Hi all,
Twice, I've done Richard Conrad's flicker-sensitivity test - where I put a dark towel over my laptop's screen to test my response. Both times, I noticed a definite relief - a type of "destressing" of my brain (possibly my eyes, too). This certainly doesn't mean that "flicker sensitivity" is responsible for all of my "computer woes" - but apparently, it is part of the problem. Great - so whenever I'm in front of this screen, my brain is having little seizures. Life is good. ;-/ Anyway, this realization led me to try to look up information on the screenthat's attached to this laptop. Such information is quite hard to come by(Dell doesn't even seem to give any information about the screen in the User's manual or its official listing of specs) - but I managed to come across a site that listed this screen's refresh rate as being 60Hz, and its "response time" as being 25ms ("rise") to 35ms ("fall"). From what I know about LCD displays, a 25ms response time is quite a bad number - it seems that the absolute maxium response time for a LCD to be considered any good is 8ms. But my question is, how does response time contribute to flicker sensitivity? Does a "slow" response time contribute any to flicker/screen sensitivity, or is it all about refresh rate? Does response time factor into the equation when you're, say, reading webpages or watching YouTube? Could the slow response time be contributing to my screen sensitivity? Oh, and I also dim the screen - because of my sensitivity/intolerance to screen brightness. Could the dimming of the screen be contributing in some way to my brain's adverse response to this display? (Because of the "chopping" effect?) Considering my apparent flicker sensitivity, should I look for a LCD with a85Hz or greater refresh rate, or would it be sufficient if I just found one with a low (say, 5ms) response time? LCD monitors with low response times are relatively easy to come by these days - LCDs with a greater than 60Hzrefresh rate are harder to come by (and more expensive). For those of you flicker sensitive, what has worked for you as far as LCD monitors go? Is finding a montior with 85Hz-or-greater refresh rate absolutely essential - or could you "cover" for a 60Hz refresh rate by getting a display with a relatively-low resolution, and/or a low response-time? What size screen, and other screen parameters, have worked for you? Any and all responses welcome (there may be some of you who are not flickersensitive, but who may have knowledge on this topic). Thanks in advance, ~Svetaswan |
Hi Svetaswan,
Your symptoms sound like typical symptoms of new LED lit screens, rather than the tradition fluorescent tube (CCFL) lighting of LCD screens. I have enormous difficulty looking at my new Acer laptop LED lit screen, as does my partner. I have never had any problem with normal CCFL LCD screens. I have always had problems with low refresh rate CRT monitors - 60-80Hz would cause some strain, above 85Hz generally fine, BUT this LED strain is different altogether. Like many, it took me some while to realise it was the screen itself causing the problem (rather than emfs or wifi etc. concerns)- I went online and was surprise at how many others were experiencing the same thing, from strain through disorientation and even nausea. There's no obvious explanation as to why it happens, some say not dimming helps, as dimming is achieved by lowering the LED refresh rate, some say blinking helps and my partner finds sunglasses at full screen brightness makes it bearable! But for me, none of those help and I can only bear a few minutes before severe symptoms start kicking in (general weird brain-strain, eyestrain, fatigue, disorientation). The GOOD news is that by simply connecting my 'normal' CCFL monitor to my Acer laptop, I can merrily work for hours with no problem (WiFi IS off, mind you, as confirmed by my electrosmog detector). It looks like LED screens are becoming a BIG issue (unless they can solve this problem) Good luck John PS here is a page where macbook owners share their Experiences with the new LED screens; I can relate to just about every post here, and recommend reading them all: http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1677617 <http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1677617&start=45&tst art=0> &start=45&tstart=0 I can also attest to having severe eye strain from LED displays. I have spent countless long days staring at many types of monitors (CRT, LCD, Plasma) with no problems. Then, in January, I purchased a new Macbook Pro with an LED display only to realize that after about an hour I would get headaches and my eyes felt severely strained. I have used a combination of full spectrum desk lighting and frequent breaks, but I still cannot work on my computer all day like I used to. I didn't fully understand that it was LED technology causing the eye problems until my Dad purchased a new LED television recently, and I immediately experienced the same eye strain within a half-hour of watching his television. That experience led to more research and this thread, which confirms that at least some others are experiencing issues with this display type. My advice to others is try out LED displays before purchasing because sensitivity can occur even if you've never had eye strain before. My only solution now is to either sell my Macbook Pro or buy an additional monitor, which will at least help with home work. This is a problem whether it's blinding the masses or not. I am glad that other people have reported a problem because I thought I was losing my mind. Don't know what I'm going to do because it's taken me more than two weeks to get to the bottom of this problem. I love Apple, but I also hate them. You get a few choice and live and die by those choices. I waited on the non-glare screen, but still the LED seems to be causing me a problem. Grrrr. I feel trapped. I get sore eyes, But i thought this was just because i had glasses, and to speak, I never had this problem with my iBook. The way i found to fix it is to 1. Turn the Brightness Down, 2. Blink More (You have to think about this when you are concentrating). Add me to the list of people strongly affected by this issue. I've been using computers since the Apple ][ days and typically spend hours per day in front of screen displays. I have never experienced anything like the nausea and headaches I've been feeling since I purchased the new Macbook Pro. It ranges from "unpleasant" to "completely debilitating". None of my other laptops or monitors have caused this problem before. Like many of you, I'm reluctant to give up what is an otherwise nice machine (and I'm out of my 14-day return window), but this is not something I can live with. If anyone has found anything that works for them, please share. I'm going to do some experiments over the next few days with brightness settings, but I am not optimistic at this point. Well, I had to give up the MacBook Pro. I'm working on one of the last MacBooks with an LCD screen. I got it yesterday. You see, Apple just announced that even MacBooks are now coming out with LED Backlit screens. I feel fortunate that I figured this out before the LCD screen became extinct. Yes, I miss my MBPro, but in a few days I'll adjust to the slightly slower speed and the smaller screen. My eyes definitely feel better. I visited my eye doctor yesterday before I made the decision and took my computer. She said that she noticed my eyes tearing up from the strain of the looking at the screen in just a few minutes. This is a real phenomenon and I hope Apple will make note and provide the LCD screen as an option. Having the non-glare screen on the LED seems to make no difference IF you are sensitive to the light generated by the LED technology. I had had my MBPro for about six weeks. It took time to identify what was causing the problem. I visited two Apple stores, taking material from the Internet, and managers at both places said they had "heard" something about this issue and would have no problem trading out the machine, in spite of the time. I waited until I saw my doctor, hoping she could prescribe some special glasses, but no. I returned to one of the stores and hoped to get a hard drive larger than the 160, but I would have to get that online. The store manager said I could do the exchange online with no problem. NOT TRUE. I went to my car and phoned Apple and was told that I was outside of the 14-day window, there was no swapping, and was there anything else I needed help with. I didn't see the point in mentioning the letter I had from the doctor or anything since I was right outside of a store and could get the computer that day, rather than wait, after begging. The manager of the store could not have been nicer. I was impressed. So, yes, I miss the MBP, but I've rationalized: My old iBook had 60 GB, so 160 is more than twice that. I had a 12" screen before, now I have 13". So, I didn't get to go state-of-the-art with the MBP, but my eyes aren't on fire. This is a real problem that a few, very light sensitive people have. Blinking and dimming the screen did not help. Deselecting the ambient light option did not help. There were certain lighting conditions where it didn't hurt as much, but that was a moving target trying to combine time of day, position of window blinds, and position of desk---hard to hit with a searing headache. Another option is to keep the MBP and get an external monitor. MBP works closed, a specialist told me, and you can sit the monitor on top of it. Get the magic and avoid the burn that way. hey i bought my laptop from mac about a month ago and since then my vision has become very shaky and becoming worse and worse everyday when i drive when i try to focus on cars infront of me or to the left or right of me they seem to dissapear for a second then reappear and sometimes they seem to be doing a shutter movement day or night its the same thing i just got my eyes checked out to make sure it wasnt that the doctor said my eyes are perfectly fine i was doing some research yesterday and found all of you out there with the same problems im trying to return my macbook pro and they arent being coorperative i cant drive anymore because of how bad my vision has gotten and it doesnt seem like anyone at apple cares what so ever purchased the new LED monitor for my MacBook Air and it works great. However I have experienced severe headaches and feelings of nausea up to dissorientation. I am totaly confident that this is the monitor as my girlfriend and I were doing some work together on my monitor last night and she expereinced severe reaction with nausea and dizzyness. After 30 minutes away from the monitor she was fine. I have experienced this from the first day I got he monitor and it does this in any light conditions in the room, no matter how far I sit from it or light level settings. I dont want to give up the monitor but I feel sick every time I use it. The previous monitor I was using was the LCD version of the same monitor and it gave me no