Re: Removed mercury fillings Was: Sulfur
Posted by
KathyB on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Sulfur-tp3624108p3628321.html
It would have been ineffective. I had to have a bridge removed due to infection, so would have needed an implant to keep them. I didn't want anything to do w implants even before I knew what I do now.
I had too many fillings. It would have cost too much along with above.
They are recent prices. I asked a few mos ago. My daughter needs one removed.
I'm praying for a better year as well. It's encouraging to read all the smart meter legal goings on.
Kathy
<
[hidden email] wrote:
Re: [eSens] Re: Removed mercury fillings Was: Sulfur
Wow, thanks Kathy. I want to be clear. Did you have the teeth removed because it was too much money to just replace the fillings? Or would it have been ineffective? Also, I paid once after a root canal to have the amalgam replaced. At the time it was $120 to put in the composite alone. Also, are those recent prices that you quoted or were they fromm the time when you were having you teeth done?
Happy New Year, Kathy! I hope it can somehow be a better one for all, somehow.
Pam
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]