Re: Presenting the facts on RF

Posted by Hud J O Ramelan on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Presenting-the-facts-on-RF-tp4025027p4025030.html

[snip]I've been looking for a site that lists ALL the research done, and I'd
like to actually read the conclusions of the studies, not just hear
about them by hearsay.  Does such a site exist or partially exist? 
Seems such a site would help educate the skeptics.

I'd love to hear any thoughts or suggestions about this... [snip]

Hi Tim,

For a very comprehensive treatment of the subject try http://www.magdahavas.com/.  I doubt any single site will have _all_ the research.  But this one is very good.  Lots of 'objective' info.  Many links.

Another excellent resource is http://www.c4st.org/ which is growing rapidly.

Let me know what you think.

 

  This is the End...      
 

  ~=~
  HJR
_________________________________________________________
nam tua res agitur, paries cum proximus ardet
You too are in danger when your neighbor's house is on fire (Horace)




>________________________________
> From: Tim <[hidden email]>
>To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 2:01:29 PM
>Subject: [eSens] Presenting the facts on RF
>
> I know what I've experienced personally, and there's no question that I see cause and effect with RF and my health, but we are in the vast minority of those who can see this clearly...
>
>These misleading articles and skeptics use research that say they find no cause and effect with RF and ES. There's a lot of research on both sides though. I wonder, what studies are funded by telecom, governments, and what are independently funded?  Are they biased or faulted, or are they well researched and carried out?  I've come across such information or accusations occasionally, but it's scattered on different sites.
>
>I've been looking for a site that lists ALL the research done, and I'd like to actually read the conclusions of the studies, not just hear about them by hearsay.  Does such a site exist or partially exist?  Seems such a site would help educate the skeptics.
>
>I'd love to hear any thoughts or suggestions about this...
>
>Tim
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]