Introduction and insights please :)

>
> On July 23, torch369 <torch369@...> wrote:
> > Well that stinks. What would work best against wireless things like this and smart meters?
> > Steve
>
> We don't yet have smart meters here, and I don't seem to be as sensitive
> to wireless as some people here.  I primarily use stuff from Quantum Products
> for EMF protection, although that has mostly been for computers,
> florescent lights, TV sets, etc.  I do also use stuff from Earthcalm, but
> I don't generally expect it to do much.  I get more consistent results
> from the Mega-Chi pendant, which doesn't even advertise itself much
> to be about EMF protection.  Also I find Springlife Polarizers to be
> beneficial, although these are no longer manufactured/sold.
>
> Marc
>

>
> A sledge hammer.
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: torch369 <torch369@...>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 12:39 PM
> Subject: [eSens] Re: Introduction and insights please :)
>  
>
>
>  
> Well that stinks. What would work best against wireless things like this and smart meters?
> Steve
>
> --- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@> wrote:
> >
> > On July 23, torch369 <torch369@> wrote:
> > > That's pretty scary but I move then someone else gets one. It's never ending.
> > > I don't know if the earth calm products protect against this but they say they do.
> >
> > The protection I've noticed from Earthcalm products is typically minor.  There
> > have been occasions where I've noticed the resonator helping a lot, but that
> > seems to be exception not the norm.
> >
> > Marc
> >
>
>
>  
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> On July 23, torch369 <torch369@...> wrote:
> > Well that stinks. What would work best against wireless things like this and smart meters?
> > Steve
>
> We don't yet have smart meters here, and I don't seem to be as sensitive
> to wireless as some people here. I primarily use stuff from Quantum Products
> for EMF protection, although that has mostly been for computers,
> florescent lights, TV sets, etc. I do also use stuff from Earthcalm, but
> I don't generally expect it to do much. I get more consistent results
> from the Mega-Chi pendant, which doesn't even advertise itself much
> to be about EMF protection. Also I find Springlife Polarizers to be
> beneficial, although these are no longer manufactured/sold.
>
> Marc
>

>
> what "DNA communicate via wireless"
> says to me is that we can telepath.  
> i'm sure the cell phone and phone companies
> would not like us to realize that we really
> don't need them.
> love, patricia
>
>
> On Jul 22, 2013, at 4:32 PM, paulpjc@... wrote:
>
> > you talk about dna and wireless coms - the other day I witnessed a lady  
> > coming out of a very deep coma miraculously it was her husband who put there  
> > baby on her body skin to skin every day, my thoughts were that the babies
> > sten  cell radiation was strong enough to influence and communicate with the
> > mothers  dna etc to bring her back from the bring - roger coghill called this
> > cerebral  morhogenic radiation in hisbook something in the air written many
> > years  ago
> >
> > puk
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 7/22/2013 6:51:04 A.M. Dateline Standard Time,  
> > iprovedit@... writes:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Steve,
> >
> > I believe you are on the right track. Below is a tiny bit  evidence for my
> > belief. I hve lots more if you want.
> >
> > Our DNA  communicate via wireless and this was shown by Nobel Prize winner
> > Luc  Montagnier, MD  in 2011.  
> > http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/306/1/012007
> >
> > That  router you are dealing with is using a pulsed 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz
> > frequency. My  previous neighbor had the same setup and I would wake up whenever
> > he turned it  on. I finally moved and never regretted it.  Ironically, these
> > are the  same frequencies that Russia used to bombard our embassy in Moscow
> > during the  cold war. The workers had dna damage along with cancer and two
> > consecutive  ambassadors died within two years of each other from leukemia.
> > The U.S.  government knew this but didn't say anything as they watched for
> > ten  years.
> >
> > Microwave weapons expert, Barrie Trower has come out of  retirement to warn
> > the world of the dangers we now use in our homes. Part  1
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xgJmeQaQmc   part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhcuSEHVOSM
> >
> > "  Lai and Singh (*1997) found that the dispensation of melatonin and  N‐
> > Tert‐Butylalpha‐Phenylnitron (PBN) before the EMF exposure prevented  the
> > occurrence of DNA breaks. Melatonin captures free radicals and for  PBN it has
> > been proven that it protects cells from cell death induced by  free
> > radicals."
