Posted by
Loraine Connon on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Feedback-of-3-therapies-tp4022048p4022067.html
Hi Debbie ... please know you are not deluded, never let anyone persuade
you of that, not even someone you trust implicitly. (Too many good people
have fallen for the 'expert' lies about our invisble environment.) I too
have discovered I'm seriously affected by levels of exposure that are
barely detectable and usually stated to be safe even for ES people like us.
5 years ago I moved to my current house in a bigger corner plot to escape
my neighbours mobLie pollution, and have been 'electromagnetically
reclused' from all public places for a couple of years. During this last
year I've been increasingly under par since my neighbours whyfry invaded my
home. Actually 'under par' is a gross understatement, I know I'm very close
to the edge because I lost about 35% of my body weight (with no other
apparent explanation) and my breathing is haywire unless I maintain
conscious control of it during and after exposure, which is now all the
time! Recently I had to take my husband to A&E to get stitched up after he
fell from a ladder - it took me at least 2 days to bounce back after
spending several hours in an A&E waiting room full of mobLIes.
I'm just beginning to search for an isolated house to escape neighbours
toxic spills, so have purchased a rad meter to survey any contender new
properties with. Thing is though, (getting back to the question of actual
levels of exposure) these past months, prior to getting the meter, I've
been guessing which parts of my house to avoid based on symptoms/intuition
alone - you know, hypothesising where is better, and when etc. I pretty
much guess/mapped out my whole house from which bedroom is safest, which
toilet to use, right down to which chair to sit in particularly in any
given room, and which end of the bath is best. I knew without checking
against a meter that I'd been largely correct in my guesses cos of how much
better I felt by avoiding the bits that I'd worked out were worst. However,
when I started checking once the meter arrived, I was completely astounded
by how accurately my guesswork corresponded with the detailed results of
measuring the detectable levels. Eg. I strongly preferred one armchair over
another just two steps away and the meter confirms my preferred chair is
consistently receiving lower levels of exposure, but only (on average) by
an extremely slim margin of .030 mw/m3! I know! unbelievable that my body
could measure and let my brain know of that tiny difference ... no need to
tell me I agree, haven't stopped saying 'please don't let this be so' it
yet myself, and I know I can safely assume that the vast majority of
'scientifically' minded non-sensitive people will never believe anything
other than I'm insane for claiming this. The bath too, surprised me, my
favourite end only averages .200 mw/m3 less than my hated end - I just
wouldn't have thought, when immersed in water, experiencing significant
temperature changes and primarily preoccupied with washing, that anyone
(much less me) could be so accurate about invisible frequencies.
Anyway, for now I'm confined to one end of one room where levels are least,
and need to get out of here fast as possible ... There's £500 thank you
reward payable to anyone who can find me a suitable house (payable on
completion of purchase) before I can find one myself. It's hard for me to
even search, my computer is in the wrong room (you can't cram everything
you need in one end of one room!) and it affects me too (even though
there's no whyfry) Anyone interested, with time to spare, let me know and
I'll send you my house requirements..
Be light, stay bright, do right
With best intent
Loraine Connon
On 5 June 2012 16:29, <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> **
>
>
> I have found the Iphones a menace !! tell me - why when I tested a HTC
> android phone with my esmog detector with the phone transmitting did the
> esmog
> not register it at all ????!!
>
> help ?
>
> puk
>
>
> In a message dated 05/06/2012 03:43:08 GMT Daylight Time,
>
[hidden email] writes:
>
> On June 4, _Debbie4God39@aol.com_ (mailto:
[hidden email]) wrote:
> > my husband just came home with a 4G phone!! he says all that's
> > different is the bandwidth and that shouldn't make any difference
> > with EMF's etc
>
> Your husband may have a fundamental misunderstanding about
> what EMF sensitive people react to.
>
> The phone may indeed produce about the same amount EMFs as
> a 2G or 3G phone, however, an EMF sensitive person may
> be more reactive to it because of the higher bandwidth,
> or the different frequency spectrum used, or the higher
> processing power required to encode/decode the signal
> and/or run the screen display.
>
> But every person reacts a bit differently, and I doubt
> that all 4G phones are created equal. For example,
> I've noticed rather obvious reactions to other people's
> iPhones (3G), but have found "Droids" to be not
> as bad (not a controlled test, but merely my random
> observations being around other people with these
> things in use)
>
> Marc
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/join (Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[hidden email]
[hidden email]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[hidden email]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/