problem whatsoever. Apple - please address this - it is very real and people are feeling like they are getting the flu or sick. Wow, I truly appreciate this post and all the people who have wrote back. I just bought the new 21.5 Imac and without realizing the screen difference between my March 2009 20"Imac and the new Nov 2009 21.5" Imac, I started to get a tense burning in my eyes the first few days of using it. I had never felt this before with the March 2009 20 inch Imac with the LCD screen that I had used for almost 1 year. I am now going to return the new one. I want someone to tell me that there is a fix because the new machine is a bit faster and of course it is "newer". However, there is none and the trade off does not compare. I thought I may be over reacting, but now as I am using the old one again the screen looks much softer and not so sharp and my eyes are not hurting me any longer. Nothing more to be said! I also was wondering if I was going blind or something. I used to have ccfl macbook pro but it got stolen. After reading text on my recently purchased used macbook pro my eyes would shift out of focus and I felt like I was tripping on something for a few seconds. Then it goes away. And then it would happen again. Obviously some kind of sync or refresh issue. This doesn't happen to me viewing anything else. Yeah so it almost makes the laptop useless for reading text. One thing that helps is speed reading. If I read almost too fast it doesn't happen as much. But if I leisurely read it will go all unfocused. I have a feeling newer versions have better technology and do not do it as much. Oh there it goes I'm going all cross eyed again or whatever. This is frustrating! I bought my macbook just when it came out in October 2008. It has the led-backlit glossy screen. I have noticed that over the past year, my eyesight has worsened and that seeing long-distance is especially worse off than before. I have also gotten intense headaches, something that I have never experienced before purchasing the macbook. I think that my usage of the macbook, that is, looking at the computer screen for several hours a day for the past year has affected my eyesight. Permanently? I'm not sure. If I'm able to change my screen to matte, and I have noticed that I can see normal then I will post back on this forum again. have an imac and have experienced what I guess is eye strain ever since getting it. Eye feels like it is pulling or my face can literally ache....dry eyes....gee, it has sure changed my computer experience. I have been to the eye dr. and he found no changes in my eyes. So I have just been winging it and hoping to hear something similar to help me with my problem. I am lowering the brightness, changing to white on black background when I can, wearing sunglasses....eyedrops.....geez.....it almost seems like APPLE should have a complaint page about this issue. Not sure about this changing the gamma setting?? Any more input is greatly appreciated! Anyway, what I wanted to share is the fact that the chopper circuit that controls the LED backlight dimming is operating at a far higher frequency than have been previous versions of LED backlit panels in Apple's notebooks. In fact, it looks to my eyes to be an order of magnitude higher, which would mean higher than 3 kilohertz switching. This is really good news. The frequency is so high that normal phosphor decay dominates the operating characteristic of the white LEDs in dimming mode, and not the switching frequency as was the case before. That puts LED backlit LCDs much more on par with previous generation CCFL backlit LCDs, and perhaps even better than, at least with respect to this particular type of flicker. If people really were suffering ill effects from the lower blinking frequency of the LEDs before, then the new ones should start reducing the number of complaints about eyestrain, headaches, dizziness, nausea, etc. that have been seen on these discussion forums. Time will tell. But I'm really encouraged by this development. Someone is listening somewhere. For all of you doubters out there. I replaced my LED screen for a non-LED screen and the eye strain headaches were gone instantly. 100% gone! No doubt about it. cont... I just want to emphasize that I traded in my LED glossy screen for a non-LED glossy screen. My eye strain headaches were gone instantly and I have never seen them since despite the fact that I am still using a glossy screen. Oh, and by the way, I went to the eye doctor recently and my eyes are approximately the same as they have always been. There is no doubt that LED was giving me a miserable headache. Perhaps it was me and not all users will have the same reaction. But, with that being said, I would urge all to take caution with the new LED screens. _____ From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of svetaswan Sent: 11 May 2010 05:40 To: [hidden email] Subject: [eSens] Anyone here flicker sensitive? Hi all, Twice, I've done Richard Conrad's flicker-sensitivity test - where I put a dark towel over my laptop's screen to test my response. Both times, I noticed a definite relief - a type of "destressing" of my brain (possibly my eyes, too). This certainly doesn't mean that "flicker sensitivity" is responsible for all of my "computer woes" - but apparently, it is part of the problem. Great - so whenever I'm in front of this screen, my brain is having little seizures. Life is good. ;-/ Anyway, this realization led me to try to look up information on the screen that's attached to this laptop. Such information is quite hard to come by (Dell doesn't even seem to give any information about the screen in the User's manual or its official listing of specs) - but I managed to come across a site that listed this screen's refresh rate as being 60Hz, and its "response time" as being 25ms ("rise") to 35ms ("fall"). From what I know about LCD displays, a 25ms response time is quite a bad number - it seems that the absolute maxium response time for a LCD to be considered any good is 8ms. But my question is, how does response time contribute to flicker sensitivity? Does a "slow" response time contribute any to flicker/screen sensitivity, or is it all about refresh rate? Does response time factor into the equation when you're, say, reading webpages or watching YouTube? Could the slow response time be contributing to my screen sensitivity? Oh, and I also dim the screen - because of my sensitivity/intolerance to screen brightness. Could the dimming of the screen be contributing in some way to my brain's adverse response to this display? (Because of the "chopping" effect?) Considering my apparent flicker sensitivity, should I look for a LCD with a 85Hz or greater refresh rate, or would it be sufficient if I just found one with a low (say, 5ms) response time? LCD monitors with low response times are relatively easy to come by these days - LCDs with a greater than 60Hz refresh rate are harder to come by (and more expensive). For those of you flicker sensitive, what has worked for you as far as LCD monitors go? Is finding a montior with 85Hz-or-greater refresh rate absolutely essential - or could you "cover" for a 60Hz refresh rate by getting a display with a relatively-low resolution, and/or a low response-time? What size screen, and other screen parameters, have worked for you? Any and all responses welcome (there may be some of you who are not flicker sensitive, but who may have knowledge on this topic). Thanks in advance, ~Svetaswan [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Great info. I was looking forward to an LED monitor... now I'll wait
and see. LED's can be turned on and off essentially instantly, unlike any other kind of light. An LED run directly off DC should have no flicker, but to get the best performance the DC voltage is generally regulated with a switching regulator. There is no way the eye could consciously perceive such a frequency, but it's conceivable it creates correlations in nerve firing times that then has some negative effect. When the brightness isn't 100% there will be a chopping action, which is much more likely to cause problems. It's possible that some do this even when set to 100%. Also, some screens have separate adjustments for brightness and back-light. You might try getting an old monitor shield for CRT's (to block static electricity) and use that to make it less bright. It would be interesting to rewire so the LEDs are fed from a rechargeable battery, or a linear power supply.... On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:50 AM, John Jamieson <[hidden email]>wrote: > > > Hi Svetaswan, > > Your symptoms sound like typical symptoms of new LED lit screens, rather > than the tradition fluorescent tube (CCFL) lighting of LCD screens. > > I have enormous difficulty looking at my new Acer laptop LED lit screen, as > does my partner. I have never had any problem with normal CCFL LCD screens. > I have always had problems with low refresh rate CRT monitors - 60-80Hz > would cause some strain, above 85Hz generally fine, BUT this LED strain is > different altogether. > > Like many, it took me some while to realise it was the screen itself > causing > the problem (rather than emfs or wifi etc. concerns)- I went online and was > surprise at how many others were experiencing the same thing, from strain > through disorientation and even nausea. > > There's no obvious explanation as to why it happens, some say not dimming > helps, as dimming is achieved by lowering the LED refresh rate, some say > blinking helps and my partner finds sunglasses at full screen brightness > makes it bearable! > > But for me, none of those help and I can only bear a few minutes before > severe symptoms start kicking in (general weird brain-strain, eyestrain, > fatigue, disorientation). > > The GOOD news is that by simply connecting my 'normal' CCFL monitor to my > Acer laptop, I can merrily work for hours with no problem (WiFi IS off, > mind > you, as confirmed by my electrosmog detector). > > It looks like LED screens are becoming a BIG issue (unless they can solve > this problem) > > Good luck > > John > > PS here is a page where macbook owners share their Experiences with the new > LED screens; I can relate to just about every post here, and recommend > reading them all: > > http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1677617 > < > http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1677617&start=45&tst > art=0> &start=45&tstart=0 > > I can also attest to having severe eye strain from LED displays. > > I have spent countless long days staring at many types of monitors (CRT, > LCD, Plasma) with no problems. Then, in January, I purchased a new Macbook > Pro with an LED display only to realize that after about an hour I would > get > headaches and my eyes felt severely strained. > > I have used a combination of full spectrum desk lighting and frequent > breaks, but I still cannot work on my computer all day like I used to. I > didn't fully understand that it was LED technology