Thank you Stewart, your input is very helpful, especially your analogies.
I have been looking as more rural areas to move, but is challenging to be so far away from my place of work, given gas costs and commute time and hassle.
Always is the question - how far away to get from the city to be free enough from emf effects, given the technology is continually encroaching on open space?
Seems like a faraday cage around a sleeping cot might be a good partial solution as I can economize by using less shielding fabric. Getting good sleep is so essential.
>
> Hi Renee,
>
> > How does one conclusively tell if ground sources are contaminated,
> I can think of two ways. One is if there is ground current between
> ground rods on opposite sides of your home, current between an
> independent ground rod and the outlet ground, and 2nd if there are any
> spikes when measured on an ocilliscope. But we're trying to measure
> ground, not the 120V AC, so the noise may only be a volt or two.
>
>
> > I rely a lot on my intuition, and they 'feel' right.
> Then it is beneficial to you. If only we all were in tune with which
> vibrations complement ours.
>
>
> > and don't care what wikipedia says on it).
> >
> Since when is modern science fully comprehending the nature of the universe?
> They have room to grow!
>
>
> > It's like what I imagine an epileptic goes through with brain overload - except I don't lose consciousness.
> >
> That may be a close parallel.
> I guess the important thing is to ask, how to heal these kinds of
> neurological damage...
> And if it is possible to do so in the increasing sea of electromagnetic
> noise bathing the planet.
>
>
> > hearing test, then EEG, then CT scan or MRI?
> Nearly the same route I took, 19 years ago. Perfect hearing, No tumor.
>
>
> > Tho CT uses xrays; and MRI uses radio wave frequencies - is that safe?
> I think it is low enough the body tolerates it, unless your cup is full
> of course. I didn't really notice additional symptoms from my MRI, but
> then I was in a big city (Seattle) getting cooked and fried already, and
> not enjoying the experience, shall we say...
>
>
> > we put up some foil patches on the wall and that did reduce the emfs.
> No doubt it Will reflect, so if the foil is between you (or a meter) and
> the source of the microwaves, then the levels will be reduced, exactly
> like a shadow.
>
>
> > I have another question - I know microwaves penetrate walls etc, but do they or signals from cell towers, power lines, wifi, etc ricoshet off buildings as well
> Absolutely for all listed except power lines.
> Cell towers, WiFi, are all microwaves, and they do bounce, just like in
> the oven.
> They bounce off buildings, walls, and rocks (thinking of valley walls
> and slopes.)
>
> Think of the cell tower (etc) as the Sun. Very bright. Put up an
> umbrella, or aluminum foil. It casts a shadow. It feels much better in
> the shade. But it is not completely dark, because the light also bounced
> off the walls, trees, etc, and comes at you from nearly all sides. That
> is why to create a faraday cage, requires absolutely no leaks.
>
> I've spent a great deal of time studying how the towers (7 miles away)
> bounce into my valley here. Some places with a hill blocking directly,
> have varying power/reception levels. Pictures, stories, etc., on my page.
>
> Power lines are ELF, extremely low frequency, only 50-60 cycles per
> second (Hertz), so those waves are more likely to penetrate than
> reflect. I can measure magnetic fields, and electric fields, but not the
> ELF waves themselves at longer distances than a quarter mile, as they
> become "background" and beyond my ability to measure (and worry about.)
>
> Stewart
>
>
http://seahorseCorral.org/ehs1.html>