> >
> > Review of the Current Scientific Research in view  of Precautionary Health
> > Protection
> > Commissioned  by
> > T‐Mobil
> > DeTeMobil Deutsche Telekom MobilNet GmbH
> >
> >
> > To:  _eSens@yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:[hidden email])  
> > Sent:  Monday, July 22, 2013 7:38 AM
> > Subject: [eSens] Re: Introduction and  insights please :)
> >
> >
> >
> > U-verse isn't DSL it's a fiber optic  network I believe. But as someone
> > else said it could be their wireless modem  that's bothering me, although the
> > previous tenants had a dish and I think they  had wireless as well
> > I use Time Warner Cable. The cable box tests out very  well with my gauss
> > meter and it's not wireless
> > Steve
> >
> > --- In _eSens@yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:[hidden email]) , Marc Martin
> > <marc@> wrote:
> >>
> >> On July 21, torch369  <torch369@> wrote:
> >>> I've beenb having really bad aches  since my neighbor had ATT U-Verse
> > installed.
> >>> The hook-up is in  the garage below my living room.
> >>> I couldn't figure out why my  fibromyalgia was getting worse but I
> > think it must be this.
> >>> Kind  of surprises me though because I didn't think phone lines would
> > be such an  issue
> >>
> >> Is AT&T U-Verse a DSL/phone line service?
> >>
> >> I had really bad problems with I (foolishly) tried upgrading my  1.5Mbps
> > DSL
> >> service to 7 Mbps. The house went from tolerable to  intolerable the day
> > the
> >> switchover took place. I later had a  technician come by, and they said
> > that
> >> the wiring to my house wasn't  good enough for 7 Mbps, and that the "lines
> >> were stressed", but  still... I downgraded back to the 1.5Mbps as soon as
> >> I could.
> >>
> >> Marc
> >>
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been  removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

>
> A sledge hammer.
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: torch369 <torch369@...>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 12:39 PM
> Subject: [eSens] Re: Introduction and insights please :)
>
>
>
>  
> Well that stinks. What would work best against wireless things like this and smart meters?
> Steve
>
> --- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@> wrote:
> >
> > On July 23, torch369 <torch369@> wrote:
> > > That's pretty scary but I move then someone else gets one. It's never ending.
> > > I don't know if the earth calm products protect against this but they say they do.
> >
> > The protection I've noticed from Earthcalm products is typically minor.  There
> > have been occasions where I've noticed the resonator helping a lot, but that
> > seems to be exception not the norm.
> >
> > Marc
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

> Steve, for what it's worth.... I can vouch for earthcalm resonator pendant.  I lost my first one, yes they are too expensive to lose, but I managed. I thought I would see what happened before I got another, and I found I was again having so much trouble in malls, etc etc.  I ordered another.
> Yes, you can return without hassle.  I have only dealt with the canadian seller tho.
> Aimee
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: torch369 <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:24 PM
> Subject: [eSens] Re: Introduction and insights please :)
>
>  
> The Mega Chi has no return policy so that concerns me. At least with quantum and earthcalm, if you don't like it back it goes.
> earthcalm says their pendants work on emfs but man they're expensive
> Steve
>
> --- In mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com, Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote:
> >
> > On July 23, torch369 <torch369@...> wrote:
> > > Well that stinks. What would work best against wireless things like this and smart meters?
> > > Steve
> >
> > We don't yet have smart meters here, and I don't seem to be as sensitive
> > to wireless as some people here. I primarily use stuff from Quantum Products
> > for EMF protection, although that has mostly been for computers,
> > florescent lights, TV sets, etc. I do also use stuff from Earthcalm, but
> > I don't generally expect it to do much. I get more consistent results
> > from the Mega-Chi pendant, which doesn't even advertise itself much
> > to be about EMF protection. Also I find Springlife Polarizers to be
> > beneficial, although these are no longer manufactured/sold.