causing the eye problems > until my Dad purchased a new LED television recently, and I immediately > experienced the same eye strain within a half-hour of watching his > television. > > That experience led to more research and this thread, which confirms that > at > least some others are experiencing issues with this display type. > > My advice to others is try out LED displays before purchasing because > sensitivity can occur even if you've never had eye strain before. My only > solution now is to either sell my Macbook Pro or buy an additional monitor, > which will at least help with home work. > > This is a problem whether it's blinding the masses or not. I am glad that > other people have reported a problem because I thought I was losing my > mind. > Don't know what I'm going to do because it's taken me more than two weeks > to > get to the bottom of this problem. I love Apple, but I also hate them. You > get a few choice and live and die by those choices. I waited on the > non-glare screen, but still the LED seems to be causing me a problem. > Grrrr. > I feel trapped. > > I get sore eyes, But i thought this was just because i had glasses, and to > speak, I never had this problem with my iBook. The way i found to fix it is > to 1. Turn the Brightness Down, 2. Blink More (You have to think about this > when you are concentrating). > > Add me to the list of people strongly affected by this issue. > > I've been using computers since the Apple ][ days and typically spend hours > per day in front of screen displays. I have never experienced anything like > the nausea and headaches I've been feeling since I purchased the new > Macbook > Pro. > > It ranges from "unpleasant" to "completely debilitating". None of my other > laptops or monitors have caused this problem before. > > Like many of you, I'm reluctant to give up what is an otherwise nice > machine > (and I'm out of my 14-day return window), but this is not something I can > live with. > > If anyone has found anything that works for them, please share. I'm going > to > do some experiments over the next few days with brightness settings, but I > am not optimistic at this point. > > Well, I had to give up the MacBook Pro. I'm working on one of the last > MacBooks with an LCD screen. I got it yesterday. You see, Apple just > announced that even MacBooks are now coming out with LED Backlit screens.I > feel fortunate that I figured this out before the LCD screen became > extinct. > Yes, I miss my MBPro, but in a few days I'll adjust to the slightly slower > speed and the smaller screen. My eyes definitely feel better. I visited my > eye doctor yesterday before I made the decision and took my computer. She > said that she noticed my eyes tearing up from the strain of the looking at > the screen in just a few minutes. This is a real phenomenon and I hope > Apple > will make note and provide the LCD screen as an option. > > Having the non-glare screen on the LED seems to make no difference IF you > are sensitive to the light generated by the LED technology. I had had my > MBPro for about six weeks. It took time to identify what was causing the > problem. I visited two Apple stores, taking material from the Internet, and > managers at both places said they had "heard" something about this issue > and > would have no problem trading out the machine, in spite of the time. > > I waited until I saw my doctor, hoping she could prescribe some special > glasses, but no. I returned to one of the stores and hoped to get a hard > drive larger than the 160, but I would have to get that online. The store > manager said I could do the exchange online with no problem. NOT TRUE. I > went to my car and phoned Apple and was told that I was outside of the > 14-day window, there was no swapping, and was there anything else I needed > help with. I didn't see the point in mentioning the letter I had from the > doctor or anything since I was right outside of a store and could get the > computer that day, rather than wait, after begging. The manager of the > store > could not have been nicer. I was impressed. > > So, yes, I miss the MBP, but I've rationalized: My old iBook had 60 GB, so > 160 is more than twice that. I had a 12" screen before, now I have 13". So, > I didn't get to go state-of-the-art with the MBP, but my eyes aren't on > fire. > > This is a real problem that a few, very light sensitive people have. > Blinking and dimming the screen did not help. Deselecting the ambient light > option did not help. There were certain lighting conditions where it didn't > hurt as much, but that was a moving target trying to combine time of day, > position of window blinds, and position of desk---hard to hit with a > searing > headache. > > Another option is to keep the MBP and get an external monitor. MBP works > closed, a specialist told me, and you can sit the monitor on top of it. Get > the magic and avoid the burn that way. > > hey i bought my laptop from mac about a month ago > and since then my vision has become very shaky > and becoming worse and worse everyday > when i drive when i try to focus on cars infront of me > or to the left or right of me they seem to dissapear > for a second then reappear and sometimes > they seem to be doing a shutter movement > day or night its the same thing > i just got my eyes checked out to make sure it wasnt that > the doctor said my eyes are perfectly fine > i was doing some research yesterday > and found all of you out there with the same problems > im trying to return my macbook pro and they arent being coorperative > i cant drive anymore because of how bad my vision has gotten > and it doesnt seem like anyone at apple cares what so ever > > purchased the new LED monitor for my MacBook Air and it works great. > > However I have experienced severe headaches and feelings of nausea up to > dissorientation. I am totaly confident that this is the monitor as my > girlfriend and I were doing some work together on my monitor last night and > she expereinced severe reaction with nausea and dizzyness. After 30 minutes > away from the monitor she was fine. I have experienced this from the first > day I got he monitor and it does this in any light conditions in the room, > no matter how far I sit from it or light level settings. > > I dont want to give up the monitor but I feel sick every time I use it. The > previous monitor I was using was the LCD version of the same monitor and it > gave me no problem whatsoever. > > Apple - please address this - it is very real and people are feeling like > they are getting the flu or sick. > > Wow, I truly appreciate this post and all the people who have wrote back.I > just bought the new 21.5 Imac and without realizing the screen difference > between my March 2009 20"Imac and the new Nov 2009 21.5" Imac, I started to > get a tense burning in my eyes the first few days of using it. I had never > felt this before with the March 2009 20 inch Imac with the LCD screen that > I > had used for almost 1 year. I am now going to return the new one. > > I want someone to tell me that there is a fix because the new machine is a > bit faster and of course it is "newer". However, there is none and the > trade > off does not compare. I thought I may be over reacting, but now as I am > using the old one again the screen looks much softer and not so sharp and > my > eyes are not hurting me any longer. Nothing more to be said! > > I also was wondering if I was going blind or something. > > I used to have ccfl macbook pro but it got stolen. > > After reading text on my recently purchased used macbook pro my eyes would > shift out of focus and I felt like I was tripping on something for a few > seconds. Then it goes away. And then it would happen again. Obviously some > kind of sync or refresh issue. This doesn't happen to me viewing anything > else. > > Yeah so it almost makes the laptop useless for reading text. > > One thing that helps is speed reading. If I read almost too fast it doesn't > happen as much. But if I leisurely read it will go all unfocused. > > I have a feeling newer versions have better technology and do not do it as > much. Oh there it goes I'm going all cross eyed again or whatever. This is > frustrating! > > I bought my macbook just when it came out in October 2008. It has the > led-backlit glossy screen. I have noticed that over the past year, my > eyesight has worsened and that seeing long-distance is especially worse off > than before. I have also gotten intense headaches, something that I have > never experienced before purchasing the macbook. > I think that my usage of the macbook, that is, looking at the computer > screen for several hours a day for the past year has affected my eyesight. > Permanently? I'm not sure. If I'm able to change my screen to matte, and I > have noticed that I can see normal then I will post back on this forum > again. > > have an imac and have experienced what I guess is eye strain ever since > getting it. Eye feels like it is pulling or my face can literally > ache....dry eyes....gee, it has sure changed my computer experience. I have > been to the eye dr. and he found no changes in my eyes. So I have just been > winging it and hoping to hear something similar to help me with my problem. > I am lowering the brightness, changing to white on black background when I > can, wearing sunglasses....eyedrops.....geez.....it almost seems like APPLE > should have a complaint page about this issue. Not sure about this changing > the gamma setting?? Any more input is greatly appreciated! > > Anyway, what I wanted to share is the fact that the chopper circuit that > controls the LED backlight dimming is operating at a far higher frequency > than have been previous versions of LED backlit panels in Apple's > notebooks. > In fact, it looks to my eyes to be an order of magnitude higher, which > would > mean higher than 3 kilohertz switching. This is really good news. The > frequency is so high that normal phosphor decay dominates the operating > characteristic of the white LEDs in dimming mode, and not the switching > frequency as was the case before. That puts LED backlit LCDs much more on > par with previous generation CCFL backlit LCDs, and perhaps even better > than, at least with respect to this particular type of flicker. > > If people really were suffering ill effects from the lower blinking > frequency of the LEDs before, then the new ones should start reducing the > number of complaints about eyestrain, headaches, dizziness, nausea, etc. > that have been seen on these discussion forums. Time will tell. But I'm > really encouraged by this development. Someone is listening somewhere. > > For all of you doubters out there. I replaced my LED screen for a non-LED > screen and the eye strain headaches were gone instantly. 