Anyone know what electrosmog detector was used in that abc Good Morning America video. Seems like it was pretty sensitive. And worked to prove her point. Loni [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
I don't remember specifically, but the MW1 electrosmog detector is pretty
good if you don't need a numerical value. It's possible she had the predecessor to that model. Charles has recommended the eSpion detectors (can have them shipped from Europe w/ Priggen.com, but they are pretty expensive), and there was some TV segment or movie that showed someone using one. On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Loni <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > Anyone know what electrosmog detector was used in that abc Good Morning > America video. Seems like it was pretty sensitive. And worked to prove her > point. > > Loni > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Thanks Bill. I'll check both of those out! I'm looking for something similar because it looks easy to use and is also something that can validate what is going on in the environment. Loni --- On Sat, 4/24/10, Bill Bruno <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Bill Bruno <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector To: [hidden email] Date: Saturday, April 24, 2010, 11:53 AM I don't remember specifically, but the MW1 electrosmog detector is pretty good if you don't need a numerical value. It's possible she had the predecessor to that model. Charles has recommended the eSpion detectors (can have them shipped from Europe w/ Priggen.com, but they are pretty expensive), and there was some TV segment or movie that showed someone using one. On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Loni <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > Anyone know what electrosmog detector was used in that abc Good Morning > America video. Seems like it was pretty sensitive. And worked to prove her > point. > > Loni > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Loni Rosser
The one used by sarah dacre is/was the electrosmog detector from Toms
Gadgets in the uk or powerwatch and so on, it has no read out just converts signals to noise, its very good but could be improved to give greater sensitivity. In a message dated 24/04/2010 22:10:47 GMT Daylight Time, [hidden email] writes: Anyone know what electrosmog detector was used in that abc Good Morning > America video. Seems like it was pretty sensitive. And worked to prove her > point. > > Loni [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Thanks Paul. I will google & see if I can get one. Loni
--- On Sun, 4/25/10, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote: From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector To: [hidden email] Date: Sunday, April 25, 2010, 12:43 AM The one used by sarah dacre is/was the electrosmog detector from Toms Gadgets in the uk or powerwatch and so on, it has no read out just converts signals to noise, its very good but could be improved to give greater sensitivity. In a message dated 24/04/2010 22:10:47 GMT Daylight Time, loni326@yahoo. com writes: Anyone know what electrosmog detector was used in that abc Good Morning > America video. Seems like it was pretty sensitive. And worked to prove her > point. > > Loni [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by PUK
I bought this one, its better as gives you more info. And doesn't alarm to many people out there when you use it. Remember we ES people are only mad!!!
http://www.tomsgadgets.com/products/details.aspx?pc=ED85EX Best Giles --- On Sun, 25/4/10, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote: From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector To: [hidden email] Date: Sunday, 25 April, 2010, 8:43 The one used by sarah dacre is/was the electrosmog detector from Toms Gadgets in the uk or powerwatch and so on, it has no read out just converts signals to noise, its very good but could be improved to give greater sensitivity. In a message dated 24/04/2010 22:10:47 GMT Daylight Time, loni326@yahoo. com writes: Anyone know what electrosmog detector was used in that abc Good Morning > America video. Seems like it was pretty sensitive. And worked to prove her > point. > > Loni [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
It is a good idea to have one that goes up to 5 GHz at least now.
