Re: US documents from 53 years ago reveals it was accepted science that non-thermal radiation was harmful! What happened?
Posted by
sailplane on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/US-documents-from-53-years-ago-reveals-it-was-accepted-science-that-non-thermal-radiation-was-harmfu-tp4033566p4033576.html
casper wrote
sailplane wrote
Perhaps each mouse has a different threshold as well, and the NTP experiment was just barely enough over that threshold to get some results.
Sailplane, you should read Arthur Firstenberg's analysis on the NTP study here:
http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/ntp-analysis/
The “unexposed” groups of rats were in worse shape than the “exposed” animals and developed just as many tumors. Are we the "unexposed" group ???.... I always had a feeling, and some experts even say.. that a low signal can be even worse.. but a high signal is bad for us too.. so I don't know what we can do.