100% gone! > No doubt about it. > > cont... I just want to emphasize that I traded in my LED glossy screen for > a non-LED glossy screen. My eye strain headaches were gone instantly and I > have never seen them since despite the fact that I am still using a glossy > screen. > > Oh, and by the way, I went to the eye doctor recently and my eyes are > approximately the same as they have always been. > > There is no doubt that LED was giving me a miserable headache. Perhaps it > was me and not all users will have the same reaction. But, with that being > said, I would urge all to take caution with the new LED screens. > > _____ > > From: [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto: > [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of > svetaswan > Sent: 11 May 2010 05:40 > To: [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [eSens] Anyone here flicker sensitive? > > > Hi all, > > Twice, I've done Richard Conrad's flicker-sensitivity test - where I put a > dark towel over my laptop's screen to test my response. Both times, I > noticed a definite relief - a type of "destressing" of my brain (possibly > my > eyes, too). This certainly doesn't mean that "flicker sensitivity" is > responsible for all of my "computer woes" - but apparently, it is part of > the problem. > > Great - so whenever I'm in front of this screen, my brain is having little > seizures. Life is good. ;-/ > > Anyway, this realization led me to try to look up information on the screen > that's attached to this laptop. Such information is quite hard to come by > (Dell doesn't even seem to give any information about the screen in the > User's manual or its official listing of specs) - but I managed to come > across a site that listed this screen's refresh rate as being 60Hz, and its > "response time" as being 25ms ("rise") to 35ms ("fall"). From what I know > about LCD displays, a 25ms response time is quite a bad number - it seems > that the absolute maxium response time for a LCD to be considered any good > is 8ms. > > But my question is, how does response time contribute to flicker > sensitivity? Does a "slow" response time contribute any to flicker/screen > sensitivity, or is it all about refresh rate? > > Does response time factor into the equation when you're, say, reading > webpages or watching YouTube? Could the slow response time be contributing > to my screen sensitivity? > > Oh, and I also dim the screen - because of my sensitivity/intolerance to > screen brightness. Could the dimming of the screen be contributing in some > way to my brain's adverse response to this display? (Because of the > "chopping" effect?) > > Considering my apparent flicker sensitivity, should I look for a LCD witha > 85Hz or greater refresh rate, or would it be sufficient if I just found one > with a low (say, 5ms) response time? LCD monitors with low response times > are relatively easy to come by these days - LCDs with a greater than 60Hz > refresh rate are harder to come by (and more expensive). > > For those of you flicker sensitive, what has worked for you as far as LCD > monitors go? Is finding a montior with 85Hz-or-greater refresh rate > absolutely essential - or could you "cover" for a 60Hz refresh rate by > getting a display with a relatively-low resolution, and/or a low > response-time? What size screen, and other screen parameters, have worked > for you? > > Any and all responses welcome (there may be some of you who are not flicker > sensitive, but who may have knowledge on this topic). Thanks in advance, > > ~Svetaswan > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Far as I remember, Low EMF Office in Italy does this with their/his modified LED monitors (replaces the CC tubes with LEDs, and I think he uses a linear power supply - or if not that, shields all the components in a separate shielded box) - I believe he told me it should be possible to run his monitors off of a deep cycle 12V battery, assuming the capacity of the battery'sbig enough to run for appreciable periods of time. Have you checked himout?
I'm still hoping for one of his monitors as a solution, I just don't have the money right now... R. --- On Tue, 5/11/10, Bill Bruno <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Bill Bruno <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Anyone here flicker sensitive? To: [hidden email] Received: Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 4:32 PM Great info. I was looking forward to an LED monitor... now I'll wait and see. LED's can be turned on and off essentially instantly, unlike any other kind of light. An LED run directly off DC should have no flicker, but to get the best performance the DC voltage is generally regulated with a switching regulator. There is no way the eye could consciously perceive such a frequency, but it's conceivable it creates correlations in nerve firing times that then has some negative effect. When the brightness isn't 100% there will be a chopping action, which is much more likely to cause problems. It's possible that some do this even when set to 100%. Also, some screens have separate adjustments for brightness and back-light. You might try getting an old monitor shield for CRT's (to block static electricity) and use that to make it less bright. It would be interesting to rewire so the LEDs are fed from a rechargeable battery, or a linear power supply.... On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:50 AM, John Jamieson <[hidden email]>wrote: > > > Hi Svetaswan, > > Your symptoms sound like typical symptoms of new LED lit screens, rather > than the tradition fluorescent tube (CCFL) lighting of LCD screens. > > I have enormous difficulty looking at my new Acer laptop LED lit screen, as > does my partner. I have never had any problem with normal CCFL LCD screens. > I have always had problems with low refresh rate CRT monitors - 60-80Hz > would cause some strain, above 85Hz generally fine, BUT this LED strain is > different altogether. > > Like many, it took me some while to realise it was the screen itself > causing > the problem (rather than emfs or wifi etc. concerns)- I went online and was > surprise at how many others were experiencing the same thing, from strain > through disorientation and even nausea. > > There's no obvious explanation as to why it happens, some say not dimming > helps, as dimming is achieved by lowering the LED refresh rate, some say > blinking helps and my partner finds sunglasses at full screen brightness > makes it bearable! > > But for me, none of those help and I can only bear a few minutes before > severe symptoms start kicking in (general weird brain-strain, eyestrain, > fatigue, disorientation). > > The GOOD news is that by simply connecting my 'normal' CCFL monitor to my > Acer laptop, I can merrily work for hours with no problem (WiFi IS off, > mind > you, as confirmed by my electrosmog detector). > > It looks like LED screens are becoming a BIG issue (unless they can solve > this problem) > > Good luck > > John > > PS here is a page where macbook owners share their Experiences with the new > LED screens; I can relate to just about every post here, and recommend > reading them all: > > http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1677617 > < > http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1677617&start=45&tst > art=0> &start=45&tstart=0 > > I can also attest to having severe eye strain from LED displays. > > I have spent countless long days staring at many types of monitors (CRT, > LCD, Plasma) with no problems. Then, in January, I purchased a new Macbook > Pro with an LED display only to realize that after about an hour I would > get > headaches and my eyes felt severely strained. > > I have used a combination of full spectrum desk lighting and frequent > breaks, but I still cannot work on my computer all day like I used to. I > didn't fully understand that it was LED technology causing the eye problems > until my Dad purchased a new LED television recently, and I immediately > experienced the same eye strain within a half-hour of watching his > television. > > That experience led to more research and this thread, which confirms that > at > least some others are experiencing issues with this display type. > > My advice to others is try out LED displays before purchasing because > sensitivity can occur even if you've never had eye strain before. My only > solution now is to either sell my Macbook Pro or buy an additional monitor, > which will at least help with home work. > > This is a problem whether it's blinding the masses or not. I am glad that > other people have reported a problem because I thought I was losing my > mind. > Don't know what I'm going to do because it's taken me more than two weeks > to > get to the bottom of this problem. I love Apple, but I also hate them. You > get a few choice and live and die by those choices. I waited on the > non-glare screen, but still the LED seems to be causing me a problem. > Grrrr. > I feel trapped. > > I get sore eyes, But i thought this was just because i had glasses, and to > speak, I never had this problem with my iBook. The way i found to fix it is > to 1. Turn the Brightness Down, 2. Blink More (You have to think about this > when you are concentrating). > > Add me to the list of people strongly affected by this issue. > > I've been using computers since the Apple ][ days and typically spend hours > per day in front of screen displays. I have never experienced anything like > the nausea and headaches I've been feeling since I purchased the new > Macbook > Pro. > > It ranges from "unpleasant" to "completely debilitating". None of my other > laptops or monitors have caused this problem before. > > Like many of you, I'm reluctant to give up what is an otherwise nice > machine > (and I'm out of my 14-day return window), but this is not something I can > live with. > > If anyone has found anything that works for them, please share. I'm going > to > do some experiments over the next few days with brightness settings, but I > am not optimistic at this point. > > Well, I had to give up the MacBook Pro. I'm working on one of the last > MacBooks with an LCD screen. I got it yesterday. You see, Apple just > announced that even MacBooks are now coming out with LED Backlit screens.I > feel fortunate that I figured this out before the LCD screen became > extinct. > Yes, I miss my MBPro, but in a few days I'll adjust to the slightly slower > speed and the smaller screen. My eyes definitely feel better. I visited my > eye doctor yesterday before I made the decision and took my computer. She > said that she noticed my eyes tearing up from the strain of the looking at > the screen in just a few minutes. This is a real phenomenon and I hope > Apple > will make note and provide the LCD screen as an option. > > Having the non-glare screen on the LED seems to make no difference IF you > are sensitive to the light generated by the LED technology. I had had my > MBPro for about six weeks. It took time to identify what was causing the > problem. I visited two Apple stores, taking material from the Internet, and > managers at both places said they had "heard" something about this issue > and > would have no problem trading out the machine, in spite of the time. > > I waited until I saw