I do wish there were more that were a bit more sensitive. Of course with the external antenna you can improve sensitivity by getting a dish antenna. And with some meters I've had luck just putting a metal bowl behind it to increase sensitivity and directionality... but I never got it to work on the "yellow ball" meter we were discussing before (it has 3 antennas inside... using X mode may only activate one, and one could try to figure out which). On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Christina Steils <[hidden email]>wrote: > > > I bought this one, its better as gives you more info. And doesn't alarm to > many people out there when you use it. Remember we ES people are only mad!!! > http://www.tomsgadgets.com/products/details.aspx?pc=ED85EX > Best > Giles > > > --- On Sun, 25/4/10, [hidden email] <paulpjc%40aol.com> <[hidden email]<paulpjc%40aol.com>> > wrote: > > From: [hidden email] <paulpjc%40aol.com> <[hidden email]<paulpjc%40aol.com> > > > Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector > To: [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com> > Date: Sunday, 25 April, 2010, 8:43 > > > > > The one used by sarah dacre is/was the electrosmog detector from Toms > > Gadgets in the uk or powerwatch and so on, it has no read out just converts > > > signals to noise, its very good but could be improved to give greater > > sensitivity. > > In a message dated 24/04/2010 22:10:47 GMT Daylight Time, [hidden email] > > writes: > > Anyone know what electrosmog detector was used in that abc Good Morning > > > America video. Seems like it was pretty sensitive. And worked to prove > > her > > > point. > > > > > > Loni > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Christina Steils
Is this one just a read out & no noise then? Looks like it will only pick up RF? Loni
--- On Mon, 4/26/10, Christina Steils <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Christina Steils <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector To: [hidden email] Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 1:44 AM I bought this one, its better as gives you more info. And doesn't alarm to many people out there when you use it. Remember we ES people are only mad!!! http://www.tomsgadg ets.com/products /details. aspx?pc=ED85EX Best Giles --- On Sun, 25/4/10, paulpjc@aol. com <paulpjc@aol. com> wrote: From: paulpjc@aol. com <paulpjc@aol. com> Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector To: eSens@yahoogroups. com Date: Sunday, 25 April, 2010, 8:43 The one used by sarah dacre is/was the electrosmog detector from Toms Gadgets in the uk or powerwatch and so on, it has no read out just converts signals to noise, its very good but could be improved to give greater sensitivity. In a message dated 24/04/2010 22:10:47 GMT Daylight Time, loni326@yahoo. com writes: Anyone know what electrosmog detector was used in that abc Good Morning > America video. Seems like it was pretty sensitive. And worked to prove her > point. > > Loni [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
No noise, and the dig read out is very good.. You wont look like to much ofa weirdo walking down the street with this one, unlike the one that just screams at you!
--- On Mon, 26/4/10, Loni <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Loni <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector To: [hidden email] Date: Monday, 26 April, 2010, 16:12 Is this one just a read out & no noise then? Looks like it will only pick up RF? Loni --- On Mon, 4/26/10, Christina Steils <csteils@yahoo. co.uk> wrote: From: Christina Steils <csteils@yahoo. co.uk> Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector To: eSens@yahoogroups. com Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 1:44 AM I bought this one, its better as gives you more info. And doesn't alarm to many people out there when you use it. Remember we ES people are only mad!!! http://www.tomsgadg ets.com/products /details. aspx?pc=ED85EX Best Giles --- On Sun, 25/4/10, paulpjc@aol. com <paulpjc@aol. com> wrote: From: paulpjc@aol. com <paulpjc@aol. com> Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector To: eSens@yahoogroups. com Date: Sunday, 25 April, 2010, 8:43 The one used by sarah dacre is/was the electrosmog detector from Toms Gadgets in the uk or powerwatch and so on, it has no read out just converts signals to noise, its very good but could be improved to give greater sensitivity. In a message dated 24/04/2010 22:10:47 GMT Daylight Time, loni326@yahoo. com writes: Anyone know what electrosmog detector was used in that abc Good Morning > America video. Seems like it was pretty sensitive. And worked to prove her > point. > > Loni [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by BiBrun
Hi All,
Best one I've used is the Acoustimeter from EMFields. It's a little pricey, but if you rent it for a week you can minimise costs. I shared rental with a friend and therefore only spent £17.50 for the privilege. http://www.emfields.org/equipment/acoustimeter.asp You can turn the sound up or down on this. Also it has the advantage of indicating what type of frequency you have picked up based on the type of sound that comes through. It also shows current readings and average readings. I did some great testing with this! Regards David -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Bill Bruno Sent: 26 April 2010 14:37 To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector It is a good idea to have one that goes up to 5 GHz at least now. I do wish there were more that were a bit more sensitive. Of course with the external antenna you can improve sensitivity by getting a dish antenna. And with