EMF stacking effect?

I believe I am Esensitive. When I am on the computer for too long, drive in a car, or am in front of an old TV, are the major culprits.

When I stay away from any kind of EMF for 3 days, I fee half as bad.

My question is. Do EMFs stack, or compound?

Example. Say Im in 5 gauss from computer monitor, and my mouse and keyboard give off 5 gauss each as well. Am I in 15 gauss, or 5?

whatever the ambient reading is I guess that is the main reading, I guess  
that the most powerful emf will ramp up the meter however multiple scources
will  no doubgt compound issues multiple scuorces multiple frequencies
multiple  effects in the long run
 
puk
 
 
In a message dated 09/10/2011 03:13:11 GMT Daylight Time,  olsonand
[hidden email] writes:

 
 
 
I believe I am Esensitive. When I am on the computer for too long, drive in
 a car, or am in front of an old TV, are the major culprits.

When I stay  away from any kind of EMF for 3 days, I fee half as bad.

My question  is. Do EMFs stack, or compound?

Example. Say Im in 5 gauss from  computer monitor, and my mouse and
keyboard give off 5 gauss each as well. Am  I in 15 gauss, or 5?






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> My question is. Do EMFs stack, or compound?
>
> Example. Say Im in 5 gauss from computer monitor, and my mouse and keyboard give off 5 gauss
> each as well. Am I in 15 gauss, or 5?

I'm not sure if you're asking the right question -- a simple gauss reading is not going to give
you the whole picture with regard to health effects.  Very likely your computer monitor is putting
out all sorts of frequencies that your meter is not reading.  And your mouse and keyboard are
most likely emitting RF noise that originates from your computer, which is also not registering
on your meter.

Now, certainly the damage from EMF is cumulative -- that is, if you can reduce your exposure
in one place, then your tolerance may improve somewhere else.  But it's not as simple as
adding the readings on your meter.

Marc

 
One may think that there is a correlation as simple as adding the readings.
 It is very complex.
 
 I have done various experiments with various frequencies and  intensities.
First there is no linear correlation between intensity and  biological
effect, it is logarithmic. Second it is not so much the carrier  frequency that
does the harm  but the ELF modulation or pulsing of this  frequency; so the
same carrier frequency at the same intensitiy may have  different effects
due to a different pulsing rate.  Third there  is a phenomenon called the
biological window; it means that biological  effect occur only within a certain
range of intensity, not below a certain  threshold and not above a certain
higher threshold; that is what a window means.  Fourth to wich frequencies
one has a negative reaction, from experience in this  forum we know, is
individually different.
 
In consequence this means whatever your reading is, you never can say  how
harmful the effect of this radiation will be. Naturally when you have  
several sources of radiation the chance that some of these are specificly  
harmful increases, but you never can say exactly from technical readings how  
harmful they are.
So any readings are just an indication that there possibly could be harm.  
This opens the door to all kinds of speculations that lead nowhere.
 
dietrich
 
 
In einer eMail vom 10.10.2011 19:06:53 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt  
[hidden email]:

>  My question is. Do EMFs stack, or compound?
>
> Example. Say Im  in 5 gauss from computer monitor, and my mouse and
keyboard give off 5 gauss  
> each as well. Am I in 15 gauss, or 5?






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]