Is DOD foot-dragging on spectrum sharing?

I'd like to hear more about which EMF frequencies
are most likely to evoke symptoms, or are these
frequencies just dependent on past frequency
exposures?  And which frequencies are most likely
to evoke cancers based upon tissue penetration
and other factors?  Do we know of references?
Is there a list which follows such important
parameters?  What about balloon-distributed wi-fi risks for another example?

Many thanks,
Lawrence Plumee, M.D.

FCW: Is DOD foot-dragging on spectrum sharing?

 >The Obama administration pledged to make 500
MHz of spectrum available to expand wireless
broadband services as part of its 2010 National
Broadband Plan, with spectrum coming from
shifting some existing commercial and government
users. ... Industry has its sights set on the
1755-1780 MHz band, which is used internationally for wireless services.
 >Currently DOD uses the spectrum for air combat
training, unmanned aerial vehicles or drones,
precision guided munitions, satellite
communications and more. There 'is growing
urgency on the part of industry to make this
swath of spectrum available, because it pairs
well with the 2155-2180 MHz band, which the
Federal Communications Commission is required to auction off by February 2015.


======
Is DOD foot-dragging on spectrum sharing?
<http://fcw.com/Articles/2013/06/27/takai-spectrum.aspx?s=fcwdaily_280613&p=1>http://fcw.com/Articles/2013/06/27/takai-spectrum.aspx?s=fcwdaily_280613&p=1

On June 29, "Lawrence A. Plumlee" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I'd like to hear more about which EMF frequencies
> are most likely to evoke symptoms, or are these
> frequencies just dependent on past frequency
> exposures?  

It varies with people -- some people complain about certain
types of frequencies, while other people complain about a completely
different set of frequencies.   It's not clear to me that "past exposure"
is 100% relevant or not.

Marc

Lawrence,
 
Here is what I have learned. 

As you know our bodies are a wonderful and magnificent piece of art, when healthy. Luc A. Montagnier, found that our cells communicate using electromagnetic waves and communicate at a low frequency. http://montagnier.org/IMG/pdf/DNA_waves_and_water.pdf  

Water absorbs microwave radiation. Henry Lai found DNA breakage at higher frequencies http://www.smartmeterdangers.org/index.php/position-statements/180-henry-lai-smart-meters

Magnetic proteins called Cryptochromes are located in the retina and are responsible for sending a signal to the pineal gland. Telling it that light is present http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14712913

Melatonin and it's role in the body. http://umm.edu/health/medical/altmed/supplement/melatonin

The pineal gland produces melatonin when light is absent https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pineal_gland

Light waves and microwaves are identical accept for frequency. They are actually quite close considering the spectrum. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation

If they place balloons in the sky, they would be similar to producing an artificial sun. Unfortunately it will penatrate the roof and expose you to it's radiation 24/7. "Everything is a poison it's just a matter of dose."http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracelsus
 
At the least it will wreak havoc on your melatonin supply. I see this as eugenics in full operation.

Al

________________________________
 From: Lawrence A. Plumlee <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 8:08 AM
Subject: [eSens] Is DOD foot-dragging on spectrum sharing?
 


 
I'd like to hear more about which EMF frequencies
are most likely to evoke symptoms, or are these
frequencies just dependent on past frequency
exposures?  And which frequencies are most likely
to evoke cancers based upon tissue penetration
and other factors?  Do we know of references?
Is there a list which follows such important
parameters?  What about balloon-distributed wi-fi risks for another example?

Many thanks,
Lawrence Plumee, M.D.

FCW: Is DOD foot-dragging on spectrum sharing?

>The Obama administration pledged to make 500
MHz of spectrum available to expand wireless
broadband services as part of its 2010 National
Broadband Plan, with spectrum coming from
shifting some existing commercial and government
users. ... Industry has its sights set on the
1755-1780 MHz band, which is used internationally for wireless services.
>Currently DOD uses the spectrum for air combat
training, unmanned aerial vehicles or drones,
precision guided munitions, satellite
communications and more. There 'is growing
urgency on the part of industry to make this
swath of spectrum available, because it pairs
well with the 2155-2180 MHz band, which the
Federal Communications Commission is required to auction off by February 2015.

======
Is DOD foot-dragging on spectrum sharing?
<http://fcw.com/Articles/2013/06/27/takai-spectrum.aspx?s=fcwdaily_280613&p=1>http://fcw.com/Articles/2013/06/27/takai-spectrum.aspx?s=fcwdaily_280613&p=1 


 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]