my doctor, hoping she could prescribe some special > glasses, but no. I returned to one of the stores and hoped to get a hard > drive larger than the 160, but I would have to get that online. The store > manager said I could do the exchange online with no problem. NOT TRUE. I > went to my car and phoned Apple and was told that I was outside of the > 14-day window, there was no swapping, and was there anything else I needed > help with. I didn't see the point in mentioning the letter I had from the > doctor or anything since I was right outside of a store and could get the > computer that day, rather than wait, after begging. The manager of the > store > could not have been nicer. I was impressed. > > So, yes, I miss the MBP, but I've rationalized: My old iBook had 60 GB, so > 160 is more than twice that. I had a 12" screen before, now I have 13". So, > I didn't get to go state-of-the-art with the MBP, but my eyes aren't on > fire. > > This is a real problem that a few, very light sensitive people have. > Blinking and dimming the screen did not help. Deselecting the ambient light > option did not help. There were certain lighting conditions where it didn't > hurt as much, but that was a moving target trying to combine time of day, > position of window blinds, and position of desk---hard to hit with a > searing > headache. > > Another option is to keep the MBP and get an external monitor. MBP works > closed, a specialist told me, and you can sit the monitor on top of it. Get > the magic and avoid the burn that way. > > hey i bought my laptop from mac about a month ago > and since then my vision has become very shaky > and becoming worse and worse everyday > when i drive when i try to focus on cars infront of me > or to the left or right of me they seem to dissapear > for a second then reappear and sometimes > they seem to be doing a shutter movement > day or night its the same thing > i just got my eyes checked out to make sure it wasnt that > the doctor said my eyes are perfectly fine > i was doing some research yesterday > and found all of you out there with the same problems > im trying to return my macbook pro and they arent being coorperative > i cant drive anymore because of how bad my vision has gotten > and it doesnt seem like anyone at apple cares what so ever > > purchased the new LED monitor for my MacBook Air and it works great. > > However I have experienced severe headaches and feelings of nausea up to > dissorientation. I am totaly confident that this is the monitor as my > girlfriend and I were doing some work together on my monitor last night and > she expereinced severe reaction with nausea and dizzyness. After 30 minutes > away from the monitor she was fine. I have experienced this from the first > day I got he monitor and it does this in any light conditions in the room, > no matter how far I sit from it or light level settings. > > I dont want to give up the monitor but I feel sick every time I use it. The > previous monitor I was using was the LCD version of the same monitor and it > gave me no problem whatsoever. > > Apple - please address this - it is very real and people are feeling like > they are getting the flu or sick. > > Wow, I truly appreciate this post and all the people who have wrote back.I > just bought the new 21.5 Imac and without realizing the screen difference > between my March 2009 20"Imac and the new Nov 2009 21.5" Imac, I started to > get a tense burning in my eyes the first few days of using it. I had never > felt this before with the March 2009 20 inch Imac with the LCD screen that > I > had used for almost 1 year. I am now going to return the new one. > > I want someone to tell me that there is a fix because the new machine is a > bit faster and of course it is "newer". However, there is none and the > trade > off does not compare. I thought I may be over reacting, but now as I am > using the old one again the screen looks much softer and not so sharp and > my > eyes are not hurting me any longer. Nothing more to be said! > > I also was wondering if I was going blind or something. > > I used to have ccfl macbook pro but it got stolen. > > After reading text on my recently purchased used macbook pro my eyes would > shift out of focus and I felt like I was tripping on something for a few > seconds. Then it goes away. And then it would happen again. Obviously some > kind of sync or refresh issue. This doesn't happen to me viewing anything > else. > > Yeah so it almost makes the laptop useless for reading text. > > One thing that helps is speed reading. If I read almost too fast it doesn't > happen as much. But if I leisurely read it will go all unfocused. > > I have a feeling newer versions have better technology and do not do it as > much. Oh there it goes I'm going all cross eyed again or whatever. This is > frustrating! > > I bought my macbook just when it came out in October 2008. It has the > led-backlit glossy screen. I have noticed that over the past year, my > eyesight has worsened and that seeing long-distance is especially worse off > than before. I have also gotten intense headaches, something that I have > never experienced before purchasing the macbook. > I think that my usage of the macbook, that is, looking at the computer > screen for several hours a day for the past year has affected my eyesight. > Permanently? I'm not sure. If I'm able to change my screen to matte, and I > have noticed that I can see normal then I will post back on this forum > again. > > have an imac and have experienced what I guess is eye strain ever since > getting it. Eye feels like it is pulling or my face can literally > ache....dry eyes....gee, it has sure changed my computer experience. I have > been to the eye dr. and he found no changes in my eyes. So I have just been > winging it and hoping to hear something similar to help me with my problem. > I am lowering the brightness, changing to white on black background when I > can, wearing sunglasses....eyedrops.....geez.....it almost seems like APPLE > should have a complaint page about this issue. Not sure about this changing > the gamma setting?? Any more input is greatly appreciated! > > Anyway, what I wanted to share is the fact that the chopper circuit that > controls the LED backlight dimming is operating at a far higher frequency > than have been previous versions of LED backlit panels in Apple's > notebooks. > In fact, it looks to my eyes to be an order of magnitude higher, which > would > mean higher than 3 kilohertz switching. This is really good news. The > frequency is so high that normal phosphor decay dominates the operating > characteristic of the white LEDs in dimming mode, and not the switching > frequency as was the case before. That puts LED backlit LCDs much more on > par with previous generation CCFL backlit LCDs, and perhaps even better > than, at least with respect to this particular type of flicker. > > If people really were suffering ill effects from the lower blinking > frequency of the LEDs before, then the new ones should start reducing the > number of complaints about eyestrain, headaches, dizziness, nausea, etc. > that have been seen on these discussion forums. Time will tell. But I'm > really encouraged by this development. Someone is listening somewhere. > > For all of you doubters out there. I replaced my LED screen for a non-LED > screen and the eye strain headaches were gone instantly. 100% gone! > No doubt about it. > > cont... I just want to emphasize that I traded in my LED glossy screen for > a non-LED glossy screen. My eye strain headaches were gone instantly and I > have never seen them since despite the fact that I am still using a glossy > screen. > > Oh, and by the way, I went to the eye doctor recently and my eyes are > approximately the same as they have always been. > > There is no doubt that LED was giving me a miserable headache. Perhaps it > was me and not all users will have the same reaction. But, with that being > said, I would urge all to take caution with the new LED screens. > > _____ > > From: [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto: > [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of > svetaswan > Sent: 11 May 2010 05:40 > To: [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [eSens] Anyone here flicker sensitive? > > > Hi all, > > Twice, I've done Richard Conrad's flicker-sensitivity test - where I put a > dark towel over my laptop's screen to test my response. Both times, I > noticed a definite relief - a type of "destressing" of my brain (possibly > my > eyes, too). This certainly doesn't mean that "flicker sensitivity" is > responsible for all of my "computer woes" - but apparently, it is part of > the problem. > > Great - so whenever I'm in front of this screen, my brain is having little > seizures. Life is good. ;-/ > > Anyway, this realization led me to try to look up information on the screen > that's attached to this laptop. Such information is quite hard to come by > (Dell doesn't even seem to give any information about the screen in the > User's manual or its official listing of specs) - but I managed to come > across a site that listed this screen's refresh rate as being 60Hz, and its > "response time" as being 25ms ("rise") to 35ms ("fall"). From what I know > about LCD displays, a 25ms response time is quite a bad number - it seems > that the absolute maxium response time for a LCD to be considered any good > is 8ms. > > But my question is, how does response time contribute to flicker > sensitivity? Does a "slow" response time contribute any to flicker/screen > sensitivity, or is it all about refresh rate? > > Does response time factor into the equation when you're, say, reading > webpages or watching YouTube? Could the slow response time be contributing > to my screen sensitivity? > > Oh, and I also dim the screen - because of my sensitivity/intolerance to > screen brightness. Could the dimming of the screen be contributing in some > way to my brain's adverse response to this display? (Because of the > "chopping" effect?) > > Considering my apparent flicker sensitivity, should I look for a LCD witha > 85Hz or greater refresh rate, or would it be sufficient if I just found one > with a low (say, 5ms) response time? LCD monitors with low response times > are relatively easy to come by these days - LCDs with a greater than 60Hz > refresh rate are harder to come by (and more expensive). > > For those of you flicker sensitive, what has worked for you as far as LCD > monitors go? Is finding a montior with 85Hz-or-greater refresh rate > absolutely essential - or could you "cover" for a 60Hz refresh rate by > getting a display with a relatively-low resolution, and/or a low > response-time? What size screen, and other screen parameters, have worked > for you? > > Any and all responses welcome (there may be some of you who are not flicker > sensitive, but who may have knowledge on this topic). Thanks in advance, > > ~Svetaswan > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by BiBrun
