Posted by S Andreason on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Radio-Towers-vs-Cell-Phone-Towers-would-really-appreciate-any-info-thanks-tp4024625p4024644.html

Hi Russ,

Yes, I meant close to Seattle, say east of Sequim or Port Angeles.
When I look at a cellular coverage map, the whole I-5 corridor is built
up now with total coverage.

I drove around the Olympic Penninsula on Hwy-101 back in 1995. Except
for the tower(s) at Forks, the entire NW corner, north of Quinault River
should be much quieter than most places. I strongly believe there are
lots of dead zones out there, but it is all National Forest, and
Weyerhauser Tree farm.

They did add a NextRad at Aberdeen a few years ago.
South of Aberdeen, enters the area I lived, and intensively studied for
places to move to.

Stewart


russel395 wrote:
> I actually thought the Olympic Peninsula might be one of the better places in the country to live as far as getting away from EMFs.  I've found places that are 2+ miles from the nearest cell phone antenna and thought that was a pretty good and rare find.  Were you more referring to the areas closer to Seattle?  Or is there something bad about the Olympic Peninsula area as well?  Maybe something that doesn't show up in the antenna counts/distances data?
>
>  

--
http://seahorseCorral.org