> >
> > Marc
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

>
> Steve, for what it's worth.... I can vouch for earthcalm resonator pendant.  I lost my first one, yes they are too expensive to lose, but I managed. I thought I would see what happened before I got another, and I found I was again having so much trouble in malls, etc etc.  I ordered another.
> Yes, you can return without hassle.  I have only dealt with the canadian seller tho.
> Aimee
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: torch369 <torch369@...>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:24 PM
> Subject: [eSens] Re: Introduction and insights please :)
>
>  
> The Mega Chi has no return policy so that concerns me. At least with quantum and earthcalm, if you don't like it back it goes.
> earthcalm says their pendants work on emfs but man they're expensive
> Steve
>
> --- In mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com, Marc Martin <marc@> wrote:
> >
> > On July 23, torch369 <torch369@> wrote:
> > > Well that stinks. What would work best against wireless things like this and smart meters?
> > > Steve
> >
> > We don't yet have smart meters here, and I don't seem to be as sensitive
> > to wireless as some people here. I primarily use stuff from Quantum Products
> > for EMF protection, although that has mostly been for computers,
> > florescent lights, TV sets, etc. I do also use stuff from Earthcalm, but
> > I don't generally expect it to do much. I get more consistent results
> > from the Mega-Chi pendant, which doesn't even advertise itself much
> > to be about EMF protection. Also I find Springlife Polarizers to be
> > beneficial, although these are no longer manufactured/sold.
> >
> > Marc
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> Steve, for what it's worth.... I can vouch for earthcalm resonator pendant.  I lost my first one, yes they are too expensive to lose, but I managed. I thought I would see what happened before I got another, and I found I was again having so much trouble in malls, etc etc.  I ordered another.
> Yes, you can return without hassle.  I have only dealt with the canadian seller tho.
> Aimee
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: torch369 <torch369@...>
> To: mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:24 PM
> Subject: [eSens] Re: Introduction and insights please :)
>
>  
> The Mega Chi has no return policy so that concerns me. At least with quantum and earthcalm, if you don't like it back it goes.
> earthcalm says their pendants work on emfs but man they're expensive
> Steve
>
> --- In mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com, Marc Martin <marc@> wrote:
> >
> > On July 23, torch369 <torch369@> wrote:
> > > Well that stinks. What would work best against wireless things like this and smart meters?
> > > Steve
> >
> > We don't yet have smart meters here, and I don't seem to be as sensitive
> > to wireless as some people here. I primarily use stuff from Quantum Products
> > for EMF protection, although that has mostly been for computers,
> > florescent lights, TV sets, etc. I do also use stuff from Earthcalm, but
> > I don't generally expect it to do much. I get more consistent results
> > from the Mega-Chi pendant, which doesn't even advertise itself much
> > to be about EMF protection. Also I find Springlife Polarizers to be
> > beneficial, although these are no longer manufactured/sold.
> >
> > Marc
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> I got the tube like silver one.  I tired the pink stone one, but when it came I didn't like it.  It didnt look as nice as the picture, so I returned it and got this one.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: torch369 <torch369@...>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:32 AM
> Subject: [eSens] Re: Introduction and insights please :)
>
>  
> Hi Aimee,
> Did you get the round crystal kind or the oblong metal one?
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> --- In mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com, Aimee <ohkanaduh@> wrote:
> >
> > Steve, for what it's worth.... I can vouch for earthcalm resonator pendant.  I lost my first one, yes they are too expensive to lose, but I managed. I thought I would see what happened before I got another, and I found I was again having so much trouble in malls, etc etc.  I ordered another.
> > Yes, you can return without hassle.  I have only dealt with the canadian seller tho.
> > Aimee
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: torch369 <torch369@>
> > To: mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:24 PM
> > Subject: [eSens] Re: Introduction and insights please :)
> >
> >  
> > The Mega Chi has no return policy so that concerns me. At least with quantum and earthcalm, if you don't like it back it goes.
