Posted by
Patricia on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/3-D-Bar-Graph-of-health-effects-from-cell-towers-tp4028135p4028139.html
how many towers does one small town need?
i would think that this article:
Electrohypersensitivity and Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Recognized by the World Health Organization;
Suggests They Be Included in the International Classification of Diseases
Sep 05, 2015 10:13 pm
By Catherine J. Frompovich The World Health Organization (WHO), on September 4th, 2015, issued a one-page press release, regarding “International Scientific Declaration on Electrohypersensitivity...
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/09/electrohypersensitivity-and-multiple-chemical-sensitivity.htmlwould - in a sane society - trump this "act"...
"Under the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, local governments cannot deny an application for a wireless telecommunications site because of perceived health risks if the proposed site complies with federal Radio Frequency emissions standards. Similarly, local governments may not set their own emissions standards."
however, it's a rigged game. sounds like something the industry itself
might have written... simply to be rubberstamped by
congress. i think there is something with the 10th amendment
that allows states to bow out of federal laws.
so your claim will have to be based on something else... for
instance your ability to function at a job and support yourself?
"where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations."
a gazillion laws written by corporations to keep us all in their customer base.
love, patricia
On Sep 9, 2015, at 3:33 AM, KarenEck [via ES] wrote:
> A study was done in another country besides the USA. The bar graph is often used in presentations and shows bad effects are NOT linear the farther you get from the tower. Can anyone tell me where to find this or what country it was?
>
> I live in a small town and other than the cell tower at the High School (very dumb idea) and one other, the towers are on hills away from residential neighborhoods. Now Verizon want to put one in 3 blocks to the west of my home and another 1 mile to the east. The high school is .4 miles North and the closest neighbors, 10 feet away have WiFi that extends an entire block from their house. I live with my mom and we help each other out. Moving is not an option ... this home is her prized possession for the last 50 years ... very nice 110 yr old home. She won't be moving anywhere.
>
> I don't have the ability or the stamina to be in the long-haul fight against the towers (since they are 100 feet tall, the city has to approve them). There is a hearing on 16th. I also know health grounds cannot be used, but in looking at locations that have defeated cell towers in residential neighborhoods, they have not been left out of the fight. Maybe I can instigate some others to put in their energy to fight them if I get a letter to the editor printed and at least attend one meeting with a boatload of SCARY facts. They are to be sited in small strips of commercial land, so ruining the view cannot be much of a factor. I read talking to the landlord about lawsuits can be effective to make them back out.
>
> Any other ammo?
>
> Thanks,
> Karen, wifrying in the Eastern Oregon boondocks.
>
>
> Change your brain, remove old stress programming, heal yourself while you sleep.
http://AskKarenEck.com>
>
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
>
http://es-forum.com/3-D-Bar-Graph-of-health-effects-from-cell-towers-tp4028135.html> To start a new topic under ES, email
[hidden email]
> To unsubscribe from ES, click here.