some meters I've had luck just putting a metal bowl behind it to increase sensitivity and directionality... but I never got it to work on the "yellow ball" meter we were discussing before (it has 3 antennas inside... using X mode may only activate one, and one could try to figure out which). On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Christina Steils <[hidden email]>wrote: > > > I bought this one, its better as gives you more info. And doesn't alarm to > many people out there when you use it. Remember we ES people are only mad!!! > http://www.tomsgadgets.com/products/details.aspx?pc=ED85EX > Best > Giles > > > --- On Sun, 25/4/10, [hidden email] <paulpjc%40aol.com> <[hidden email]<paulpjc%40aol.com>> > wrote: > > From: [hidden email] <paulpjc%40aol.com> <[hidden email]<paulpjc%40aol.com> > > > Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector > To: [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com> > Date: Sunday, 25 April, 2010, 8:43 > > > > > The one used by sarah dacre is/was the electrosmog detector from Toms > > Gadgets in the uk or powerwatch and so on, it has no read out just > > > signals to noise, its very good but could be improved to give greater > > sensitivity. > > In a message dated 24/04/2010 22:10:47 GMT Daylight Time, [hidden email] > > writes: > > Anyone know what electrosmog detector was used in that abc Good Morning > > > America video. Seems like it was pretty sensitive. And worked to prove > > her > > > point. > > > > > > Loni > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links |
In reply to this post by Loni Rosser
PUK replies - Noise can be good for demonstration purposes, also the
electrosmog detector has a jack plug so you can plug in headphones and keepthe unit inconspicuous ps I have a microalert match box size detector for sale £35, retail £65-70 if anyone is interested In a message dated 26/04/2010 19:52:47 GMT Daylight Time, [hidden email] writes: No noise, and the dig read out is very good.. You wont look like to much of a weirdo walking down the street with this one, unlike the one that just screams at you! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Christina Steils
Ha ha! Ok I'll research. Thanks! Loni
--- On Mon, 4/26/10, Christina Steils <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Christina Steils <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector To: [hidden email] Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 11:52 AM No noise, and the dig read out is very good.. You wont look like to much ofa weirdo walking down the street with this one, unlike the one that just screams at you! --- On Mon, 26/4/10, Loni <loni326@yahoo. com> wrote: From: Loni <loni326@yahoo. com> Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector To: eSens@yahoogroups. com Date: Monday, 26 April, 2010, 16:12 Is this one just a read out & no noise then? Looks like it will only pick up RF? Loni --- On Mon, 4/26/10, Christina Steils <csteils@yahoo. co.uk> wrote: From: Christina Steils <csteils@yahoo. co.uk> Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector To: eSens@yahoogroups. com Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 1:44 AM I bought this one, its better as gives you more info. And doesn't alarm to many people out there when you use it. Remember we ES people are only mad!!! http://www.tomsgadg ets.com/products /details. aspx?pc=ED85EX Best Giles --- On Sun, 25/4/10, paulpjc@aol. com <paulpjc@aol. com> wrote: From: paulpjc@aol. com <paulpjc@aol. com> Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector To: eSens@yahoogroups. com Date: Sunday, 25 April, 2010, 8:43 The one used by sarah dacre is/was the electrosmog detector from Toms Gadgets in the uk or powerwatch and so on, it has no read out just converts signals to noise, its very good but could be improved to give greater sensitivity. In a message dated 24/04/2010 22:10:47 GMT Daylight Time, loni326@yahoo. com writes: Anyone know what electrosmog detector was used in that abc Good Morning > America video. Seems like it was pretty sensitive. And worked to prove her > point. > > Loni [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by PUK
Yes that was what I had in mind. Demonstration purposes like Sarah did in her video.
But on the other hand it would be nice to have one that had a read out too.Oh geez I wish I could just have it all! LOL Loni --- On Tue, 4/27/10, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote: From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector To: [hidden email] Date: Tuesday, April 27, 2010, 1:32 AM PUK replies - Noise can be good for demonstration purposes, also the electrosmog detector has a jack plug so you can plug in headphones and keepthe unit inconspicuous ps I have a microalert match box size detector for sale £35, retail £65-70 if anyone is interested In a message dated 26/04/2010 19:52:47 GMT Daylight Time, csteils@yahoo. co.uk writes: No noise, and the dig read out is very good.. You wont look like to much of a weirdo walking down the street with this one, unlike the one that just screams at you! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Hello Loni,
I do have all of them. And even more as prototypes. LOL. Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton ----- Original Message ----- From: "Loni" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:41 PM Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector Yes that was what I had in mind. Demonstration purposes like Sarah did in her video. But on the other hand it would be nice to have one that had a read out too. Oh geez I wish I could just have it all! LOL Loni |
Ha Ha Charles, I am not surprised!
Do you like the noise electrosmog one for demo purposes as used in the abc video? Loni --- On Thu, 4/29/10, charles <[hidden email]> wrote: From: charles <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector To: [hidden email] Date: Thursday, April 29, 2010, 10:04 AM Hello Loni, I do have all of them. And even more as prototypes. LOL. Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes. nl www.milieuziektes. be www.hetbitje. nl checked by Norton ----- Original Message ----- From: "Loni" <loni326@yahoo. com> To: <eSens@yahoogroups. com> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:41 PM Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector Yes that was what I had in mind. Demonstration purposes like Sarah did in her video. But on the other hand it would be nice to have one that had a read out too. Oh geez I wish I could just have it all! LOL Loni [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
It is my experience, that most reports do not impress ordinary folks.
But when you let them hear the modulations, then they take attention. Especially with modems and DECT phones. Let them hear the modulations, then cut the power supply, and let them enjoy the silence. Then plug in the powersupply again, wait for two seconds, and the noise is there again. And that is the only thing that impresses people. (And if the sound is not loud enough, I also have a Terror Speaker.) I have made a special leaflet about the DECT phone, in dutch. When I speak to a woman, and mention that one may have headaches from those elektrosmog sources, they reply that they can imagine that. But this said to men, they deny that, by stating that the pressure of work is the cause. For that reason I have added, that these signals can cause erection problems and sterility. (Overhere every sixth couple can not have children.) That said, I got the attention of the men also. Yes, I am a mean bastard, but you have to do something to achieve certain goals. Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton ----- Original Message ----- From: "Loni" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:23 PM Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector Ha Ha Charles, I am not surprised! Do you like the noise electrosmog one for demo purposes as used in the abc video? Loni --- On Thu, 4/29/10, charles <[hidden email]> wrote: From: charles <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector To: [hidden email] Date: Thursday, April 29, 2010, 10:04 AM Hello Loni, I do have all of them. And even more as prototypes. LOL. Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes. nl www.milieuziektes. be www.hetbitje. nl checked by Norton ----- Original Message ----- From: "Loni" <loni326@yahoo. com> To: <eSens@yahoogroups. com> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:41 PM Subject: Re: [eSens] Electrosmog Detector Yes that was what I had in mind. Demonstration purposes like Sarah did in her video. But on the other hand it would be nice to have one that had a read out too. Oh geez I wish I could just have it all! LOL Loni [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links |
"Yes, I am a mean bastard, but you have to do something to achieve certain
goals." Ha! I don't like having to do it, either, but sometimes that can be what it takes - in truth, though, you're not telling people lies, you're just giving them information which may be unpleasant but could ultimately help them, and others. R. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Loni Rosser
Loni wrote:
> Do you like the noise electrosmog one for demo purposes as used in the abc video? > Hi, The electrosmog detector only has a frequency range up to 3 GHz. That is not high enough to catch the new WLAN at 5.8 GHz that has invaded my rural valley. Now 3 neighbors have wireless routers for their computers and satellite internet! The Acoustimeter does cover up to 8 GHz I have now heard that beacon over 1000 ft (305 m) away from the source. And unless there is a fourth neighbor eastward with it too, I can detect that beacon at 2870 ft (875m) when I am on the next plateau east. I also find it interesting when walking (riding) through the woods on a hillside the next valley over, that I can hear distant 3G from towers in some places, like hot spots. Not all hilltops are in line of sight with Franson Peak, and the valley floor is very quiet. But in between, I get signals in places I did not expect. Very useful, holding up a meter while riding large distances. I have updated my page with more meter results and a table comparing the different meters I have. http://seaHorseCorral.org/ehs1.html I wish there were more "In-the-field" comparisons like this (of the other meters I don't have.) :) Stewart |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |