Posted by PUK on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Feedback-of-3-therapies-tp4022048p4022074.html

yes we are very accurate but then thousands of years of evolution has  
instilled in us something quite valuable, well perhaps it was many moons  ago.  
Anyway I to was astounded by how accurate my body is, twice this week  I
came over the brow of this hill just past a major array of mobile antenneas,  
at the brow of the hill my heart drops a beat, when I use my simple
microalert  box in the car as I drove it registered that the signal just dissapeared
at the  brow of the hill - was this due to the fact that the signal levels I
passed  through were so high that they entrained my heart muscle for a few
moments only  to drop suddenly cuasing the heart to go back to normal rytm
and subsequently  going a bit potty at that moment !!!
 
puk
 
 
In a message dated 06/06/2012 15:51:31 GMT Daylight Time,  
[hidden email] writes:

Oops ...  my calculator has brain fog too ... correction 18% of my weight.

On 6  June 2012 10:12, Loraine Connon  
<[hidden email]>wrote:

> Hi Debbie ...  please know you are not deluded, never let anyone persuade
> you of  that, not even someone you trust implicitly. (Too many good people
>  have fallen for the 'expert' lies about our invisble environment.)  I  
too
> have discovered I'm seriously affected by levels of exposure that  are
> barely detectable and usually stated to be safe even for ES people  like
us.
>
> 5 years ago I moved to my current house in a bigger  corner plot to escape
> my neighbours mobLie pollution, and have been  'electromagnetically
> reclused' from all public places for a couple of  years. During this last
> year I've been increasingly under par since my  neighbours whyfry invaded
my
> home. Actually 'under par' is a gross  understatement, I know I'm very
close
> to the edge because I lost about  35% of my body weight (with no other
> apparent explanation) and my  breathing is haywire unless I maintain
> conscious control of it during  and after exposure, which is now all the
> time! Recently I had to take  my husband to A&E to get stitched up after
he
> fell from a ladder -  it took me at least 2 days to bounce back after
> spending several hours  in an A&E waiting room full of mobLIes.
>
> I'm just beginning  to search for an isolated house to escape neighbours
> toxic spills, so  have purchased a rad meter to survey any contender new
> properties  with. Thing is though, (getting back to the question of actual
> levels  of exposure) these past months, prior to getting the meter, I've
> been  guessing which parts of my house to avoid based on
symptoms/intuition
>  alone - you know, hypothesising where is better, and when etc.  I  pretty
> much guess/mapped out my whole house from which bedroom is  safest, which
> toilet to use, right down to which chair to sit in  particularly in any
> given room, and which end of the bath is best. I  knew without checking
> against a meter that I'd been largely correct in  my guesses cos of how
much
> better I felt by avoiding the bits that I'd  worked out were worst.
However,
> when I started checking once the meter  arrived, I was completely
astounded
> by how accurately my guesswork  corresponded with the detailed results of
> measuring the detectable  levels. Eg. I strongly preferred one armchair
over
> another just two  steps away and the meter confirms my preferred chair is
> consistently  receiving lower levels of exposure, but only (on average) by
> an  extremely slim margin of .030 mw/m3! I know! unbelievable that my body
>  could measure and let my brain know of that tiny difference ... no need  
to thank

[Non-text portions of this message  have been  removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo!  Groups Links






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]