Excellent idea - as soon as my notebook is out of 12 month warrantee I will
see if I can power up its LED array with a battery DC source, I'm sure it won't use up much power, and could easily be lit with some NiMH AAs. I find plenty of strain at full brightness, and it actually improves with reduced brightness! And there's less strain when the room is well lit. It's quite a mystery why there's this effect - I'm extremely sensitive to flicker, especially when looking out of corner of my eye, and yet this LED screen looks rock solid! I have NO problems with battery powered LEDs that I'm aware of - I use them a lot (eg for reading at night) Cheers John -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Bill Bruno Sent: 11 May 2010 17:32 To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [eSens] Anyone here flicker sensitive? Great info. I was looking forward to an LED monitor... now I'll wait and see. LED's can be turned on and off essentially instantly, unlike any other kind of light. An LED run directly off DC should have no flicker, but to get the best performance the DC voltage is generally regulated with a switching regulator. There is no way the eye could consciously perceive such a frequency, but it's conceivable it creates correlations in nerve firing times that then has some negative effect. When the brightness isn't 100% there will be a chopping action, which is much more likely to cause problems. It's possible that some do this even when set to 100%. Also, some screens have separate adjustments for brightness and back-light. You might try getting an old monitor shield for CRT's (to block static electricity) and use that to make it less bright. It would be interesting to rewire so the LEDs are fed from a rechargeable battery, or a linear power supply.... On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:50 AM, John Jamieson <[hidden email]>wrote: > > > Hi Svetaswan, > > Your symptoms sound like typical symptoms of new LED lit screens, rather > than the tradition fluorescent tube (CCFL) lighting of LCD screens. > > I have enormous difficulty looking at my new Acer laptop LED lit screen, as > does my partner. I have never had any problem with normal CCFL LCD screens. > I have always had problems with low refresh rate CRT monitors - 60-80Hz > would cause some strain, above 85Hz generally fine, BUT this LED strain is > different altogether. > > Like many, it took me some while to realise it was the screen itself > causing > the problem (rather than emfs or wifi etc. concerns)- I went online and was > surprise at how many others were experiencing the same thing, from strain > through disorientation and even nausea. > > There's no obvious explanation as to why it happens, some say not dimming > helps, as dimming is achieved by lowering the LED refresh rate, some say > blinking helps and my partner finds sunglasses at full screen brightness > makes it bearable! > > But for me, none of those help and I can only bear a few minutes before > severe symptoms start kicking in (general weird brain-strain, eyestrain, > fatigue, disorientation). > > The GOOD news is that by simply connecting my 'normal' CCFL monitor to my > Acer laptop, I can merrily work for hours with no problem (WiFi IS off, > mind > you, as confirmed by my electrosmog detector). > > It looks like LED screens are becoming a BIG issue (unless they can solve > this problem) > > Good luck > > John > > PS here is a page where macbook owners share their Experiences with the > LED screens; I can relate to just about every post here, and recommend > reading them all: > > http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1677617 > < > http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1677617&start=45&tst > art=0> &start=45&tstart=0 > |
In reply to this post by Svetaswan-2
PUK replies - could be that the responsiveness of the leds might be more
able to convey dirty power and modulate this on the light waves so you percieve emf effect from these waves subconsiously, or perhaps the way the leds interlace with the LCD screen switching may also have an effect. Has anyone kept a pace on the use of LEDS for wireless internet use, ie modulating the light then picked up by a remote reciver ? In a message dated 11/05/2010 22:35:05 GMT Daylight Time, [hidden email] writes: It looks like LED screens are becoming a BIG issue (unless they can solve > this problem) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
No, but that sounds promising (LEDs for wireless) - or am I misunderstanding it?
R. --- On Wed, 5/12/10, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote: From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Anyone here flicker sensitive? To: [hidden email] Received: Wednesday, May 12, 2010, 8:59 AM PUK replies - could be that the responsiveness of the leds might be more able to convey dirty power and modulate this on the light waves so you percieve emf effect from these waves subconsiously, or perhaps the way theleds interlace with the LCD screen switching may also have an effect. Has anyone kept a pace on the use of LEDS for wireless internet use, ie modulating the light then picked up by a remote reciver ? In a message dated 11/05/2010 22:35:05 GMT Daylight Time, john@theomegashift. com writes: It looks like LED screens are becoming a BIG issue (unless they can solve > this problem) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by PUK
This is a good thought, but I've been running it without mains connected and
on the internal battery and it seems to be just the same. So, it's still a mystery why these LEDs cause strain, unless, as you say, there's a kind of interference with the LED and screen flicker. My screen refreshes at 60Hz, but no idea what the LEDs flicker at. _____ From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of [hidden email] Sent: 12 May 2010 09:59 To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [eSens] Anyone here flicker sensitive? PUK replies - could be that the responsiveness of the leds might be more able to convey dirty power and modulate this on the light waves so you percieve emf effect from these waves subconsiously, or perhaps the way the leds interlace with the LCD screen switching may also have an effect. Has anyone kept a pace on the use of LEDS for wireless internet use, ie modulating the light then picked up by a remote reciver ? In a message dated 11/05/2010 22:35:05 GMT Daylight Time, john@theomegashift. <mailto:john%40theomegashift.com> com writes: It looks like LED screens are becoming a BIG issue (unless they can solve > this problem) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Svetaswan-2
It could also be the wave length of the light emitted or indeed the light
may well be corrupted with signals from the laptop modulated on the wave which subconsciously you pick up on. How are your stress levels at the moment or when on the laptop if they rise then your nervous system will fire quicker and so may leave you susceptible to noticing disturbances in the led light form, try a glass of wine or something calming before going on the pc as an experiment maybe ? puk In a message dated 15/05/2010 22:08:42 GMT Daylight Time, [hidden email] writes: This is a good thought, but I've been running it without mains connected and on the internal battery and it seems to be just the same. So, it's still a mystery why these LEDs cause strain, unless, as you say, there's a kind of interference with the LED and screen flicker. My screen refreshes at 60Hz, but no idea what the LEDs flicker at. _____ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Jomega
Some LED bulbs (even some 12V DC ones) have built-in PWM regulators, so
checking with an AM radio is a good precaution. Bill On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:34 PM, John Jamieson <[hidden email]>wrote: > > > Excellent idea - as soon as my notebook is out of 12 month warrantee I will > see if I can power up its LED array with a battery DC source, I'm sure it > won't use up much power, and could easily be lit with some NiMH AAs. > > I find plenty of strain at full brightness, and it actually improves with > reduced brightness! And there's less strain when the room is well lit. > > It's quite a mystery why there's this effect - I'm extremely sensitive to > flicker, especially when looking out of corner of my eye, and yet this LED > screen looks rock solid! > > I have NO problems with battery powered LEDs that I'm aware of - I use them > a lot (eg for reading at night) > > Cheers > John > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto: > [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of Bill > Bruno > Sent: 11 May 2010 17:32 > To: [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [eSens] Anyone here flicker sensitive? > > Great info. I was looking forward to an LED monitor... now I'll wait > and see. LED's can be turned on and off essentially instantly, unlike > any other kind of light. An LED run directly off DC should have no > flicker, but to get the best performance the DC voltage is generally > regulated with a switching regulator. There is no way the eye could > consciously perceive such a frequency, but it's conceivable it creates > correlations in nerve firing times that then has some negative effect. > > When the brightness isn't 100% there will be a chopping action, which > is much more likely to cause problems. It's possible that some do this even > when set to 100%. Also, some screens have separate adjustments for > brightness and back-light. > > You might try getting an old monitor shield for CRT's (to block static > electricity) and use that to make it less bright. > > It would be interesting to rewire so the LEDs are fed from a rechargeable > battery, or a linear power supply.... > > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:50 AM, John Jamieson > <[hidden email] <john%40theomegashift.com>>wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Svetaswan, > > > > Your symptoms sound like typical symptoms of new LED lit screens, rather > > than the tradition fluorescent tube (CCFL) lighting of LCD screens. > > > > I have enormous difficulty looking at my new Acer laptop LED lit screen, > as > > does my partner. I have never had any problem with normal CCFL LCD > screens. > > I have always had problems with low refresh rate CRT monitors - 60-80Hz > > would cause some strain, above 85Hz generally fine, BUT this LED strain > is > > different altogether. > > > > Like many, it took me some while to realise it was the screen itself > > causing > > the problem (rather than emfs or wifi etc. concerns)- I went online and > was > > surprise at how many others were experiencing the same thing, from strain > > through disorientation and even nausea. > > > > There's no obvious explanation as to why it happens, some say not dimming > > helps, as dimming is achieved by lowering the LED refresh rate, some say > > blinking helps and my partner finds sunglasses at full screen brightness > > makes it bearable! > > > > But for me, none of those help and I can only bear a few minutes before > > severe symptoms start kicking in (general weird brain-strain, eyestrain, > > fatigue, disorientation). > > > > The GOOD news is that by simply connecting my 'normal' CCFL monitor to my > > Acer laptop, I can merrily work for hours with no problem (WiFi IS off, > > mind > > you, as confirmed by my electrosmog detector). > > > > It looks like LED screens are becoming a BIG issue (unless they can solve > > this problem) > > > > Good luck > > > > John > > > > PS here is a page where macbook owners share their Experiences with the > new > > LED screens; I can relate to just about every post here, and recommend > > reading them all: > > > > http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1677617 > > < > > > http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1677617&start=45&tst > > art=0> &start=45&tstart=0 > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Jomega
