Posted by
Patricia on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/found-the-reference-to-EMF-in-the-conference-video-tp4028228p4028250.html
those are good questions, marc.
where 'bouts do you live?
do you see many of the persistent trails
where you live? when you first became
ES, were you living/working under
persistent trails? yet many people don't
notice the skies... they are so busy
watching the road, hurrying to work or
school, etc.
in your first paragraph, i'm
not altogether certain what you are saying...
not sure if you are saying that aluminum
and barium did or did not show up as a
problem in your heavy metals tests. ???
i am thinking you are saying they did not.
as for the second paragraph:
problem is that nano aluminum is small
enough to be breathed into the lungs and
is even small enough to be absorbed by
the skin, while aluminum in deodorants,
pots and pans and cans can be a problem,
but not as much of a problem as nano
particles. larger sized particles are not as
readily absorbed as nano sized particles.
you might find this interesting... i did.
Ceriodaphnia dubia as a Potential Bio-Indicator
for Assessing Acute Aluminum Oxide Nanoparticle Toxicity in Fresh Water Environment
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0074003"With increasing proliferation in the usage it is certain that aluminum oxide nanoparticles will ultimately find a way into the biosphere [17], chemtrails left by jet fuel have already raised concerns over their role increased incidences of Alzheimer disease [18]. Several relevant studies concerning aluminum oxide nanoparticles toxicity include its detrimental effects on prokaryotic microorganisms [19], microalgae species [20], aquatic cladocerans [21], earthworms [22], nematodes [23], zebra fish [24] and cell lines [25]. Despite the growing market size of aluminum oxide and its proven toxicity record we feel that there is a dearth of available literature concerning its toxicity in the aquatic environment and a significant knowledge gap exists between time dependent monitoring of bioavailability and resulting toxicity of nanoparticles [26]."
Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock is another
good source of information. here,
https://youtu.be/57dySwITpkE?t=1m42she talks about nano-Al and the blood-brain
barrier.
as far as i can tell, EMS is a neurological
disorder due to heavy metal toxicity. we
truly are acting as antenna for cell phone
towers, wifi, smart meters, etc. at least
that's how my connect-the-dots mentality
sees it.
love, patricia
On Sep 20, 2015, at 1:45 PM, Marc Martin [via ES] wrote:
> > i sent that link because someone in that conference
> > mentioned how the metals in chemtrails - aluminum/barium
> > make us especially good antennae and therefore susceptible to
> > electromagnetic fields.
>
> Yes, although I've been tested for heavy metals on several occasions over the years, and I don't aluminum or barium have showed up as being a concern.
>
> Also, I have to wonder how much aluminum exposure you would really get with a chemtrail, when many people get direct daily exposure to aluminum with things they make contact with or apply to their body (e.g. antiperspirants, soda cans)
>
> Marc
>
>
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
>
http://es-forum.com/found-the-reference-to-EMF-in-the-conference-video-tp4028228p4028240.html> To start a new topic under ES, email
[hidden email]
> To unsubscribe from ES, click here.