> > earthcalm says their pendants work on emfs but man they're expensive
> > Steve
> >
> > --- In mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com, Marc Martin <marc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > On July 23, torch369 <torch369@> wrote:
> > > > Well that stinks. What would work best against wireless things like this and smart meters?
> > > > Steve
> > >
> > > We don't yet have smart meters here, and I don't seem to be as sensitive
> > > to wireless as some people here. I primarily use stuff from Quantum Products
> > > for EMF protection, although that has mostly been for computers,
> > > florescent lights, TV sets, etc. I do also use stuff from Earthcalm, but
> > > I don't generally expect it to do much. I get more consistent results
> > > from the Mega-Chi pendant, which doesn't even advertise itself much
> > > to be about EMF protection. Also I find Springlife Polarizers to be
> > > beneficial, although these are no longer manufactured/sold.
> > >
> > > Marc
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> I got the tube like silver one.  I tired the pink stone one, but when it came I didn't like it.  It didnt look as nice as the picture, so I returned it and got this one.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: torch369 <torch369@...>
> To: mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:32 AM
> Subject: [eSens] Re: Introduction and insights please :)
>
>  
> Hi Aimee,
> Did you get the round crystal kind or the oblong metal one?
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> --- In mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com, Aimee <ohkanaduh@> wrote:
> >
> > Steve, for what it's worth.... I can vouch for earthcalm resonator pendant.  I lost my first one, yes they are too expensive to lose, but I managed. I thought I would see what happened before I got another, and I found I was again having so much trouble in malls, etc etc.  I ordered another.
> > Yes, you can return without hassle.  I have only dealt with the canadian seller tho.
> > Aimee
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: torch369 <torch369@>
> > To: mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:24 PM
> > Subject: [eSens] Re: Introduction and insights please :)
> >
> >  
> > The Mega Chi has no return policy so that concerns me. At least with quantum and earthcalm, if you don't like it back it goes.
> > earthcalm says their pendants work on emfs but man they're expensive
> > Steve
> >
> > --- In mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com, Marc Martin <marc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > On July 23, torch369 <torch369@> wrote:
> > > > Well that stinks. What would work best against wireless things like this and smart meters?
> > > > Steve
> > >
> > > We don't yet have smart meters here, and I don't seem to be as sensitive
> > > to wireless as some people here. I primarily use stuff from Quantum Products
> > > for EMF protection, although that has mostly been for computers,
> > > florescent lights, TV sets, etc. I do also use stuff from Earthcalm, but
> > > I don't generally expect it to do much. I get more consistent results
> > > from the Mega-Chi pendant, which doesn't even advertise itself much
> > > to be about EMF protection. Also I find Springlife Polarizers to be
> > > beneficial, although these are no longer manufactured/sold.
> > >
> > > Marc
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> Well, the lady that I order from said that the strength on that one is not as strong as the one I had been wearing.
>  
>  Also, if a person gets the weaker one, they soon will need to either add to it or purchase a stronger resonator.  That;s what was explained to me.
> BTW, I am not promoting this company .  It just happens to be the one I have dealt with.
>  
> Aimee
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: torch369 <torch369@...>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 8:10 PM
> Subject: [eSens] Re: Introduction and insights please :)
>
>  
> They also have an s series which is less expensive. They say because the chain is only silver plated but they work the same way
>
> --- In mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com, Aimee <ohkanaduh@> wrote:
> >
> > I got the tube like silver one.  I tired the pink stone one, but when it came I didn't like it.  It didnt look as nice as the picture, so I returned it and got this one.
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: torch369 <torch369@>
> > To: mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:32 AM
> > Subject: [eSens] Re: Introduction and insights please :)
> >
> >  
> > Hi Aimee,
> > Did you get the round crystal kind or the oblong metal one?
> > Thanks,
> > Steve
> >
> > --- In mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com, Aimee <ohkanaduh@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Steve, for what it's worth.... I can vouch for earthcalm resonator pendant.  I lost my first one, yes they are too expensive to lose, but I managed. I thought I would see what happened before I got another, and I found I was again having so much trouble in malls, etc etc.  I ordered another.