Hi John, Wow - thanks for that info. It seems that I was somehow under the impression that LED-backlit screens were "healthier" than CCFL screens in some way. But the fact that many people have been experiencing problems with Apple's LED screens is *very* valuable info to have as I consider buying a Macbook Pro. I was already thinking that it may not be worth buying what could easily come out to a $3,000-plus computer (if you buy the AppleCare protectionplan and opt for a SSD drive) if I'm going to have to attach an external monitor and external keyboard/mouse. It may not be worth it even with the cheapest configurations - as I'm not sure how much difference that turning off/removing the WiFi would make in making those computers more emf-neutral. But no, the laptop screen that is currently giving me some problems is not a LED, but a 14.1-inch (diagonal) CCFL-backlit screen. My laptop is several years old - I'm assuming that in 2004, LED laptop screens weren't even inexistence. What a shame about those Apple screens though. I believe that I've alreadyremarked about how when I was in the Apple Store, I found the 24-inch LED Apple Cinema Display to be remarkably comfortable for such a large screen. I wasn't conscious of any discomfort - but perhaps I wasn't concentrating that much on any "flicker sensitivity" (the effect can be subtle). Also - I probably was never in front of that screen for more than 15 or 20 straight minutes. My reaction within 20 minutes inside of an Apple Store could be(quite) different from what my reaction would be after several days/weeks/months of 4-plus hour sessions in front of the screen. If anything seemed to bother me about the Macbook (Pro) screens - it was that I was looking down (from a standing position) at a relatively small screen of high-resolution - which, for me, makes the font too small to be viewed comfortably over the long-term. Looking at the listed resolutions of theMacbook Pro screens - they seem to be pretty high for the screen size. The 15-inch screens are 1440x900 - you can find a lot of stand-alone, 19/20-inch LCD screens with that resolution. Their 17-inch Macbook Pro screens are even "worse" - the resolution jumps to 1920x1200. That is the same resolution as the 24" Apple Cinema display! Would a lower or higher resolution reduce the effects of flicker sensitivity? Historically, it seems that I've felt more comfortable with a relatively-low resolution. Would a higher-resolution screen also be more problematic from an emf-standpoint? Or does it not matter? Btw, Apple not only seems to want to have the highest-resolution screens around - they also want to have the brightest screens. Their Apple Cinema Diplay is advertised at 330 cd/m2 (nits). Most LCD screens seem to top out at 300 cd/m2. The problem is - that brighter, higher-resolution screens aren't really better for some people, from a biological-response perspective. But boy, it gives computer companies bragging rights - and feeds into the marketing-illusion of constant "improvement" that gives these companies "justification" to keep raising their prices (or at least not having to lower them). I guess before long, we'll be seeing 400-nit screens at 2500x1600 resolutions. Or maybe they'll finally realize that enough is enough - and start to focus on increasing refresh-rates. ~Svetaswan --- In [hidden email], "John Jamieson" <john@...> wrote: > > Hi Svetaswan, > > > > Your symptoms sound like typical symptoms of new LED lit screens, rather > than the tradition fluorescent tube (CCFL) lighting of LCD screens. > > > > I have enormous difficulty looking at my new Acer laptop LED lit screen, as > does my partner. I have never had any problem with normal CCFL LCD screens. > I have always had problems with low refresh rate CRT monitors - 60-80Hz > would cause some strain, above 85Hz generally fine, BUT this LED strain is > different altogether. > > > > Like many, it took me some while to realise it was the screen itself causing > the problem (rather than emfs or wifi etc. concerns)- I went online and was > surprise at how many others were experiencing the same thing, from strain > through disorientation and even nausea. > > > > There's no obvious explanation as to why it happens, some say not dimming > helps, as dimming is achieved by lowering the LED refresh rate, some say > blinking helps and my partner finds sunglasses at full screen brightness > makes it bearable! > > > > But for me, none of those help and I can only bear a few minutes before > severe symptoms start kicking in (general weird brain-strain, eyestrain, > fatigue, disorientation). > > > > The GOOD news is that by simply connecting my 'normal' CCFL monitor to my > Acer laptop, I can merrily work for hours with no problem (WiFi IS off, mind > you, as confirmed by my electrosmog detector). > > > > It looks like LED screens are becoming a BIG issue (unless they can solve > this problem) > > > > Good luck > > John > > PS here is a page where macbook owners share their Experiences with the new > LED screens; I can relate to just about every post here, and recommend > reading them all: > > http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1677617 > <http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1677617&start=45&tst > art=0> &start=45&tstart=0 > > > > I can also attest to having severe eye strain from LED displays. > > I have spent countless long days staring at many types of monitors (CRT, > LCD, Plasma) with no problems. Then, in January, I purchased a new Macbook > Pro with an LED display only to realize that after about an hour I would get > headaches and my eyes felt severely strained. > > I have used a combination of full spectrum desk lighting and frequent > breaks, but I still cannot work on my computer all day like I used to. I > didn't fully understand that it was LED technology causing the eye problems > until my Dad purchased a new LED television recently, and I immediately > experienced the same eye strain within a half-hour of watching his > television. > > That experience led to more research and this thread, which confirms thatat > least some others are experiencing issues with this display type. > > My advice to others is try out LED displays before purchasing because > sensitivity can occur even if you've never had eye strain before. My only > solution now is to either sell my Macbook Pro or buy an additional monitor, > which will at least help with home work. > > > > > > > > > > This is a problem whether it's blinding the masses or not. I am glad that > other people have reported a problem because I thought I was losing my mind. > Don't know what I'm going to do because it's taken me more than two weeksto > get to the bottom of this problem. I love Apple, but I also hate them. You > get a few choice and live and die by those choices. I waited on the > non-glare screen, but still the LED seems to be causing me a problem. Grrrr. > I feel trapped. > > > > > > > > > > I get sore eyes, But i thought this was just because i had glasses, and to > speak, I never had this problem with my iBook. The way i found to fix it is > to 1. Turn the Brightness Down, 2. Blink More (You have to think about this > when you are concentrating). > > > > > > > > > > Add me to the list of people strongly affected by this issue. > > I've been using computers since the Apple ][ days and typically spend hours > per day in front of screen displays. I have never experienced anything like > the nausea and headaches I've been feeling since I purchased the new Macbook > Pro. > > It ranges from "unpleasant" to "completely debilitating". None of my other > laptops or monitors have caused this problem before. > > Like many of you, I'm reluctant to give up what is an otherwise nice machine > (and I'm out of my 14-day return window), but this is not something I can > live with. > > If anyone has found anything that works for them, please share. I'm goingto > do some experiments over the next few days with brightness settings, but I > am not optimistic at this point. > > > > > > > > Well, I had to give up the MacBook Pro. I'm working on one of the last > MacBooks with an LCD screen. I got it yesterday. You see, Apple just > announced that even MacBooks are now coming out with LED Backlit screens.I > feel fortunate that I figured this out before the LCD screen became extinct. > Yes, I miss my MBPro, but in a few days I'll adjust to the slightly slower > speed and the smaller screen. My eyes definitely feel better. I visited my > eye doctor yesterday before I made the decision and took my computer. She > said that she noticed my eyes tearing up from the strain of the looking at > the screen in just a few minutes. This is a real phenomenon and I hope Apple > will make note and provide the LCD screen as an option. > > Having the non-glare screen on the LED seems to make no difference IF you > are sensitive to the light generated by the LED technology. I had had my > MBPro for about six weeks. It took time to identify what was causing the > problem. I visited two Apple stores, taking material from the Internet, and > managers at both places said they had "heard" something about this issue and > would have no problem trading out the machine, in spite of the time. > > I waited until I saw my doctor, hoping she could prescribe some special > glasses, but no. I returned to one of the stores and hoped to get a hard > drive larger than the 160, but I would have to get that online. The store > manager said I could do the exchange online with no problem. NOT TRUE. I > went to my car and phoned Apple and was told that I was outside of the > 14-day window, there was no swapping, and was there anything else I needed > help with. I didn't see the point in mentioning the letter I had from the > doctor or anything since I was right outside of a store and could get the > computer that day, rather than wait, after begging. The manager of the store > could not have been nicer. I was impressed. > > So, yes, I miss the MBP, but I've rationalized: My old iBook had 60 GB, so > 160 is more than twice that. I had a 12" screen before, now I have 13". So, > I didn't get