Does baking soda neutralize stress proteins?

Posted by Elysia Drew on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Does-baking-soda-neutralize-stress-proteins-tp4023861.html

Hi, all. I'm wondering if baking soda neutralizes the "stress proteins" described by Dr. Belpomme as being overly abundant in EHS sufferers' bodies; that along w/ histamines. I'm in more pain since I took about 1/2 tsp. of baking soda this morning, but in some ways it feels like a cleansing pain. Feels like it's trying to access & neutralize the stress proteins that have built up in my connective tissue, esp. spine, lungs (scarred by mold), & my neck & jaw. I'm wondering if there's any science to back this up (???). If I'm wrong, is there anything that DOES neutralize these stress proteins (& perhaps histamines, too?) Either way, I plan to keep doing it, altho I don't know if I should avoid taking probiotics around the same time as taking the baking soda; I don't want to neutralize stuff. 

Love & blessings,
Elysia

Below is the text of the article where EHS is explained physiologically; sorry the actual link won't work:

__http://www.robindestoits.org/Wifi-EMFs-Electrosensitivity-ES-EHS-physiologi_ 
(http://www.robindestoits.org/Wifi-EMFs-Electrosensitivity-ES-EHS-physiologi
> cally-explained-at-last-15-03-2012_a1661.html_ 

(_http://www.robindestoits.org/Wifi-EMFs-Electrosensitivity-ES-EHS-physiologically-explained-at-last-15-03_ 
(http://www.robindestoits.org/Wifi-EMFs-Electrosensitivity-ES-EHS-physiologically-explained-at-last-15-03
> -2012_a1661.html) 


> In 2007, a number of libraries employees in Paris complained about 
> headaches, nausea... right after massive installation of wifi emitters 
in their 
> offices. This led to a fight between Paris' city hall and worker unions 
> (giving way to the set up of a citizen conference on proliferation of 
EMFs in 
> Paris) 


> At French National Library BNF, and more recently in Paris subway 
> transport company RATP, it is in the same deleterious conditions that 
the debate 
> takes place between unions and corporations, relative to questions about 
> health implications at work relative to the in-flow of those new 
wireless 
> technologies in businesses. Everyone in this file has now access to a 
first 
> medical answer relative to intolerance to EMFs published in Canadian 
Newspaper 
> **La Maison du 21ème Siècle** 


> French researchers have just shown that Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) 
does 
> notably modify blood and grain physiology in ES people, and that the 
> impact on those biological markers rises and falls with intensity of the 

> exposure. **We do know with certainty that Electrohypersensitivity is 
not 
> psychosomatic**, tells us Oncologist Pr. Belpomme in a telephone 
interview. **EMFs 
> do trigger major effects in the brain. The most important effect is the 
> opening of the blood-brain barrier. This allows mercury, organochlorates 
and 
> other toxics to pervade through the brain, where they cause diverse 
ailments 
> and neurodegenerative diseases.** Pr Belpomme records having 20 new 
> patients per week. 


> An Oncology Professor at Paris Descartes University, Pr. Belpomme is 
> president of the Association for Therapeutic Research Against Cancer 
(french 
> acronym ARTAC, artac.info), which shifted to cancer prevention from 2004 
on. 
> Since may 2008, his team studies what he named Electromagnetic Fields 
> Intolerance Syndrome (french acronym SICEM). **I have 450 patients and I 
see up to 
> 20 new patients each week, including children with headaches, memory 
loss, 
> attention or language troubles. We have the biggest cluster in Europe of 
> electrosensitive patients. This is a major problem in public health.**


> ES, or SICEM, is an extreme reaction to fairly low exposure levels to 
> electric and magnetic fields of low frequency (50-60Hz) emitted by 
electric 
> wires and electrical appartus, up to 10MHz or 300GHz radiofrequencies, 
> including microwaves, of wireless devices and their antennaes. This 
syndrome is 
> recognized in Sweden as a handicap giving way to diverse modifications 
of the 
> environment by protecting devices that can be state-subsidized to lower 
> exposures. 


> Most sensitive cases are wrongly imputed to psychiatry : their symptoms 
> (cardiovascular, dermatological, neurological and muscular) are so 
strong 
> they have to protect themselves with special clothing, paints, metal 
> shieldings, ideally connected to the electrical ground. Others move to 
forests, 
> caves, and remote places, far away from EMF emissions. 


> Pr. Belpomme's team put up a diagnosis method based on blood tests and a 
> special type of electroencephalogram (pulsed doppler echographics) which 
> enables them to visualize blood flows in the brain. **Those kind of 
patients 
> are sure to have troubles in brain vascularization**, says the 
oncologist. 