> > > Yes, you can return without hassle.  I have only dealt with the canadian seller tho.
> > > Aimee
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: torch369 <torch369@>
> > > To: mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:24 PM
> > > Subject: [eSens] Re: Introduction and insights please :)
> > >
> > >  
> > > The Mega Chi has no return policy so that concerns me. At least with quantum and earthcalm, if you don't like it back it goes.
> > > earthcalm says their pendants work on emfs but man they're expensive
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > --- In mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com, Marc Martin <marc@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On July 23, torch369 <torch369@> wrote:
> > > > > Well that stinks. What would work best against wireless things like this and smart meters?
> > > > > Steve
> > > >
> > > > We don't yet have smart meters here, and I don't seem to be as sensitive
> > > > to wireless as some people here. I primarily use stuff from Quantum Products
> > > > for EMF protection, although that has mostly been for computers,
> > > > florescent lights, TV sets, etc. I do also use stuff from Earthcalm, but
> > > > I don't generally expect it to do much. I get more consistent results
> > > > from the Mega-Chi pendant, which doesn't even advertise itself much
> > > > to be about EMF protection. Also I find Springlife Polarizers to be
> > > > beneficial, although these are no longer manufactured/sold.
> > > >
> > > > Marc
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> Well, the lady that I order from said that the strength on that one is not as strong as the one I had been wearing.
>  
>  Also, if a person gets the weaker one, they soon will need to either add to it or purchase a stronger resonator.  That;s what was explained to me.
> BTW, I am not promoting this company .  It just happens to be the one I have dealt with.
>  
> Aimee
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: torch369 <torch369@...>
> To: mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 8:10 PM
> Subject: [eSens] Re: Introduction and insights please :)
>
>  
> They also have an s series which is less expensive. They say because the chain is only silver plated but they work the same way
>
> --- In mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com, Aimee <ohkanaduh@> wrote:
> >
> > I got the tube like silver one.  I tired the pink stone one, but when it came I didn't like it.  It didnt look as nice as the picture, so I returned it and got this one.
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: torch369 <torch369@>
> > To: mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:32 AM
> > Subject: [eSens] Re: Introduction and insights please :)
> >
> >  
> > Hi Aimee,
> > Did you get the round crystal kind or the oblong metal one?
> > Thanks,
> > Steve
> >
> > --- In mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com, Aimee <ohkanaduh@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Steve, for what it's worth.... I can vouch for earthcalm resonator pendant.  I lost my first one, yes they are too expensive to lose, but I managed. I thought I would see what happened before I got another, and I found I was again having so much trouble in malls, etc etc.  I ordered another.
> > > Yes, you can return without hassle.  I have only dealt with the canadian seller tho.
> > > Aimee
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: torch369 <torch369@>
> > > To: mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:24 PM
> > > Subject: [eSens] Re: Introduction and insights please :)
> > >
> > >  
> > > The Mega Chi has no return policy so that concerns me. At least with quantum and earthcalm, if you don't like it back it goes.
> > > earthcalm says their pendants work on emfs but man they're expensive
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > --- In mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com, Marc Martin <marc@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On July 23, torch369 <torch369@> wrote:
> > > > > Well that stinks. What would work best against wireless things like this and smart meters?
> > > > > Steve
> > > >
> > > > We don't yet have smart meters here, and I don't seem to be as sensitive
> > > > to wireless as some people here. I primarily use stuff from Quantum Products
> > > > for EMF protection, although that has mostly been for computers,
> > > > florescent lights, TV sets, etc. I do also use stuff from Earthcalm, but
> > > > I don't generally expect it to do much. I get more consistent results
> > > > from the Mega-Chi pendant, which doesn't even advertise itself much
> > > > to be about EMF protection. Also I find Springlife Polarizers to be
> > > > beneficial, although these are no longer manufactured/sold.
> > > >
> > > > Marc
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>