to go state-of-the-art with the MBP, but my eyes aren't on > fire. > > This is a real problem that a few, very light sensitive people have. > Blinking and dimming the screen did not help. Deselecting the ambient light > option did not help. There were certain lighting conditions where it didn't > hurt as much, but that was a moving target trying to combine time of day, > position of window blinds, and position of desk---hard to hit with a searing > headache. > > Another option is to keep the MBP and get an external monitor. MBP works > closed, a specialist told me, and you can sit the monitor on top of it. Get > the magic and avoid the burn that way. > > > > > > > > hey i bought my laptop from mac about a month ago > and since then my vision has become very shaky > and becoming worse and worse everyday > when i drive when i try to focus on cars infront of me > or to the left or right of me they seem to dissapear > for a second then reappear and sometimes > they seem to be doing a shutter movement > day or night its the same thing > i just got my eyes checked out to make sure it wasnt that > the doctor said my eyes are perfectly fine > i was doing some research yesterday > and found all of you out there with the same problems > im trying to return my macbook pro and they arent being coorperative > i cant drive anymore because of how bad my vision has gotten > and it doesnt seem like anyone at apple cares what so ever > > > > > > purchased the new LED monitor for my MacBook Air and it works great. > > However I have experienced severe headaches and feelings of nausea up to > dissorientation. I am totaly confident that this is the monitor as my > girlfriend and I were doing some work together on my monitor last night and > she expereinced severe reaction with nausea and dizzyness. After 30 minutes > away from the monitor she was fine. I have experienced this from the first > day I got he monitor and it does this in any light conditions in the room, > no matter how far I sit from it or light level settings. > > I dont want to give up the monitor but I feel sick every time I use it. The > previous monitor I was using was the LCD version of the same monitor and it > gave me no problem whatsoever. > > Apple - please address this - it is very real and people are feeling like > they are getting the flu or sick. > > > > > > > > Wow, I truly appreciate this post and all the people who have wrote back.I > just bought the new 21.5 Imac and without realizing the screen difference > between my March 2009 20"Imac and the new Nov 2009 21.5" Imac, I started to > get a tense burning in my eyes the first few days of using it. I had never > felt this before with the March 2009 20 inch Imac with the LCD screen that I > had used for almost 1 year. I am now going to return the new one. > > I want someone to tell me that there is a fix because the new machine is a > bit faster and of course it is "newer". However, there is none and the trade > off does not compare. I thought I may be over reacting, but now as I am > using the old one again the screen looks much softer and not so sharp andmy > eyes are not hurting me any longer. Nothing more to be said! > > > > > > > > I also was wondering if I was going blind or something. > > I used to have ccfl macbook pro but it got stolen. > > After reading text on my recently purchased used macbook pro my eyes would > shift out of focus and I felt like I was tripping on something for a few > seconds. Then it goes away. And then it would happen again. Obviously some > kind of sync or refresh issue. This doesn't happen to me viewing anything > else. > > Yeah so it almost makes the laptop useless for reading text. > > One thing that helps is speed reading. If I read almost too fast it doesn't > happen as much. But if I leisurely read it will go all unfocused. > > I have a feeling newer versions have better technology and do not do it as > much. Oh there it goes I'm going all cross eyed again or whatever. This is > frustrating! > > > > > > > > I bought my macbook just when it came out in October 2008. It has the > led-backlit glossy screen. I have noticed that over the past year, my > eyesight has worsened and that seeing long-distance is especially worse off > than before. I have also gotten intense headaches, something that I have > never experienced before purchasing the macbook. > I think that my usage of the macbook, that is, looking at the computer > screen for several hours a day for the past year has affected my eyesight. > Permanently? I'm not sure. If I'm able to change my screen to matte, and I > have noticed that I can see normal then I will post back on this forum > again. > > > > > > > > > > have an imac and have experienced what I guess is eye strain ever since > getting it. Eye feels like it is pulling or my face can literally > ache....dry eyes....gee, it has sure changed my computer experience. I have > been to the eye dr. and he found no changes in my eyes. So I have just been > winging it and hoping to hear something similar to help me with my problem. > I am lowering the brightness, changing to white on black background when I > can, wearing sunglasses....eyedrops.....geez.....it almost seems like APPLE > should have a complaint page about this issue. Not sure about this changing > the gamma setting?? Any more input is greatly appreciated! > > > > > > > > > > Anyway, what I wanted to share is the fact that the chopper circuit that > controls the LED backlight dimming is operating at a far higher frequency > than have been previous versions of LED backlit panels in Apple's notebooks. > In fact, it looks to my eyes to be an order of magnitude higher, which would > mean higher than 3 kilohertz switching. This is really good news. The > frequency is so high that normal phosphor decay dominates the operating > characteristic of the white LEDs in dimming mode, and not the switching > frequency as was the case before. That puts LED backlit LCDs much more on > par with previous generation CCFL backlit LCDs, and perhaps even better > than, at least with respect to this particular type of flicker. > > If people really were suffering ill effects from the lower blinking > frequency of the LEDs before, then the new ones should start reducing the > number of complaints about eyestrain, headaches, dizziness, nausea, etc. > that have been seen on these discussion forums. Time will tell. But I'm > really encouraged by this development. Someone is listening somewhere. > > > > > > > > > > For all of you doubters out there. I replaced my LED screen for a non-LED > screen and the eye strain headaches were gone instantly. 100% gone! > No doubt about it. > > cont... I just want to emphasize that I traded in my LED glossy screen for > a non-LED glossy screen. My eye strain headaches were gone instantly and I > have never seen them since despite the fact that I am still using a glossy > screen. > > Oh, and by the way, I went to the eye doctor recently and my eyes are > approximately the same as they have always been. > > There is no doubt that LED was giving me a miserable headache. Perhaps it > was me and not all users will have the same reaction. But, with that being > said, I would urge all to take caution with the new LED screens. > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of > svetaswan > Sent: 11 May 2010 05:40 > To: [hidden email] > Subject: [eSens] Anyone here flicker sensitive? > > > > > > Hi all, > > Twice, I've done Richard Conrad's flicker-sensitivity test - where I put a > dark towel over my laptop's screen to test my response. Both times, I > noticed a definite relief - a type of "destressing" of my brain (possiblymy > eyes, too). This certainly doesn't mean that "flicker sensitivity" is > responsible for all of my "computer woes" - but apparently, it is part of > the problem. > > Great - so whenever I'm in front of this screen, my brain is having little > seizures. Life is good. ;-/ > > Anyway, this realization led me to try to look up information on the screen > that's attached to this laptop. Such information is quite hard to come by > (Dell doesn't even seem to give any information about the screen in the > User's manual or its official listing of specs) - but I managed to come > across a site that listed this screen's refresh rate as being 60Hz, and its > "response time" as being 25ms ("rise") to 35ms ("fall"). From what I know > about LCD displays, a 25ms response time is quite a bad number - it seems > that the absolute maxium response time for a LCD to be considered any good > is 8ms. > > But my question is, how does response time contribute to flicker > sensitivity? Does a "slow" response time contribute any to flicker/screen > sensitivity, or is it all about refresh rate? > > Does response time factor into the equation when you're, say, reading > webpages or watching YouTube? Could the slow response time be contributing > to my screen sensitivity? > > Oh, and I also dim the screen - because of my sensitivity/intolerance to > screen brightness. Could the dimming of the screen be contributing in some > way to my brain's adverse response to this display? (Because of the > "chopping" effect?) > > Considering my apparent flicker sensitivity, should I look for a LCD witha > 85Hz or greater refresh rate, or would it be sufficient if I just found one > with a low (say, 5ms) response time? LCD monitors with low response times > are relatively easy to come by these days - LCDs with a greater than 60Hz > refresh rate are harder to come by (and more expensive). > > For those of you flicker sensitive, what has worked for you as far as LCD > monitors go? Is finding a montior with 85Hz-or-greater refresh rate > absolutely essential - or could you "cover" for a 60Hz refresh rate by > getting a display with a relatively-low resolution, and/or a low > response-time? What size screen, and other screen parameters, have worked > for you? > > Any and all responses welcome (there may be some of you who are not flicker > sensitive, but who may have knowledge on this topic). Thanks in advance, > > ~Svetaswan > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
In reply to this post by BiBrun
--- In [hidden email], Bill Bruno <wbruno@...> wrote: > > > When the brightness isn't 100% there will be a chopping action, which > is much more likely to cause problems. It's possible that some do this even > when set to 100%. ------>Hi Bill - this may be a redundant question, but I just wanted to make sure that your above statement applies to CCFL-backlit screens as well asLED screens. So is the problem with dimming the screen involve introducing more low-frequency "flicker", or increasing electromagnetic radiation? I've tried running this screen at full-brightness to see if it alleviated any of my problems. There may have been some positive effect, but it was hard to gauge because of my sensitivity to the bright screen. Any positive effect seemed to be dampened, if not nullified - by the sheer brightness. ~Svetaswan |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |