Posted by
Elysia Drew on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Does-baking-soda-neutralize-stress-proteins-tp4023861.html
Hi, all. I'm wondering if baking soda neutralizes the "stress proteins" described by Dr. Belpomme as being overly abundant in EHS sufferers' bodies; that along w/ histamines. I'm in more pain since I took about 1/2 tsp. of baking soda this morning, but in some ways it feels like a cleansing pain. Feels like it's trying to access & neutralize the stress proteins that have built up in my connective tissue, esp. spine, lungs (scarred by mold), & my neck & jaw. I'm wondering if there's any science to back this up (???). If I'm wrong, is there anything that DOES neutralize these stress proteins (& perhaps histamines, too?) Either way, I plan to keep doing it, altho I don't know if I should avoid taking probiotics around the same time as taking the baking soda; I don't want to neutralize stuff.
Love & blessings,
Elysia
Below is the text of the article where EHS is explained physiologically; sorry the actual link won't work:
__http://www.robindestoits.org/Wifi-EMFs-Electrosensitivity-ES-EHS-physiologi_
(
http://www.robindestoits.org/Wifi-EMFs-Electrosensitivity-ES-EHS-physiologi)
> cally-explained-at-last-15-03-2012_a1661.html_
>
(_http://www.robindestoits.org/Wifi-EMFs-Electrosensitivity-ES-EHS-physiologically-explained-at-last-15-03_
(
http://www.robindestoits.org/Wifi-EMFs-Electrosensitivity-ES-EHS-physiologically-explained-at-last-15-03)
> -2012_a1661.html)
>
>
> In 2007, a number of libraries employees in Paris complained about
> headaches, nausea... right after massive installation of wifi emitters
in their
> offices. This led to a fight between Paris' city hall and worker unions
> (giving way to the set up of a citizen conference on proliferation of
EMFs in
> Paris)
>
>
> At French National Library BNF, and more recently in Paris subway
> transport company RATP, it is in the same deleterious conditions that
the debate
> takes place between unions and corporations, relative to questions about
> health implications at work relative to the in-flow of those new
wireless
> technologies in businesses. Everyone in this file has now access to a
first
> medical answer relative to intolerance to EMFs published in Canadian
Newspaper
> **La Maison du 21ème Siècle**
>
>
> French researchers have just shown that Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs)
does
> notably modify blood and grain physiology in ES people, and that the
> impact on those biological markers rises and falls with intensity of the
> exposure. **We do know with certainty that Electrohypersensitivity is
not
> psychosomatic**, tells us Oncologist Pr. Belpomme in a telephone
interview. **EMFs
> do trigger major effects in the brain. The most important effect is the
> opening of the blood-brain barrier. This allows mercury, organochlorates
and
> other toxics to pervade through the brain, where they cause diverse
ailments
> and neurodegenerative diseases.** Pr Belpomme records having 20 new
> patients per week.
>
>
> An Oncology Professor at Paris Descartes University, Pr. Belpomme is
> president of the Association for Therapeutic Research Against Cancer
(french
> acronym ARTAC, artac.info), which shifted to cancer prevention from 2004
on.
> Since may 2008, his team studies what he named Electromagnetic Fields
> Intolerance Syndrome (french acronym SICEM). **I have 450 patients and I
see up to
> 20 new patients each week, including children with headaches, memory
loss,
> attention or language troubles. We have the biggest cluster in Europe of
> electrosensitive patients. This is a major problem in public health.**
>
>
> ES, or SICEM, is an extreme reaction to fairly low exposure levels to
> electric and magnetic fields of low frequency (50-60Hz) emitted by
electric
> wires and electrical appartus, up to 10MHz or 300GHz radiofrequencies,
> including microwaves, of wireless devices and their antennaes. This
syndrome is
> recognized in Sweden as a handicap giving way to diverse modifications
of the
> environment by protecting devices that can be state-subsidized to lower
> exposures.
>
>
> Most sensitive cases are wrongly imputed to psychiatry : their symptoms
> (cardiovascular, dermatological, neurological and muscular) are so
strong
> they have to protect themselves with special clothing, paints, metal
> shieldings, ideally connected to the electrical ground. Others move to
forests,
> caves, and remote places, far away from EMF emissions.
>
>
> Pr. Belpomme's team put up a diagnosis method based on blood tests and a
> special type of electroencephalogram (pulsed doppler echographics) which
> enables them to visualize blood flows in the brain. **Those kind of
patients
> are sure to have troubles in brain vascularization**, says the
oncologist.
>
>
> Besides, biological tests demonstrates that 30% have elevated histamine
> rates, 50% have elevated rate of stress proteins, most of them have a
very
> low rate of melatonin (anticancer hormone), and 30% have antibodies and
> protein rates which indicates a thermal shock and speak for brain
suffering**
> he adds that half of his patients also develop hypersensitivity to
man-made
> chemicals, both syndromes sharing common brain anomalies.
>
>
> The oncologist explained us there were 3 distinct levels of sensitivity
to
> pollutants. At first, there is intolerance, triggered by pollutants
> polymorphism. **This means we are all different. For instance, 30% of
the general
> population has the biggest risk of contracting cancer.** Then lies
> susceptibility, a factor demonstrated by his Swedish colleague Lennard
Hardell who
> observed 16 families with bigger ES because of heredity. There also are
> active susceptibility factors **such as dental amalgams which act up as
> antennas** catching the waves. Then, ES manifests in two steps : **the
first
> step is that of induction with overexposure to a specific frequency of
EMFs,
> either acute or chronic way, such as speaking on a mobile phone for 20
> minutes a day,** says Pr. Belpomme. **The first signs of
hypersensitivity are
> pain and a feeling of heat in the ear. The second step is constitution
of the
> disease. Then sensitivity builds up and the person becomes intolerant to
> all frequencies.**
>
>
> The scientific council of ARTAC, a team made of experimented
researchers,
> is presided by Dr. Luc Montagnier, co-Nobel Prize 2008 for discovering
AIDS
> causing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). ARTAC research coordinator,
> nutrition specialist Dr Philippe Irigaray, is one of the 5 international
> experts to have been recently invited by Health Research Funds in Quebec
and
> who selected the best research project in Environmental cancer
prevention.
> Philippe Irigaray underlines that the human brain contains magnetosomes,
iron
> oxides which behave like magnets. ES could depend on their quantity,
which
> varies from person to person.
>
>
> Those researchers are nowadays preparing 5 articles on
electrosensitivity.
> **This requires a lot of time**, says Pr. Dominique Belpomme. **They
will
> be published in one year or two.** But independent and immediate action
is
> required to reduce overexposure of people to EMFs, adds he. In France
> alone, an estimates gives 5% of people being electrosensitive, and the
> proportion rises up with the spreading of wireless technologies.
**Studies show that
> 10 to 50% of population will face becoming very intolerant to EMFs in
the
> next 25 to 50 years. Two patients of mine have been hit by multiple
> sclerosis triggered by overuse of cell phones, 3 cases of breast cancer,
among
> which 2 relapses after overexposure to EMFs, daily use of computers -
and
> proof is building up against autism and Alzheimer*s disease, which seem
to be
> triggered with higher risk than cancer by EMF exposure. Causality is
really
> possible.**
>
>
> Fortunately, this practitioner does provide relief to patients as he
> administrates them nervous system tonics and helps blood brain barrier
close
> down with antihistaminics. According to World Health Organization (WHO),
there
> is no established link. In 2005, WHO claimed that ES symptoms could be
> psychosomatic or linked to other causes (bad vision, poor air quality,
poor
> ergonomics, etc...) **There is no such thing as clear diagnosis criteria
to
> this health problem, neither is there any scientific basis permitting to
> connect ES symptoms to EMF exposure (...)Well controlled studies in
> double-blind showed that those symptoms were not correlated to EMF
exposure.** To Pr.
> Dominique Belpomme, this is utter nonsense. **This is a political
> backwardness which shows nothing of scientific nature. WHO will have to
revise its
> judgment in the upcoming months. This is societal denial which doesn*t
take
> into account nowadays knowledge which permanently builds up.**
>
>
> According to this oncologist, the cause-consequence link between EMF
> fields and leukemia is no longer to be doubted. **When doses shoots up,
leukemia
> shoots up accordingly. Dozens of toxicological lab studies show that in
> the most obvious way, in vivo and in vitro.**
>
>
> Ontarian Researcher Magda Havas, from Trent University, claims that
> negative results to ES testings are compromised by major flaws
**Researchers
> would presume that reactions are instant albeit very often there is a
backlash
> delay. People are not instantly reactive electrical switches. Those
studies
> erroneously infer that if nothing can be felt, then it shouldn*t be
> harmful. We do very well know that you cannot detect the taste of
arsenic, lead,
> DDT, asbestos ; yet all of those are toxics.**
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]