

johnlankes
In reply to this post by Emil at Less EMF Inc
I was in San Francisco during the 1989 earthquake. Had rather severe

inexplicable ES symptoms (especially fatigue) for at least three or

four hours prior to quake.


John Lankes
 

-- In [hidden email], "Less EMF Inc" <lessemf@...> wrote:
>
> from http://www.interferencetechnology.com/emcnews/id1411
>
> Stanford University researcher believes that large earthquakes can
be
> predicted by detecting ultra-low frequency electromagnetic waves
days or
> even weeks before they take place. Antony Fraser-Smith, emeritus
professor
> of electrical engineering and geophysics, has long been interested
in
> electromagnetic signals, most of which come from space where they
are
> generated in the upper atmosphere by the sun and then beamed down
to Earth.
> In 1989 Fraser-Smith and his research team were monitoring such
waves in the
> Yorba Linda Mountains. On October 5, 1989 their monitoring equipment
> detected a large signal, which stayed constant for the next 12
days. The
> radio wave spiked at 2 p.m. on October 17, increasing in magnitude
by 20 or
> 30 times. The Loma Prieta earthquake struck three hours later at
5:04 p.m.,
> inflicting 63 fatalities and extensive damage across the San
Francisco and
> Monterey Bay regions.
>
>
> Fraser-Smith concedes that because background EM waves would mask
signals
> from small quakes, only significant quakes of 7.0 or above could be
> detected. Since it is precisely those quakes that cause the most
damage,
> forewarnings could prove invaluable. He has called for federal
funding to
> place 30 ultra-low-frequency monitoring equipment in 30 earthquake-
prone
> locations around the globe. Find more details on this research on
the

> Stanford University website at
> http://news-service.stanford.edu/pr/2007/pr-agufraser-010908.html.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Emil DeToffol
> Less EMF Inc.
> tel: +1-518-432-1550
> fax: +1-309-422-4355
> www.lessemf.com
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Is all zeolite the same?

Bruno M.
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Good question,
pops up also on other forums.
and it is a good thing people ask such a questions
in forums, before they separate them selfs
from there ( may be not so abundant available amount of ) money.


All Zeolite are not the same,
if you talk about the solid forms, there are to begin with,
natural and also synthetic Zeolites.

About the Liquid Zeolites sold as supplement.
al sorts have one thing in common:
They are CRAP.
There is no such a thing as LIQUID ZEOLITE,
it's a volcanic rock found at the sea bottom;
if that survived years of seawater beating, how do those
snake oil sellers are gonna make that liquid?

And how will this mineral hold it's very specific adsorption capacity?
It's is gonna lose those special properties if you dissolve
it in an acid or something.

Convince your self : Go to Pub Med
and try to search for one ( like in 1 ) research paper
were benefits of "Liquid Zeolite " is discussed.  
... Non found, how strange.

Nuff said,

Grts
Bruno M.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@...> wrote:

>
> > I am about to try it. What I wanted to know, was is all zeolite the
> > same? Should I only buy liquid zeolite from the company waioria, or
> > would it also be the same if I bought it from the company at this
> > website:
> >
> > http://www.zeolitesupplement.com/index.htm
>
> I haven't seen much in the way of comparisons between the various
> zeolite supplements on the market. Certainly most people are
> taking the Waioria version, but that of course doesn't mean it
> is the best! I've only tried two companies zeolite formulas,
> Waioria and Denali, and had equally bad reactions to both. :-(
>
> Marc
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Is all zeolite the same?

scollier
In reply to this post by jbbolden24
-
I have not been to the group in some time. So I am sorry if I make
some mistake here in my reply. Isn't zeolite supposed to be like
clay? Clay is supposed to be useful in removing electrical
sensitivity and radiation. I have been taking clay baths about five
days a week for about 9 months now. There are groups that are
helpful if you want to do that. One is eytonsearth.  





-- In [hidden email], "jbbolden24" <jbbolden24@...> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone this is John. I don't post here often, but I browse
the
> messages from time to time, and I had to ask everyone a question.  
As
> you all know, I have a stubborn case of ES that seems to never get
too
> much worse, but it never seems to get better either.
>
> The funny thing is, when I sleep at night, my body seems to be able
to
> recuperate and do some healing. However, as the day progresses, it
> never gets too far beyond that.
>
> I have constant pain coming from my buccal nerve in the upper part
of
> my gums; however, I think the whole trigeminal nerve in my head, as
> well as my central nervous system, has become ES sensitive.
>
> I have tried everything possible to get rid of my ES, and nothing
has
> really worked. The only time I get relief, is when I either go to
> sleep at night, go outside, or take a shower full of hot steam.
>
> I have been driving myself crazy trying to figure out how to stop
this
> problem. The only thing that I haven't tried is liquid zeolite. I
> remember Marc Martin saying something to me about this a long time
ago.
>
> I am about to try it. What I wanted to know, was is all zeolite the
> same? Should I only buy liquid zeolite from the company waioria, or
> would it also be the same if I bought it from the company at this
website:
>
> http://www.zeolitesupplement.com/index.htm
>
> Somebody please get back to me so that I can make my choice.
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Is all zeolite the same?

Marc Martin
Administrator
> I have not been to the group in some time. So I am sorry if I make
> some mistake here in my reply. Isn't zeolite supposed to be like
> clay?

Yes, zeolite is supposed to be like clay, in that it is supposed
to attract toxins due to opposing electrical charges.

I recently started seeing a new practitioner, so that I could
give the ionic detox footbaths a fair try. When the practitioner
heard my concerns about heavy metal poisoning, she pulled
out her bottle of NCD (zeolite), asking if I had tried it.
I said that I had, but had a bad reaction to it. She found
this difficult to believe (as it is supposed to be free of
side effects), but then she muscle tested me with it, and
was surprised to find that I tested "allergic" to it.

As for the ionic foot baths, I've only done two of these in
the last week, so it's premature to say anything about it,
other than I don't appear to be having a bad reaction to
it. Also there is lots of gunk in the water after
30 minutes, supposedly toxins originating from the liver,
kidneys, lympathic system, etc. I'm not sure how many
sessions or how much time it's supposed to take to have a
clearly noticeable improvement, but I plan on giving it a
fair try.

Marc