> Besides, biological tests demonstrates that 30% have elevated histamine 
> rates, 50% have elevated rate of stress proteins, most of them have a 
very 
> low rate of melatonin (anticancer hormone), and 30% have antibodies and 
> protein rates which indicates a thermal shock and speak for brain 
suffering** 
> he adds that half of his patients also develop hypersensitivity to 
man-made 
> chemicals, both syndromes sharing common brain anomalies. 


> The oncologist explained us there were 3 distinct levels of sensitivity 
to 
> pollutants. At first, there is intolerance, triggered by pollutants 
> polymorphism. **This means we are all different. For instance, 30% of 
the general 
> population has the biggest risk of contracting cancer.** Then lies 
> susceptibility, a factor demonstrated by his Swedish colleague Lennard 
Hardell who 
> observed 16 families with bigger ES because of heredity. There also are 
> active susceptibility factors **such as dental amalgams which act up as 
> antennas** catching the waves. Then, ES manifests in two steps : **the 
first 
> step is that of induction with overexposure to a specific frequency of 
EMFs, 
> either acute or chronic way, such as speaking on a mobile phone for 20 
> minutes a day,** says Pr. Belpomme. **The first signs of 
hypersensitivity are 
> pain and a feeling of heat in the ear. The second step is constitution 
of the 
> disease. Then sensitivity builds up and the person becomes intolerant to 
> all frequencies.** 


> The scientific council of ARTAC, a team made of experimented 
researchers, 
> is presided by Dr. Luc Montagnier, co-Nobel Prize 2008 for discovering 
AIDS 
> causing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). ARTAC research coordinator, 
> nutrition specialist Dr Philippe Irigaray, is one of the 5 international 
> experts to have been recently invited by Health Research Funds in Quebec 
and 
> who selected the best research project in Environmental cancer 
prevention. 
> Philippe Irigaray underlines that the human brain contains magnetosomes, 
iron 
> oxides which behave like magnets. ES could depend on their quantity, 
which 
> varies from person to person. 


> Those researchers are nowadays preparing 5 articles on 
electrosensitivity. 
> **This requires a lot of time**, says Pr. Dominique Belpomme. **They 
will 
> be published in one year or two.** But independent and immediate action 
is 
> required to reduce overexposure of people to EMFs, adds he. In France 
> alone, an estimates gives 5% of people being electrosensitive, and the 
> proportion rises up with the spreading of wireless technologies. 
**Studies show that 
> 10 to 50% of population will face becoming very intolerant to EMFs in 
the 
> next 25 to 50 years. Two patients of mine have been hit by multiple 
> sclerosis triggered by overuse of cell phones, 3 cases of breast cancer, 
among 
> which 2 relapses after overexposure to EMFs, daily use of computers - 
and 
> proof is building up against autism and Alzheimer*s disease, which seem 
to be 
> triggered with higher risk than cancer by EMF exposure. Causality is 
really 
> possible.** 


> Fortunately, this practitioner does provide relief to patients as he 
> administrates them nervous system tonics and helps blood brain barrier 
close 
> down with antihistaminics. According to World Health Organization (WHO), 
there 
> is no established link. In 2005, WHO claimed that ES symptoms could be 
> psychosomatic or linked to other causes (bad vision, poor air quality, 
poor 
> ergonomics, etc...) **There is no such thing as clear diagnosis criteria 
to 
> this health problem, neither is there any scientific basis permitting to 
> connect ES symptoms to EMF exposure (...)Well controlled studies in 
> double-blind showed that those symptoms were not correlated to EMF 
exposure.** To Pr. 
> Dominique Belpomme, this is utter nonsense. **This is a political 
> backwardness which shows nothing of scientific nature. WHO will have to 
revise its 
> judgment in the upcoming months. This is societal denial which doesn*t 
take 
> into account nowadays knowledge which permanently builds up.** 


> According to this oncologist, the cause-consequence link between EMF 
> fields and leukemia is no longer to be doubted. **When doses shoots up, 
leukemia 
> shoots up accordingly. Dozens of toxicological lab studies show that in 
> the most obvious way, in vivo and in vitro.** 


> Ontarian Researcher Magda Havas, from Trent University, claims that 
> negative results to ES testings are compromised by major flaws 
**Researchers 
> would presume that reactions are instant albeit very often there is a 
backlash 
> delay. People are not instantly reactive electrical switches. Those 
studies 
> erroneously infer that if nothing can be felt, then it shouldn*t be 
> harmful. We do very well know that you cannot detect the taste of 
arsenic, lead, 
> DDT, asbestos ; yet all of those are toxics.** 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]