Posted by
Elizabeth thode on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/New-Member-Bio-tp4023216p4023266.html
Speaking of Klinghardt: This is an excellent video he gives.
Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt - Smart Meters & EMR: The Health Crisis Of Our Time
http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/dr-dietrich-klinghardt-smart-meters-emr-the-health-crisis-of-our-time/Blessings, LizzieTo:
[hidden email]
From:
[hidden email]
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 05:32:07 +0000
Subject: [eSens] Re: New Member Bio--Gia/BioPro
I have not used any cellphone sticker, I have only tried some zero point energy pendants; Dr Klinghardt said cell phones stickers, emf neutralizing devices do not give protection to emf & insisted his patients to have proper shielding means eg bed canopy etc. Some viruses & bacteria would continue to multiply unless proper shielding to emf; I guess the proper way to check if these devices work or not is to have some kind of measuring devices to see whether the body improve such as biontology or other bio resonance systems etc.
I myself trust Dr Klinghardt's suggestions as he has yrs of extensive research on emf effects to health & working with many patients whose health problems are emf related
alice
--- In
[hidden email], Elizabeth thode <lizt777@...> wrote:
>
>
> My thoughts here: First, this is the same thing I told Maggie, regardingcell phne stickers. I think we're going to end up with some who believe they were helped, and some like me, who did actually use the Bio pro cell phone, (years ago) who werenot helped. I believe the stickers masked the symptoms, which can be dangerous, becausepeople believe they are safe, in the absence of physical visual signs of radiation symptoms.Or in the case where the dots are not connected, and the signs are mis interpreted; such as:thyroid distress, inflammation, arthritus, fibromyalgia, diabetes, low blood sugar, ect ect. The absence of such visual signs does not mean something is not occuring, at the cellular level! Stop and really think about this: Mainstream articles often point out the "absence of a connection of brain tumors" in the cell phone studies.The direct connection or lack of, does not in any way, assure that cell phne radiation is SAFE.Therefore, because someone using a cell phone sticker product, doesn't immediately showsigns of radiation toxicity, again, this does not mean that radiation is SAFE. Those who know the information well, of course, realize that brain tumors are merely one side effect of micro wave radiation. There are tons of others, most related to Inflammation. I will state this again:If the product sticker works to reduce the radiation, the issue may end up being:the cell phone has to work harder to bring in the signal, thereby actually increasingthe amount of radiation emitted. Similiar to using a cell phone with a bad cell towerconnection.I also believe many of the cell phone stickers end up merely masking the symptoms.Much like prescription drugs do. Those sticker products that claim to "transmute" the emfs????It seems to me: "Wouldn't we have alot less people with Es, instead of MORE peoplebecoming ES?" And if these products really work as claimed, why wouldn't they also work on smart meters? As radiation is radiation, why wouldn't gov't just use this technology to transmute nuclear fall out,instead of evacuating populations? When you study the symptoms from nuclear fall out, ionizing radiation, and compare these symptoms toso called: non ionizing radiation, you start to see that the symptoms are very similiar, if not identical.The difference in my opinion, is: Dose, Duration, and Proximity. They evacuate to get people as far away from the "hot zones" as possible. This means proximity, nearnessto the source of radiation. As for the use of non ionizing and ioniziing? What is the burning caused from, if not tissues being heated? Lizzie
> To:
[hidden email]
> From: snoshoe_2@...
> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:17:42 +0000
> Subject: [eSens] Re: New Member Bio--Gia/BioPro
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> My experience with the biopro chip for the cellphone, is that
>
> it was hugely helpful, and immediately I could feel the difference on the cellphone.
>
>
>
> I still can't stand to use the thing, but I can tolerate it for
>
> a minute or two when emergency arises, such as breaking down on the side of the hwy.
>
>
>
> ~ Snoshoe
>
>
>
> --- In
[hidden email], "cjosephj" <cjosephj@> wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --- In
[hidden email], "maggigarloff" <maggigarloff@> wrote:
>
> > > And, yes, Gia used to be BioPro. I don't have any knowledge of the >turmoil surrounding the business.
>
> >
>
> > I hate to be a spoiler here, but this is incomplete information at best, and an outright lie at worst. There are some things people should know before purchasing anything from this company. (My experience goes back quite a few years, before I had EHS, and the company was still BioPro.)
>
> >
>
> > First, this company is an MLM (multi-level marketing) and Maggi Garloff is a distributor. They call themselves "consultants," but their "consultation" is a thinly disguised way to introduce you to their products and "opportunity." Her failure to disclose this fact is to me, in itself, deceptive. Her website is a standard copy of the website all their "consultants" get.
>
> >
>
> > The company used to be BioPro. They have been in myriad legal trouble almost since the beginning. Just google "BioPro scam" or "ray grimm scam artist" and take a look. A class action lawsuit was filed against them in Indiana in 2010 for violation of federal RICO statutes. That one may still be pending, I'm not sure. In an ultimate slippery move to disassociate from the reputation, they changed their name to Gia Wellness which is an umbrella for a bunch of MLMs. There is no way Maggi Garloff doesn't have "any knowledge of the turmoil surrounding the business."
>
> >
>
> > I was burned by this company and its highly deceptive advertising years ago and did not find any benefit to their over-priced products. Make your own judgment, but do your due diligence first. --CJ
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]