Posted by
Gruendg on
Jun 02, 2011; 8:46pm
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/EMF-shileding-products-tp3005128p3017160.html
to consider all these neutralizing devices as scam is too simple. Many
people experience relief from their ES symptoms, and there is also scientific
proof that these things work. Now there arises the question, why in many
cases it does not work. The answer due to my research is als follows.
Electromagnetic waves cause a biological effect mainly through the Tesla
waves contained in the normally measurable waves. These Tesla waves behave
somewhat different, than the measurable waves. They follow very peculiar laws
of resonance. A human body is a fairly good resonator for these waves,
q-link and all these others are also resonators, usually stronger than a human
body. Through their resonance the keep away the harmful radiation form the
human body and neutralize it. The problem of electrosensitive people is
that they have developed a much stronger resonance to these Tesla waves,
stronger than these devices and then the body absorbes these waves and the
symptoms persist.
A way to remedy this situation is to develop stronger resonators. I have
done this, but still quite a number of electrosensitives are not helped.
A second way is to use these laws of resonance more intelligently. This
resonance is also dependant on distance, the further away form the source of
radiation less good is the resonance and vice versa. So if you fix an
electrosmog neutralizing device to the relevant electric appliance, it my help,
while it did not help wearing it on the body. Being close to the source of
radiation the device my overcome the strong resonance of your body even if
it has a lower resonance than your body. This is the law of distance .
This is not speculation, this is the result of now 10 years of
experimentation with these Tesla waves.
Now the resonance of a human body may be different for different
frequencies, the resonance of a device also may be different for different
frequencies. This explains, why the experience with these devices is individually so
different. But always generally valid is the law of resonance as described
above.
So, before discarding something as scam, use this knowledge and most
important let me know your results.
dietrich
n einer eMail vom 31.05.2011 14:38:24 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt
[hidden email]:
Towards the beginning of my awareness, I bought a q-link w/ a return policy
and then did further research and decided to return it. My initial
research found it mentioned in a reputable source with a study to back it up.
Later on, however, I realized that was all probably part of the scam.
BTW, I think Less EMF is pretty good about not having most of the typical
scam energetic protection devices, e.g., they don't have q-link and
earthcalm, for instance. What else did you buy besides Trifield?
Links Warning about Scams:
1. Blog by Alasdair Philips who I believe may be ES also:
_http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/columns/aphilips/viewcomments.asp?viewBlog=16_
(
http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/columns/aphilips/viewcomments.asp?viewBlog=16) .
2. Article "Scams Galore" under _http://www.microwavenews.com/_
(
http://www.microwavenews.com/)
3. EMFacts Consultancy _http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1096_
(
http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1096)
I'd recommend looking for a good building biologist in your area to check
out your home for problems such as body voltage, dimmers, etc.
--- In _eSens@yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:
[hidden email]) ,
"electromagneticzoe" <mscherrylane@...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm just wondering if anybody has bought any products that they can say
from their experience without a doubt actually work. I just received
several hundred dollars worth of products from lessemf and on the whole I'm
pretty disappointed- I can't be sure if they really even work...and I'm even
measuring with a trifield meter...possibly I expected too much? I think the
best solution is still avoidance!
>
> I would like to know if anybody has any tried and tested products they
found have helped and would HIGHLY recommend. I am particularly interested
to know if anybody has tried energetic protection devices like earthcalm? I
personally have had for the last few years the qlink pendant and ally but
my sensitivity has gotten to the point that it seems to no longer be that
helpful.
>
> any feedback appreciated.
>
> cheers,
> zoe
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]